← New search

2009 Nissan 370Z

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all 370Z years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

146 reports with mileage · 7 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Steering. Review the 88 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 67 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 26 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

2 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Power Train complaints

26 reports
Clear category filter
64,000 miles · Jun 29, 2015
Power TrainService BrakesUnknown Or Other

LOSS OF CLUTCH PEDAL (CSC) CLUTCH SLAVE CYLINDER AND (CMC) CLUTCH MASTER CYLINDER

NHTSA ODI #10730881

30,000 miles · Jun 25, 2015
Power Train

PUSHED THE CLUTCH IN TO SHIFT AND IT NEVER CAME BACK UP. HAD TO TOW IT TO A SHOP. COST A BUNCH. HAPPENED AROUND 30K AND AT 53K. A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE THIS ISSUE. ALMOST EVERY OTHER DAY I SEE SOMEONE POSTING ABOUT THE CSC FAILURE.

NHTSA ODI #10730473

65,000 miles · Jun 24, 2015
EnginePower TrainUnknown Or Other

I WAS DRIVING TO WORK ONE MORNING WHEN MY CLUTCH PEDAL BECAME LIMP. I WAS ON THE FREEWAY GETTING READY TO SHIFT INTO 6TH GEAR WHEN I HAD NO CLUTCH RESISTANCE! I NEARLY CRASHED DUE TO THE LACK OF ENGAGEMENT. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP AND THEY SAID I WAS OUT OF WARRANTY. THIS VERY SAME ISSUE WAS FIXED UNDER WARRANTY AT 30,000…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING TO WORK ONE MORNING WHEN MY CLUTCH PEDAL BECAME LIMP. I WAS ON THE FREEWAY GETTING READY TO SHIFT INTO 6TH GEAR WHEN I HAD NO CLUTCH RESISTANCE! I NEARLY CRASHED DUE TO THE LACK OF ENGAGEMENT. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP AND THEY SAID I WAS OUT OF WARRANTY. THIS VERY SAME ISSUE WAS FIXED UNDER WARRANTY AT 30,000 MILES. THE DEALERSHIP EITHER NEVER REPLACED THE PARTS THEY CLAIMED TO HAVE REPLACED AT 30K MILES OR THEY HAVE FAILED AGAIN, JUST 35K MILES LATER. THESE PARTS ARE THE MASTER CYLINDER AND SLAVE CYLINDER IN THE TRANSMISSION. THE ISSUE HAS BEEN GOING ON WITH 2009-2015 MODELS. ACTUALLY, IT HAS BEEN GOING ON AS FAR BACK AS 2003 WITH THE 350Z, WHICH WAS NEVER ADDRESSED. I'M SELLING THE CAR AND HOPEFULLY THE BUYER DOESN'T CRASH AND DIE FROM IT. IF HE/SHE DOES, YOU SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE. MANY OF THE MEMBERS ON THE370Z.COM FORUM HAVE THIS ISSUE CITED HERE: HTTP://WWW.THE370Z.COM/NISSAN-370Z-GENERAL-DISCUSSIONS/25007-STICKY-OFFICIAL-370Z-CLUTCH-PRESSURE-CSC-FAILURES.HTML

NHTSA ODI #10730152

31,075 miles · Jun 17, 2015
Power Train

CAME TO A STOP AT A BUSY INTERSECTION TO MAKE A LEGAL RIGHT TURN ON RED WHEN THE CLUTCH PEDAL REFUSED TO COME UP MORE THAN IN INCH, CAUSING THE CAR TO STALL THE IN MIDDLE OF THE INTERSECTION REPEATEDLY UNTIL I WAS ABLE TO STICK IT IN TO A GEAR AND GET IT TO A PARKING LOT OF A NEARBY HOTEL WHERE THE CLUTCH PEDAL REMAINED LIMP ON …

