1993 Mitsubishi 3000GT

THE SEAT BELT IN MY 1993 MITSUBISHI 3000GT SL DOES NOT WORK CORRECTLY. THE BELT WILL STILL HAVE SLACK IN IT AND IT WILL NOT RETRACT TO ITS ORIGINAL POSITION. IF I HAVE TO BRAKE HARD THE BELT WILL NOT KEEP ME AGAINST THE BACK OF THE SEAT BECAUSE IT HAS SO MUCH SLACK, ONCE IT IS PULLED ON IT WILL NOT RETRACT. SOMETIMES AFTER I GET OUT OF THE CAR THE SEAT BELT WILL HANG OUTSIDE OF THE DOOR AFTER I SHUT THE DOOR FROM ALL OF THE SLACK IN THE BELT. THIS IS A VERY COMMON PROBLEM ON DODGE STEALTHS AND MITSUBISHI 3000GT AND IT IS VERY UNSAFE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.*JB

SEAT BELTS IN MY 1993 3000GT VR4 DO NOT RETRACT CORRECTLY, THIS SEEMS TO HAPPEN TO A LOT OF OTHER FRIENDS I KNOW THAT HAVE THIS CAR, AND THE SLACK THE SEAT BELT LEAVES IS EXTREMELY UNREASONABLE, IT WONT RETRACT AT ALL SOMETIMES AND YOU HAVE TO HAND FEED IT BACK IN THE SLOT. I CALL MITSUBISHI DEALERSHIPS AND THEY SAY I HAVE TO PAY FOR NEW SEAT BELT REPLACEMENTS TO HAVE THIS FIXED. IF THEY ARE CAUSING SAFETY ISSUES WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY FOR NEW SEAT BELTS? *NM

THIS IS THE MOST RECENT OCCURRENCE OF THIS INCIDENT (4/14/06). THE ISSUE INVOLVES THE SEAT BELT MECHANISMS ON MY 1993 MITSUBISHI 3000GT VR-4. THE SEAT BELTS WILL NOT RETRACT FULLY AND AT TIMES ARE SIMPLY INOPERABLE. THE REAL SAFETY ISSUE BECOMES APPARENT WHEN I AM BRAKING AND THE SEAT BELTS HAVE TOO MUCH SLACK AS A RESULT OF THE MECHANISM NOT PROVIDING ENOUGH TENSION TO SECURE THE BELTS. THIS FAILURE COULD POTENTIALLY LEAD TO A SCENARIO WHERE I AM BRAKING FORCEFULLY, AND BY NOT BEING PROPERLY RESTRAINED, COME INTO CONTACT WITH MY STEERING WHEEL OR WINDSHIELD. BASED ON SIMILAR STORIES FROM OTHER OWNERS, I AM INCLINED TO SAY THAT THIS PROBLEM EXISTS AMONG ALL 3000GTS AND STEALTHS. *NM

MY CAR BEGAN TO BUCK VIOLENTLY ON THE WAY HOME THE REAR WHEELS LOCKED UP AND THE FRONT CONTINUED TO MOVE, WHICH CAUSED HEAVY VIBRATIONS. I TURNED THE HAZARD LIGHTS ON AND SLOWED DOWN TO A STOP. I THEN REMOVED THE KEY FROM THE IGNITION AND RESTED THE CAR WHERE IT STOPPED, 120 FT FROM MY HOUSE. IMMEDIATELY, I KNEW THE CULPRIT -- THE TRANSFER CASE, AND A RECALL WAS ISSUED APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AGO. I HAD THE CAR TOWED TO DARCARS MITSUBISHI TO HAVE THE RECALL PERFORMED. INITIALLY, SERVICE SUPPORT TOLD ME THE PROBLEM WOULD BE TAKEN CARE OF. A FEW DAYS PASSED, AND I RECIEVED A CALL FROM THE DEALERSHIP SAYING IT WAS NOT COVERED BECAUSE THE "FLUID PLUG WAS MISSING." THEY PROPOSED THE REMEDY OF REFILLING THE FLUIDS AND REPLACING THE PLUGS, SOMETHING THAT ALSO SHOULD HAVE BEEN COVERED BY THE RECALL -- AT THE CHARGE OF ABOUT $82. I RECIEVED THE CAR THE NEXT FRIDAY, AND THE CAR WORKED FINE... TEMPORARILY. THE VERY NEXT FRIDAY, THE CAR EXPERIENCED THE SAME SYMPTOMS AS BEFORE. I PULLED OVER BY A NEARBY SHOPPING CENTER AND CALLED TO HAVE THE CAR TOWED. IT WAS TOWED TO THE SAME DEALERSHIP AS BEFORE -- DARCARS MITSUBISHI. THE DEALERSHIP GAVE ME A RATHER LARGE LIST OF FAULTS -- MOST NOTABLY, AN INTERNALLY DAMAGED AND LEAKING TRANSFER CASE. I ONCE AGAIN FOUGHT FOR THE RECALL, BUT THE DEALERSHIP REFUSED. THE RECALL EXPLICITLY STATES TRANSFER CASE, YET THEY WERE ARGUING THAT IT WAS THE YOKE THAT IS COVERED -- WHICH IS COMPLETELY FALSE. I CALLED MITSUBISHI AMERICA AND THEY SAID THAT THE CAR HAS HAD ITS TRANSFER CASE REPLACED BEFORE -- IN 1999, 3 YEARS BEFORE THE TRANSFER CASER RECALL HAD BEEN INSSUED IN 2002. THE CAR WAS THEN TOWED HOME AND HAS SAT SINCE. HAVE BEEN IN TOUCH WITH SEVERAL OTHER DEALERSHIPS WHO WERE UNABLE TO DO ANYTHING, BECAUSE DARCARS SIGNED OFF AS COMPLETING THE RECALL ON MY CAR -- WHICH THEY DID NOT, AS I WAS CHARGED FOR THE ONLY WORK THAT WAS DONE ON MY CAR AT THE DEALERSHIP. *AK

WHILE ACCELERATING INTO SECOND GEAR I HEARD A LOAD THUMP AND MY CAR STOPPED ACCELERATING. MY TRANSMISSION HAS FAILED. WHEN YOU PUT IT IN ANY GEAR AND RELEASE THE CLUTCH THE CAR GOES NOWHERE. WHY DOES MITSUBISHI MAKE A CAR WITH 300HP AND A TRANNY THAT CANNOT HANDLE IT. I SPOKE WITH 3 OTHER 3KGT OWNERS THAT HAVE ALL HAD TRANNY PROBLEMS WITH THIS CAR...IT DESERVES A RECALL!*AK