← New search

2010 Hyundai Genesis

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2010 Hyundai Genesis do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 109.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

77 reports with mileage · 11 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes. Review the 25 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 14 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 13 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

4 crash reports0 fire reports2 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

25 reports
Clear category filter
54,000 miles · Jun 30, 2015
Service Brakes

I HAD TWO PRIOR INCIDENTS WHERE PARTIAL TO COMPLETE BRAKING FAILURE OCCURRED PREVIOUSLY, BUT THE ISSUE WAS ONLY TEMPORARY (A SINGLE STOP). THIS INCIDENT PERSISTED FOR DURATION OF MY DRIVE, PROMPTING RESEARCH INTO THE ISSUE (AND DISCOVERY OF THE KNOWN ABS HECU CORROSION ISSUE. I WAS ATTEMPTING TO SLOW AND MAKE A TURN ONTO A SI…

Read full complaint

I HAD TWO PRIOR INCIDENTS WHERE PARTIAL TO COMPLETE BRAKING FAILURE OCCURRED PREVIOUSLY, BUT THE ISSUE WAS ONLY TEMPORARY (A SINGLE STOP). THIS INCIDENT PERSISTED FOR DURATION OF MY DRIVE, PROMPTING RESEARCH INTO THE ISSUE (AND DISCOVERY OF THE KNOWN ABS HECU CORROSION ISSUE. I WAS ATTEMPTING TO SLOW AND MAKE A TURN ONTO A SIDESTREET ON THE WAY TO WORK, WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WITH MINIMAL RESISTANCE (AND LIMITED BRAKING EFFECTIVENESS). THIS PROMPTED A PANICKED PUMPING OF THE BRAKES TO EVENTUALLY STOP THE VEHICLE 5-10FT SHY OF THE REAR BUMPER OF ANOTHER CAR. AFTER CAREFULLY TESTING TO ENSURE I HAD SOME BRAKING EFFECTIVENESS, I FINISHED THE SHORT DISTANCE TO MY OFFICE, NOTING THAT THE PEDAL REMAINED VERY SOFT, GOING TO THE FLOOR WITH EASE, AND HAVING LIMITED SUCCESS IN STOPPING THE VEHICLE. I SHUDDER TO THINK WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED HAD THIS ISSUE PRESENTED ITSELF AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. I HAVE ALREADY CONTACTED HYUNDAI CORPORATE AND DROPPED MY VEHICLE OFF WITH A DEALERSHIP FOR RECALL REPAIR. I AM HOPING THIS INCIDENT, COUPLED WITH MY MANUFACTURE DATE (PRIOR TO JUNE 1, 2010 CUTOFF DATE) WILL JUSTIFY A FULL ABS HECU REPLACEMENT UNDER RECALL.

NHTSA ODI #10731324

41,000 miles · May 15, 2015
Service Brakes

DRIVING ABOUT 10 MPH ON TIGHT CURVY COUNTRY ROAD, BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR. PUMPING THE PEDAL GOT THE CAR TO STOP. DEALER SAID THE BRAKE FORCE DISTRIBUTION MODULE FAILED, ALLOWING BRAKE FLUID TO SIMPLY BYPASS BEING SENT TO THE BRAKES. THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS FAILURE MODE; IT SHOULD FAIL BY ELIMINATING ABS BUT STILL GIVING…

Read full complaint

DRIVING ABOUT 10 MPH ON TIGHT CURVY COUNTRY ROAD, BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR. PUMPING THE PEDAL GOT THE CAR TO STOP. DEALER SAID THE BRAKE FORCE DISTRIBUTION MODULE FAILED, ALLOWING BRAKE FLUID TO SIMPLY BYPASS BEING SENT TO THE BRAKES. THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS FAILURE MODE; IT SHOULD FAIL BY ELIMINATING ABS BUT STILL GIVING FULL BRAKE FORCE. THERE WAS NO INDICATION ON DASH LIGHTS THAT ANYTHING HAD FAILED.