Read full complaint

CAME TO A STOP AT A BUSY INTERSECTION TO MAKE A LEGAL RIGHT TURN ON RED WHEN THE CLUTCH PEDAL REFUSED TO COME UP MORE THAN IN INCH, CAUSING THE CAR TO STALL THE IN MIDDLE OF THE INTERSECTION REPEATEDLY UNTIL I WAS ABLE TO STICK IT IN TO A GEAR AND GET IT TO A PARKING LOT OF A NEARBY HOTEL WHERE THE CLUTCH PEDAL REMAINED LIMP ON THE FLOOR. MECHANIC CONFIRMED EARLIER THIS WEEK THAT THE CLUTCH SLAVE CYLINDER HAD GIVEN OUT. UPON FURTHER RESEARCH I FOUND MULTIPLE PEOPLE WITH SIMILAR INCIDENCES IN THE SAME KIND OF CAR AND ALSO AFFECTING 6 SPEED MANUAL G37'S AND LATER 350Z'S. WHEN MY CAR CONTINUED TO STALL IN THE INTERSECTION I COULD'VE BEEN T-BONED AND I BELIEVE TO BE ONE OF THE LUCKY ONES. IT COULD'VE HAPPENED ON THE HIGHWAY. UPDATED 07-16-15 *BF UPDATED 9/21/2015*JS

NHTSA ODI #10725675

36,500 miles · May 4, 2014
Power Train

THIS PROBLEM OF THE CLUTCH STICKING HAS BEEN AN ONGOING PROBLEM SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE. I DON'T DRIVE THE CAR THAT OFTEN BUT WHEN I DO THE CLUTCH PEDAL DOES NOT COME UP ONCE PUSHED TO THE FLOOR. IN ORDER FOR THE CLUTCH PEDAL TO RETURN TO THE UP POSITION I HAVE TO PULL IT UP WITH MY LEFT FOOT AND THIS HAVE BECOME A HAZARD …

Read full complaint

THIS PROBLEM OF THE CLUTCH STICKING HAS BEEN AN ONGOING PROBLEM SINCE I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE. I DON'T DRIVE THE CAR THAT OFTEN BUT WHEN I DO THE CLUTCH PEDAL DOES NOT COME UP ONCE PUSHED TO THE FLOOR. IN ORDER FOR THE CLUTCH PEDAL TO RETURN TO THE UP POSITION I HAVE TO PULL IT UP WITH MY LEFT FOOT AND THIS HAVE BECOME A HAZARD DRIVING. THE CAR CURRENTLY HAVE 42,242 MILES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10586461

27,190 miles · Feb 24, 2014
Power Train

CONCENTRIC SLAVE CYLINDER ON VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A MANUAL TRANSMISSION LEAKS AND FAILS RESULTING IN THE CLUTCH PETAL TO FALL TO THE FLOOR PREVENTING THE DRIVER FROM RELEASING THE CLUTCH PRESSURE PLATE. THIS PREVENTS THE DRIVER FROM BEING ABLE TO SHIFT GEARS AND COMPLETELY IMMOBILIZES THE VEHICLE. THE DEFECTIVE PART IS LOCATED…

Read full complaint

CONCENTRIC SLAVE CYLINDER ON VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH A MANUAL TRANSMISSION LEAKS AND FAILS RESULTING IN THE CLUTCH PETAL TO FALL TO THE FLOOR PREVENTING THE DRIVER FROM RELEASING THE CLUTCH PRESSURE PLATE. THIS PREVENTS THE DRIVER FROM BEING ABLE TO SHIFT GEARS AND COMPLETELY IMMOBILIZES THE VEHICLE. THE DEFECTIVE PART IS LOCATED INSIDE THE BELL HOUSING REQUIRING THE EXHAUST AND TRANSMISSION TO BE REMOVED TO REPLACE IT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10565551

