SkipThatYearREAL DATA. SMARTER CAR DECISIONS.
← New search

2007 Mercury Mariner Hybrid

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →
31Owner complaints

Model-year median: 15

0Recall campaigns

View recall details →

1Investigations

View investigation details →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
34
200631
2007116
200821
20099
2010
Compare all Mariner Hybrid years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Service Brakes
8Engine And Engine Cooling
6Electrical System
4Engine
4Hybrid Propulsion System
3
All reported categories
Power Train
3Fuel/propulsion System
2Steering
2Structure
2Unknown Or Other
2Equipment
1Seats
1Suspension
1Traction Control System
1

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

28 reports with mileage · 3 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes. Review the 8 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 6 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 4 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

1 crash reports0 fire reports1 injury reports

What owners actually said

31 reports
20,750 miles · Apr 25, 2010
SeatsCrashInjury

DRIVING HOME LATE AT NIGHT, FROM BABYSITTING MY GRANDKIDS, WAS HIT IN THE REAR END BY A DRUNK DRIVER (ARRESTED BY THE STATE POLICE), GOING A HIGH RATE OF SPEED. THE DRIVERS SEATBACK BROKE FROM THE IMPACT AND I WAS UNABLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL. SUV ROLLED 3 TIMES ACROSS THE EXPRESSWAY. SIDE CURTAIN AIRBAGS DEPLOYED. I SUFFERED …

Read full complaint

DRIVING HOME LATE AT NIGHT, FROM BABYSITTING MY GRANDKIDS, WAS HIT IN THE REAR END BY A DRUNK DRIVER (ARRESTED BY THE STATE POLICE), GOING A HIGH RATE OF SPEED. THE DRIVERS SEATBACK BROKE FROM THE IMPACT AND I WAS UNABLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL. SUV ROLLED 3 TIMES ACROSS THE EXPRESSWAY. SIDE CURTAIN AIRBAGS DEPLOYED. I SUFFERED POST CONCUSSIVE SYNDROME, WHIPLASH, GROIN INJURY, BOTH THUMBS (FROM TRYING TO HOLD MYSELF UP THRU THE ROLL) AND A CLOSED HEAD INJURY. BOTH CARS WERE TOTALED. I'M STILL IN TREATMENT. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10327344

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.