← New search

2009 Hyundai Genesis

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Genesis years

Owner complaints for the 2009 Hyundai Genesis are substantially higher than the model-year median of 109.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

207 reports with mileage · 27 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes. Review the 110 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 28 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 24 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

15 crash reports2 fire reports3 injury reports

Service Brakes, Hydraulic complaints

18 reports
Clear category filter
88,000 miles · Feb 24, 2015
Service BrakesService Brakes, Hydraulic

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 HYUNDAI GENESIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO ENGAGE THE BRAKES, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WITHOUT ANY WARNING. THE CONTACT WAS INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 13V489000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC) AND INDICATED THAT THE DEALER ONLY REPLACED THE FACTORY BRAKE FLUID. THE CONT…

Read full complaint

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 HYUNDAI GENESIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO ENGAGE THE BRAKES, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WITHOUT ANY WARNING. THE CONTACT WAS INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 13V489000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC) AND INDICATED THAT THE DEALER ONLY REPLACED THE FACTORY BRAKE FLUID. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DEALER DID NOT INSPECT THE HECU MODULE FOR PROPER OPERATION. THE CONTACT STATED THAT MONTHS LATER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE RECALL REPAIR DID NOT REMEDY THE FAILURE AND THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER WHO DIAGNOSED THAT THE HECU NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 88,000. UPDATED 4/7/15*CN

NHTSA ODI #10690258

36,000 miles · Jan 10, 2014
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 HYUNDAI GENESIS. THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE WAS INCLUDED AND REPAIRED UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 13V489000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC). AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH WHEN IT FELL TO THE FLOOR BOARD AND THE BRAKES WOULD NOT…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 HYUNDAI GENESIS. THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE WAS INCLUDED AND REPAIRED UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 13V489000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC). AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED THE CONTACT DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH WHEN IT FELL TO THE FLOOR BOARD AND THE BRAKES WOULD NOT RESPOND. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSIS WHERE THE TECHNICIAN STATED AIR WAS ENTERING THE BRAKE SYSTEM CAUSING THE FAILURE. THE BRAKE FLUID WAS REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 36,000. THE CONSUMER STATED THE BRAKE WENT TO THE FLOOR AFTER THE LAST REPAIR.

NHTSA ODI #10559338

70,000 miles · Jan 3, 2014
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

I FILED MY ORIGINAL COMPLAINT ON 10/21/13 CONCERNING A SOFT PEDAL CONDITION. AFTER MANY VISITS TO MY DEALER, HYUNDAI AGREED TO REPLACE THE HECU AND FLUSH / BLEED THE SYSTEM AGAIN TO CORRECT MY ISSUE. THE WORK WAS PERFORMED AT THE END OF NOVEMBER AND I PICKED UP THE CAR IN EARLY DECEMBER. AFTER DRIVING THE VEHICLE FOR A FEW DAYS …

Read full complaint

I FILED MY ORIGINAL COMPLAINT ON 10/21/13 CONCERNING A SOFT PEDAL CONDITION. AFTER MANY VISITS TO MY DEALER, HYUNDAI AGREED TO REPLACE THE HECU AND FLUSH / BLEED THE SYSTEM AGAIN TO CORRECT MY ISSUE. THE WORK WAS PERFORMED AT THE END OF NOVEMBER AND I PICKED UP THE CAR IN EARLY DECEMBER. AFTER DRIVING THE VEHICLE FOR A FEW DAYS THE WAS NO IMPROVEMENT / CORRECTION OF THE PROBLEM. I CONTACTED MY DEALER AND WAS TOLD THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKE SYSTEM AND " THAT THE SOFT PEDAL CONDITION I WAS EXPERIENCING IS A NORMAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE GENESIS" I DID NOT AGREE WITH THE ANSWER AND WAS GIVEN THE CUSTOMER CARE # AT HYUNDAI. I CONTACTED HYUNDAI ON 12/17/13 AND EXPLAINED MY POSITION ( PRESSURE IS BEING LOST DUE TO FLUID MOVING SOMEWHERE IN THE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM ) STATING THAT IS NOT NORMAL. I REQUESTED THAT SOMEONE IN THE DESIGN ENGINEERING OR BRAKE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONTACT ME AND STATE THAT " THIS IS A NORMAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE GENESIS" TELL ME THAT THIS IS NORMAL AND SAFE. I WAS GIVEN A CASE # BUT HAVE NOT HAD A RESPONSE TO DATE. IF IN FACT THE SOFT PEDAL CONDITION IS A NORMAL CONDITION OF THE GENESIS , THEN WHY DOESN'T HYUNDAI JUST STATE THAT.....OR IS THERE MORE TO THE PLOT? WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE NHTSA INVESTIGATION OF THIS ISSUE? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10558354

