Service Brakes. Review the 253 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Air Bags. Review the 91 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Electrical System. Review the 83 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

24 crash reports4 fire reports13 injury reports

What owners actually said

635 reports

20,440 miles · Dec 28, 2011

Electronic Stability Control (esc)Service Brakes, HydraulicVehicle Speed Control

ABS MODULE FAILURE. NEEDS REPLACEMENT. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, ABS,VDC AND STABILITY CONTROL ARE NOT GOING TO CONTROL THE VEHICLE. ALSO THE TIRES LIGHTS WARNING AND THE BRAKES ARE ON. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10441563

34,000 miles · Dec 20, 2011

Electrical SystemFire

Read full complaint

10 MINUTES AFTER VEHICLE WAS PARKED, WITH DOORS LOCKED AND WINDOWS ROLLED UP, MY WIFE WAS ALERTED BY A PASSERBY THAT HER CAR WAS ON FIRE. FIRE STARTED IN THE FORWARD PASSENGER COMPARTMENT AND SPREAD THRU THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT VERY RAPIDLY. VEHICLE WAS A TOTAL LOSS. VEHICLE HAD NO AFTERMARKET WORK AND HAD NOT BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY ACCIDENTS. ALL SERVICE WORK WAS PERFORMED BY A CERTIFIED NISSAN DEALER ON SCHEDULE.PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE INVESTIGATED AND FOUND OWNER NOT TO BE AT FAULT (CLAIM #[XXX] WAS PAID). I HAVE REQUESTED NISSANS INTERNAL INVESTIGATION ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS REPORT TO DETERMINE CAUSE OF FIRE, BUT THEY WILL NOT RELEASE THE INFORMATION TO ME. I FEEL THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE . NISSAN POC[XXX] SHE WOULD NOT PASS ME UP THE CHAIN AT NISSAN SO THAT I COULD SPEAK TO SOMEONE OTHER THAN HER. CONCERN IS THERE MAYBE OTHER INCIDENCES OF NISSAN MURANO FIRES THAT ARE NOT BEING REPORTED. I WAS LUCKY THAT THE FIRE OCCURRED OUTSIDE THE HOME AND NOT IN THE GARAGE AT MY HOUSE WHERE IT IS ALWAYS PARKED. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10440613

77,500 miles · Dec 13, 2011

Electrical System

ALTERNATOR WENT OUT AND SENT VEHICLE INTO "FAIL SAFE" MODE AND STOPPED THE VEHICLE. MY WIFE WAS COMING ON FROM WORK AND IT PUT HER IN THE MIDDLE OF A BAD NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS THE SAME THING WITH THE MURANO FROM THE 2005 RECALLS. IT IS STILL HAPPENING AND NISSAN IS DOING NOTHING FOR THE NEWER VEHICLES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10439756

53,000 miles · Oct 12, 2011

Steering

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN MURANO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE STEERING WHEEL COLUMN ADJUSTER FAILED. WHEN THE ENGINE WAS STARTED, THE CONTACT HEARD A GRINDING NOISE AND WAS UNABLE TO TURN THE STEERING WHEEL. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO THE DEALER TO BE DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE AND TH…

Read full complaint

NHTSA ODI #10429556

75,000 miles · Sep 21, 2011

Power Train

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN MURANO. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD A WHISTLING SOUND AND FELT A VIBRATION IN THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO DECELERATE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTICS. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THE TRANSMISSION AND THE TRANSFER CASE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THE …

Read full complaint

NHTSA ODI #10426614

Mileage unknown · Sep 11, 2011

Electrical SystemLatches/locks/linkages

POWER DOOR LOCKS DO NOT WORK ON TWO OF THE DOORS -- DRIVER'S DOOR AND RIGHT REAR PASSENGER DOOR. ONE DOOR LOCK STOPPED WORKING LAST WEEK; THE OTHER DOOR LOCK STOPPED WORKING YESTERDAY. REAR DOOR CANNOT BE LOCKED TO KEEP OUR CHILDREN IN -- A SAFETY ISSUE -- AND IT HAS TO BE LOCKED MANUALLY. IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENT, I WILL BE …

