← New search

2015 GMC Sierra Denali

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Sierra Denali years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 19 of 22 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes. Review the 7 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Power Train. Review the 5 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 3 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

1 crash reports0 fire reports0 injury reports

What owners actually said

22 reports
70,135 miles · Dec 11, 2018
Service Brakes

FAILURE OF THE BELT DRIVEN VACUUM PUMP WHILE DRIVING CAUSING VERY HARD BRAKING AND ALMOST CAUSED AN ACCIDENT. VACUUM PRESSURE DROPPED OFF AND CAUSED THE PEDAL TO BECOME FIRM. LUCKILY AFTER IT WAS INSPECTED FOR REPAIR THERE WASN'T OIL CONTAMINATION IN THE VACUUM LINE OR BRAKE BOOSTER SO THOSE DID NOT HAVE TO BE REPLACED.

NHTSA ODI #11160832

46,000 miles · Nov 24, 2018
Service Brakes

POWER BRAKE VACUUM PUMP ISSUE. LOST BRAKES WHILE DRIVING IN STOP AND GO CITY TRAFFIC. HAD TO HAVE TRUCK TOWED, WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE DUE TO NO BRAKES.

NHTSA ODI #11153471

47,800 miles · Oct 18, 2018
Electrical SystemPower Train

INTERIOR DASH LIGHTS GOES OUT AND A FEW MINUTES LATER THE ENGINE CUTS OFF WHILE I'M TRYING TO PARK. EACH TIME WHILE I WAS BACKING INTO MY PARKING SPACE. AFTER SITTING FOR ABOUT 30 SECONDS THE LIGHTS DASH BOARD LIGHTS COME BACK ON, THEN I RESTART THE TRUCK. SOMETIMES WHILE DRIVING THE DASH BOARD LIGHT BLINK OF AND ON.

NHTSA ODI #11141357

22,567 miles · Aug 4, 2018
Electrical SystemSeats

VEHICLE STARTED SHOWING "SERVICE LANE DEPARTURE SYSTEM, SERVICE PARK ASSIST, SERVICE TRAILER BRAKE SYSTEM" ALARMS WHILE DRIVING. UPON TAKING IT TO THE DEALER FOR SERVICE IT WAS FOUND TO HAVE BROKEN WIRING FOR HAPTIC MOTOR FOR DRIVERS SEAT. NOT ONLY DID THIS CAUSE A POSSIBLE SAFETY ISSUE WITH THE LANE DEPARTURE SYSTEM AND TRAIL…

Read full complaint

VEHICLE STARTED SHOWING "SERVICE LANE DEPARTURE SYSTEM, SERVICE PARK ASSIST, SERVICE TRAILER BRAKE SYSTEM" ALARMS WHILE DRIVING. UPON TAKING IT TO THE DEALER FOR SERVICE IT WAS FOUND TO HAVE BROKEN WIRING FOR HAPTIC MOTOR FOR DRIVERS SEAT. NOT ONLY DID THIS CAUSE A POSSIBLE SAFETY ISSUE WITH THE LANE DEPARTURE SYSTEM AND TRAILER BRAKE SYSTEM NOT WORKING CORRECTLY, BUT IT ALSO CAUSED A POSSIBLE FIRE CONCERN DUE TO BROKEN WIRING.

NHTSA ODI #11115739

55,000 miles · May 25, 2018
Power Train

STARTING THE VEHICLE I'M PUTTING THE TRUCK IN REVERSE, THE TRUCK LUNGES BACKWARDS. ALSO A VIOLENT JERK OF THE VEHICLE HAPPENS. THIS HAPPENS A MAJORITY OF THE TIME. PUTTING THE VEHICLE INTO GEAR TO DRIVE I HAVE A VIOLENT JERK AND A LOUD NOISE. THE TRUCK DOES NOT LUNGE FORWARD WHEN PLACING THE TRUCK INTO DRIVE. THIS HAPPENS A COU…

