NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
893 reports47,000 miles · Sep 8, 2009
Fuel System, Gasoline
MY FREESTYLE HAS A PROBLEM WITH THE ENGINE SURGING / LURCHING WHILE DRIVING BOTH FORWARD OR REVERSE EVEN WHEN THE BRAKE IS APPLIED. ON 25 AUG 2009, I MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH BEACH FORD DEALERSHIP IN VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. THE TECHNICIAN COULD NOT REPLICATE THE PROBLEMS I WAS HAVING. THE MAINTENANCE TEAM TRIED AGAIN AND COND…
Read full complaint
MY FREESTYLE HAS A PROBLEM WITH THE ENGINE SURGING / LURCHING WHILE DRIVING BOTH FORWARD OR REVERSE EVEN WHEN THE BRAKE IS APPLIED. ON 25 AUG 2009, I MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH BEACH FORD DEALERSHIP IN VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. THE TECHNICIAN COULD NOT REPLICATE THE PROBLEMS I WAS HAVING. THE MAINTENANCE TEAM TRIED AGAIN AND CONDUCTED A "PIN POINT TEST" AND FOUND OUT THAT THE TB NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. THE DEALERSHIP ORDERED THE PART WHICH IS IN BACK ORDER UNTIL 7 DEC, 2009. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10283348
44,000 miles · Sep 6, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control
MY 2007 FREESTYLE ACCELERATES WITHOUT WARNING. THIS STARTED ABOUT 2 WEEKS AGO. ON SATURDAY AUG 29, MY CAR WOULD NOT START, I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND WAS TOLD MY BATTERY NEEDED REPLACEMENT (AGAIN NO WARNING OF A PROBLEM) 3 DAYS LATER 9/2 WHILE BACKING UP, MY CAR SUDDENLY AND VIOLENTLY ACCELERATED AND JERKED BACKWARDS, I NEARL…
Read full complaint
MY 2007 FREESTYLE ACCELERATES WITHOUT WARNING. THIS STARTED ABOUT 2 WEEKS AGO. ON SATURDAY AUG 29, MY CAR WOULD NOT START, I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND WAS TOLD MY BATTERY NEEDED REPLACEMENT (AGAIN NO WARNING OF A PROBLEM) 3 DAYS LATER 9/2 WHILE BACKING UP, MY CAR SUDDENLY AND VIOLENTLY ACCELERATED AND JERKED BACKWARDS, I NEARLY HIT A CAR. I IMMEDIATELY WENT TO THE DEALER, THEY TOLD ME I NEEDED A THROTTLE BODY BUT THE PART IS ON BACK ORDER UNTIL DEC. I CALLED FORD CUSTOMER CARE AND THEY CONFIRMED THEY ARE AWARE OF THE PROBLEM AND THE "ENGINEERS ARE REDESIGNING THE PART AND THE DEC DATE IS ONLY A PROJECTION" I INQUIRED ABOUT THE DEALER GIVING ME A LOANER CAR, WAS TOLD NO, BUT I COULD RENT ONE, I TOOK MY CAR HOME, IN THE 7 MILES THAT I DROVE I HAD 3 UNEXPECTED ACCELERATIONS. THE CAR IS NOT DRIVABLE AND NOW WILL SIT IN THE GARAGE UNTIL WHO KNOWS WHEN. NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE BY FORD TO CORRECT THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY ISSUE. MY CAR ONLY HAS 44000 MILES, AND HAS HAD ALL RECOMMENDED SERVICES DONE BY THE DEALER AT THE RECOMMENDED INTERVALS. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10282984
23,400 miles · Sep 2, 2009
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
PREMATURE BRAKE WEAR - 2007 FORD FREESTYLE, OUR 2007 FREESTYLE NEEDED REAR BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS REPLACED AT ONLY 23,400 MILES. THIS CAR WAS DRIVEN MAINLY ON THE HIGHWAYS, WITH LITTLE STOP-AND-GO CITY DRIVING. WHILE NO ACCIDENT OCCURRED, PREMATURE WEAR COULD HAVE AFFECTED THE CAR'S HANDLING IN AN EMERGENCY STOP. THE DEALE…
Read full complaint
PREMATURE BRAKE WEAR - 2007 FORD FREESTYLE, OUR 2007 FREESTYLE NEEDED REAR BRAKE PADS AND ROTORS REPLACED AT ONLY 23,400 MILES. THIS CAR WAS DRIVEN MAINLY ON THE HIGHWAYS, WITH LITTLE STOP-AND-GO CITY DRIVING. WHILE NO ACCIDENT OCCURRED, PREMATURE WEAR COULD HAVE AFFECTED THE CAR'S HANDLING IN AN EMERGENCY STOP. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER REFUSE TO REIMBURSE ME FOR THE $400 REPLACEMENT COST. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10282695