Read full complaint

NHTSA ODI #10424677

69,639 miles · Aug 20, 2011

Steering

Read full complaint

FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2011, MY 2009 NISSAN MURANO HAS EXPERIENCED FOUR (4) STEERING WHEEL FAILURES THAT COULD'VE RESULTED IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR DEATH. HAWKINSON NISSAN REPLACED THE SERPENTINE BELT AT LEAST TWICE IN LESS THAN A TWO-WEEK PERIOD IN AUGUST OF THIS YEAR BECAUSE IT WAS SHREDDED. ALTHOUGH THE DEALERSHIP HAD DONE MULTIPLE MULTI-POINT INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH, THEY REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY PENDING FAILURE OF THE SERPENTINE BELT WHEN THEY DID THE INSPECTIONS. IN ADDITION, ON AUGUST 8, 2011, THE TECHNICIAN FOUND A "PASS SIDE RACK AND PINION BOOT FILLING UP WITH FLUID FROM BAD SEAL IN POWER STEERING RACK," ACCORDING TO THE INVOICE. NISSAN FOUND A LEAK IN THE POWER STEERING HIGH PRESSURE LINE. NISSAN REPAIRED THE PROBLEM BY REPLACING THE HIGH PRESSURE POWER LINE AND POWER STEERING RACK. THEY ALSO BLED THE POWER STEERING FLUID SYSTEM AND PERFORMED A FRONT END ALIGNMENT, ACCORDING TO THE INVOICE. I DO NOT THINK THE 2009 NISSAN MURANO IS SAFE TO DRIVE BECAUSE I WAS NEARLY KILLED OR BADLY INJURED MULTIPLE TIMES. THEY NEED TO RECALL THE VEHICLE SINCE THEY'VE ATTEMPTED TO CORRECT ISSUES WITH THE STEERING WHEEL ON MULTIPLE TIMES WITH NO AVAIL. I'M AFRAID OF THEM RETURNING THE VEHICLE TO ME SINCE THE MECHANICS OBVIOUSLY CANNOT FIX THE PROBLEM SINCE IT'S MOST LIKELY A DEFECT THAT'S CAUSING THE SERPENTINE BELT TO CONSTANTLY SHRED WITH NO PRIOR EVIDENCE OF PENDING FAILURE OR WEAR AND TEAR. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10420822

69,036 miles · Aug 7, 2011

EquipmentSteering

Read full complaint

ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 2, 2011, I WAS DRIVING ON A MAJOR EXPRESSWAY. WHILE TRYING TO EXIT FROM THE EXPRESSWAY, THE STEERING WHEEL ON MY 2009 NISSAN MURANO LOCKED, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO TURN IT. I WAS ALMOST HIT BY AN 18-WHEEL SEMI-TRAILER TRUCK. THE INCIDENT RESULTED IN BLACK SKID/TIRE MARKS ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD BY MY CAR AND THE TRUCK THAT WAS TRYING TO AVOID FROM HITTING ME. NISSAN'S CONTRACTED TOWING SERVICE HAD TO TOW MY VEHICLE INTO NISSAN'S SHOP SINCE THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE DRIVEN SAFELY AFTER THE INCIDENT. ON AUGUST 3, THE SERVICE ADVISOR CALLED TO SAY THAT THE PROBLEM WITH THE STEERING WHEEL HAD BEEN FIXED. HE INDICATED THAT THE STEERING WHEEL WOULD NOT TURN BECAUSE OF A FAULTY SERPENTINE BELT. HE SAID THE SERPENTINE BELT WAS REPLACED, THAT THEY HAD TEST DROVE THE VEHICLE BEFORE ITS RELEASE TO ME, AND THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOW SAFE TO DRIVE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT MY NISSAN HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN IN NISSAN'S SHOP BARELY A WEEK BEFORE THE AUGUST 2ND INCIDENT, ON JULY 21ST, FOR OTHER DEFECT ISSUES WHICH WERE COVERED BY WARRANTY. WHEN THE CAR WAS IN THE SHOP FOR THE JULY REPAIRS, THE SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES HAD INDICATED THAT THEY HAD DONE A FULL INSPECTION OF THE VEHICLE. WHAT IS INTERESTING TO ME IS THAT DURING THE FULL INSPECTION, NISSAN DID NOT DISCOVER ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE SERPENTINE BELT THEN. IF THE BELT WERE WEARING AWAY, NISSAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DISCOVER AND DISCLOSE THE WEAR AND TEAR DURING THE FULL INSPECTION IN LATE JULY. EVEN AFTER THE SERPENTINE BELT WAS REPLACED ON AUGUST 3, 2011, THE STEERING WHEEL IS STILL DIFFICULT TO STEER. I'M NOT SURE WHETHER THIS IS A MANUFACTURING/DESIGN DEFECT, BUT I THINK THIS SHOULD BE LOOKED INTO CAREFULLY SINCE THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE. IF A DRIVER IS SLOWING DOWN TO GET READY TO TURN BUT SUDDENLY CANNOT TURN BECAUSE OF A PROBLEM WITH THE STEERING WHEEL, ANOTHER VEHICLE TRAVELING BEHIND COULD EASILY HIT THE DRIVER IN FRONT. THIS COULD RESULT IN A TRAGIC ACCIDENT. *TT