85,748 miles · Dec 5, 2013
Service BrakesService Brakes, Hydraulic

PROBLEM: UPON APPLYING BRAKES, REDUCED BRAKE PRESSURE & LONGER PEDAL TRAVEL, FEELING LIKE MASTER CYLINDER PROBLEM- ALTHOUGH BRAKES CONTINUED TO WORK WITH GREATER EFFORT. NOV. 2013 RECEIVED HYUNDAI SAFETY RECALL NOTICE 13V-113: REPLACE STOP LAMP SWITCH AND FLUSH/REFILL BRAKE FLUID. DEALER COMPLETED SERVICE NOC 30, 2013. DEALER …

Read full complaint

PROBLEM: UPON APPLYING BRAKES, REDUCED BRAKE PRESSURE & LONGER PEDAL TRAVEL, FEELING LIKE MASTER CYLINDER PROBLEM- ALTHOUGH BRAKES CONTINUED TO WORK WITH GREATER EFFORT. NOV. 2013 RECEIVED HYUNDAI SAFETY RECALL NOTICE 13V-113: REPLACE STOP LAMP SWITCH AND FLUSH/REFILL BRAKE FLUID. DEALER COMPLETED SERVICE NOC 30, 2013. DEALER SAID THAT MASTER CYLINDER NEEDED REPLACEMENT. SERVICE PERFORMED DEC. 5, 2013. DEALER THEN SAID HYDRAULIC ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT NEEDED REPLACEMENT. (PARTS ORDERED.) I FEEL THAT MY BRAKE PROBLEMS WERE CAUSED BY THE MANUFACTURER INSTALLING INADEQUATE/FAULTY BRAKE FLUID. THE REPAIRS NEED TO BE DONE AT THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPENSE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10554988

68,282 miles · Oct 26, 2013
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

WITHOUT WARNING, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED ALMOST TO THE FLOOR OF THE CAR BEFORE STOPPING THE VEHICLE. THE FIRST OCCASION HAPPENED ON AUGUST 7, 2013, BUT THE PROBLEM CORRECTED ITSELF AND THE BRAKES SEEMED FINE UNTIL OCTOBER 20, 2013, WHEN MY HUSBAND AND I WERE VACATIONING IN THE MOUNTAINS OF NORTH CAROLINA, APPROXIMATELY 5 HOURS…