31,007 miles · Sep 1, 2009
Engine And Engine Cooling
VEHICLE SHUTS OFF INTERMITTANTLY. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10282577
50,705 miles · Aug 25, 2009
Fuel System, Other
I OWN A 2007 FORD FREESTYLE ON THE 13TH OF AUGUST MY CAR STARTED TO LURCH WHILE DRIVING & THEN THE WRENCH LIGHT CAME ON, DROVE CAR TO REPAIR CENTER MECHANIC CAME OUT AND LOOKED AT THE CAR, MECHANIC HAD HIS FOOT ON THE BRAKE PUT THE CAR IN GEAR & ENGINE WOULD REV WITH OUT GAS PEDAL BEING TOUCHED & CAR WOULD LURCH, REPAIR SHOP K…
Read full complaint
I OWN A 2007 FORD FREESTYLE ON THE 13TH OF AUGUST MY CAR STARTED TO LURCH WHILE DRIVING & THEN THE WRENCH LIGHT CAME ON, DROVE CAR TO REPAIR CENTER MECHANIC CAME OUT AND LOOKED AT THE CAR, MECHANIC HAD HIS FOOT ON THE BRAKE PUT THE CAR IN GEAR & ENGINE WOULD REV WITH OUT GAS PEDAL BEING TOUCHED & CAR WOULD LURCH, REPAIR SHOP KEPT CAR TO SO THEY COULD HOOK IT UP TO THE COMPUTER & RUN THEIR TEST, NEXT DAY THE CALLED & SAID IT WAS THE THROTTLE BODY (PART # IS 5F9Z-9E926-B) & SAID THEY COULD ORDER THE PART EXPEDITED AND HAVE IT IN 1-2 BUSINESS DAYS, THAT WAS THE 14TH OF AUGUST, AFTER THE 18TH THE SERVICE MANAGER STARTED CHECKING ON THE PART TODAY IS THE 24TH AND WE STILL HAVE NO RESPONSE FROM FORD AS TO WHEN PART WILL BE AVAILABLE, AS PART IS ON BACK ORDER, HAVE LOOKED ONLINE & THERE SEAM TO BE SEVERAL COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS THROTTLE BODY PART NOT WORKING RIGHT & PEOPLE HAVING WORSE DRIVING EXPERIENCES THEN I HAD. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10281670
50,000 miles · Aug 13, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control
AT A STOP LIGHT IN HEAVY TRAFFIC WITH BRAKE DEPRESSED, MY VEHICLE STARTED TO REV UP VERY HIGH AND THEN STALLED. THIS CONTINUED TO DO THIS EXCESSIVELY UNTIL I WAS ABLE TO PULL OFF TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. THE WRENCH LIGHT CAME ON ONLY AFTER THE PROBLEM HAD OCCURRED. I FELT AS THOUGH THE CAR WAS OUT OF CONTROL LIKE IT WAS GOING…
Read full complaint
AT A STOP LIGHT IN HEAVY TRAFFIC WITH BRAKE DEPRESSED, MY VEHICLE STARTED TO REV UP VERY HIGH AND THEN STALLED. THIS CONTINUED TO DO THIS EXCESSIVELY UNTIL I WAS ABLE TO PULL OFF TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. THE WRENCH LIGHT CAME ON ONLY AFTER THE PROBLEM HAD OCCURRED. I FELT AS THOUGH THE CAR WAS OUT OF CONTROL LIKE IT WAS GOING TO TAKE OFF WITH MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE. I WAS AFRAID THAT MY CAR WAS GOING TO HIT ANOTHER CAR. EVERYONE AROUND WAS STARRING AT ME LIKE I WAS SOME CRAZY DRIVER! AFTER HELP ARRIVED, WE TOOK TO THE NEAREST DEALERSHIP AND WAS TOLD THAT IT NEEDED A NEW ELECTRONIC THROTTLE BODY WHICH WOULD NOT BE COVERED UNDER MY POWERTRAIN WARRANTY. AFTER RESEARCH, I FOUND THAT FORD HAD ISSUED A TSB FOR THIS MATTER AND IS FULLY AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM BUT HAS FAILED TO ISSUE A RECALL OR PAY FOR THIS DEFECTED PART. THE TSB NUMBER IS 06-21-1. STILL THE DEALERSHIP REFUSED TO COVER THIS REPAIR WHICH WILL BE $691 PLUS THE $85 INSPECTION FEE. I FOUND THAT THIS IS A VERY COMMON PROBLEM IN THE FORD FREESTYLES AND THIS IS HAPPENING TO MANY MORE FORD OWNERS OUT THERE. THE PART IS GOING TO TAKE AT LEAST A MONTH TO GET. FORD SAYS IT IS ON BACKORDER. WORST OF ALL, THE DEALERSHIP TOLD ME THAT MY CAR SHOULD BE DRIVABLE UNTIL THEN!!!! MY CAR HAS LESS THAN $50,000 MILES ON IT AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS THAT FORD WILL NOT OWN UP TO THIS. I DEFINITELY FEEL THAT THIS IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE AND CONTINUING TO DRIVE THE CAR WILL PUT ME AND MY FAMILY AND PERHAPS OTHERS IN HARMS WAY. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10280342