NHTSA ODI #10417865

21,500 miles · Jul 21, 2011

Unknown Or Other

Read full complaint

DRIVING ON I-79 - LIGHT OUT - MANY OTHERS ON ROAD - NO DEBRIS - TIRE BLEW OUT - SENSOR ON AND IMMEDIATE BLOWOUT - NO PRIOR PROBLEMS AND HAD NOT RUN OVER ANYTHING PRIOR. NISSAN TERRIBLY UNRESPONSIVE. HAD TO PROACTIVELY CALL THEM 10-20 TIMES. 1ST PERSON COULDN'T CONVERSE IN ENGLISH - GAVE ME FALSE INFORMATION. SUPERVISOR WAS CONSTANTLY UNAVAILABLE AND NEVER RETURNED CALLS. ULTIMATELY THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE SIMILAR REPORTS. I DON'T BELIEVE THEM. TIRE COMPANY SAID SAW THIS PROBLEM MANY TIMES - SAYS THE TIRE SENSOR CORRODED AND FELL INTO THE TIRE WHICH SPRANG THE LEAK. FOUND NO OTHER DAMAGE TO TIRE. COULD HAVE DIED ON THAT HIGHWAY. MOST PEOPLE WOULDN'T TAKE THE TIME TO WRITE THIS SO I'M DOING IT FOR THEM. SHAME ON THE COMPANY FOR DOING NOTHING TO RESEARCH IT FURTHER. WOULDN'T EVEN PAY FOR THE TIRE.

NHTSA ODI #10414595

34,600 miles · Jul 13, 2011

EquipmentStructure

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN MURANO. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 70 MPH THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE AIR CONDITIONER FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE TECHNICIANS STATED THE FRONT BUMPER ON THE VEHICLE HAD THREE SMALL HOLES WHICH ALLOWED DEBRIS INTO THE ENGINE AND DAMAGED THE CONDENSE…

Read full complaint

NHTSA ODI #10412108

Official recalls

18V916000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

Dec 19, 2018

Nissan of North America, Inc (Nissan) is recalling certain 2009 Murano vehicles. The valves within the ABS Hydraulic Control Units (HCU) may react with brake fluids containing specific corrosion preventative additives. This reaction may cause the valves to not close properly.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the valves do not properly close, additional brake pedal travel may be required to stop the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Nissan has notified owners, and dealers will flush the brake system with DOT 4 fluid. The HCU will then be tested to detect a possible stuck valve condition. If necessary, the HCU will be replaced, free of charge. The recall began February 7, 2019. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-867-7669.