Read full complaint

WITHOUT WARNING, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED ALMOST TO THE FLOOR OF THE CAR BEFORE STOPPING THE VEHICLE. THE FIRST OCCASION HAPPENED ON AUGUST 7, 2013, BUT THE PROBLEM CORRECTED ITSELF AND THE BRAKES SEEMED FINE UNTIL OCTOBER 20, 2013, WHEN MY HUSBAND AND I WERE VACATIONING IN THE MOUNTAINS OF NORTH CAROLINA, APPROXIMATELY 5 HOURS FROM OUR HOME. AGAIN, WITHOUT ANY WARNING, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT ALMOST TO THE FLOOR BEFORE STOPPING THE VEHICLE. WE MADE IT HOME SAFELY, BUT THE BRAKE FAILURE WAS A MAJOR SAFETY CONCERN. AFTER SEEING INFORMATION ONLINE ABOUT A RECALL OF THE GENESIS RELATED TO THE BRAKES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE HYUNDAI DEALERSHIP IN GOLDSBORO, NC, ON OCTOBER 23, AND THEY REPLACED THE BRAKE FLUID, WHICH FAILED TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKES. THEY TOLD US THE MASTER CYLINDER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. BASED ON THE HISTORY OF THE PROBLEM, WE DID NOT AGREE WITH THAT DIAGNOSIS AND, ON OCTOBER 24, TOOK THE GENESIS TO JOHNSON HYUNDAI IN RALEIGH, NC, WHERE THEY DETERMINED THE PROBLEM WAS CAUSED BY A FAILURE OF THE HYDRAULIC MODULE FOR THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM. THE HYUNDAI COMPANY TOLD US THEY ARE CURRENTLY INVESTIGATING THIS VERY SAME PROBLEM WITH THE 2009 GENESIS BUT THE INVESTIGATION IS NOT FAR ENOUGH ALONG TO DETERMINE IF A RECALL WILL BE MADE. FURTHER, THAT WE SHOULD HAVE THE REPAIRS DONE (OVER $2100) AND IF A RECALL IS MADE, WE WOULD BE REIMBURSED. JOHNSON HYUNDAI IS TRYING TO HELP US FIND A RESOLUTION TO THIS ISSUE. THE VEHICLE IS ONLY FOUR YEARS OLD AND ABOUT 10,000 MILES OUT OF WARRANTY; $2100 IN A REPAIR BILL IS A LOT OF MONEY FOR US TO PAY FOR A BRAKE PROBLEM OF WHICH HYUNDAI IS ALREADY AWARE. ...UPDATED 11-12-13 *BF JOHNSON HYUNDAI AND HYUNDAI CORPORATION REPLACED THE DEFECTIVE ABS MODULE AT NO CHARGE. UPDATED 11/19/13

NHTSA ODI #10549634

63,000 miles · Oct 21, 2013
Electrical SystemEquipmentService Brakes, Hydraulic

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 HYUNDAI GENESIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, HE DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL BUT IT WENT TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION WHERE THEY STATED THAT THE ABS MODULE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAIL…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 HYUNDAI GENESIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH, HE DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL BUT IT WENT TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION WHERE THEY STATED THAT THE ABS MODULE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 63,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE. VIN ADDED* SMCH UPDATED 10/31/13*CN THE CONSUMER ALSO STATED THE ELECTRONICS STARTED TO MALFUNCTION. THE BLUETOOTH WOULD CONTINUOUSLY DISCONNECT THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM WOULD FREEZE.

NHTSA ODI #10548791

62,900 miles · Sep 3, 2013
Service Brakes, Hydraulic

WAS TRAVELING ON A ROAD AT THE POSTED 45 MPH WHEN I CAME TO S STOP SIGN. WHEN I TRIED TO SLOW DOWN PRIOR TO REACHING THE SIGN, THE CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN AT ALL AND THE BRAKES WERE SOFT AND WENT DOWN ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR. NEEDLES TO SAY, I WAS NOT ABLE TO STOP AT THE STOP SIGN BUT BY VIRTUE OF PUMPING THE BRAKES I STOPPED ON …

Read full complaint

WAS TRAVELING ON A ROAD AT THE POSTED 45 MPH WHEN I CAME TO S STOP SIGN. WHEN I TRIED TO SLOW DOWN PRIOR TO REACHING THE SIGN, THE CAR DID NOT SLOW DOWN AT ALL AND THE BRAKES WERE SOFT AND WENT DOWN ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR. NEEDLES TO SAY, I WAS NOT ABLE TO STOP AT THE STOP SIGN BUT BY VIRTUE OF PUMPING THE BRAKES I STOPPED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET. HAD THIS TRANSPIRED DURING A BUSY TIME, I WOULD HAVE T BONED A CAT THAT HAD A RIGHT OF WAY AND AT 45 MPH, I AM SURE THERE COULD HAVE BEEN LIVES LOST IF THE OTHER CAR HAD PASSENGERS. RESEARCH SHOWS THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH HYUNDAI THAT IS BEING DISREGARDED. THE CAR HAS 62,900 MILES AND THE DEALER SIMPLY SAYS, SORRY, YOU ARE ONE MONTH AND 3000 MILES OVER THE WARRANTY. THE PROBLEM ACCORDING TO THE DEALER IS A FLUID LEAKING IN THE ABS CONTROL UNIT AND THEY WANT ABOUT $2500 TO REPLACE IT .CURIOUSLY, THE ESTIMATE INVOICE ALSO SHOWED THAT THEY HAD FLUSHED THE BRAKE LINES AND REPLACE IT WITH A NEW DOT 4 BRAKE FLUID AND, THIS WAS DONE UNDER A WARRANTY WHICH HAS EXPIRED. COULD THE ORIGINAL FLUID HAVE CREATED SOME OF THE PROBLEMS? EITHER WAY, THE BREAKS FAIL WITHOUT ANY WARNING WHATSOEVER AND I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT SOMEONE LOOKS INTO THIS BEFORE A DISASTROUS ACCIDENT WITH CASUALTIES TAKES PLACE. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10541741