18,700 miles · Aug 12, 2009
Service Brakes, Hydraulic
PREMATURE WEAR OF REAR BRAKE PADS ON FORD FREESTYLE. FIRST INCIDENT APPROX. MAY OF 2008 WITH 18,700 MILES. SECOND INCIDENT AUG. 9, 2009 WITH 35,390 MILES. BOTH TIMES HAD TO GET NEW PADS AND ROTORS AND NOT UNDER WARRANTY. FIRST TIME THEY DID REPLACE FOR FREE EVEN THOUGH THEY MADE IT CLEAR IT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY. SECOND TIM…
Read full complaint
PREMATURE WEAR OF REAR BRAKE PADS ON FORD FREESTYLE. FIRST INCIDENT APPROX. MAY OF 2008 WITH 18,700 MILES. SECOND INCIDENT AUG. 9, 2009 WITH 35,390 MILES. BOTH TIMES HAD TO GET NEW PADS AND ROTORS AND NOT UNDER WARRANTY. FIRST TIME THEY DID REPLACE FOR FREE EVEN THOUGH THEY MADE IT CLEAR IT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY. SECOND TIME REPLACED AND CHARGED ME FOR PARTS ONLY. AFTER RESEARCHING THIS I FOUND IT WAS AN ONGOING PROBLEM SINCE THE INTRODUCTION OF THE FREESTYLE IN 2005. IN FACT I FOUND A LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR OF SERVICE ENGINEERING OPERATIONS SENT TO ALL FORD DEALERS ON JULY 3,2007. THEY WERE BLAMING THE ISSUE ON "DIRECT EXPOSURE TO MOISTURE FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD THAT MAY HAVE CAUSED THE PADS TO "SWELL" AND CREATE SLIGHT DRAG CONDITIONS." OBVIOUSLY THIS IS NOT THE CASE. I HAVE READ NUMEROUS REPORTS FROM OWNERS WHO HAVE REPLACED REAR PADS AND ROTORS SEVERAL TIMES AND NOT YET HAD THE FRONT BRAKES FAIL. SEEMS TO ME TO BE A MECHANICAL PROBLEM THAT FORD DOES NOT WANT TO ADDRESS BY FIXING THE PROBLEM CAUSING THIS ISSUE. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10280203
65,000 miles · Aug 5, 2009
Fuel System, Other
CAR ACCELERATED IN REVERSE ALMOST HITTING THE VEHICLE BEHIND THE CAR. THIS HAS HAPPENED A FEW OTHER TIMES. ALSO IN FORWARD. A WARNING LIGHT CAME ON AND I DROVE DIRECTLY TO THE DEALER. THEY SAID IT NEEDED A NEW THROTTLE BODY PART, BUT WON'T BE AVAILABLE UNTIL DECEMBER!! CAR IS NOT DRIVABLE AND IS SITTING AT THE DEALERS SERVICE CE…
Read full complaint
CAR ACCELERATED IN REVERSE ALMOST HITTING THE VEHICLE BEHIND THE CAR. THIS HAS HAPPENED A FEW OTHER TIMES. ALSO IN FORWARD. A WARNING LIGHT CAME ON AND I DROVE DIRECTLY TO THE DEALER. THEY SAID IT NEEDED A NEW THROTTLE BODY PART, BUT WON'T BE AVAILABLE UNTIL DECEMBER!! CAR IS NOT DRIVABLE AND IS SITTING AT THE DEALERS SERVICE CENTER. *TR
NHTSA ODI #10279504
50,000 miles · Jul 20, 2009
Electrical System
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD FREESTYLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE GAUGES AND WARNING INDICATORS, INCLUDING THE SPEEDOMETER AND ODOMETER, HAVE COMPLETELY FAILED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. ALL OF THE LIGHTS ARE ILLUMINATED, EVEN IF THERE ARE NO FAILURES. AS A RESULT, HE IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH FUEL IS IN THE VEHICLE …
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD FREESTYLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE GAUGES AND WARNING INDICATORS, INCLUDING THE SPEEDOMETER AND ODOMETER, HAVE COMPLETELY FAILED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. ALL OF THE LIGHTS ARE ILLUMINATED, EVEN IF THERE ARE NO FAILURES. AS A RESULT, HE IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH FUEL IS IN THE VEHICLE OR HOW FAST HE IS TRAVELING. THROUGH RESEARCH, THE CONTACT FOUND NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ON THE SAME DEFECT AND BELIEVES THAT A RECALL SHOULD BE ISSUED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE 50,000. UPDATED 08/28/09. *LJ UPDATED 08/31/09.*JB
NHTSA ODI #10277429
64,742 miles · Jun 25, 2009
Vehicle Speed Control