NHTSA ODI #10716787

59,000 miles · Feb 1, 2015
Exterior LightingService BrakesVehicle Speed Control

1) ALMOST HIT FROM ONCOMING TRAFFIC AT A STOP LIGHT, WHEN I WAS ATTEMPTING TO MAKE A LEFT HAND TURN. THE SIGNAL TURNED YELLOW SO I TRIED TO TURN LEFT BEFORE I REALIZED THE ONCOMING CAR WAS GOING TO RUN THE LIGHT. I TOOK MY FOOT OFF THE BRAKE AND HIT THE GAS TO MAKE A QUICK TURN TO AVOID THE ONCOMING CAR. THE CAR STALLED FOR A S…

Read full complaint

1) ALMOST HIT FROM ONCOMING TRAFFIC AT A STOP LIGHT, WHEN I WAS ATTEMPTING TO MAKE A LEFT HAND TURN. THE SIGNAL TURNED YELLOW SO I TRIED TO TURN LEFT BEFORE I REALIZED THE ONCOMING CAR WAS GOING TO RUN THE LIGHT. I TOOK MY FOOT OFF THE BRAKE AND HIT THE GAS TO MAKE A QUICK TURN TO AVOID THE ONCOMING CAR. THE CAR STALLED FOR A SECOND AS I PRESSED THE GAS INTO THE TURN, THEN KICKED INTO FULL POWER, SCREECHING THE TIRES. I THOUGHT THIS WAS A FLUKE BUT HIS SAME PROBLEM OF "STALLING" FOR A FEW SECONDS WHEN DEPRESSING THE BRAKE AND HITTING THE GAS AT TAKEOFF KEEPS HAPPENING INTERMITTENTLY. THIS IS A DANGEROUS ISSUE. WHEN NEEDING TO ACCELERATE QUICKLY FROM A STOP, THIS CAR HAS A SECONDS GAP FROM HITTING THE GAS TO THE CAR MOVING. I'VE ALMOST BEEN HIT TWICE BECAUSE OF IT. 2) THE HEADLIGHTS SWITCH OFF INTERMITTENTLY WHEN USING THE TURN SIGNALS TO CHANGE LANES OR TURN. THEY FLASH ONCOMING DRIVERS AS I CLICK DOWN TO TURN THEM ON BEFORE THE TURN, OR WHEN THE TURN SIGNAL CLICKS BACK AFTER THE TURN. THIS PROBLEM HAPPENS ALMOST EVERY TIME I DRIVE THE VEHICLE WITH THE HEADLIGHTS ON. THE LIGHTS HAVE SHUT OFF COMPLETELY FOR ABOUT 5 SECONDS WHILE I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE FREEWAY, IMPAIRING MY ABILITY TO SEE AT NIGHT. I HAD TO IMMEDIATELY PULL OVER ON THE FREEWAY IN AN UNSAFE LOCATION TO TURN THE LIGHTS OFF, THEN TURN THEM BACK ON TO CLEAR THE PROBLEM. 3) MY VEHICLE HAD THE BRAKE SWITCH REPLACED FROM THE 2013 RECALL. HOWEVER, PRESSING THE BRAKE STILL DOES NOT SHUT OFF THE CRUISE CONTROL WHEN DRIVING DOWN THE FREEWAY. I HAVE TO MANUALLY TURN IT OFF FROM THE BUTTON ON THE STEERING WHEEL. I LOVE THIS CAR, BUT I'M AFRAID TO DRIVE MY CHILDREN IN IT IF THESE PROBLEMS ARE NOT ADDRESSED. THIS VEHICLE IS UNSAFE AND IT IS GOING TO KILL OR SERIOUSLY INJURE PEOPLE. PLEASE INVESTIGATE THESE MECHANICAL PROBLEMS AND ISSUE THE APPROPRIATE RECALLS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10680412

67,100 miles · Jan 7, 2015
Service Brakes

WHEN I PRESSED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, IT FELT MUSHY. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM THE FIRM BRAKING THE VEHICLE BRAKES HAD EXHIBITED JUST A FEW MINUTES PREVIOUSLY. I COULD FEEL THE BRAKES TRYING TO ENGAGE AT THE PROPER BRAKE PEDAL PLACEMENT BUT THEN I HAD TO CONTINUE PRESSING THE PEDAL BECAUSE THE BRAKES WERE NOT ENGAGING. ONLY AFTE…