250 miles · Dec 18, 2009
Electronic Stability Control (esc)Power TrainService Brakes, Hydraulic

HYUNDAI GENESIS 3.8L V6 2009 MODEL 1. STEERING PULL TO LEFT - SIGNIFICANT PULL DESPITE ALIGNMENT FIX 2. BRAKE JAM AT LOW SPEEDS INCLUDING AT TRAFFIC LIGHT STOPS 3. STEERING NOISE - WHEN TURNING LEFT DURING CAR PARKING AND BACK-UP 4. ENGINE NOISE LIKE MOTOR CYCLE WHEN DRIVING AT MODERATE SPEEDS 30-65 MILES/HOUR. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10296408

Official recalls

3

14V713000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch

Nov 7, 2014

Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) is recalling certain 2009-2011 Hyundai Genesis vehicles manufactured April 30, 2008, to November 21, 2010, and 2011 Hyundai Equus vehicles manufactured July 31, 2010, to November 21, 2010. Due to a circuit failure, the stop lamps in the affected vehicles may not illuminate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A following vehicle may not recognize that the vehicle is slowing or coming to a stop if the stop lamps on the vehicle do not illuminate as expected. There is an increased risk of a rear-end crash as a result.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners, and dealers will repair the stop lamp switch circuit, free of charge. Hyundai issued an interim notification to owners on January 6, 2015. The recall began on March 23, 2015. Owners may contact Hyundai customer service at 1-855-671-3059. Hyundai's number for this recall is 125.

13V489000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:fluid

Oct 29, 2013

Hyundai is recalling certain model year 2009-2012 Genesis vehicles manufactured April 30, 2008, through March 28, 2012. The vehicles may contain brake fluid which does not protect against corrosion of the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU).

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the module corrodes, reduced brake effectiveness may result, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners and instruct them to bring their vehicle to a dealer for service. Hyundai will inspect the HECU module for proper operation, and will replace the modules as necessary. Hyundai will replace the factory brake fluid in those vehicles that have not previously had the factory brake fluid replaced. These repairs will be done free of charge. The recall began on December 24, 2013. Owners may contact Hyundai at 1-800-633-5151 or by email at consumeraffairs@hmausa.com. Hyundai's recall number is 114.

13V113000 · Exterior Lighting:brake Lights:switch

Apr 1, 2013

Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) is recalling certain model year 2006-2009 Accent, model year 2007-2011 Azera, Sonata and Sante Fe,2006-2011 Tucson, 2009-2011 Elantra Touring, 2007-2010 Elantra, 2008-2011 Veracruz, 2009-2011 Genesis, 2010-2011 Genesis Coupe, 2007-2008 Entourage, and 2006-2008 Tiburon vehicles. Originally, in April 2013, Hyundai recalled 1,059,824 model year 2007-2009 Accent and Tucson, model year 2007-2010 Elantra, model year 2007-2011 Santa Fe, model year 2008-2009 Veracruz, model year 2010-2011 Genesis Coupe, and model year 2011 Sonata vehicles. In September 2013, Hyundai informed the agency that it was adding more vehicles to this campaign, representing an additional 652,512 units. The total number of vehicles being recalled is now 1,712,336. In the affected vehicles, the stop lamp switch may malfunction. A malfunctioning stop lamp switch may cause the brake lights to not illuminate when the brake pedal is depressed or may cause an inability to deactivate the cruise control by depressing the brake pedal. Additionally, a malfunctioning stop lamp switch may also result in intermittent operation of the push-button start feature, affect the operation of the brake transmission shift interlock feature, preventing the shifter from being moved out of the PARK position and cause the Electronic Stability Control (ESC) malfunction light to illuminate.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure to illuminate the stop lamps during braking or inability to disengage the cruise control could increase the risk of a crash. Additionally, when the ignition is in the 'ON' position, the transmission shifter may be able to be moved out of Park without first applying the brake. This may lead to unintentional movement of the car which may increase the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Hyundai will notify owners, and dealers will replace the stop lamp switch, free of charge. The safety recall began on April 22, 2013. Owners may contact Hyundai at 1-800-633-5151. Hyundai's recall campaign number is 110.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE13033 · Brake Hydraulic Control Module Failure