Read full complaint

STARTING THE VEHICLE I'M PUTTING THE TRUCK IN REVERSE, THE TRUCK LUNGES BACKWARDS. ALSO A VIOLENT JERK OF THE VEHICLE HAPPENS. THIS HAPPENS A MAJORITY OF THE TIME. PUTTING THE VEHICLE INTO GEAR TO DRIVE I HAVE A VIOLENT JERK AND A LOUD NOISE. THE TRUCK DOES NOT LUNGE FORWARD WHEN PLACING THE TRUCK INTO DRIVE. THIS HAPPENS A COUPLE OF TIMES A DAY. THIS IS NOT AN ISOLATED INCIDENT.

NHTSA ODI #11098024

56,000 miles · Feb 4, 2018
Service Brakes

HARD BRAKE PEDAL. AT LOW SPEED THE BRAKE PEDAL GETS REALLY HARD AND MAKES IT HARD TO STOP THE TRUCK. PEDAL HAS TO GET PUSHED REALLY HARD TO BARELY STOP FROM HITTING OTHER VEHICLES. ONGOING ISSUE.

NHTSA ODI #11066885

39,900 miles · Dec 20, 2017
Steering

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 GMC SIERRA DENALI. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH, THE STEERING LOST POWER AND THE POWER STEERING WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER (SEWELL BUICK GMC OF DALLAS IN DALLAS, TX, PHONE NUMBER: 214-350-8000) WHERE A DIAGNOSTIC TEST WAS PERFORMED. THE CONTACT WAS NOT GIV…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 GMC SIERRA DENALI. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH, THE STEERING LOST POWER AND THE POWER STEERING WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER (SEWELL BUICK GMC OF DALLAS IN DALLAS, TX, PHONE NUMBER: 214-350-8000) WHERE A DIAGNOSTIC TEST WAS PERFORMED. THE CONTACT WAS NOT GIVEN THE RESULTS OF THE TEST. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND OFFERED TO PAY A PERCENTAGE OF THE REPAIR COSTS. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 39,900. *BF UPDATED 8/28/18*JB

NHTSA ODI #11055771

Mileage unknown · Oct 16, 2017
Air Bags

2015 GMC SIERRA. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO SENSING AND DIAGNOSTIC MODULE SAFETY RECALL. *LD THE CONSUMER REQUESTED TO BE ADVISED OF THE OPTIONS OF HAVING A RECALL COMPLETED ON AN ISLAND. UPDATED 10/16/2017*JS

NHTSA ODI #11029809

15,000 miles · Oct 13, 2017
Electrical SystemCrash

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 GMC SIERRA DENALI. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE EXHIBITED NUMEROUS ELECTRICAL FAILURES. THE FAILURE CAUSED THE STEERING WHEEL TO LOCK, THE BRAKE SYSTEM NOT TO ENGAGE, AND THE INSTRUMENT PANEL AND ALL OTHER ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS IN THE VEHICLE NOT TO OPERATE NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO MARTY…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 GMC SIERRA DENALI. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE EXHIBITED NUMEROUS ELECTRICAL FAILURES. THE FAILURE CAUSED THE STEERING WHEEL TO LOCK, THE BRAKE SYSTEM NOT TO ENGAGE, AND THE INSTRUMENT PANEL AND ALL OTHER ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS IN THE VEHICLE NOT TO OPERATE NORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO MARTY'S BUICK GMC (5 COLLECTION WAY, KINGSTON MA, 02364, 781-585-7570) SEVERAL TIMES FOR THE FAILURE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DEALER REPLACED WIRES, BUT THE FAILURE WAS NOT CORRECTED. THE CONTACT DID NOT KNOW THE NAME OF THE WIRES THAT WERE REPLACED. THE CONTACT ALSO STATED THAT THE ELECTRICAL FAILURE ALSO CAUSED A CRASH ON THE ROAD MEDIAN BECAUSE THE STEERING WHEEL LOCKED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES AND A POLICE REPORT WAS NOT FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER FOR FURTHER INSPECTION. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 15,000.