31,060 miles · Feb 12, 2014
Power Train

ENGINE WAS REPLACED AT 30,295 MILES (DUE TO EXCESSIVE OIL USE) ON 5/16/12. UPON RETURN AND ON MAY 17, 2012, WHILE DRIVING THE CAR, THE CLUTCH PEDAL WOULD REMAIN AT THE BASE OF THE FLOOR OF THE VEHICLE. AFTER DRIVING, THE CLUTCH PEDAL WOULD EVENTUALLY CAME BACK TO IT'S NORMAL POSITION. APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS LATER, THIS RE-OC…

Read full complaint

ENGINE WAS REPLACED AT 30,295 MILES (DUE TO EXCESSIVE OIL USE) ON 5/16/12. UPON RETURN AND ON MAY 17, 2012, WHILE DRIVING THE CAR, THE CLUTCH PEDAL WOULD REMAIN AT THE BASE OF THE FLOOR OF THE VEHICLE. AFTER DRIVING, THE CLUTCH PEDAL WOULD EVENTUALLY CAME BACK TO IT'S NORMAL POSITION. APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS LATER, THIS RE-OCCURRED WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE AGAIN, BUT THIS TIME, THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT GO INTO 3RD GEAR, (LEAVING ME STRANDED IN TRAFFIC)...EVERYTHING EVENTUALLY WENT BACK TO NORMAL. AT 38,607, THE CLUTCH PEDAL ONCE AGAIN REMAINED ON THE FLOOR BOARD & ON 1/26/13, THE DEALER DIAGNOSED AND REPLACED THE FAILED CLUTCH SLAVE CYLINDER & MASTER CYLINDER. ON 5/27/13, AT 45,769 MI, THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER FOR THE SAME PROBLEM (CLUTCH PEDAL REMAINED ON FLOOR)-DEALER STATED-COULDN'T DUPLICATE THE CONCERN. ON 2/05/14, APPROX. 52,000 MI, THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE SHOP AFTER THE CLUTCH PEDAL REMAINED ON THE FLOOR AND WOULD NOT SHIFT INTO GEAR (ONCE AGAIN STRANDING ME IN TRAFFIC). THIS PART (SLAVE CYLINDER) IS A COMMON FAILURE IN THE 350Z, G37, 370Z VEHICLES (AS INDICATED IN VARIOUS FORUMS) BECAUSE OF IT'S POOR DESIGN AND HAS A HISTORY OF FAILURE. THERE ARE NO PREVIOUS WARNINGS GIVEN AND CAN RENDER THE CAR HELPLESS WHILE DRIVING IN TRAFFIC. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10564080

53,000 miles · Jun 19, 2013
Power Train

SLAVE CYLINDER ON MY 370Z HAD A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE. NISSAN PUT AN INFERIOR SLAVE CYLINDER IN THEIR 370Z MODELS. MY SLAVE CYLINDER HAD A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE WHILE SITTING AT A STOP. THANKFULLY I WAS NOT ON THE HIGHWAY. THE TECH THAT REPLACED THE PART SAID THEIR WAS VIRTUALLY NOTHING LEFT FROM THE SLAVE CYLINDER BECAUSE IT WAS …

Read full complaint

SLAVE CYLINDER ON MY 370Z HAD A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE. NISSAN PUT AN INFERIOR SLAVE CYLINDER IN THEIR 370Z MODELS. MY SLAVE CYLINDER HAD A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE WHILE SITTING AT A STOP. THANKFULLY I WAS NOT ON THE HIGHWAY. THE TECH THAT REPLACED THE PART SAID THEIR WAS VIRTUALLY NOTHING LEFT FROM THE SLAVE CYLINDER BECAUSE IT WAS MADE OUT OF INFERIOR MATERIAL. NISSAN WANTED $2,000 TO REPLACE AND INSTALL THE SAME INFERIOR PART BECAUSE TO THEM IT IS NOT CONSIDERED PART OF THE DRIVE TRAIN EVEN THOUGH THIS PART IS REQUIRED FOR THE DRIVE TRAIN TO OPERATE. THIS ITEM SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED WEAR AND TEAR. HAD TO TAKE MY VEHICLE TO A PLACE THAT SPECIALIZES IN NISSAN 370Z TO GET AN UPGRADED PART PUT INTO MY VEHICLE FOR LESS THAN HALF THE COST NISSAN WANTED. CLUTCH ENGAGEMENT AND FEEL IS BETTER THAN BRAND NEW NO THANKS TO NISSAN. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10520684