09V393000 · Tires:pressure Monitoring And Regulating Systems

Oct 5, 2009

NISSAN IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008-2010 VEHICLES ORIGINALLY SOLD IN OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE STATES OF CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, IOWA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, MAINE, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, WASHINGTON D.C., WEST VIRGINIA AND WISCONSIN. THE MATERIAL IN THE NUT USED TO SECURE THE SENSOR-TRANSMITTER OF THE TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM (TPMS) MAY CORRODE AND POTENTIALLY CRACK IN AREAS WITH HEAVY CONCENTRATIONS OF ROAD SALT. IF THIS OCCURS, THE NUT MAY COME OUT OF THE SENSOR-TRANSMITTER AND THE TPMS LAMP WILL ILLUMINATE.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IF THE TPMS LAMP IS DISREGARDED AND THE VEHICLE CONTINUES TO BE DRIVEN IN THIS CONDITION, THE TIRE WILL QUICKLY LOSE AIR PRESSURE AT A CONSISTENT RATE RESULTING IN A FLAT TIRE INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: THE DEALER WILL REPLACE THE TPMS NUT WITH A NEW, MORE ROBUST NUT. THIS SERVICE WILL BE PERFORMED FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 9, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261 AND INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200.

08V521000 · Air Bags; Electrical System:software

Oct 7, 2008

NISSAN IS RECALLING 204,361 MY 2007-2008 ALTIMA, ALTIMA HYBRID, 350Z, 350Z ROADSTER, MY 2008 ALTIMA COUPE, ROGUE, MY 2009 MURANO, AND INFINITI MY 2007-2008 G35 SEDAN, MY 2008 G37 COUPE AND EX35 PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS' OCCUPANT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (OCS) CONTROL UNITS. A VARISTOR IN THE OCS CONTROL UNIT LOCATED IN THE PASSENGER SEAT CUSHION MAY HAVE BEEN MANUFACTURED OUT OF SPECIFICATION. UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, THIS COULD CAUSE AN INTERRUPTION OF SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND THE AIR BAG CONTROL UNIT (ACU).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG BEING SUPPRESSED WHICH COULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL TEST THE SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND ACU SYSTEMS USING A SPECIAL TOOL TO CHECK THAT IT IS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. IF NECESSARY, THE SEAT CUSHION (CONTAINING OCS HARDWARE) WILL BE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE MANUFACTURED TO SPECIFICATION. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 4, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261 OR INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Electrical System:software

Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG BEING SUPPRESSED WHICH COULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL TEST THE SIGNAL BETWEEN THE OCS AND ACU SYSTEMS USING A SPECIAL TOOL TO CHECK THAT IT IS FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED. IF NECESSARY, THE SEAT CUSHION (CONTAINING OCS HARDWARE) WILL BE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE MANUFACTURED TO SPECIFICATION. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 4, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261 OR INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200.

Air Bags

Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG BEING SUPPRESSED WHICH COULD FAIL TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.

08V066000 · Air Bags

Feb 12, 2008

NISSAN IS RECALLING 16,365 MY 2008 INFINITI EX35 AND MY 2009 NISSAN MURANO VEHICLES. DUE TO INCORRECT SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING, THE AIR BAG CONTROL UNIT (ACU) MAY CAUSE THE PASSENGER AIR BAG NOT TO OPERATE AS DESIGNED IF THE VEHICLE BATTERY BECOMES SIGNIFICANTLY DISCHARGED.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PASSENGER AIR BAG NOT INFLATING IN A CRASH IN WHICH IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO SO, AND INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPROGRAM THE ACU IN AFFECTED VEHICLES. THE RECALL BEGAN ON FEBRUARY 19, 2008. OWNERS MAY CONTACT INFINITI AT 1-800-662-6200 OR NISSAN AT 1-800-647-7261.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

EA18001 · Extended Braking Distances

Opened Apr 18, 2018 · Closed Jan 17, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip

