← New search

2007 Lexus RX350

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most RX350 years

Owner complaints for the 2007 Lexus RX350 are substantially higher than the model-year median of 29.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

141 reports with mileage · 26 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Engine. Review the 36 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Steering. Review the 25 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 22 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

17 crash reports1 fire reports10 injury reports

What owners actually said

167 reports
100,000 miles · Sep 28, 2014
Electrical SystemEngineSteering

THE CAR COMPLETELY HALTED WHILE DRIVING ON A CITY ROAD. THE STEERING LOCKED AND THE CAR COMPLETELY STOPPED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD. THE MANUFACTURER INSPECTED THE CAR. DURING INSPECTION THEY FOUND A/C COMPRESSOR LOCKED UP CAUSING VEHICLE TO STALL UNDER LOAD. ONCE THE A/C SYSTEM IS ACTIVATED, VEHICLE WILL STALL OUT. THEY ALSO…

Read full complaint

THE CAR COMPLETELY HALTED WHILE DRIVING ON A CITY ROAD. THE STEERING LOCKED AND THE CAR COMPLETELY STOPPED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD. THE MANUFACTURER INSPECTED THE CAR. DURING INSPECTION THEY FOUND A/C COMPRESSOR LOCKED UP CAUSING VEHICLE TO STALL UNDER LOAD. ONCE THE A/C SYSTEM IS ACTIVATED, VEHICLE WILL STALL OUT. THEY ALSO CONFIRMED THAT THIS COULD HAPPEN WHILE THE VEHICLE IS IN MOTION ON A HIGHWAY GOING 60 MPH AND IF IT DID, IT WOULD STALL THE CAR AND LOCK UP THE VEHICLE JUST LIKE IT DID IN THE FIRST INCIDENT. IT SEEMS COMPLETELY UNREADABLE TO STALL A VEHICLE IN MOTION FOR SOME CONFIRM/CONVENIENCE FEATURE LIKE A/C. I FEEL THIS IS A FUNDAMENTAL ENGINEERING PROBLEM WITH THE WAY THE CAR IS DESIGNED. I WOULD LIKE TO ENSURE THIS IS DECLARED AS AN ISSUE WITH THE DESIGN OF LEXUS VEHICLES AND THERE IS A TRIGGER TO DISCONNECT AC UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE AC CAN STALL A CAR IN MOTION. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10639651

61,000 miles · Sep 25, 2014
Structure

THE DASHBOARD HAS DEVELOPED SEVERAL HAIRLINE CRACKS AND IN ONE SPOT A SMALL PART OF THE DASHBOARD HAS DETACHED, REVEALING THE PADDING UNDERNEATH. IF NOT REPAIRED, THE CRACKS WILL CONTINUE TO ENLARGE, POSSIBLY AFFECTING THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE DASHBOARD AIR BAGS. I FEEL THAT THE DEFECTIVE DASHBOARD IS A MANUFACTURER'S DEFECT AND IT…

Read full complaint

THE DASHBOARD HAS DEVELOPED SEVERAL HAIRLINE CRACKS AND IN ONE SPOT A SMALL PART OF THE DASHBOARD HAS DETACHED, REVEALING THE PADDING UNDERNEATH. IF NOT REPAIRED, THE CRACKS WILL CONTINUE TO ENLARGE, POSSIBLY AFFECTING THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE DASHBOARD AIR BAGS. I FEEL THAT THE DEFECTIVE DASHBOARD IS A MANUFACTURER'S DEFECT AND IT SHOULD BE REPAIRED/REPLACED BY LEXUS, AS IT IS A POTENTIAL SAFETY PROBLEM. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10639035

