← New search

1999 Mercedes Benz 230

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all 230 years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 4 of 8 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Suspension. Review the 2 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 2 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

2 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Electrical System complaints

1 reports
Clear category filter
105,000 miles · Feb 2, 2005
Electrical System

APPROXIMATELY, IN 2001 I STOPPED INTO A MERCEDES DEALER IN LATROBE, PA. FOR HELP REPLACING MY RIGHT REAR BRAKE LIGHT. IT WAS FROZEN IN THE SOCKET AND IT WOULDN'T MOVE. I WAS TOLD THAT IT WAS A DESIGN PROBLEM AND THAT THE SOCKET HOLDING THE BULB GETS SO HOT THAT THE PLASTIC ADHERES TO THE FRAME. THEY REPLACED THE ENTIRE LIGHT AS…

Read full complaint

APPROXIMATELY, IN 2001 I STOPPED INTO A MERCEDES DEALER IN LATROBE, PA. FOR HELP REPLACING MY RIGHT REAR BRAKE LIGHT. IT WAS FROZEN IN THE SOCKET AND IT WOULDN'T MOVE. I WAS TOLD THAT IT WAS A DESIGN PROBLEM AND THAT THE SOCKET HOLDING THE BULB GETS SO HOT THAT THE PLASTIC ADHERES TO THE FRAME. THEY REPLACED THE ENTIRE LIGHT ASSEMBLY EXPLAINING TO ME THAT IT WAS A SAFETY ISSUE AND EVEN THOUGH I WAS OUT OF WARRENTY SAFETY ISSUE RESPONSIBILITY NEVER EXPIRE AS A MANUFACTURER. I LIKE THAT, I FELT OK WITH IT. SINCE THEN I AM CONTINUING TO PLACE BRAKE LIGHT BULBS ON BOTH SIDES FREQUENTLY NEEDING PLIERS TO GET THE BULB OUT. NOW REPLACING DOESN'T DO IT AND 2 DEALERS ARE TELLING ME THAT SINCE IT IS OUT OF WARRANTY AND THAT BOTH SIDES NEED REPLACING IT WILL COST ME $501 TO REPAIR THEIR MANUFACUTRERS DEFECT, NOT WHAT I WAS TOLD IN LATROBE. I GUESS SAFETY DOES EXPIRE, WELL NOT TO ME.I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT THERE WAS NO GUARANTEE HOW LONG THE NEW MODULE WOULD WORK. BRAKE LIGHTS ARE A SAFETY ISSUE OR THEY WOULDN'T GIVE TRAFFIC TICKETS IF THEY ARE NOT WORKING. SINCE EVERY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THIS COUNTRY RECOGNIZES THAT BRAKE LIGHTS ARE A MATTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY I AM SURE THAT YOU DO ALSO. AT LEAST THE WIRING DOESN'T MELT WITH THE GAS TANK BACK THERE. I DON'T FEEL THAT I SHOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR A PROBLEM THAT MERCEDES ADMITS IS A MANUFACTURING PROBLEM. BRAKE LIGHTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ON ALL CARS FOR PUBLIC SAFTEY REASONS AND IF A MANUFACTURER BUILDS A CAR WITH DEFECTIVE SAFTEY EQUIPMENT THEN THEY NOT ME OR ANY OTHER CONSUMER SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE TO PAY FOR THEIR DESIGN PROBLEM.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10108413

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.