Read full complaint

WHEN I PRESSED ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, IT FELT MUSHY. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM THE FIRM BRAKING THE VEHICLE BRAKES HAD EXHIBITED JUST A FEW MINUTES PREVIOUSLY. I COULD FEEL THE BRAKES TRYING TO ENGAGE AT THE PROPER BRAKE PEDAL PLACEMENT BUT THEN I HAD TO CONTINUE PRESSING THE PEDAL BECAUSE THE BRAKES WERE NOT ENGAGING. ONLY AFTER I CONTINUED TO APPLY PRESSURE TO THE BRAKE PEDAL TOWARD THE END OF THE PEDALS RANGE OF MOTION DID I FINALLY FEEL THE BRAKES BEGIN TO SLOW THE CAR. AFTER THIS FIRST OCCURRENCE, SINCE I WAS OVER 300 MILES FROM HOME, I HAD TO ANTICIPATE ANY BRAKING I NEEDED TO DO. I FOUND THAT EACH TIME I NEEDED TO BRAKE, IF I PUMPED THE BRAKES AFTER THE FIRST INITIAL PRESSING OF THE BRAKE PEDAL, I COULD GET THE BRAKE PEDAL TO BUILD UP PRESSURE SO I WOULD HAVE CLOSE TO THE SAME BRAKING 'FEEL' THAT I HAD BEFORE THIS PROBLEM BEGAN. I RETURNED HOME ON SATURDAY. I DID NOT DRIVE THE CAR ON SUNDAY. ON MONDAY, I TOOK THE GENESIS TO THE HYUNDAI DEALERSHIP. AFTER ALMOST TWO HOURS, THEY SAID THEY HAD IDENTIFIED THE PROBLEM AS THE MASTER CYLINDER. I HAD THE MASTER CYLINDER REPLACED ON TUESDAY. THERE WAS ALMOST NO CHANGE IN THE MUSHINESS OF THE BRAKE PEDAL. AFTER SEARCHING THE INTERNET FOR POSSIBLE CAUSES I DISCOVERED HYUNDAI HAS HAD CONSIDERABLE COMPLAINTS ABOUT FADING AND MUSHY BRAKES ON THEIR GENESIS LINE OF VEHICLES. IT SEEMS IT ALL STEMS FROM THE HYDRAULIC ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT MODULE. SO, WITH HYUNDAI KNOWING THIS, WHY DID THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF THE ABILENE, TX DEALERSHIP RECOMMEND A MASTER CYLINDER REPLACEMENT WHEN, IN MY ESTIMATION, THE FIRST CULPRIT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE ABS MODULE? I DISCOVERED THIS PERSISTENT ISSUE WITH THE GENESIS VEHICLE ON WEDNESDAY, I HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE ABILENE TX HYUNDAI DEALERSHIP ON THURSDAY. I'LL SEE HOW THEY RESPOND. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10670819

81,000 miles · Oct 20, 2014
Service Brakes

WHEN DRIVING THE VEHICLE, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR AND MY BRAKES WENT TOTALLY OUT. IT IS A MIRACLE THERE WASN'T A CRASH WITH SOMEONE KILLED. THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THIS SAME ISSUE AND MY RECALL WAS DONE LAST DECEMBER BUT OBVIOUSLY THE DAMAGE WAS ALREADY DONE AND IT DID NOT FIX MY CAR. I CALLED THAT DEALERSHI…

Read full complaint

WHEN DRIVING THE VEHICLE, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR AND MY BRAKES WENT TOTALLY OUT. IT IS A MIRACLE THERE WASN'T A CRASH WITH SOMEONE KILLED. THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THIS SAME ISSUE AND MY RECALL WAS DONE LAST DECEMBER BUT OBVIOUSLY THE DAMAGE WAS ALREADY DONE AND IT DID NOT FIX MY CAR. I CALLED THAT DEALERSHIP BACK TODAY AND THEY ADVISED ME THAT BECAUSE THE RECALL HAD BEEN DONE AND MY CAR IS OUT OF WARRANTY, THAT EVERYTHING WILL BE AT MY EXPENSE TO REPAIR. I WILL ALSO HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE IT TOWED TO BE REPAIRED. HYUNDAI SHOULD BE PAYING FOR THE TOWING, REPAIR, AND LOANER VEHICLE AS THIS WAS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE THAT THEY HAVE FAILED TO TAKE CARE OF. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10648728

55,000 miles · Sep 16, 2014
Electrical SystemExterior LightingService Brakes

TOOK MY 2010 GENESIS IN FOR SERVICE...BRAKE STOP LIGHTS WERE NOT WORKING. REPLACED DEFECTIVE SWITCH. TOOK MY SAME CAR IN FOR STATE INSPECTION ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2014, BRAKE LIGHTS NOT WORKING AGAIN. REPLACED DEFECTIVE SWITCH MYSELF BECAUSE OF 2 HOUR DRIVE TO DEALER AND THE SAFETY ISSUE INVOLVED WITH DRIVING VEHICLE. SOMETHING …

