← New search

2009 Nissan 370Z

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all 370Z years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

146 reports with mileage · 7 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Steering. Review the 88 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 67 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 26 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

2 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Steering complaints

88 reports
Clear category filter
29,000 miles · Jan 1, 2013
Electrical SystemSteering

THE STEERING LOCK MECHANISM PART #48700-JF00A ON 09 AND 10 MODELS FAILS AFTER A WHILE DUE TO POOR QUALITY. THIS RESULTS IN THE STEERING COLUMN BEING UNABLE TO UNLOCK AND THEREFORE DISABLING THE CAR FROM BEING STARTED. THIS CAN LEAVE ANYONE STRANDED AND NEEDING THE CAR TOWED. IN MY CASE THE CAR IS STUCK IN MY GARAGE BECAUSE I AM …

Read full complaint

THE STEERING LOCK MECHANISM PART #48700-JF00A ON 09 AND 10 MODELS FAILS AFTER A WHILE DUE TO POOR QUALITY. THIS RESULTS IN THE STEERING COLUMN BEING UNABLE TO UNLOCK AND THEREFORE DISABLING THE CAR FROM BEING STARTED. THIS CAN LEAVE ANYONE STRANDED AND NEEDING THE CAR TOWED. IN MY CASE THE CAR IS STUCK IN MY GARAGE BECAUSE I AM UNABLE TO START IT DUE TO THIS FAULTY PART. THIS NEEDS TO BE RECALLED BECAUSE THE PART WILL FAIL ITS JUST A MATTER OF WHEN. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10490657

17,500 miles · Dec 31, 2012
Steering

THERE IS A KNOWN ISSUE / PROBLEM WITH 2009 AND EARLY 2010 NISSAN 370Z'S. THE PROBLEM IS RELATED TO THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK MECHANISM, WHICH PREVENTS THE CAR FROM BEING TURNED ON IN ANY FORM (POWER OR ENGINE) BECAUSE THE MECHANISM FAILS MECHANICALLY AND PREVENTS AN ELECTRICAL RESPONSE FROM BEING SENT. IT IS NOT AN ISSUE THAT WO…

Read full complaint

THERE IS A KNOWN ISSUE / PROBLEM WITH 2009 AND EARLY 2010 NISSAN 370Z'S. THE PROBLEM IS RELATED TO THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK MECHANISM, WHICH PREVENTS THE CAR FROM BEING TURNED ON IN ANY FORM (POWER OR ENGINE) BECAUSE THE MECHANISM FAILS MECHANICALLY AND PREVENTS AN ELECTRICAL RESPONSE FROM BEING SENT. IT IS NOT AN ISSUE THAT WOULD AFFECT SAFETY WHILE DRIVING, BUT IT IS ABSOLUTELY A SAFETY ISSUE BECAUSE IT CAN AND WILL CAUSE CONSUMERS TO BE STRANDED WITHOUT WARNING. NISSAN IS REFUSING TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS ISSUE AND CONSUMERS NEED A VOICE FOR A KNOWN FAULTY PART WHICH HUNDREDS ARE EXPERIENCING! THE SIMPLE FACT IS THAT BECAUSE THIS VEHICLE IS NOT A WIDELY PURCHASED, POPULAR MODEL, THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN IGNORED BY NISSAN AND THE POWERS THAT BE IN THE GOVERNMENT THAT MAKE RECALLS HAPPEN. MORE INFORMATION FROM FRUSTRATED CONSUMERS MAY BE SEEN AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: HTTP://WWW.THE370Z.COM/DIY-SECTION-DO-YOURSELF/53437-STEERING-LOCK-CUT-ONE-WIRE-SWITCH-OPTIONAL-18.HTML HTTP://WWW.THE370Z.COM/DIY-SECTION-DO-YOURSELF/47181-DIY-REPLACE-DREADED-STEERING-LOCK-2009S-EARLY-2010S-30.HTML HTTP://WWW.THE370Z.COM/NISSAN-370Z-GENERAL-DISCUSSIONS/48434-Z-LOOKED-AWESOME-TOW-TRUCK-SARCASTIC-6.HTML MY VEHICLE SHOULD NOT HAVE MECHANICAL ISSUES WITH ANY PART WITH LESS THAN 18,000 MILES ON IT. RIDICULOUS! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10490557

40,000 miles · Dec 29, 2012
Steering

DROVE 370Z TO WORK WITH NO PROBLEM. ATTEMPTED TO LEAVE FOR APPOINTMENT LATER IN THE DAY AND CAR WILL NOT START. THE CAR WILL DO NOTHING, NO POWER, NO RADIO, CAN'T ROLL THE WINDOWS UP, ETC. THE WHEEL LOCK SYSTEM HAS MALFUNCTIONED. APPARENTLY, THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10490476