55,000 miles · Aug 30, 2014
Engine

I RECEIVED LETTER FROM LEXUS TELLING ME THE ENGINE OIL COOLER PIPE COULD HAVE LEAKAGE, BUT LEXUS WON'T REPLACE IT UNLESS IT'S LEAKING. I SEARCHED THE INTERNET AND THERE ARE MANY OTHER CAR OWNERS HAVE HAD THE LEAK AND WHEN IT DOES, THE ENGINE MIGHT BE GONE BECAUSE OF NO OIL LEFT IN THE RESERVOIR. THIS COULD END UP IN AN ACCIDEN…

Read full complaint

I RECEIVED LETTER FROM LEXUS TELLING ME THE ENGINE OIL COOLER PIPE COULD HAVE LEAKAGE, BUT LEXUS WON'T REPLACE IT UNLESS IT'S LEAKING. I SEARCHED THE INTERNET AND THERE ARE MANY OTHER CAR OWNERS HAVE HAD THE LEAK AND WHEN IT DOES, THE ENGINE MIGHT BE GONE BECAUSE OF NO OIL LEFT IN THE RESERVOIR. THIS COULD END UP IN AN ACCIDENT OR FIRE, OR AT LEAST ENGINE BLOWS UP. LEXUS ALSO SAID WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THEY WILL ONLY REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE PIPE, TOYOTA PART NUMBER: 15767-31020 PIPE, OIL COOLER, THUS LEAVING OWNERS TO PAY THOUSANDS FOR A NEW OR REBUILT ENGINE. WHY DON'T THEY JUST REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE RUBBER PIPE WITH THEIR NEW METAL PIPE? I AM SURE THEY ARE AWARE OF THE PROBLEM, IT WILL HAPPEN SOONER OR LATER. PLEASE HELP! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10629541

63,078 miles · Aug 29, 2014
Structure

MY LEXUS'S DASHBOARD IS MELTING AND CRACKING. IT'S SO SOFT THAT IF I MISS THE KEY HOLE IT WILL DIG A HOLE IN THE RUBBER AROUND THE IGNITION. RESALE VALUE SERIOUSLY DIMINISHED. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10629510

120,000 miles · Aug 18, 2014
Vehicle Speed Control

I WAS DRIVING ON HWY I-SOUTH AND I HAD MY CAR CRUISE AT ABOUT 68 MPH. DUE TO DOWNHILL ROAD AHEAD I TOOK IT OUT OF CRUISE AS SOMETIME CAR GOES FEW MILES ABOVE CRUISE LIMIT. NOW THERE WAS UPHILL ROAD SO I PUT IT NO CRUISE AGAIN ABOUT 65 BY PUSHING CRUISE ARROW UP DIRECTION. THIS TIME SUDDENLY IT ACCELERATE AND ENGINE RPM SHOOT…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING ON HWY I-SOUTH AND I HAD MY CAR CRUISE AT ABOUT 68 MPH. DUE TO DOWNHILL ROAD AHEAD I TOOK IT OUT OF CRUISE AS SOMETIME CAR GOES FEW MILES ABOVE CRUISE LIMIT. NOW THERE WAS UPHILL ROAD SO I PUT IT NO CRUISE AGAIN ABOUT 65 BY PUSHING CRUISE ARROW UP DIRECTION. THIS TIME SUDDENLY IT ACCELERATE AND ENGINE RPM SHOOT UP VERY HIGH AND SPEED KEPT GOING UP. IN MATER OF 2-3 SECONDS IT WAS 80 MPH. MY BREAK DID NOT WORK AND I TOOK IT OUT OF CRUISE AND IT STOP GOING UP. I WAS REALLY SCARED THAT THIS MAY GO OUT OF CONTROL. I BEEN DRIVER THIS CAR FROM FOUR YEARS AND I DON'T KNOW HOW THIS HAPPEN. I FEEL SCARY TO PUT MY FAMILY INSIDE THIS CAR. I HAVE 10 MONTH OLD AND 3 YEARS OLD DAUGHTERS. I CANT LET ANYTHING HAPPEN TO THEM BECAUSE SOME SOFTWARE MALFUNCTION IN THIS CAR. I AM AN ELECTRICAL ENGINEER AND I ALSO WORK IN AUTOMOTIVE AND NEVER CAME ACROSS SOMETHING LIKE THIS. I HOPE YOU CAN ANSWER MY CONCERN. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10626068

