NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Vehicle Speed Control complaints
24 reportsClear category filterMileage unknown · Jul 1, 2015
Vehicle Speed ControlCrash
PETITION FOR A DEFECT INVESTIGATION INTO LOW-SPEED SURGING IN DIFFERENT MODELS OF TOYOTA AUTOMOBILES IN WHICH THE CAR STARTS ACCELERATING AND THE ENGINE RPM INCREASES WHEN ACCELERATOR IS NOT DEPRESSED. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED ON FEBRUARY 13, 2015, HIS WIFE WAS DRIVING TO AN APPOINTMENT. SHE PULLED INTO THE PARKING LOT AND DID…
Read full complaint
PETITION FOR A DEFECT INVESTIGATION INTO LOW-SPEED SURGING IN DIFFERENT MODELS OF TOYOTA AUTOMOBILES IN WHICH THE CAR STARTS ACCELERATING AND THE ENGINE RPM INCREASES WHEN ACCELERATOR IS NOT DEPRESSED. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED ON FEBRUARY 13, 2015, HIS WIFE WAS DRIVING TO AN APPOINTMENT. SHE PULLED INTO THE PARKING LOT AND DID NOT HAVE HER FOOT ON THE BRAKE PEDAL AS SHE WAS COASTING INTO THE PARKING SPOT. THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED. BIG BUSHES IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE LIMITED THE SPEED, SO HIS WIFE TURNED OFF THE IGNITION AND THE VEHICLE FELL BACK. A WITNESS SAW THE ENTIRE EVEN AND ATTESTED TO THE FACT THE ENGINE SUDDENLY STARTED ROARING. THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE WAS SMASHED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED FROM THE SCENE AND SUBSEQUENTLY INSPECTED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURER. THE PETITIONER DISPUTES THE MANUFACTURER'S CONCLUSION THAT THE EDR READOUT DOWNLOADED AS PART OF THAT INSPECTION PROVIDED NO EVIDENCE THAT THE INCIDENT "WAS THE RESULT OF ANY TYPE OF MANUFACTURING OR DESIGN DEFECT." *JB UPDATED 07/27/15. *JB UPDATED 07/29/15. *JLQ
NHTSA ODI #10732103
71,000 miles · Nov 14, 2014
Vehicle Speed Control
I PUT THE CAR ON D TO DRIVE. I STOPPED AT A RED LIGHT, I BRAKE THE CAR TO STOP. WHEN THE LIGHT TURNED GREEN, I PRESSED ON THE GAS PEDAL TO DRIVE FORWARD, BUT THE CAR REVERSED WITHOUT ME PUTTING ON R. THE REVERSE GO WAS SLOW. WHEN IT REVERSED, I TRIED TO STOP THE CAR CAR BY PRESSING ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT I COULD NOT STOP THE CA…
Read full complaint
I PUT THE CAR ON D TO DRIVE. I STOPPED AT A RED LIGHT, I BRAKE THE CAR TO STOP. WHEN THE LIGHT TURNED GREEN, I PRESSED ON THE GAS PEDAL TO DRIVE FORWARD, BUT THE CAR REVERSED WITHOUT ME PUTTING ON R. THE REVERSE GO WAS SLOW. WHEN IT REVERSED, I TRIED TO STOP THE CAR CAR BY PRESSING ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, BUT I COULD NOT STOP THE CAR THAT WAY. I HAD TO TURN OFF THE CAR TO STOP THE REVERSE. THE CAR REVERSED LIKE THAT BOTH TIMES SPORADICALLY ON TWO CONSECUTIVE DAYS - ON 11.11.2014 AND ON THE MORNING OF 11.12.2014. MY CAR WAS UNDER WARRANTY. I BROUGHT IT TO THE SERVICE OF LEXUS AT LONGO ON THE EVENING OF 11.12.2014, WHICH IS WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS BOUGHT. THEY FOUND NO PROBLEM WITH THE CAR, CHARGE ME MONEY, AND GAVE THE CAR BACK TO ME THE NEXT DAY. I BELIEVE THAT THE CAR NEEDS MORE INVESTIGATION. I AM AFRAID OF THE SPORADIC REVERSAL OF THE CAR WHILE IT IS ON D. I AM FURTHER AFRAID THAT AT HIGH FREEWAY SPEED, THE PROBLEM IT COULD CAUSE IS EVEN MORE DANGEROUS. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10655131
54,900 miles · May 9, 2013
Air BagsStructureVehicle Speed ControlCrash
CAR WAS BEING DRIVEN INTO A PARKING SPOT AT LESS THAN 5 MPH WHEN IT SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND STARTED TO CLIMB A ROCK HILL BEFORE IT COULD BE STOPPED. WHEELS WERE TURNED TO RIGHT AS RESULT OF TURN INTO PARKING SPOT WHICH CAUSED THE VEHICLE TO START TIPPING OVER. AIR BAGS WERE NOT DEPLOYED AND REPAIRS ARE APPROXIMATELY $4500. *…