On April 18, 2018, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Engineering Analysis (EA) 18-001 to investigate reports of braking concerns in model year (MY) 2009 Nissan Murano vehicles. A failure of the hydraulic control unit (HCU) portion of the antilock brake system (ABS), which involves improper operation of an internal hydraulic control valve(s), can cause extended brake pedal travel and may result in a reduction in overall braking effectiveness. Tier-one supplier Continental manufactured the HCU for Nissan.The corrosion-preventive, zinc coating used on the armatures of the normally closed (NC) valves within ABS HCU may react with brake fluids lacking sufficient corrosion-preventative additives. This reaction can cause the formation of a gelatinous material, which may cause the NC valves to close slowly. Over time, the gel can solidify to an extent such that the spring used to return the valve to the closed position may not be able to overcome the gel buildup, allowing the NC valve to remain open. If any of the four NC valves remains open, fluid will be diverted to one or two accumulator(s). This misdirected fluid has the net effect of causing brake pedal travel to increase, however enough stroke remains in the pedal to generate braking force. Although the hydraulic braking system remains intact and full braking force is maintained once the pedal travels the additional distance, when this condition occurs, the initial increase in brake pedal travel could result in increased stopping distance. An existing Nissan Service Campaign was launched for MY 2009 vehicles built prior to 11/1/2007. After consultation with ODI as part of EA18-001, Nissan decided to expand this population to the full range of MY2009 Murano vehicles. Later Murano vehicles exhibit significantly lower rates of malfunction.During this investigation 156 complaints were identified that related to the braking concern. Within the complainants 2 allege crashes with 4 injuries. The Nissan reports from investigation Information Request letter responses, were similar in content and identified 870 reports with 16 crashes and no injuries.On December 19, 2018, Nissan notified ODI it would conduct a safety recall (18V916) to remedy the ABS modules on certain MY 2009 Nissan Murano vehicles. The remedy procedure involves dealers flushing the brake system with DOT 4 fluid. The HCU will then be tested to detect a possible stuck valve condition. If necessary, the HCU will be replaced. The 2010-14 Murano SUVs outside the recall population and equipped with zinc-coated armatures will be inspected under a service campaign P0A08 using the same procedure as recall 18V916.Continental HCUs with a redesigned armature coating were phased into new vehicle production after December 2014 and do not appear to be experiencing corrosion. The recall action initiated by the manufacturer appears to address the safety risks of concern to ODI. Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exists on other model or MY vehicles outside of the recall scope. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.For a complete summary of this investigation and related consumer complaints, please see attached closing resume document.

PE17002 · Extended Braking Distances

Opened May 3, 2017 · Closed May 4, 2018

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes; Service Brakes, Air:antilock; Service Brakes, Air:antilock:control Unit/module

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is closing this Preliminary Evaluation and upgrading to an Engineering Analysis (EA) 18-001.During the PE, ODI requested and reviewed information provided by Nissan including consumer complaints and other field and technical data related to failures of the hydraulic control unit (HCU), an electro-mechanical brake system component that provides antilock braking and other functionality in the subject model year (MY) 2009 Murano.The subject failure of the HCU, which involves improper operation of an internal hydraulic control valve, can cause extended brake pedal travel and may result in a reduction in overall braking effectiveness.Tier-one supplier Continental manufactured the HCU for Nissan.ODI currently recognizes 484 subject vehicle complaints that appear related to the alleged defect.Fourteen crash allegations, with three non-life threatening injuries are under evaluation also.ODI has been monitoring consumer complaints received, and in some cases has obtained suspect HCUs from complainants' vehicles.Recovered HCUs sent to NHTSA's Vehicle Research and Test Center (VRTC) in East Liberty, Ohio are under evaluation, and VRTC has conducted limited vehicle testing also.In a July 28, 2017 submission, Nissan acknowledged that a failure of the HCU can result in increased brake pedal travel during braking.Nissan's analysis of returned parts revealed that a zinc coating used on the normally closed valve assemblies inside the HCU may react with certain brake fluid constituents.The reaction results in the formation of a gelatinous material that can harden with time and prevent the valve from closing after opening in an ABS event.When this occurs, Nissan maintains that the hydraulic brake system remains intact and that full braking is available once the pedal travels an additional distance, about 36 mm according to Nissan.Although still under investigation, Nissan states it has not determined the condition represents an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety, citing low rate and vehicle age as additional factors.In March 2018, Nissan began conducting a customer satisfaction campaign on certain MY 2009 Murano to service (flush and replace the brake fluid), and then test and replace the HCU as needed.The campaign is being conducted free of charge to customers.During the EA, ODI will request VRTC continue to evaluate the cause and consequence of HCU failures, including the affects of multi-valve failures.ODI will further study the potential scope of the alleged defect as it understands similar HCUs and brake fluid is used in other MY Muranos, and potentially in other Nissan models as well.ODI notes that improved valve coatings were introduced on Nissan HCUs at some subsequent stage.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Service Brakes, Air:antilock:control Unit/module

Service Brakes, Air:antilock

Service Brakes