NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
153 reports38,120 miles · Jan 25, 2015
Electrical SystemSteering
STEERING LOCK SOLENOID FAILED AT 38120 MILES (2120 MILES OUTSIDE ELECTRICAL WARRANTY) YELLOW "KEY" WARNING LIGHT ON DASH ONLY ILLUMINATED THE MORNING OFF FAILURE. WENT TO LEAVE WORK CAR WOULD NOT START DUE TO STEERING LOCK SOLENOID FAILURE. HAD TO HAVE VEHICLE FLAT BEDDED TO DEALERSHIP AT THE COST OF $121.10. THANK GOD THIS DI…
Read full complaint
STEERING LOCK SOLENOID FAILED AT 38120 MILES (2120 MILES OUTSIDE ELECTRICAL WARRANTY) YELLOW "KEY" WARNING LIGHT ON DASH ONLY ILLUMINATED THE MORNING OFF FAILURE. WENT TO LEAVE WORK CAR WOULD NOT START DUE TO STEERING LOCK SOLENOID FAILURE. HAD TO HAVE VEHICLE FLAT BEDDED TO DEALERSHIP AT THE COST OF $121.10. THANK GOD THIS DIDN'T FAIL WHILE DRIVING. THIS IS A WELL KNOW ISSUE WITHIN THE ONLINE FORUMS / COMMUNITY. I'M CURRENTLY REQUESTING A FULL REIMBURSEMENT FROM NISSAN MOTOR CORP FOR THE REPAIR COST OF $887.37 PLUS THE TOW BILL. I HAVE RECENTLY RETURNED TO THE ONLINE FORUMS AND HAVE READ OVER 25 PAGES OF FAILURES WITH THE NISSAN 370Z. I ALSO HEARD OF THIS ISSUE ON NISSAN GTR AND MAXIMA VEHICLES. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10678805
54,600 miles · Nov 19, 2014
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN 370Z. WHILE PARKED, THE CLUTCH PEDAL FAILED AND THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER AND CONCENTRIC SLAVE CYLINDER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ALSO, DIFFERENT BRAKE FLUID WOULD HAVE TO BE USED PER THE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN 370Z. WHILE PARKED, THE CLUTCH PEDAL FAILED AND THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER AND CONCENTRIC SLAVE CYLINDER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. ALSO, DIFFERENT BRAKE FLUID WOULD HAVE TO BE USED PER THE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 54,600.
NHTSA ODI #10659281
30,000 miles · Oct 22, 2014
Fuel/propulsion System
AS I WAS MERGING ONTO 101 FROM 880 IN SAN JOSE, THE CAR LOST ALL DRIVE AT THE EXIT OF THE MERGE AS THE CAR EXPERIENCED FUEL STARVATION WHEN THE FUEL ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE GAS TANK SLOSH OVER TO THE LEFT SIDE DURING THE TIGHT TURN FROM 101 AND 880. MY SPEED WAS LESS THAN 30MPH AT THE TURN AND THE STARVATION HAPPENED AS I EXIT…
Read full complaint
AS I WAS MERGING ONTO 101 FROM 880 IN SAN JOSE, THE CAR LOST ALL DRIVE AT THE EXIT OF THE MERGE AS THE CAR EXPERIENCED FUEL STARVATION WHEN THE FUEL ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE GAS TANK SLOSH OVER TO THE LEFT SIDE DURING THE TIGHT TURN FROM 101 AND 880. MY SPEED WAS LESS THAN 30MPH AT THE TURN AND THE STARVATION HAPPENED AS I EXITED THE CLOVER LEAF. THE EXPERIENCE WAS SCARY AS I LOST ALL DRIVE WHILE CARS WERE COMING UP BEHIND ME AT 65MPH. THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE, IT IS A COMMON ISSUE WITH THE 370. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK NHTSA TO STEP IN AND ASK NISSAN FOR A PERMANENT FIX. THIS HAPPENED WITH MORE THAN HALF A TANK OF GAS ON BOARD. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10649292
45,000 miles · Sep 17, 2014
Electrical System
ON MONDAY 9/15/14 I ATTEMPTED TO START MY CAR LIKE I HAD DONE EARLIER IN THE DAY WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. WHEN I WENT TO PUSH MY START BUTTON, I NOTICED THAT NOTHING HAD HAPPENED AT ALL EXCEPT THE ILLUMINATION OF A KEY LOCK LIGHT. AFTER CHECKING THE GAS, BATTERY, AND FUSES, I DID NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO ABOUT THIS ISSUE. TODAY IS 9/17…