Read full complaint
CAR WAS BEING DRIVEN INTO A PARKING SPOT AT LESS THAN 5 MPH WHEN IT SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND STARTED TO CLIMB A ROCK HILL BEFORE IT COULD BE STOPPED. WHEELS WERE TURNED TO RIGHT AS RESULT OF TURN INTO PARKING SPOT WHICH CAUSED THE VEHICLE TO START TIPPING OVER. AIR BAGS WERE NOT DEPLOYED AND REPAIRS ARE APPROXIMATELY $4500. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10511287
39,960 miles · Aug 10, 2012
Power TrainVehicle Speed ControlCrash
ON MONDAY AUGUST 6TH, 2012 AT APPROXIMATELY 5: 25 AM, I ([XXX]) WAS ARRIVING AT WORK AT METHODIST HOSPITAL. I PULLED IN THE PARKING LOT AND STARTED TO MAKE A WIDE U TURN INTO A PARKING STALL DRIVING ABOUT 5 MILES PER HOUR. MY CAR SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND THE BRAKES WOULD NOT WORK AND I WAS UNABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. I KEPT TRY…
Read full complaint
ON MONDAY AUGUST 6TH, 2012 AT APPROXIMATELY 5: 25 AM, I ([XXX]) WAS ARRIVING AT WORK AT METHODIST HOSPITAL. I PULLED IN THE PARKING LOT AND STARTED TO MAKE A WIDE U TURN INTO A PARKING STALL DRIVING ABOUT 5 MILES PER HOUR. MY CAR SUDDENLY ACCELERATED AND THE BRAKES WOULD NOT WORK AND I WAS UNABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. I KEPT TRYING TO BRAKE TO NO AVAIL. I WENT THROUGH A FENCE AND DROVE OVER A STEEL POLE. JUST AS I WAS ABOUT TO HIT A VERY LARGE TREE, THE CAR FINALLY STOPPED. THE BRAKES FINALLY WORK ABOUT 3 TO 4 FEET IN FRONT OF THE TREE. I WAS ABLE TO DRIVE AROUND THE TREE AND PARK LIKE I DO EVERY DAY. AFTER PARKING, I GOT OUT OF THE VEHICLE, GOT MY PHONE FROM MY PURSE IN THE TRUNK AND CALLED MY HUSBAND AND TOLD HIM WHAT HAD JUST HAPPENED. I WAS VERY SHAKEN AND CRYING. THE CAR WAS WRECKED ON THE PASSENGER SIDE. [XXX] CALLED SECURITY & [XXX] CAME OVER. WE BOTH WENT BACK OUT WHERE THE ACCIDENT HAPPENED. I SHOWED HIM WHERE IT HAPPENED, WHAT HAPPENED AND WHERE I ENDED UP. [XXX] TOLD A FEW PHOTOS. WE HAVE CONTACTED LEXUS [XXX] #2 OPTION (JUDY)AND OUR ATTORNEY ([XXX]) [XXX]. WE HAVE TAKEN THE VEHICLE TO LEXUS OF OMAHA. LEXUS WANTS US TO SIGN A BLACK BOX RELEASE. OUR ATTORNEY SUGGEST WE TURN IN A CLAIM TO SEE IF FARMERS WISHES TO SEE THE BLACK BOX 1ST.. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR
NHTSA ODI #10470188
29,000 miles · Jun 13, 2012
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 LEXUS ES350. THE CONTACT WAS REVERSING FROM A RESIDENTIAL GARAGE. AS THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND THE CONTACT SHIFTED FROM REVERSE TO DRIVE, THE VEHICLE ABNORMALLY ACCELERATED. THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO A BRICK WALL AND SUSTAINED INJURIES TO THE LEFT LEG. THE CRASH CAUSED DAMAGED THE CONTACT'S HOME. THE…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 LEXUS ES350. THE CONTACT WAS REVERSING FROM A RESIDENTIAL GARAGE. AS THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED AND THE CONTACT SHIFTED FROM REVERSE TO DRIVE, THE VEHICLE ABNORMALLY ACCELERATED. THE CONTACT CRASHED INTO A BRICK WALL AND SUSTAINED INJURIES TO THE LEFT LEG. THE CRASH CAUSED DAMAGED THE CONTACT'S HOME. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND SENT AN INVESTIGATOR TO INSPECT THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A LOT BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY AND DEEMED DESTROYED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 29,000.
