IllustrationI STARTED MY VEHICLE ON MONDAY MORNING AND IT WAS UNUSUALLY LOUD. AFTER INSPECTION, I FOUND MY MANIFOLD WAS CRACKED. *TR
2008 GMC Envoy
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 2008 GMC Envoy do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 22.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Envoy years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
60–25K
1125–50K
1050–75K
875–100K
15100–150K
9150K+
59 reports with mileage · 18 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Electrical System. Review the 18 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Exterior Lighting. Review the 17 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electronic Stability Control (esc). Review the 12 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
5 crash reports4 fire reports4 injury reports
What owners actually said
77 reportsTL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 GMC ENVOY DENALI. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT SEIZED AND COULD NOT BE RELEASED FROM THE ENCLOSURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THEY ADVISED THAT THE RETRACTION MECHANISM FAILED AND THE ENTIRE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICL…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 GMC ENVOY DENALI. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT SEIZED AND COULD NOT BE RELEASED FROM THE ENCLOSURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THEY ADVISED THAT THE RETRACTION MECHANISM FAILED AND THE ENTIRE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 53,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 53,806.
OUR SUV HAS BEEN IN THE SHOP SO MANY TIMES FOR STABILITY TRAC CONTROL ELECTRICAL WINDOW SWITCH ,TWO STEERING COLUMNS OUT SIDE TEMP READING, NEW SHOCK,NEW CONVERTERS. *TR
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 GMC ENVOY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DRIVE UP AN INCLINE, THE VEHICLE MADE A TAPPING NOISE AND THE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FAILED TO ENGAGE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE FRONT RIGHT SIDE OF THE SHAFT HOUSING FAILED, CAUSING THE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE TO F…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 GMC ENVOY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DRIVE UP AN INCLINE, THE VEHICLE MADE A TAPPING NOISE AND THE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FAILED TO ENGAGE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE FRONT RIGHT SIDE OF THE SHAFT HOUSING FAILED, CAUSING THE FOUR WHEEL DRIVE TO FAIL. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 105,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 109,000.
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 GMC ENVOY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE CHECK ENGINE WARNING LAMP ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THEY STATED THAT THE SEAL THAT WAS ON TOP OF THE FIRE WALL WAS DAMAGED. AS A RESULT, THE WATER WAS SIPPING INTO THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT AND WAS GETTING ON THE C…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 GMC ENVOY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE CHECK ENGINE WARNING LAMP ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THEY STATED THAT THE SEAL THAT WAS ON TOP OF THE FIRE WALL WAS DAMAGED. AS A RESULT, THE WATER WAS SIPPING INTO THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT AND WAS GETTING ON THE COIL PACKS AND THE PLUGS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 59,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.
GAS GAUGE UNKNOWINGLY DOESN'T WORK CORRECTLY, DRIVER RUNS OUT OF GAS, ALMOST GOT INTO MAJOR ACCIDENT. LUCKILY CAR BEHIND ME DIDN'T SLAM INTO ME. BUT IT ALMOST CAUSED A CHAIN REACTION OF REAR-ENDINGS. FAILURE IS DEFECTIVE GAS GAUGE/PUMP. INCORRECT INFO GIVEN TO DASH BOARD TELLING DRIVER IS AT 1/4 TANK OF GAS BUT THE REALTY IS…
Read full complaint
GAS GAUGE UNKNOWINGLY DOESN'T WORK CORRECTLY, DRIVER RUNS OUT OF GAS, ALMOST GOT INTO MAJOR ACCIDENT. LUCKILY CAR BEHIND ME DIDN'T SLAM INTO ME. BUT IT ALMOST CAUSED A CHAIN REACTION OF REAR-ENDINGS. FAILURE IS DEFECTIVE GAS GAUGE/PUMP. INCORRECT INFO GIVEN TO DASH BOARD TELLING DRIVER IS AT 1/4 TANK OF GAS BUT THE REALTY IS THAT THE SENDING UNIT IS GIVING BAD INFO AND THE TANK IS POSSIBLY ON EMPTY. NO LIGHT COMES ON. DOING AN INTERNET SEARCH REVEALS GM'S PART IS KNOWN TO FAIL FREQUENTLY AND IS POORLY DESIGNED. *TR