Read full complaint
ON MONDAY 9/15/14 I ATTEMPTED TO START MY CAR LIKE I HAD DONE EARLIER IN THE DAY WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. WHEN I WENT TO PUSH MY START BUTTON, I NOTICED THAT NOTHING HAD HAPPENED AT ALL EXCEPT THE ILLUMINATION OF A KEY LOCK LIGHT. AFTER CHECKING THE GAS, BATTERY, AND FUSES, I DID NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO ABOUT THIS ISSUE. TODAY IS 9/17/14 AND WHEN I ATTEMPT TO START MY CAR I HAVE TO DEPRESS THE START BUTTON 7-10 TIMES BEFORE IT ACTUALLY STARTS THE CAR. I CALLED A NEARBY NISSAN DEALERSHIP THEY SAID IT PROBABLY HAD A STEERING LOCK FAILURE, WHICH IS A COMMON OCCURRENCE IN THE 2009-2010 370Z. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10637101
24,874 miles · Jul 22, 2014
Electrical System
THIS IS TO RECTIFY THE COMPLAINT I SUBMITTED YESTERDAY RELATED TO THE STEERING LOCK UNIT FAILING. I DID HAVE THE PROBLEM (NO CHANGE THERE) AND FILED COMPLAINT #10614959 AFTER DOING THE INITIAL RESEARCH AND READING EVERYWHERE (INCLUDING HERE) THAT NISSAN'S RECALL DID NOT COVER MY MODEL YEAR (2009), BEING THAT MINE IS NOT A GTR. A…
Read full complaint
THIS IS TO RECTIFY THE COMPLAINT I SUBMITTED YESTERDAY RELATED TO THE STEERING LOCK UNIT FAILING. I DID HAVE THE PROBLEM (NO CHANGE THERE) AND FILED COMPLAINT #10614959 AFTER DOING THE INITIAL RESEARCH AND READING EVERYWHERE (INCLUDING HERE) THAT NISSAN'S RECALL DID NOT COVER MY MODEL YEAR (2009), BEING THAT MINE IS NOT A GTR. AFTER I HAD COME TO TERMS WITH HAVING TO PAY FOR THIS OUT OF POCKET, I CALLED THE DEALER IN FORT LAUDERDALE, AND HE (VOLUNTARILY) SAID THAT RECALLS ARE VIN SPECIFIC AND THAT MINE WAS COVERED (WHAT A RELIEF). I ALSO TALKED WITH NISSAN USA LATER AND THEY TOLD ME THAT IT IS NOT A RECALL BUT THAT THEY HAVE EXTENDED THE WARRANTY ON THAT PARTICULAR PIECE OF EQUIPMENT. I AM NOT SURE, BUT I THINK THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT IF THE PROGRAM IS AN EXTENDED WARRANTY, YOU HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL YOU HAVE THE ISSUE WHEREAS A RECALL YOU CAN TAKE IT IN BEFORE (OR AFTER). WHICHEVER IT IS, THOSE WHO HAD THIS PROBLEM EARLY ON AND HAD TO PAY OUT OF POCKET MAY WANT TO RE-CHECK WITH NISSAN TO SEE IF THEY CAN GET REIMBURSED. MAYBE NISSAN EXTENDED THE INITIAL RECALL OR OFFERED THE EXTENDED WARRANTY LONG AFTER SOME PEOPLE HAD THE PROBLEM AND GOT MISSED IN THE PROCESS. IF THEY EVER SENT ME A NOTE ABOUT THIS IN THE MAIL, I PROBABLY MISTOOK IT FOR JUNK MAIL AND THREW IT OUT. IN MY CASE AT LEAST, NISSAN DID RIGHT BY ME AFTER I HAD THE PROBLEM. WHEN I CALLED (NISSAN USA) AND ASKED ABOUT THE TOWING, THE REP SAID THE PROGRAM DID NOT SPECIFICALLY SAY EITHER WAY, BUT THEY AGREED TO REIMBURSE ME FOR IT. ANYWAY, GOOD LUCK WITH ALL OF THIS. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10615396
24,874 miles · Jul 21, 2014
Electrical System
SAME PROBLEM AS EVERYONE ELSE IS REPORTING ABOUT VEHICLE NOT STARTING BECAUSE THE SMART KEY PUSH BUTTON IGNITION IS STUCK IN THE LOCK POSITION. I THINK THEY CALL IT STEERING WHEEL SYSTEM FAIL. APPARENTLY NISSAN HAS KNOWN ABOUT THIS FOR A LONG TIME, HAS RECALLED NEWER MODELS BUT IS NOT WILLING TO RECALL THE 2009S. SO THE Q…
Read full complaint
