1988 Jeep Laredo

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

3Owner complaints

Model-year median: 23

0Recall campaigns

View recall details →

0Investigations

View investigation details →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year

Compare all Laredo years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

Electrical System

1 Exterior Lighting

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 0 of 3 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

Electrical System. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Exterior Lighting. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
Seat Belts. Review the 1 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

0 crash reports1 fire reports0 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

1 reports

Clear category filter

Mileage unknown · Nov 29, 2002

Exterior Lighting

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AND WITHOUT WARNING THE TAILLIGHT DID NOT WORK AND COULD HAVE CAUSED A DISTRACTION TO THE OTHER DRIVER'S. THE DEALER WAS NOTIFIED. PH WHEN THE CONSUMER HAD TAKEN THE VEHICLE IN FOR REPAIRS IN ORDER TO PASS INSPECTION, IT BROUGHT ABOUT NEW VIOLATION(S). THE CONSUMER NOTICED THAT THE DRIV…

Read full complaint

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AND WITHOUT WARNING THE TAILLIGHT DID NOT WORK AND COULD HAVE CAUSED A DISTRACTION TO THE OTHER DRIVER'S. THE DEALER WAS NOTIFIED. PH WHEN THE CONSUMER HAD TAKEN THE VEHICLE IN FOR REPAIRS IN ORDER TO PASS INSPECTION, IT BROUGHT ABOUT NEW VIOLATION(S). THE CONSUMER NOTICED THAT THE DRIVER SIDE SEAT BELT WAS DAMAGED AFTER RECEIVING REPAIRS, WHICH WASN'T DAMAGED PRIOR TO. SCC

NHTSA ODI #8023449

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.