← New search

2012 Lexus Ct

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Lexus Ct do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 20.5.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Ct years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

22 reports with mileage · 21 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Engine. Review the 15 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 11 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Air Bags. Review the 4 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

3 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Fuel/propulsion System complaints

2 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Apr 17, 2022
EngineFuel/propulsion System

First noticed excessive oil usage. Then, engine rumble. Temperature warning light. Took to repair shop who was unable to repair stating ONLY Lexus has tools required to repair. Lexus will not divulge how to repair. Lexus states a letter was mailed to me (never received) in 2016 for a service issue - warranty enhancement. Th…

Read full complaint

First noticed excessive oil usage. Then, engine rumble. Temperature warning light. Took to repair shop who was unable to repair stating ONLY Lexus has tools required to repair. Lexus will not divulge how to repair. Lexus states a letter was mailed to me (never received) in 2016 for a service issue - warranty enhancement. Thus, they are aware of the issue. Now that I’m having issues with the car (2021), the car is too old and has too many miles, thus, Lexus will not repair free of charge under service issue. I am Scared to drive because of hundreds of on line reports that state car can and make completely stop while driving. Toyota is fully aware of the issue and should be help liable to repair under a recall. Note: I’ve had my car repaired for other issues by Certified Lexus since 2016 and the service centers never mentioned the issue/warranty enhancement - a known issue apparently since 2016.

NHTSA ODI #11461065

40,000 miles · May 17, 2017
Fuel/propulsion System

DRIVING UPHILL ON A DIRT ROAD @ ~ 20MPH. GAS ENGINE RUNNING AT THE TIME. FAIRLY STEEP GRADE. ~6% GRADE UPHILL. CAR STARTED TO ACCELERATE AT A RATE I WOULD COMPARE TO MERGING ONTO A HIGHWAY. WAS UNSURE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON AT FIRST SO I DIDN'T ACTUALLY HIT THE BRAKES FOR ABOUT 5 SECONDS AT WHICH POINT I WAS ALREADY AT 45MPH. TH…

Read full complaint

DRIVING UPHILL ON A DIRT ROAD @ ~ 20MPH. GAS ENGINE RUNNING AT THE TIME. FAIRLY STEEP GRADE. ~6% GRADE UPHILL. CAR STARTED TO ACCELERATE AT A RATE I WOULD COMPARE TO MERGING ONTO A HIGHWAY. WAS UNSURE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON AT FIRST SO I DIDN'T ACTUALLY HIT THE BRAKES FOR ABOUT 5 SECONDS AT WHICH POINT I WAS ALREADY AT 45MPH. THE FOUR PASSENGERS IN MY CAR WERE VERY CONFUSED. WE CHECKED THE FLOOR MAT FOR ANY OBSTRUCTIONS AND THAT IT WAS OPERATING CORRECTLY AND IT WAS. I SHUT THE CAR OFF, WAITED A MONTH NITE THEN TURNED IT BACK ON. IMMEDIATELY AS I LET OFF THE BRAKE THE CAR ACCELERATED UP THE HILL. THIS TIME I ONLY ALLOWED IT TO GET UP TO 15MPH BEFORE STOPPING THE VEHICLE. THE BRAKE WAS ACTING AGAINST THE ENGINE PROPELLING THE CAR. BRAKE APPLICATION DID NOT DISENGAGE THE ENGINE FROM TRYING TO MOVE THE CAR FORWARD. I EVEN PUT MY TOES UNDER THE PEDAL TO TRY AND LIFT THE ACCELERATOR MAKING SURE IT WASN'T MECHANICAL ERROR. ZERO MOVEMENT, THE PEDAL WAS IN PLACE. AFTER HAVING LEXUS "ANALYZE" MY VEHICLE THEY CALL ME BACK AND TELL ME "WE CAN'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH IT" AND THAT ALSO THEY DID NOT UPDATE ANY COMPUTERS OR RESET ANYTHING OR SWAP OUT MY BATTERY. THEY EXPECTED ME TO COME PICK UP MY CAR WITHIN THE WEEK OR THEY SAID THEY WOULD REPORT THEIR LOANER CAR STOLEN AND I WOULD BE CHARGED FOR IT. MY ONLY OPTION GIVEN WAS TO GET BACK INTO MY VEHICLE. MY SUSPICION IS MY BATTER ALLOWED ITSELF TO OVERCHARGE WHILE DRIVING DOWN LONG STRETCHES OF MOUNTAIN ROADS AND THEN WAS NOT BEING DRAINED ON THE STRENUOUS UPHILL SECTIONS. THIS OVERCHARGE APPEARED IN THE FORM OF ULTRA ENGINE ASSIST WHICH I EXPERIENCED WITHIN 1 MILE OF STARTING MY CAR AFTER A 4 HOUR HIKE.

NHTSA ODI #10986208

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

DP22005 · Pedestrian Alert Sounds

Opened Jan 27, 2023 · Closed Aug 7, 2023

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System:propulsion System

NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after March 1, 2021.On January 27, 2023, NHTSA opened Defect Petition (DP) 22-005 to evaluate the subject matter described in the petition. On June 24, 2023 and as supplemented on June 25, 2023, the petitioner notified NHTSA he was withdrawing his petition. The petitioner indicated that, based on his review of data, there is no justification for asserting potential benefits that could be derived from actions sought by my petition. Based on the petitioner's withdrawal, DP22-005 is closed. Closure of this DP does not represent a determination by NHTSA regarding the subject matter of the petition.