Read full complaint

TOOK MY 2010 GENESIS IN FOR SERVICE...BRAKE STOP LIGHTS WERE NOT WORKING. REPLACED DEFECTIVE SWITCH. TOOK MY SAME CAR IN FOR STATE INSPECTION ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2014, BRAKE LIGHTS NOT WORKING AGAIN. REPLACED DEFECTIVE SWITCH MYSELF BECAUSE OF 2 HOUR DRIVE TO DEALER AND THE SAFETY ISSUE INVOLVED WITH DRIVING VEHICLE. SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE! THESE SWITCHES SHOULD NOT FAIL THIS OFTEN.... THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE. WE DON'T KNOW HOW LONG THIS SWITCH WAS NOT WORKING SINCE THERE IS NO WAY TO TELL WHEN YOU ARE DRIVING THE VEHICLE... THANKS! [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ODI #10633727

19,000 miles · Sep 7, 2014
Service Brakes

BRAKES FAILED - SO MASTER CYLINDER WAS REPLACED BY DEALER BUT BRAKES ARE STILL A BIT SPONGY. ABS IS NOT WORKING QUITE RIGHT. BRAKE FLUID HAD ALREADY BEEN REPLACED 6 MONTHS EARLIER UNDER RECALL, BUT BRAKE CONTROL UNIT WAS NOT REPLACED. I AM CONCERNED THAT CONTROL UNIT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPLACED AND BY OTHER REPORTS IT SEEMS HYUND…

Read full complaint

BRAKES FAILED - SO MASTER CYLINDER WAS REPLACED BY DEALER BUT BRAKES ARE STILL A BIT SPONGY. ABS IS NOT WORKING QUITE RIGHT. BRAKE FLUID HAD ALREADY BEEN REPLACED 6 MONTHS EARLIER UNDER RECALL, BUT BRAKE CONTROL UNIT WAS NOT REPLACED. I AM CONCERNED THAT CONTROL UNIT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPLACED AND BY OTHER REPORTS IT SEEMS HYUNDAI IS VERY RELUCTANT TO PAY FOR THAT. CAR IS STILL UNDER WARRANTY. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10631390

65,311 miles · Aug 17, 2014
Service Brakes

ON 7/1/2014 I WAS DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH WHEN I PUT MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE OF MY 2010 HYUNDAI GENESIS AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR OF THE CAR AND THE CAR DID NOT STOP. THE NEXT DAY I PHONED HYUNDAI ABOUT THE INCIDENT AND ASKED IF I COULD BRING THE CAR IN FOR A BRAKE INSPECTION. I WAS TOLD DO TO 4TH OF…

Read full complaint

ON 7/1/2014 I WAS DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH WHEN I PUT MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE OF MY 2010 HYUNDAI GENESIS AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR OF THE CAR AND THE CAR DID NOT STOP. THE NEXT DAY I PHONED HYUNDAI ABOUT THE INCIDENT AND ASKED IF I COULD BRING THE CAR IN FOR A BRAKE INSPECTION. I WAS TOLD DO TO 4TH OF JULY HOLIDAY THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THE CAR. SINCE THEY WOULD NOT MAKE THIS A PRIORITY I TOOK THE CAR TO MY LOCAL MECHANIC FOR INSPECTION ON 7/3/14. THE LOCAL MECHANIC WAS NOT ABLE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE. LATER THAT DAY THE CAR HAD BEGUN STOPPING AS NEEDED WITH NO CAUSE IDENTIFIED SO I WENT BACK TO NORMAL DRIVING BUT MAINTAINED FEELING UNCOMFORTABLE. I HAD FORGOTTEN THAT PREVIOUSLY I HAD TAKEN MY CAR TO HYUNDAI SERVICE TO HAVE A SAFETY RECALL PERFORMED ON 1/27/2014 (RECALL #114) THAT SPECIFICALLY RELATED THIS THIS AS A POSSIBILITY. THE SERVICE INVOLVED REPLACING THE BRAKE FLUID DUE TO HAVING TOO LOW OF A BOILING TEMPERATURE LEADING TO EVENTUAL CORROSION OF THE HECU ANTI-LOCK BRAKING COMPONENT RESULTING IN REDUCED STOPPING ABILITY OR COMPLETE FAILURE OF BRAKING POWER WHICH IS WHAT OCCURRED. ON 8/13/2014 ONCE AGAIN I WENT TO PUT MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE WHILE DRIVING AND AGAIN MY FOOT WENT STRAIGHT TO THE FLOOR AND WAS UNABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE RESULTING IN ME ALMOST HITTING ANOTHER CAR IN MY WORK PARKING LOT. I IMMEDIATELY TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALER INSISTING THEY PERFORM A BRAKE INSPECTION. THEY DETERMINED AFTER A FEW DAYS THAT IT WAS THE HECU UNIT THAT NEEDED REPLACEMENT AND PROPOSED CHARGING ME $3500 FOR THE REPAIR LATER REDUCING THAT TO $2500 WHEN I COMPLAINED THAT MY VEHICLE HAD RELATIVELY LOW MILEAGE AND COMPLETE BRAKE FAILURE WAS UNACCEPTABLE AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITY. THE COST OF REPAIR AND OTHER EXPENSES INCURRED (RENTAL CAR) IS COMPLETELY HYUNDAI'S RESPONSIBILITY SINCE LOSE OF BRAKING RELATES DIRECTLY TO SAFETY RECALL #114. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10625848