52,000 miles · Dec 28, 2012
Electrical SystemSteering

STEERING WHEEL LOCK FAILURE (INTELLIGENT KEY SYSTEM WARNING). WAS AT A GAS STATION AND CAR WOULD NOT START. "YELLOW" KEY LIGHT SHOWED UP BUT CAR WOULD NOT START AT ALL. HAD TO HAVE CAR TOWED TO DEALERSHIP. AFTER RESEARCH, I HAVE DISCOVERED THAT THIS PART HAS FAILED ON MANY NISSAN MODELS WITH THIS TYPE OF ELECTRONIC STEERING…

Read full complaint

STEERING WHEEL LOCK FAILURE (INTELLIGENT KEY SYSTEM WARNING). WAS AT A GAS STATION AND CAR WOULD NOT START. "YELLOW" KEY LIGHT SHOWED UP BUT CAR WOULD NOT START AT ALL. HAD TO HAVE CAR TOWED TO DEALERSHIP. AFTER RESEARCH, I HAVE DISCOVERED THAT THIS PART HAS FAILED ON MANY NISSAN MODELS WITH THIS TYPE OF ELECTRONIC STEERING WHEEL LOCK. THIS NEEDS TO BE RECALLED AND ANYONE WHO HAS PAID TO HAVE IT REPLACED NEEDS TO BE REIMBURSED. A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT NEEDS TO BE FILED BECAUSE NISSAN REFUSES TO ACCEPT THAT IT IS A FAULTY PART. TOTAL COST TO REPLACE: $1084. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10490418

27,400 miles · Dec 28, 2012
Electrical SystemSteering

STEERING WHEEL /IGNITION SYSTEM ELECTRONICS SWITCH FAILURE ,CAUSING VEHICLE AND ALL ELECTRIC ACCESSORY SYSTEMS ON VEHICLE TO NOT FUNCTION. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10490412

52,500 miles · Dec 26, 2012
Electrical SystemSteering

2009 NISSAN 370Z WORKED PERFECTLY THEN WOULDN'T START. FOUND MANY OTHER INCIDENTS OF THE SAME PROBLEM. THE ISSUE IS A BROKEN STEERING WHEEL LOCK WHICH WON'T UNLOCK. ALTHOUGH THE SAME PART IS KNOWN TO HAVE ISSUES IN MANY NISSAN CARS, THERE IS NO RECALL SO OWNER PAYS FOR AN EXPENSIVE PART AND LABOR. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10490141

26,000 miles · Dec 14, 2012
Steering

THE STEERING LOCK WOULD NOT ENGAGE AFTER TURNING OFF OR LOCKING THE CAR. IF THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK DOES NOT WORK THEN THE CAR WILL NOT START LEAVING ME STRANDED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10488763

42,000 miles · Dec 9, 2012
Steering

CAR WILL NOT START. SEEMS TO BE A VERY COMMON PROBLEMWITH 09 370Z'S. STEERING LOCK MECHANISM. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10487781

44,000 miles · Dec 5, 2012
Electrical SystemSteering

IN THE 2009 AND 2010 MODEL YEARS OF THIS CAR (AND OTHER NISSAN VEHICLES), THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK ASSEMBLY IS KNOWN TO RANDOMLY FAIL, LEAVING THE CAR UNABLE TO START. THERE IS NO RECALL OR TSB FOR THIS AS OF YET, AND IT HAS AFFECTED SEVERAL NISSAN VEHICLES INCLUDING THE GTR. REVISIONS A AND B OF THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK ASSEM…

Read full complaint

IN THE 2009 AND 2010 MODEL YEARS OF THIS CAR (AND OTHER NISSAN VEHICLES), THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK ASSEMBLY IS KNOWN TO RANDOMLY FAIL, LEAVING THE CAR UNABLE TO START. THERE IS NO RECALL OR TSB FOR THIS AS OF YET, AND IT HAS AFFECTED SEVERAL NISSAN VEHICLES INCLUDING THE GTR. REVISIONS A AND B OF THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK ASSEMBLY ARE WELL KNOWN TO FAIL, AND REVISION C IS ALSO KNOWN TO FAIL HOWEVER THERE ARE FEWER OCCURRENCES. THIS HAS LEFT ME STRANDED AND UNABLE TO GET TO WORK, AND NISSAN WILL STRAIGHT UP REFUSE TO FIX THE PROBLEM FOR LESS THAN $1000. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10487476

23,000 miles · Dec 5, 2012
Steering

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN 370Z. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE WENT TO START THE VEHICLE BUT THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK MALFUNCTIONED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE COULD NOT UNLOCK THE STEERING WHEEL TO START THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND THEY STATED THAT THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK NEEDED TO BE…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN 370Z. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE WENT TO START THE VEHICLE BUT THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK MALFUNCTIONED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE COULD NOT UNLOCK THE STEERING WHEEL TO START THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND THEY STATED THAT THE STEERING WHEEL LOCK NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED AND STATED THAT THEY WOULD LOOK INTO THE MATTER AND GET BACK TO HIM. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 23,000.

NHTSA ODI #10487439

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.