95,000 miles · Aug 13, 2014
Structure

THE WHOLE DASHBOARD IS CRACKING. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10622144

80,168 miles · Aug 6, 2014
Steering

I OWN A 2007 LEXUS RX350. I WENT IN FOR AM OI; CHANGE. THE VEHICLE FAILED INSPECTION. THE MECHANIC SAID THAT THE STEERING RACK AND PINION WAS LEAKING AND THAT THE SEALS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THERE WERE NO REPAIRS COMPLETED ON THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND DID NOT OFFER A REMEDY. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE…

Read full complaint

I OWN A 2007 LEXUS RX350. I WENT IN FOR AM OI; CHANGE. THE VEHICLE FAILED INSPECTION. THE MECHANIC SAID THAT THE STEERING RACK AND PINION WAS LEAKING AND THAT THE SEALS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THERE WERE NO REPAIRS COMPLETED ON THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND DID NOT OFFER A REMEDY. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 80,000. QUOTED $1500.00 TO $1800.00 REPAIR. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10619423

80,000 miles · Aug 4, 2014
Structure

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LEXUS 350 RX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE PASSENGER SIDE DASHBOARD WAS CRACKED FROM THE STEERING WHEEL THAT EXPOSED FOAM THROUGH THE INTERIOR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND DID NOT PROVIDE A REMEDY. A LOCAL DEALER STATED THAT THE DASHBOARD NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THERE WERE NO REPAIRS COMPLETED…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 LEXUS 350 RX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE PASSENGER SIDE DASHBOARD WAS CRACKED FROM THE STEERING WHEEL THAT EXPOSED FOAM THROUGH THE INTERIOR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND DID NOT PROVIDE A REMEDY. A LOCAL DEALER STATED THAT THE DASHBOARD NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THERE WERE NO REPAIRS COMPLETED ON THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 80,000. UPDATED 09/11/2014*LJ UPDATED 1/13/2015 *JS

NHTSA ODI #10618739

70,000 miles · Jul 30, 2014
Structure

I NOTICED EXTENSIVE CRACKING OF MY DASHBOARD. I COULDN'T BELIEVE IT...IT SEEMED TO SHOW UP ALL AT ONCE, AND I HAD NEVER HAD THIS HAPPEN TO A VEHICLE BEFORE. MY RX HAS LOW MILES AND HAS NEVER BEEN IN ANY KIND OF ACCIDENT. IN 45 YEARS WE HAVE OWNED MANY VEHICLES, HAVE DRIVEN MANY OF THEM TO OVER 200,000, AND NONE OF THEM HAVE EVE…