SAME PROBLEM AS EVERYONE ELSE IS REPORTING ABOUT VEHICLE NOT STARTING BECAUSE THE SMART KEY PUSH BUTTON IGNITION IS STUCK IN THE LOCK POSITION. I THINK THEY CALL IT STEERING WHEEL SYSTEM FAIL. APPARENTLY NISSAN HAS KNOWN ABOUT THIS FOR A LONG TIME, HAS RECALLED NEWER MODELS BUT IS NOT WILLING TO RECALL THE 2009S. SO THE QUESTION IS, HOW MANY PEOPLE NEED TO HAVE THIS PROBLEM BEFORE A MANDATORY RECALL IS IMPOSED? THIS IS RIDICULOUS. DESPITE THE PROBLEM BEING KNOWN, THERE IS NO WARNING ON IT, SO PEOPLE, INCLUDING MYSELF, GET STRANDED IN HORRIBLE SITUATIONS. NOTE TO NISSAN. I HAVE BEEN A REPEAT CUSTOMER. I HAVE HAD 1 MAXIMA, 2 ALTIMAS AND NOW A Z. I WILL FIX THIS CAR, SELL IT AND UNTIL/UNLESS NISSAN DOES THE RIGHT THING AND ISSUES A RECALL ON THIS, I WILL NEVER LOOK AT ANOTHER NISSAN AGAIN. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10614959
80,000 miles · Jul 15, 2014
Structure
THE DRIVER SIDE DOOR WILL NOT OPEN FROM THE INSIDE. I MUST ROLL DOWN THE WINDOW AND OPEN THE DOOR FROM THE OUTSIDE. I HAVE HAD THIS PROBLEM FIXED TWICE AND TWO DAYS AGO IT HAPPENED AGAIN. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10610586
36,500 miles · May 4, 2014
Power Train
THIS PROBLEM OF THE CLUTCH STICKING HAS BEEN AN ONGOING PROBLEM SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE. I DON'T DRIVE THE CAR THAT OFTEN BUT WHEN I DO THE CLUTCH PEDAL DOES NOT COME UP ONCE PUSHED TO THE FLOOR. IN ORDER FOR THE CLUTCH PEDAL TO RETURN TO THE UP POSITION I HAVE TO PULL IT UP WITH MY LEFT FOOT AND THIS HAVE BECOME A HAZARD …
Read full complaint
THIS PROBLEM OF THE CLUTCH STICKING HAS BEEN AN ONGOING PROBLEM SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE. I DON'T DRIVE THE CAR THAT OFTEN BUT WHEN I DO THE CLUTCH PEDAL DOES NOT COME UP ONCE PUSHED TO THE FLOOR. IN ORDER FOR THE CLUTCH PEDAL TO RETURN TO THE UP POSITION I HAVE TO PULL IT UP WITH MY LEFT FOOT AND THIS HAVE BECOME A HAZARD DRIVING. THE CAR CURRENTLY HAVE 42,242 MILES. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10586461
700 miles · May 3, 2014
Engine
ENGINE USED APPROXIMATELY 3/4 QUART OF OIL IN FIRST 700 MILES. CONTINUES TO CONSUME IN EXCESS OF 1 QUART OF OIL PER 1,000 MILES. NISSAN HAS DONE NUMEROUS (4) CONSUMPTION TESTS. VEHICLE FAILED ALL TESTS. VEHICLE NOW HAS 8,700 MILES AFTER 5 YEARS AND I AM IN A PROTRACTED BATTLE WITH NISSAN. THEY HAVE BEEN AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM…
Read full complaint
ENGINE USED APPROXIMATELY 3/4 QUART OF OIL IN FIRST 700 MILES. CONTINUES TO CONSUME IN EXCESS OF 1 QUART OF OIL PER 1,000 MILES. NISSAN HAS DONE NUMEROUS (4) CONSUMPTION TESTS. VEHICLE FAILED ALL TESTS. VEHICLE NOW HAS 8,700 MILES AFTER 5 YEARS AND I AM IN A PROTRACTED BATTLE WITH NISSAN. THEY HAVE BEEN AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM SINCE 2008 AND ISSUED TSBS IN 2010 BUT CONTINUED TO TRY AND HIDE BEHIND THE PROBLEM. THERE ARE NUMEROUS POSTING ON THE WEB FOR LIKE PROBLEMS WITH THE 370 ENGINE, INCLUDING THE NISSAN 370Z AND THE INFINITI G37. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10586288
60,000 miles · Mar 4, 2014
Electrical SystemEngine And Engine Cooling
ENGINE POWER CUTS OUT RANDOMLY. ERROR CODE P0011 GIVEN. ALL MECHANICAL COMPONENTS ASSOCIATED WITH CODE P0011 PER NISSAN HAVE BEEN REPLACED. PROBLEM STILL PERSISTS. APPARENTLY, THIS IS NOT AN UNCOMMON PROBLEM WITH THE EARLY 2009 370Z. TO DATE, NISSAN HAS NOT ISSUED A RECALL FOR THIS PROBLEM.
NHTSA ODI #10567337
NHTSA investigations
1EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture
Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied
Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.