WATER WAS LEAKING INTO VEHICLE UNDER PASSENGER'S SEAT. DEALER DETERMINED THAT FIREWALL HAD NOT BEEN SEALED PROPERLY. VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT AT THIS TIME WATER WAS AGAIN LEAKING INTO VEHICLE.*AK
2001 Mitsubishi Spyder
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Limited comparison data
There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.
Counts are not adjusted for sales, age, mileage exposure or reporting. A lower count does not establish that a car is problem-free.
About this comparison →Model-year median: 3
0Recall campaignsView recall details →
0InvestigationsView investigation details →
Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗ Model-level counts do not show whether a particular VIN is affected or repaired.
Inspection summary
2001 Mitsubishi Spyder
NHTSA snapshot: September 18, 2026. 13 owner complaints · 0 recall campaigns · 0 investigations.
Counts are not failure probabilities and are not adjusted for sales, age, mileage exposure or reporting. One report may name several categories. Comparison method and limitations.
Top reported categories (up to 5)
- Wheels: 8 reports
- Structure: 2 reports
- Engine And Engine Cooling: 1 reports
- Power Train: 1 reports
- Tires: 1 reports
Full reported-category list and vehicle report
Recall links
No recall campaigns in this snapshot.
Check a VIN with NHTSA. Model-level history does not establish whether a particular VIN is affected or repaired.
Print the top reported categories, recall links, snapshot date and comparison limits.
How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Spyder years →Counts vary with age, sales, mileage exposure and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 6 of 13 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Wheels. Review the 8 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Structure. Review the 2 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
13 reportsREAR DEFROSTER ON CONVERTIBLE TOP IS NOT WORKING. VEHICLE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO DEALER 5 TIMES, CONVERTIBLE TOP WAS REPLACED; BUT, PROBLEM STILL EXISTS.*AK
THE RIMS ON VEHICLE WERE DAMAGED, CONSUMER NOTICED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE HAD THREE DIFFERENT AREAS THAT WERE BENT AND SEPARATING FROM THE TIRE, THEY LOOKED AS IF THE WERE FOLDING IN FROM PRESSURE, THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE ALSO WERE SHOWING SIGNS, THE DEALERS EXPLANATION WAS THAT CONSUMER PROBABLY HIT A POTHOLE OR WENT OVER …
Read full complaint
THE RIMS ON VEHICLE WERE DAMAGED, CONSUMER NOTICED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE HAD THREE DIFFERENT AREAS THAT WERE BENT AND SEPARATING FROM THE TIRE, THEY LOOKED AS IF THE WERE FOLDING IN FROM PRESSURE, THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE ALSO WERE SHOWING SIGNS, THE DEALERS EXPLANATION WAS THAT CONSUMER PROBABLY HIT A POTHOLE OR WENT OVER A SPEED BUMP TO CAUSE THE DAMAGE, VEHICLE WAS THEN TAKEN TO A FIRESTONE DEALER AND MECHANIC STATED THAT THE LOW PROFILE TIRES THAT WERE PUT ON VEHICLE WERE PUT ON A VERY SOFT ALUMINUM RIM, WHICH CAN NOT SUPPORT THE NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR OF NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS WITHOUT COLLAPSING FROM PRESSURE.*JB
Recall campaigns
0No recalls in this snapshot.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
Defect investigations
0No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.
An investigation is not a finding of a defect, and closure does not prove a vehicle is problem-free.
Illustration