50,000 miles · Jul 25, 2014
Service Brakes

BRAKES COMPLETELY FAILED AS I ENTERED NJ TURNPIKE. NO BRAKING POWER WAS RESTORED. DROVE IN LOWEST GEAR AND USED EMERGENCY BRAKE. SECOND INCIDENT WITH THIS CAR IN 6 WEEKS. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10616402

44,751 miles · May 23, 2014
Electrical SystemExterior LightingService Brakes

THE BRAKE LIGHTS ON THE 2010 HYUNDAI GENESIS (AND POSSIBLY OTHER YEARS/MODELS HYUNDAI VEHICLES) HAVE VARIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKE LIGHTS FAILING TO WORK. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS NOT ONLY TO THE HYUNDAI GENESIS DRIVER, BUT ALSO FOR ANY DRIVER FOLLOWING BEHIND THE CAR. THERE HAS BEEN VARIOUS FACTORY RECALLS FOR THE 2010 HYU…

Read full complaint

THE BRAKE LIGHTS ON THE 2010 HYUNDAI GENESIS (AND POSSIBLY OTHER YEARS/MODELS HYUNDAI VEHICLES) HAVE VARIOUS PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKE LIGHTS FAILING TO WORK. THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS NOT ONLY TO THE HYUNDAI GENESIS DRIVER, BUT ALSO FOR ANY DRIVER FOLLOWING BEHIND THE CAR. THERE HAS BEEN VARIOUS FACTORY RECALLS FOR THE 2010 HYUNDAI GENESIS BRAKES INCLUDING ONE THAT CAUSES THE BRAKE LIGHTS NOT TO WORK DUE TO A BRAKE SWITCH FAILURE: HTTP://WWW.CARS.COM/HYUNDAI/GENESIS/2010/RECALLS HOWEVER THE PARTICULAR PROBLEM MY CAR AND OTHER GENESIS OWNERS HAVE REPORTED DOES NOT HAVE A FACTORY RECALL FOR IT, EVEN THOUGH IT POSES THE SOME OF THE SAME SAFETY ISSUES THAT THE BRAKE SWITCH FACTORY RECALL HAD. HTTP://GENESISOWNERS.COM/HYUNDAI-GENESIS-FORUM/SHOWTHREAD.PHP?T=3269 THE ROOT CAUSE IS DIODE THAT FAILS WHICH CAUSE THE BRAKE LIGHTS NOT TO WORK. (THIS IS DIFFERENT THAT THE BRAKE SWITCH FACTORY RECALL.) I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY MONTHS I DROVE WITHOUT HAVING BRAKE LIGHTS. MY STATE INSPECTION WAS IN JANUARY 2014. A DRIVER THAT WAS BEHIND MY CAR INFORMED ME MY BRAKE LIGHTS DIDN'T WORK IN MAY 2014. I HAD MY CAR TOWED TO THE DEALER DUE TO THE DANGER OF DRIVING WHEN THE CAR'S BRAKE LIGHTS DON'T WORK. APPARENTLY HYUNDAI KNOWS ABOUT THE ISSUE (ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE LINK) : TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETIN 09-BE-023, STOP LAMP Z01 DIODE INSPECTION PROCEDURE, APPEARS TO DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND PROCEDURE FOR TROUBLESHOOTING OF THE DIODE BUT DESCRIBES THE ISSUE AS " . . . VEHICLES MAY EXPERIENCE THE STOP LAMPS BLINKING ON AND OFF EVEN WHEN BRAKES ARE NOT APPLIED." WHY IS THERE NO FACTORY RECALL FOR THIS PROBLEM? IT CAN CAUSE SERIOUS ACCIDENTS WHICH COULD LEAD TO FATALITIES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10593760