NHTSA ODI #10461440
15,807 miles · Feb 8, 2011
Service Brakes, HydraulicVehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury
WHEN I WAS GOING TO PARK MY CAR IN THE BOX IN FRONT OF THE HOTEL ROOM, I TOUCHED THE ACCELERATOR SLIGHTLY TO ADVANCE THE TWO METERS DISTANT TO BE PROPERLY PARKED, THEN THE ACCELERATOR RUN IN HIGH SPEED THE BRAKES DID NOT RESPOND. TO REDUCE THE IMPACT, I TURNED THE WHEEL TO THE RIGHT AND CRASHED INTO THE HOTEL WALL. PEOPLE FROM…
Read full complaint
WHEN I WAS GOING TO PARK MY CAR IN THE BOX IN FRONT OF THE HOTEL ROOM, I TOUCHED THE ACCELERATOR SLIGHTLY TO ADVANCE THE TWO METERS DISTANT TO BE PROPERLY PARKED, THEN THE ACCELERATOR RUN IN HIGH SPEED THE BRAKES DID NOT RESPOND. TO REDUCE THE IMPACT, I TURNED THE WHEEL TO THE RIGHT AND CRASHED INTO THE HOTEL WALL. PEOPLE FROM LEXUS IS MAKING AN INVESTIGATION. THE QUESTION IS HOW CONFIDENT IS THAT INVESTIGATION. THE CAR WAS CHECK THE DAY BEFORE FOR 15,000 MILES CHECK. I LIVE NOW IN DURANGO, MEXICO AND JUST CAME TO HAVE MY CAR CHECKED.
NHTSA ODI #10382019
Mileage unknown · Dec 23, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control
2009 LEXUS 350. CONSUMER WRITES REGARDING LEXUS RECALL FLOOR MAT INTERFERENCE WITH ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND CHANGE TO COMPUTER FOR ENGINE SHUT DOWN *TGW THE CONSUMER WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE RECALL MODIFICATIONS THAT WERE PERFORMED. THE CONSUMER ALSO STATED THE FLOOR MATS WERE NOT REPLACED AS HE WAS TOLD THEY WOULD BE. THE CON…
Read full complaint
2009 LEXUS 350. CONSUMER WRITES REGARDING LEXUS RECALL FLOOR MAT INTERFERENCE WITH ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND CHANGE TO COMPUTER FOR ENGINE SHUT DOWN *TGW THE CONSUMER WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE RECALL MODIFICATIONS THAT WERE PERFORMED. THE CONSUMER ALSO STATED THE FLOOR MATS WERE NOT REPLACED AS HE WAS TOLD THEY WOULD BE. THE CONSUMER STATED THE PEDAL WAS TOO SHORT AND HIS FOOT COULD SLIP OFF THE END AND BECOME LODGED UNDER THE PEDAL. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10372795
Mileage unknown · Oct 12, 2010
Vehicle Speed ControlCrashInjury
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A LEXUS ES 350. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DRIVER WAS TURNING INTO A PARKING SPACE WHEN THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED, JUMPED A CURB AND HIT A PARKED VEHICLE. THERE WAS A MINOR INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE ACCIDENT (SOMEONE IN ANOTHER VEHICLE). THE VEHICLE HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPAIRED ACCORDING TO RECALL 09…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A LEXUS ES 350. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DRIVER WAS TURNING INTO A PARKING SPACE WHEN THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED, JUMPED A CURB AND HIT A PARKED VEHICLE. THERE WAS A MINOR INJURY AS A RESULT OF THE ACCIDENT (SOMEONE IN ANOTHER VEHICLE). THE VEHICLE HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPAIRED ACCORDING TO RECALL 09V388000 (VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL: ACCELERATOR PEDAL). A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THE CONTACT FILED A COMPLAINT WITH THE MANUFACTURER WHO STATED THAT SOMEONE WOULD GET BACK WITH HIM. THE CONTACT WAS CURRENTLY AWAITING THE CALL BACK. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE UNKNOWN.