Opened Oct 17, 2013 · Closed Apr 4, 2014

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip; Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Additional source detail variants (3)

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip:control Unit/module

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/traction Control/electronic Limited Slip

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354

Service Brakes, Hydraulic

On October 28, 2013, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai) submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to NHTSA describing a safety defect in the braking system of approximately 43,500 model year (MY) 2009 through 2012 Hyundai Genesis sedans (NHTSA Recall No. 13V-489).The Hyundai report indicates that the recalled vehicles may contain brake fluid that does not sufficiently inhibit corrosion on the zinc plating of control valve armatures in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) module. The DIR indicated that, over time, the build-up of corrosion products may affect operation of HECU control valves, resulting in a low/soft brake pedal with reduced brake effectiveness, which may increase the risk of a crash.In October 2011, the HECU supplier notified Hyundai that the brake fluid used in production plants was causing corrosion of valve armatures in the control module.The supplier changed the coating of the valve armatures in late March 2012 to correct the problem in production vehicles.Hyundai's recall includes Genesis vehicles produced prior to the implementation of the HECU change.In March 2013, Hyundai initiated a Service Campaign (TL6) to replace brake fluid in the subject vehicles with brake fluid with better corrosion resistance properties.According to Hyundai's DIR letter, after PE13-033 was opened, the company noted that some of the vehicles serviced in the TL6 campaign subsequently required HECU replacement.This was an indication that internal corrosion had progressed enough to affect valve operation and brake performance, prompting Hyundai to conduct a safety recall.Hyundai's repair procedures for 13V-489 require brake system flushing and replacement in all recalled vehicles with a new fluid containing the necessary corrosion inhibitor.In addition, for vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, dealers will perform an inspection procedure to verify that the HECU is functioning properly and replace units that do not meet the test requirements.Hyundai indicated that, based on analysis of claim data, only vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010 have been in service long enough to require the additional inspection/replacement of the HECU. Analysis of failure data reported to NHTSA and provided by Hyundai in response to ODI's information request letter for PE13-033 identified 756 complaints and 1,683 warranty claims for 30,114 subject vehicles produced prior to June 1, 2010, resulting in a complaint rate of 25.1 incidents per thousand vehicles (IPTV) and a claim rate of 5.6 percent.The MY 2009 vehicles, with the longest exposure times, experienced the highest complaint (33.5 IPTV) and warranty (7.0 percent) rates.For the 45,639 subject vehicles produced after June 1, 2010, ODI identified 13 complaints and 34 warranty claims, resulting in a complaint rate of 0.3 IPTV and a warranty claim rate of 0.1 percent, indicating that the brake fluid corrosion concern had not progressed far enough to result in significant rates of brake system performance symptoms in those vehicles.This investigation is closed.ODI will continue to monitor complaints to evaluate the effectiveness of Hyundai's recall.The VOQs noted in the Failure Report are: 10569231, 10560898, 10560495, 10559360, 10558279, 10558264, 10556964, 10556631, 10556577, 10556322, 10554988, 10554802, 10554122, 10552958, 10551817, 10551157, 10551110, 10551092, 10550791, 10550773, 10550431, 10549750, 10549634, 10549629, 10549567, 10549402, 10549376, 10549270, 10549228, 10549186, 10549021, 10548903, 10548823, 10548791, 10548737, 10548722, 10548716, 10548705, 10546565, 10544803, 10543663, 10542962, 10541959, 10541741, 10538208, 10537934, 10536652, 105354