Read full complaint

I NOTICED EXTENSIVE CRACKING OF MY DASHBOARD. I COULDN'T BELIEVE IT...IT SEEMED TO SHOW UP ALL AT ONCE, AND I HAD NEVER HAD THIS HAPPEN TO A VEHICLE BEFORE. MY RX HAS LOW MILES AND HAS NEVER BEEN IN ANY KIND OF ACCIDENT. IN 45 YEARS WE HAVE OWNED MANY VEHICLES, HAVE DRIVEN MANY OF THEM TO OVER 200,000, AND NONE OF THEM HAVE EVER HAD A CRACK IN THE DASH, MUCH LESS CRACKING ACROSS THE ENTIRE DASH! IN FACT MY SISTER IN CA HAS THE EXACT SAME VEHICLE, BUT HERS HAS 225,000 MILES, AND HER DASH IS PERFECT! IMMEDIATELY, I SUSPECTED A QUALITY ISSUE, AND ASSUMED THAT SURELY LEXUS WOULD STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT. BOY WAS I WRONG! I TOOK IT INTO MY DEALERSHIP FOR AN INSPECTION, WAITED 6 WEEKS FOR A REPLY, AND WHEN NO RESPONSE WAS GIVEN, I CALLED BACK. I WAS TOLD THE VEHICLE WAS OUT OF WARRANTY (WE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT A WEAR-AND-TEAR ISSUE HERE ...THIS IS A QUALITY ISSUE!). BECAUSE MY HUSBAND DOES THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE, I WAS TOLD THAT THE DECISION NOT TO OFFER ASSISTANCE WAS BECAUSE WE HAD NOT SPENT ENOUGH MONEY WITH THEM! HOWEVER, THAT THEY SURELY HOPED I COULD GET LEXUS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, BECAUSE THEN THEY WOULD MAKE MONEY ON THE REPAIR! CAN YOU BELIEVE IT! LIKE OTHER OWNERS, I AM CONCERNED THIS WILL AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE AIRBAGS. THERE ARE LOTS OF OTHER SIMILAR COMPLAINTS ABOUT CRACKING AND MELTING DASHBOARDS, AND IN SOUTH FLORIDA, THEY ARE TRYING TO GET A CLASS-ACTION SUIT ON THE PROBLEMS. COME ON LEXUS, I EXPECTED MORE FROM YOU! DON'T ADVERTISE YOUR PRODUCT AS A QUALITY PRODUCT, WHEN SHODDY PARTS ARE USED IN ITS PRODUCTION. WE BOUGHT THE RX BECAUSE WE WANTED A VEHICLE THAT WOULD LAST A LONG TIME; WE'VE HAD 2 TOYOTA AVALONS WE HAVE PUT OVER 200,000 MILES ON. STEP UP, AND STAND BEHIND YOUR PRODUCT! I WAS QUOTED A PRICE OF $1759.19 TO REPLACE THE DASH!!! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10617475

46,000 miles · Jul 29, 2014
Structure

THIS VEHICLE HAS A CRACK IN THE DASHBOARD PAD. WHILE THIS ONE ISN'T VERY LARGE, THE LAST LEXUS RX WE HAD, A 2004 RX 330, HAD CRACKS ALL OVER THE PAD. THE FORUM ON EDMUNDS.COM INDICATED THAT THERE WERE HUNDREDS OF OWNERS OF LEXUS RX AND GS MODELS WITH THIS COMPLAINT, AND THAT LEXUS REFUSED TO REPAIR THIS OBVIOUS MANUFACTURERS DE…

Read full complaint

THIS VEHICLE HAS A CRACK IN THE DASHBOARD PAD. WHILE THIS ONE ISN'T VERY LARGE, THE LAST LEXUS RX WE HAD, A 2004 RX 330, HAD CRACKS ALL OVER THE PAD. THE FORUM ON EDMUNDS.COM INDICATED THAT THERE WERE HUNDREDS OF OWNERS OF LEXUS RX AND GS MODELS WITH THIS COMPLAINT, AND THAT LEXUS REFUSED TO REPAIR THIS OBVIOUS MANUFACTURERS DEFECT. LEXUS ANSWERED MY COMPLAINT SAYING THAT THE CERTIFIED PRE-OWNED WARRANTY I HAVE DOESN'T COVER DASH PADS. I'M CONCERNED THAT THE CRACKS MAY HAVE AN EFFECT ON THE DEPLOYMENT OF AIRBAGS. LEXUS WOULDN'T ADDRESS THAT ISSUE. MAYBE IT'S TIME THAT YOU MADE THEM. *JS