NHTSA ODI #10360054
7,939 miles · Jul 26, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control
ON JULY 22, 2010 I HAD BEEN TRAVELING FROM CAPE COD AND WAS ON I84 USING MY CRUISE CONTROL ON MY 2009 LEXUS ES, SET TO 64 MPH. I WOULD CANCEL IT BY PUSHING THE LEVER TOWARDS ME WHEN TRAFFIC GOT HEAVY AND PUSH "RESUME" WHEN I HAD AN OPEN ROAD. AFTER TRAVELING ABOUT 210 MI AND USING IT IN THE ABOVE MANNER IT WOULD NOT RESUME AS …
Read full complaint
ON JULY 22, 2010 I HAD BEEN TRAVELING FROM CAPE COD AND WAS ON I84 USING MY CRUISE CONTROL ON MY 2009 LEXUS ES, SET TO 64 MPH. I WOULD CANCEL IT BY PUSHING THE LEVER TOWARDS ME WHEN TRAFFIC GOT HEAVY AND PUSH "RESUME" WHEN I HAD AN OPEN ROAD. AFTER TRAVELING ABOUT 210 MI AND USING IT IN THE ABOVE MANNER IT WOULD NOT RESUME AS BEFORE. THE CAR WOULD SURGE AND ACCELERATE TO OVER 75 MPH. I HAD TO CANCEL THE CRUISE FOR IT TO STOP ACCELERATING BECAUSE IT WAS NOT STOPPING. I WAS NOT USING THE PEDALS AT ANY TIME. I TRIED IT TWICE. THE SAME THING HAPPENED. I THEN TURNED OFF THE CRUISE ENTIRELY AND DIDN'T USE IT AGAIN. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10345426
3,200 miles · Apr 7, 2010
Vehicle Speed Control
I AM REQUESTING THAT DOT NHTSA INVESTIGATE THE DRIVER'S CONTRIBUTION TO UNINTENDED ACCELERATION (UA) DUE TO PROGRAMMING CODE ERROR. I AM DRIVING AT 40 MPH. I SEE SIGNAL LIGHT TURNING RED. I TOOK MY FOOT OFF ACCELERATOR. THE CAR IS COASTING. WHEN SPEED REACHED 20 MPH, THE CAR SUDDENLY STARTED ACCELERATING. I STEPPED ON THE BRAKE.…
Read full complaint
I AM REQUESTING THAT DOT NHTSA INVESTIGATE THE DRIVER'S CONTRIBUTION TO UNINTENDED ACCELERATION (UA) DUE TO PROGRAMMING CODE ERROR. I AM DRIVING AT 40 MPH. I SEE SIGNAL LIGHT TURNING RED. I TOOK MY FOOT OFF ACCELERATOR. THE CAR IS COASTING. WHEN SPEED REACHED 20 MPH, THE CAR SUDDENLY STARTED ACCELERATING. I STEPPED ON THE BRAKE. CAR STARTED SLOWING DOWN. I REPORTED THIS TO LEXUS HEADQUARTER ON 03-01-10 (LEXUS INCIDENT.) I WAS ASKED TO DROP OFF MY CAR AT DEALER ON 03-30-2010 SO THAT FIELD TECHNICAL SPECIALIST CAN INVESTIGATE. I WAS ASKED TO PICK UP MY CAR ON 03-31-10. I REQUESTED COPY TECHNICIANS FINDINGS AND REPORT. AS PER TECHNICIAN'S REPORT, "WE WERE ABLE TO DUPLICATE HIS CONCERN. WHAT IS HAPPENING IS THAT AS THE VEHICLE SLOWS DOWN THE TORQUE CONVERTER LOCK UP IS TURNING OFF. THIS REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF ENGINE BRAKING AND GIVES THE FEELING THAT THE VEHICLE HAS SPED UP. WE COMPARED THIS TO ANOTHER ES350 AND IT HAS THE SAME CHARACTERISTICS. NO REPAIRS MADE, VEHICLE IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED." I WROTE LEXUS HEAD-QUARTER AGAIN SAYING, "THIS IS NOT A FEELING I EXPERIENCED. IT IS A REAL ISSUE. I NOTICED SPEEDOMETER READING RISING." I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM LEXUS HEADQUARTER INDICATING THERE IS NOTHING MORE THEY CAN DO. I ASKED, "CAN YOUR TECHNICIAN REPEAT THE TEST WITH ME IN THE CAR WITH HIM?". THEY SAID, "IT IS NOT NECESSARY". SINCE MY FOOT WAS NOT ON ACCELERATOR OR BRAKE WHEN CAR STARTED ACCELERATING, I SUSPECT PROGRAMMING CODE ERROR. MY CAR WAS ALREADY REPAIRED DURING SAFETY RECALL BY LEXUS SOME TWO MONTHS AGO. SO, THIS IS NOT A STUCK ACCELERATOR ISSUE. I REQUEST YOUR ASSISTANCE IN HAVING LEXUS REPEAT THIS TEST WITH ME INSIDE THE CAR TO WITNESS THEIR TEST. THEY HAVE REFUSED TO DO THIS. CAR WAS PURCHASED BRAND NEW FROM STERLING MCCALL LEXUS, HOUSTON IN DECEMBER 08. IT IS LEXUS 2009, ES 350. CAR IS BARELY USED SINCE WE BOUGHT IT 16 MONTHS AGO. IT HAS 3,300 MILES ON IT. ALL ROUTINE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE WAS PERFORMED BY DEALER. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10324380