SPEEDOMETER HAS WEIRD SOUNDS LIKE BIRDS FLAPPING WINGS. THE SPEEDOMETER HAS BEEN REPLACED THREE TIMES. GM USA CLAIMS THAT IT IS A DEFECT THAT THEY CANNOT REPAIR. THE ENVOY IS STILL UNDER WARRANTY. REALLY ISN'T ACCEPTABLE. MAKES ONE WONDER IF THE READINGS ON MILEAGE, AND SPEED ARE ACCURATE. *TR
2008 GMC ENVOY 51,000 MILES EXHAUST MANIFOLD CRACKED I HAD IT REPLACED AND WAS TOLD BY DEALER A 3 DAY WAIT WOULD BE NECESSARY AS THEY HAD USED STOCK PARTS ON ANOTHER ENVOY WITH SAME PROBLEM . ADVISED ME NOT TO DRIVE BECAUSE IT MAY CATCH FIRE. *TR
BOUGHT THE VEHICLE LAST NOVEMBER FROM GEORGIAN PONTIAC BUICK GMC IN BARRIE ONTARIO CANADA LAST NOVEMBER 2009. LEARNED I HAD A CRACKED EXHAUST MANIFOLD ON MY 2008 ENVOY AT 87 000 KM. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN REPAIRED. RESEARCH IS ONGOING. *TR
WHILE ON OUR WAY BACK TO OUR MOTOR HOME THE BRAKE PEDAL ON MY 2008 GMC ENVOY WENT TO THE FLOOR WHEN I TRIED TO STOP IN HEAVY TRAFFIC ON HWY 503 IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. AFTER PUMPING THE BRAKE QUICKLY I WAS ABLE TO REGAIN SOME BRAKING POWER. WHEN I CALLED THE LOCAL GMC DEALER (CARR GMC) IN VANCOUVER THE SERVICE ADVISER CONFIR…
Read full complaint
WHILE ON OUR WAY BACK TO OUR MOTOR HOME THE BRAKE PEDAL ON MY 2008 GMC ENVOY WENT TO THE FLOOR WHEN I TRIED TO STOP IN HEAVY TRAFFIC ON HWY 503 IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. AFTER PUMPING THE BRAKE QUICKLY I WAS ABLE TO REGAIN SOME BRAKING POWER. WHEN I CALLED THE LOCAL GMC DEALER (CARR GMC) IN VANCOUVER THE SERVICE ADVISER CONFIRMED THAT IT WAS THE MASTER CYLINDER. NOW THIS HAPPENED ON TUESDAY JULY 20, 2010, THE SERVICE ADVISER GAVE ME AN APPOINTMENT FOR THURSDAY JULY 22 BETWEEN 9:00 TO 9:30 AM. I ARRIVED AT 9:10 AM AND WAS TOLD THAT IT WOULD TAKE 2-1/2 TO 3 HOURS TO DIAGNOSE THE PROBLEM. NOW THIS WAS THE SAME PERSON THAT TOLD ME ON THE PHONE TWO DAY PRIOR THAT I HAD A BAD MASTER CYLINDER. NOW I JUST DROVE THIS CAR 48 MILES WITH THE BRAKES NOT WORKING PROPERLY. THE DEALER DID NOT HAVE A MASTER CYLINDER IN STOCK AND WAS HAVING ONE OVERNIGHTED IN FROM LANCING, MI AND WOULD CALL ME WHEN IT WAS REPAIRED. NOW I DON'T KNOW OF HOW MANY OTHER VEHICLES THIS HAS HAPPENED TOO, BUT HAVING A MASTER CYLINDER FAIL ON A CAR THAT HAS ONLY 31,000 MILES ON IT IS NOT GOOD AND A REAL SAFETY ISSUE. *TR
Official recalls
0No recalls in this snapshot.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1RQ17002 · Loss Of Headlights
Opened Apr 24, 2017 · Closed Mar 29, 2021
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:headlights
The subject vehicles are model year (MY) 2002-2009 Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, 2004-2007 Buick Rainier, 2003-2008 Isuzu Ascender, 2005-2009 Saab 9-7X, 2002-2004 Oldsmobile Bravada, 2003-2006 Chevrolet SSR, 2005-2009 Buick Lacrosse, and 2006-2008 Pontiac Grand Prix. This scope includes the Trailblazer/Envoy variants: 2002-2006 Envoy XL/Trailblazer EXT and 2004-2005 Envoy XUV. The original scope of this investigation was expanded to include all vehicles equipped with the subject Headlight Driver Module (HDM). The focus of the investigation was to determine whether actions performed by General Motors adequately addressed any unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety in the subject vehicles concerning the headlights and the HDM that controls them.Under normal electrical load and environmental conditions, the HDM can overheat inside the Underhood Electrical Center (UEC). This can cause the module to fail and result in a simultaneous loss of both low beam headlights and both daytime running lights (DRLs), often with no warning or prior detectability to the driver. This failure can be intermittent or permanent. No other exterior lights are affected. High beams, turn signals, brake lights, and reverse lights are still operational.General Motors addressed this issue with 2 recalls (14V755 & 15V519) and a special coverage program (N172091910). In view of the recalls and special coverage program implemented by GM and the vehicle high beams continuing to operate, ODI has tentatively concluded that the actions taken by GM mitigate any unreasonable risk to safety posed by HDM failure in the subject vehicles.Accordingly, the investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances.The ODI reports cited above are available for review online at NHTSA.gov under the identification numbers in the attached document.