SkipThatYearREAL DATA. SMARTER CAR DECISIONS.
← New search

2006 Mercury Mariner Hybrid

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →
34Owner complaints

Model-year median: 15

0Recall campaigns

View recall details →

1Investigations

View investigation details →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
34
200631
2007116
200821
2009
Compare all Mariner Hybrid years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Engine
11Electrical System
8Service Brakes
8Power Train
5Steering
5
All reported categories
Fuel/propulsion System
3Hybrid Propulsion System
3Service Brakes, Hydraulic
3Service Brakes, Electric
2Electronic Stability Control (esc)
1Engine And Engine Cooling
1Unknown Or Other
1

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

33 reports with mileage · 1 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Engine. Review the 11 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 8 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 8 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

2 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints

3 reports
Clear category filter
36,857 miles · May 14, 2010
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Service Brakes, Hydraulic

WAS SLOWING TO MAKE A TURN AND THE ANTI-LOCK/SKID KICKED IN ON DRY PAVEMENT. CONTINUED TO OCCUR THROUGH DAY WITH SERVICE BRAKE WARNING AND SERVICE 4X4 WARNING COMING ON. BRAKES WERE REPLACED, ROTORS TURNED & SYSTEM BLED. AL/S STICK KICKS IN WHILE GOING SLOW ON OCCASION. IT'S LIKE THE BRAKES LOCK-UP AND RELEASE THREE OR FOUR …

Read full complaint

WAS SLOWING TO MAKE A TURN AND THE ANTI-LOCK/SKID KICKED IN ON DRY PAVEMENT. CONTINUED TO OCCUR THROUGH DAY WITH SERVICE BRAKE WARNING AND SERVICE 4X4 WARNING COMING ON. BRAKES WERE REPLACED, ROTORS TURNED & SYSTEM BLED. AL/S STICK KICKS IN WHILE GOING SLOW ON OCCASION. IT'S LIKE THE BRAKES LOCK-UP AND RELEASE THREE OR FOUR TIMES THEN EVERYTHING IS NORMAL UNTIL THE NEXT TIME. VEHICLE IS A 2006 MERCURY MARINER HYBRID WITH 36900 MILES. HPA PUMP WAS REPLACED LAST YEAR UNDER WARRANTY. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10330478

51,000 miles · Feb 16, 2010
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

WITH THE RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT OF A SOFTWARE GLITCH ON THE FUSION AND MILAN HYBRIDS, I HAVE HAD SIMILAR OCCURRENCES ON MY 2006 MERCURY HYBRID, WHERE IT FELT LIKE I WAS TRYING TO STOP ON WET LEAVES. IT SEEMED LIKE BRAKING WAS FINE INITIALLY, THEN IT FADED (AS I DESCRIBED ABOVE) BUT WITH MORE PRESSURE ON THE PEDAL, IT DID RETURN TO…

Read full complaint

WITH THE RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT OF A SOFTWARE GLITCH ON THE FUSION AND MILAN HYBRIDS, I HAVE HAD SIMILAR OCCURRENCES ON MY 2006 MERCURY HYBRID, WHERE IT FELT LIKE I WAS TRYING TO STOP ON WET LEAVES. IT SEEMED LIKE BRAKING WAS FINE INITIALLY, THEN IT FADED (AS I DESCRIBED ABOVE) BUT WITH MORE PRESSURE ON THE PEDAL, IT DID RETURN TO "NORMAL" BRAKING. THIS HAS HAPPENED ONLY ABOUT 3 OR 4 TIMES OF THE 3 YEARS OF OWNERSHIP, AND I HAVE NOT TAKEN IT TO A DEALER. I INITIALLY THOUGHT IT WAS DUE TO WET BRAKES, AND THOUGHT NOTHING FURTHER OF IT. BUT GIVEN THE RECENT RECALL BY FORD, I THOUGHT IT WAS NECESSARY TO AT LEAST REPORT THE OCCURRENCES. DATE INDICATED IS AN APPROXIMATION OF ONE OF THE OCCURRENCES, WHICH WAS JUST AFTER I HAD SURGERY. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10310790

45,213 miles · Nov 24, 2009
Electrical SystemService Brakes, Hydraulic

THE DRIVER INFORMATION DISPLAY SHOWED: BRAKE SYSTEM FAILURE. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALERSHIP, AND WAS TOLD THAT THE ITEM WAS NOT COVERED BY EXTENDED WARRANTY THAT I PURCHASED THROUGH DEALER. THE ITEM THAT WAS FOUND TO CAUSE THE CODE IS THE WIRING THAT CONTROLS THE HYDRAULIC PUMP FOR THE ABS BRAKE SYSTEM. ALTHOUGH THE BRAKES STILL FUN…

Read full complaint

THE DRIVER INFORMATION DISPLAY SHOWED: BRAKE SYSTEM FAILURE. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALERSHIP, AND WAS TOLD THAT THE ITEM WAS NOT COVERED BY EXTENDED WARRANTY THAT I PURCHASED THROUGH DEALER. THE ITEM THAT WAS FOUND TO CAUSE THE CODE IS THE WIRING THAT CONTROLS THE HYDRAULIC PUMP FOR THE ABS BRAKE SYSTEM. ALTHOUGH THE BRAKES STILL FUNCTION, BUT DO NOT PROTECT FROM LOCKING UP IN AN EVENT OF EMERGENCY BRAKING. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10293351

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.