Official recalls
5Oct 17, 2019
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2010-2016 4Runner, 2003-2006 Tundra, 2003-2013 Corolla, 2009-2010 Corolla Matrix, 2004-2005 RAV4, 2002-2007 Sequoia, 2011-2013 Sienna, 2008-2012 Scion xB, 2008-2009 Lexus IS-F, 2007-2012 Yaris and Lexus ES350, 2010-2017 Lexus GX460, 2002-2010 Lexus SC430, 2006-2012 Lexus IS250 and IS350 and 2010-2015 Lexus IS250C and IS350C vehicles. These vehicles had their driver or passenger frontal air bag inflators previously replaced under a prior recall using inflators of the same design. The inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Toyota will notify owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front driver inflator, front passenger airbag inflator, the airbag assembly, or the front passenger airbag sub-assembly and inflator. The recall began November 20, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371 or Lexus customer service at 1-800-255-3987. Toyota's numbers for this recall are J0A, J0B, and J0C. Lexus' numbers for this recall are JLI, JLJ, and JLK.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2010-2016 4Runner, 2003-2006 Tundra, 2003-2013 Corolla, 2009-2010 Corolla Matrix, 2004-2005 RAV4, 2002-2007 Sequoia, 2011-2013 Sienna, 2008-2012 Scion xB, 2008-2009 Lexus IS-F, 2007-2012 Yaris and Lexus ES350, 2010-2017 Lexus GX460, 2002-2010 Lexus SC430, 2006-2012 Lexus IS250 and IS350 and 2010-2015 Lexus IS250C and IS350C vehicles. These vehicles had their driver or passenger frontal air bag inflators previously replaced under a prior recall using inflators of the same design. The inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.
Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Toyota will notify owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front driver inflator, front passenger airbag inflator, the airbag assembly, or the front passenger airbag sub-assembly and inflator. The recall began November 20, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371 or Lexus customer service at 1-800-255-3987. Toyota's numbers for this recall are J0A, J0B, and J0C. Lexus' numbers for this recall are JLI, JLJ, and JLK.
Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2010-2016 4Runner, 2003-2006 Tundra, 2003-2013 Corolla, 2009-2010 Corolla Matrix, 2004-2005 RAV4, 2002-2007 Sequoia, 2011-2013 Sienna, 2008-2012 Scion xB, 2008-2009 Lexus IS-F, 2007-2012 Yaris and Lexus ES350, 2010-2017 Lexus GX460, 2002-2010 Lexus SC430, 2006-2012 Lexus IS250 and IS350 and 2010-2015 Lexus IS250C and IS350C vehicles. These vehicles had their driver or passenger frontal air bag inflators previously replaced under a prior recall using inflators of the same design. The inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to high absolute humidity, temperature and temperature cycling.
Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Toyota will notify owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front driver inflator, front passenger airbag inflator, the airbag assembly, or the front passenger airbag sub-assembly and inflator. The recall began November 20, 2019. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-888-270-9371 or Lexus customer service at 1-800-255-3987. Toyota's numbers for this recall are J0A, J0B, and J0C. Lexus' numbers for this recall are JLI, JLJ, and JLK.
Jan 9, 2018
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2013 Scion xB, Toyota Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Sienna, 4Runner, Lexus IS250, IS350, IS250C, IS350C, IS-F, and GX460 vehicles sold, ever registered, in the states of AL, CA, FL, GA, HI, LA, MS, SC, TX, PR, AS, GU, the MP (Saipan), and the U.S. VI or "Zone A." Toyota is also recalling certain 2010 Scion xB, Toyota Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Yaris, 4Runner, Lexus IS250, IS350, IS250C, IS350C, ES350, IS-F, GX460, and Pontiac Vibe vehicles sold, ever registered, in the states of AZ, AR, DE, DC, IL, IN, KS, KY, MD, MO, NE, NV, NJ, NM, NC, OH, OK, PA, TN, VA, and WV or "Zone B." Toyota is also recalling certain 2009 Scion xB, Toyota Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Yaris, Lexus IS250, IS350, ES350, IS-F, and Pontiac Vibe vehicles ever registered in the states of AK, CO, CT, ID, IA, ME, MA, MI, MN, MT, NH, NY, ND, OR, RI, SD, UT, VT, WA, WI, and WY or "Zone C." These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger frontal air bag, these inflators may explode due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator explosion may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota, Scion and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the vehicle model, dealers will replace the front passenger air bag inflator, or replace the air bag assembly. The recall began on January 29, 2018. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331, or Pontiac customer service at 1-800-762-2737. Toyota's numbers for this recall are "Zone A" Toyota: G0P, Lexus: GLG; "Zone B" Toyota: G0R, Lexus GLH; "Zone C" Toyota: H0A, and Lexus: HLA.
Jan 9, 2017
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2012 Toyota 4Runner, Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Sienna, Yaris, Scion xB, Lexus ES350, GX460, IS-F, IS250, IS350, IS250C, IS350C, and Lexus LFA vehicles originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain 2009 Toyota Corolla, Corolla Matrix, Yaris, Yaris HB, Scion xB, Pontiac Vibe, Lexus, ES350, IS250, IS350, and IS-F vehicles originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" or "Zone B" above, Toyota is recalling certain 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and IS350, 2007-2008 Lexus ES350, Toyota Yaris, Yaris HB, and 2008 Lexus IS-F and Scion xB vehicles originally sold, or ever registered in Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger frontal air bag, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota, Scion and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on February 1, 2017. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331, or Pontiac customer service at 1-800-762-2737. Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), H0A (Toyota Zone C), GLG (Lexus Zone A), GLH (Lexus Zone B) and HLA (Lexus Zone C).
May 23, 2016
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2008-2011 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2009-2011 Toyota Corolla and Corolla Matrix, 2006-2011 Toyota Yaris, Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350, 2010-2011 Toyota 4Runner, Lexus IS250C, Lexus IS350C and Lexus GX460, 2011 Sienna, 2007-2011 Lexus ES350, and 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibe vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or "Zone A." Additionally, unless included in "Zone A" above, Toyota is recalling certain model year 2008 Scion xB and Lexus IS F, 2007-2008 Toyota Yaris, 2006-2008 Lexus IS250 and Lexus IS350 and 2007-2008 Lexus ES350 vehicles, originally sold, or ever registered, in Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, or "Zone B." Vehicles of these model years and models that were not originally sold or ever registered in either Zones A or B are not subject to this safety recall. These vehicles are equipped with certain air bag inflators assembled as part of the passenger frontal air bag modules, and used as original equipment or replacement equipment. In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the front air bags, these inflators may rupture due to propellant degradation occurring after long-term exposure to absolute humidity and temperature cycling.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in metal fragments striking the vehicle occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Toyota will notify the Toyota and Lexus owners. General Motors will contact the Pontiac owners. Depending on the model, dealers will replace the passenger frontal air bag inflator or the air bag assembly, free of charge. The recall began on December 6, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for interim notification for this campaign are G1P (Toyota Zone A), G1R (Toyota Zone B), G2G (Lexus Zone A), and G2H (Lexus Zone B). Toyota's numbers for final remedy for this campaign are G0P (Toyota Zone A), G0R (Toyota Zone B), GLG (Lexus Zone A), and GLH (Lexus Zone B).