2,500 miles · Mar 26, 2013
EngineFuel/propulsion SystemPower Train

CAR REVS UP TO 2500-3000 RPMS BETWEEN SHIFTS! CANNOT GET THE IDLE TO DROP LOWER; ANY ATTEMPT TO PUNCH THE GAS PEDAL AND LOWER THE IDLE JUST MAKES IT IDLE FASTER!! PROBLEM HAS EXISTED 3.5 YEARS NOW, AND EVERY TIME I REQUEST THE DEALER INVESTIGATE THEY HAVE LAME EXCUSE OF "IF IT ISN'T DOING IT WHEN YOU BRING IT IN, WE CAN'T TROUBL…

Read full complaint

CAR REVS UP TO 2500-3000 RPMS BETWEEN SHIFTS! CANNOT GET THE IDLE TO DROP LOWER; ANY ATTEMPT TO PUNCH THE GAS PEDAL AND LOWER THE IDLE JUST MAKES IT IDLE FASTER!! PROBLEM HAS EXISTED 3.5 YEARS NOW, AND EVERY TIME I REQUEST THE DEALER INVESTIGATE THEY HAVE LAME EXCUSE OF "IF IT ISN'T DOING IT WHEN YOU BRING IT IN, WE CAN'T TROUBLESHOOT IT"! WTF? THE MOST RECENT TIME (MARCH 2013) THE CAR HAD A "SERVICE ENGINE" LIGHT AT THE SAME TIME AND IDLE WOULDN'T DROP BELOW 2000 RPMS FOR 3 DAYS. I TOOK IT IN FOR SERVICE AND DEALER FOUND "NOTHING WRONG" AND "NO CODES SAVED IN ECM MEMORY". AGAIN, WTF? ISN'T THIS THE SAME TOYOTA RUNAWAY THROTTLE ISSUE - SAME YEAR, SAME JAPANESE CAR, SAME FUEL THROTTLE COMPONENT PURCHASED FROM THE SAME INFERIOR SUPPLIER? DEALER IS NOT DOCUMENTING MY REQUESTS!! ARE YOU WAITING FOR ME TO HAVE AN ACCIDENT AND DIE BEFORE YOU FIX IT? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10504578

59,000 miles · Feb 11, 2013
Power Train

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN 370Z. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE WAS UNABLE TO START THE VEHICLE. ALSO, THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT WHENEVER HE DEPRESSED THE CLUTCH, IT FAILED TO RELEASE PREVENTING HIM FROM PROPERLY SHIFTING GEARS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE STEERING LOCK FAILED AND NEED…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 NISSAN 370Z. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE WAS UNABLE TO START THE VEHICLE. ALSO, THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT WHENEVER HE DEPRESSED THE CLUTCH, IT FAILED TO RELEASE PREVENTING HIM FROM PROPERLY SHIFTING GEARS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE STEERING LOCK FAILED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 59,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 60,000. ...UPDATED 04-03-13 *BF THE CONSUMER STATED THE CSC FAILURE IS THE CAUSE FOR THIS REPORT. RENDERING THE CLUTCH USELESS AND UNABLE TO SWITCH GEARS. THE CONSUMER STATED THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT WAS FOR THE STEERING LOCK FAILURE BUT THAT ISSUE HAS BEEN RECALLED. UPDATED 04/19/2013 *JS

NHTSA ODI #10497796

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.