NHTSA ODI #10617222

Official recalls

1

11V112000 · Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

Feb 24, 2011

TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2006 HIGHLANDER, HIGHLANDER HYBRID, AND MODEL YEAR 2004-2007 LEXUS RX330, RX350, AND RX400H VEHICLES. IF THE FORWARD RETENTION CLIP USED TO SECURE THE FLOOR CARPET COVER, WHICH IS LOCATED IN FRONT OF THE CENTER CONSOLE, IS NOT INSTALLED PROPERLY THE COVER MAY LEAN TOWARD THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND INTERFERE WITH THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL ARM.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: IF THIS OCCURS, THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY TEMPORARILY BECOME STUCK IN A PARTIALLY DEPRESSED POSITION RATHER THAN RETURN TO THE IDLE POSITION. A STUCK ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN UNINTENDED AND SUSTAINED VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP, INCREASING THE RISK OF A VEHICLE CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE FLOOR CARPET COVER WITH A NEWLY DESIGNED ONE FREE OR CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING MARCH 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

RQ10003 · Unintended And Uncontrolled Acceleration

Opened Feb 16, 2010 · Closed Mar 1, 2011

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:software; Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.

Additional source detail variants (6)

Electrical System:software

On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.

Electrical System:software

On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.

Electrical System:software

On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.

Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.

Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.

Vehicle Speed Control:accelerator Pedal

On February 16, 2010, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened RQ10-003 to determine whether the scope of prior Toyota recalls relating to potential unintended acceleration were sufficiently broad, including, among others, Toyota recalls 07E-082, 09V-388, 10V-017, and 10V-023.NHTSA also requested information regarding potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota and Lexus vehicles.I. Pedal Interference from Floor mats, Carpet Covers and Plastic Pads in Carpets.During the RQ10-003 investigation, ODI reviewed a large volume of documents to assess whether additional vehicles should be recalled.Following the agency's analysis, NHTSA requested that Toyota recall additional vehicles.Toyota complied with the agency's request.The details of these recalls are set forth more fully in Toyota's reports to NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573.These recalls are as follows:Recall 11V-112: (1) model year (MY) 2004-2006 Toyota Highlander and Highlander Hybrid; and, (2) MY 2004-2007 Lexus RX330,RX350, and RX400h (hybrid model). The total estimated population under this recall is 769,379 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by a loose floor carpet cover (trim panel). Recall 11V-113: (1) MY 2003-2009 through 2009 Toyota 4Runner; (2) MY 2006-2010 Toyota RAV4; and, (3) MY 2008-2011 Lexus LX570.The total estimated population under this recall is 1,381,000 vehicles.This recall supplements recall 09V-388 and remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment by an unsecured floor mat.Recall 11V-115: (1) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS300 (all wheel drive vehicles); and, (2) MY 2006-2007 Lexus GS350 (all wheel drive vehicles). The total estimated population under this recall is 19,647 vehicles.This recall remedies potential accelerator pedal entrapment caused by inadequate clearance between the pedal linkage and a plastic pad embedded in the vehicle's carpet.II. Potential Electronic Causes of Unintended Acceleration.After NHTSA opened RQ10-003, NHTSA launched a ten-month study of potential electronic causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.NHTSA launched the study in the spring of 2010 in light of concerns aired in Congressional hearings.NHTSA enlisted engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with expertise in areas such as computer controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference and software integrity to assess whether electronic systems or electromagnetic interference played a role in incidents of unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles.That study has concluded.Two reports are associated with the study and are available on NHTSA's website.NASA's report is entitled Technical Support to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on the Reported Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) Unintended Acceleration (UA) Investigation, NESC Assessment No. TI-10-00618 (Jan. 18, 2011).NHTSA's report is entitled Technical Assessment of Toyota Electronic Throttle Control (ETC) Systems (Feb. 2011).Both reports should be read in conjunction with each other. As stated in its report, NASA did not find an electronic cause of large throttle openings that can result in unintended acceleration incidents. NHTSA did not find a vehicle-based cause of unintended acceleration incidents other than the physical pedal interference causes that are being addressed by Toyota's recalls. This RQ is closed.