Oct 5, 2009
TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2004-2010 PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL CAN GET STUCK IN THE WIDE OPEN POSITION DUE TO ITS BEING TRAPPED BY AN UNSECURED OR INCOMPATIBLE DRIVER'S FLOOR MAT.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A STUCK OPEN ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY RESULT IN VERY HIGH VEHICLE SPEEDS AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE, WHICH COULD CAUSE A CRASH, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.
Remedy: TOYOTA FILED AN AMENDED DEFECT REPORT ON NOVEMBER 25, 2009, STATING THAT DEALERS WILL MODIFY THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL AND, ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, ALTER THE SHAPE OF THE FLOOR SURFACE UNDER THE PEDAL. THESE CHANGES ADDRESS THE RISK OF PEDAL ENTRAPMENT DUE TO INTERFERENCE WITH THE FLOOR MAT. REDESIGNED ACCELERATOR PEDALS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE BEGINNING IN APRIL 2010 AND DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY MODIFIED PEDAL WITH THE NEW PEDAL IF DESIRED. ALSO, DEALERS WILL REPLACE ANY GENUINE TOYOTA OR LEXUS ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS WITH REDESIGNED ALL-WEATHER MATS, OR REPURCHASE THE PREVIOUS MATS FROM OWNERS WHO DO NOT WANT THE NEW ONES. ADDITIONALLY, SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS WILL BE INSTALLED ON CAMRY, AVALON AND LEXUS ES 350, IS 350 AND IS 250 MODELS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE BRAKE OVERRIDES THE ACCELERATOR IN THE EVENT BOTH BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PEDALS ARE APPLIED. TOYOTA WILL BEGIN MAILING LETTERS TO OWNERS ON DECEMBER 31, 2009. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331, LEXUS AT 1-800-255-3987.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture
Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied
Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
DP15005 · Low-speed Surging
Opened Jul 9, 2015 · Closed Aug 19, 2015
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control
The Agency received a petition on June 19, 2015, requesting an investigation into low-speed surging in different models of Toyota automobiles in which the car starts accelerating and the engine RPM increases even when the accelerator pedal is not depressed.The petition is based upon the petitioner's interpretation of pre-crash Event Data Recorder (EDR) data from a crash his wife experienced in a model year (MY) 2009 Lexus ES350 vehicle and from two other crashes involving a MY 2010 Toyota Corolla and a MY 2009 Toyota Camry.The petitioner's allegations regarding the three crashes are based upon several misconceptions about the manner in which the EDR samples and records pre-crash data in the ES350, Corolla and Camry vehicles.In each of the three crashes, the vehicles accelerated as the drivers were attempting to park the vehicles.All three accelerations occurred as the vehicles were entering the intended parking spaces and in the times and positions where driver braking should be initiated to safely park the vehicles.No braking was recorded in two of the crash events until the EDR trigger point (t = 0 seconds) and in the third crash no braking was recorded at all.The crashes are all consistent with pedal misapplications by the driver mistaking the accelerator pedal for the brake when attempting to park the vehicle.In addition, contrary to the petitioner's assertion regarding previous studies by NHTSA and NASA, the issues raised in the petition are fully within the scope of prior studies which have carefully examined the subject of low-speed sudden acceleration in Toyota vehicles equipped with electronic throttle control.Taking into account the allocation of agency resources, agency priorities, and the likelihood that an additional investigation would not result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists, NHTSA has concluded that further investigation of the issues raised by the petition is not warranted. The agency accordingly has denied the petition.The official petition denial, as published in the Federal Register, is available in the document file for this defect petition, as well as copies of reference material related to the denial.