NHTSA ODI #11033181

46,000 miles · Jul 3, 2017
Engine

MY GMC 2015 DIESEL DURIMAX TRUCK HAD THE ENGINE LIGHT TURN ON AND SAID EMISSION NEEDS SERVICED. IT PROCEEDED TO CUT MY TRAVELING SPEED FROM 75 MPH TO 65 MPH TO 55 MPH. I MADE IT TO DENVER COLORADO BARELY WITHOUT THE TRUCK FALLING TO 4 MPH. I WENT YESTERDAY TO HAVE IT SERVICED. THEY SAID THAT THEY FIXED IT STILL UNDER POWERTRAIN …

Read full complaint

MY GMC 2015 DIESEL DURIMAX TRUCK HAD THE ENGINE LIGHT TURN ON AND SAID EMISSION NEEDS SERVICED. IT PROCEEDED TO CUT MY TRAVELING SPEED FROM 75 MPH TO 65 MPH TO 55 MPH. I MADE IT TO DENVER COLORADO BARELY WITHOUT THE TRUCK FALLING TO 4 MPH. I WENT YESTERDAY TO HAVE IT SERVICED. THEY SAID THAT THEY FIXED IT STILL UNDER POWERTRAIN WARRANTY. I DROVE AWAY TO GO BACK TO TEXAS 700 MILES OF HIGHWAY HOME. I DROVE AND THE EXACT SAME PROBLEM HAPPENED AGAIN. I'M WAS ON A HIGHWAY AT THIS POINT WITH HEAVY HIGHSPEED TRAFFIC IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE WHERE THE SPEED LIMIT IS 75 MPH. MY TRUCK SPEED WAS REDUCED BY THE EMISSION SYSTEM AGAIN FROM 75 MPH TO 65 MPH TO 55 MPH. I WAS ALMOST HIT BY A BIG RIG TRUCK WITH MY WIFE IN THE CAR. SOMETIME LATER WERE ALMOST SIDE SWIPED TWICE, AND THEN IT STARTED RAINING AND THE SUN STARTED TO SET, AND MATTERS WENT FROM DANGEROUS TO NEAR DEADLY. WE TRIED TO TURN THE TRUCK AROUND TO GET BACK TO DENVER AND ALMOST WERE HIT AGAIN BECAUSE WITH THE GMC SPEED REDUCTION I COULD NOT ACCELERATE AWAY FROM THE HIGH SPEED CARS COMING AT US. GMC SHUTDOWNS THE CAR SPEED PURPOSELY TO AVOID SOME TINY AMOUNT OF NOX, AND PUT PEOPLE AT RISK OF BEING KILLED ON A HIGHWAY IN RAINY NIGHTIME WEATHER. WE FINALLY MADE IT BACK TO DENVER JUST 19 MILES BEFORE THE TRUCK SPEED WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO 4 MPH. WE WOULD HAVE TO BEEN ON THAT 75 MPH HIGHWAY RIDING IN THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SLOW LANE AT 4 MPH !!!!! AT NIGHT IN THE RAIN WITH HIGH SPEED 18 WHEELERS GOING BY AT 75 TO 85 MPH. THE GOVERNMENT AND GMC ARE INSANE TO HAVE DESIGNED THIS, I AM BRINGING IT TOMORROW TO GET TRY TO GET IT FIXED AGAIN BUT THE ORDEAL I WENT THRU IS STILL SCARY AS HELL, AND WORRIED ABOUT IT GETTING FIXED. WE COULD BE KILLED DUE TO THIS. I AM AN ENGINEER DEALING WITH PUBLIC SAFETY, AND I AM IN SHOCK CONCERNING GMC'S AND THE GOVERNMENT OVER STEP IN THIS DESIGN. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ODI #11002748

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

EA21002 · Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

Opened Sep 17, 2021 · No close date supplied

Status: open (inferred from source dates) · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module; Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.

Air Bags:frontal:passenger Side:inflator Module

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.