Official recalls

3

14V713000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch

Nov 7, 2014

Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) is recalling certain 2009-2011 Hyundai Genesis vehicles manufactured April 30, 2008, to November 21, 2010, and 2011 Hyundai Equus vehicles manufactured July 31, 2010, to November 21, 2010. Due to a circuit failure, the stop lamps in the affected vehicles may not illuminate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A following vehicle may not recognize that the vehicle is slowing or coming to a stop if the stop lamps on the vehicle do not illuminate as expected. There is an increased risk of a rear-end crash as a result.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners, and dealers will repair the stop lamp switch circuit, free of charge. Hyundai issued an interim notification to owners on January 6, 2015. The recall began on March 23, 2015. Owners may contact Hyundai customer service at 1-855-671-3059. Hyundai's number for this recall is 125.

13V489000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:fluid

Oct 29, 2013

Hyundai is recalling certain model year 2009-2012 Genesis vehicles manufactured April 30, 2008, through March 28, 2012. The vehicles may contain brake fluid which does not protect against corrosion of the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the module corrodes, reduced brake effectiveness may result, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners and instruct them to bring their vehicle to a dealer for service. Hyundai will inspect the HECU module for proper operation, and will replace the modules as necessary. Hyundai will replace the factory brake fluid in those vehicles that have not previously had the factory brake fluid replaced. These repairs will be done free of charge. The recall began on December 24, 2013. Owners may contact Hyundai at 1-800-633-5151 or by email at consumeraffairs@hmausa.com. Hyundai's recall number is 114.

13V113000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch

Apr 1, 2013

Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) is recalling certain model year 2006-2009 Accent, model year 2007-2011 Azera, Sonata and Sante Fe,2006-2011 Tucson, 2009-2011 Elantra Touring, 2007-2010 Elantra, 2008-2011 Veracruz, 2009-2011 Genesis, 2010-2011 Genesis Coupe, 2007-2008 Entourage, and 2006-2008 Tiburon vehicles. Originally, in April 2013, Hyundai recalled 1,059,824 model year 2007-2009 Accent and Tucson, model year 2007-2010 Elantra, model year 2007-2011 Santa Fe, model year 2008-2009 Veracruz, model year 2010-2011 Genesis Coupe, and model year 2011 Sonata vehicles. In September 2013, Hyundai informed the agency that it was adding more vehicles to this campaign, representing an additional 652,512 units. The total number of vehicles being recalled is now 1,712,336. In the affected vehicles, the stop lamp switch may malfunction. A malfunctioning stop lamp switch may cause the brake lights to not illuminate when the brake pedal is depressed or may cause an inability to deactivate the cruise control by depressing the brake pedal. Additionally, a malfunctioning stop lamp switch may also result in intermittent operation of the push-button start feature, affect the operation of the brake transmission shift interlock feature, preventing the shifter from being moved out of the PARK position and cause the Electronic Stability Control (ESC) malfunction light to illuminate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure to illuminate the stop lamps during braking or inability to disengage the cruise control could increase the risk of a crash. Additionally, when the ignition is in the 'ON' position, the transmission shifter may be able to be moved out of Park without first applying the brake. This may lead to unintentional movement of the car which may increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners, and dealers will replace the stop lamp switch, free of charge. The safety recall began on April 22, 2013. Owners may contact Hyundai at 1-800-633-5151. Hyundai's recall campaign number is 110.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE13033 · Brake Hydraulic Control Module Failure

Opened Oct 17, 2013 · Closed Apr 4, 2014

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Additional source detail variants (3)

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Service Brakes, Hydraulic

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354