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD FREESTYLE. WHEN THE CONTACT SLOWLY DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL, THE VEHICLE WOULD LUNGE FORWARD UNEXPECTEDLY AT LEAST A FOOT, AS IF SHE SLAMMED ON THE BRAKES. THE "WRENCH" WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. WHILE DRIVING OVER 50 MPH, THE RPMS WOULD INCREASE AND THE VEHICLE WOU…
Read full complaint
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 FORD FREESTYLE. WHEN THE CONTACT SLOWLY DEPRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL, THE VEHICLE WOULD LUNGE FORWARD UNEXPECTEDLY AT LEAST A FOOT, AS IF SHE SLAMMED ON THE BRAKES. THE "WRENCH" WARNING INDICATOR ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. WHILE DRIVING OVER 50 MPH, THE RPMS WOULD INCREASE AND THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT GAIN SPEED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THEY FOUND THAT THE ELECTRONIC THROTTLE BODY WAS DEFECTIVE AND AFFECTED THE POWERTRAIN, WHICH HER WARRANTY WOULD NOT COVER. THE DEALER RESET THE VEHICLE CODES TO CLEAR THE "WRENCH" WARNING INDICATOR. THE REPAIR COST WAS ESTIMATED AT $655, WHICH WOULD BE AT THE CONTACT'S EXPENSE. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE LESS THAN 64,742.
NHTSA ODI #10274984
NHTSA investigations
2PE11018 · Idle Instability
Opened May 11, 2011 · Closed Feb 7, 2013
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control
On November 29, 2012, Ford Motor Company (Ford) initiated Customer Satisfaction Program 12N03 to extend warranty coverage terms for repair of engine idle RPM surge caused by throttle body deposits in all model year (MY) 2005 through 2007 Ford Freestyle, Five Hundred and Mercury Montego vehicles.The program extends the coverage for up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles from the warranty start date of the vehicle (all vehicles are eligible for the program through May 31, 2013, regardless of mileage).Dealers will repair vehicles exhibiting the condition by removing and cleaning the throttle body and reprogramming the PCM with software containing an updated idle speed control strategy.According to Ford, some of the affected vehicles may experience momentary, intermittent engine idle RPM surge (idle flare) when stopped or during low speed driving maneuvers such as in a parking lot or driveway.Unstable idle speed control (dips and flares) around the target engine speed (700 rpm) can occur in vehicles with deposit build-up in the throttle body when the system adjusts engine speed in response to changes in engine load, typically from power steering application or air-conditioner compressor cycling.Idle speed control logic is only active at vehicle speeds below 3.5 mph and when the accelerator pedal is not applied.Ford testing of a vehicle with a worst case throttle body measured a maximum idle flare of 1360 RPM lasting approximately 1 second, which Ford indicated was consistent with system design to limit vehicle speed and acceleration in idle control mode.Ford indicated that the test vehicle was held in place with normal brake effort and that vehicle speed remained under 4 mph without the brake pedal applied.In addition to throttle body deposit accumulation, symptoms associated with the condition may include Check Engine lamp illumination and diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) P0505, P0506 or P061B.Ford attributed the surge condition to changes in idle air flow resulting from the progressive buildup of deposits in the throttle body from normal Positive Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) system operation.This condition was not adequately compensated for in the original Powertrain Control Module (PCM) calibration.Ford issued a technical service bulletin on August 15, 2011 (TSB 11-8-5), releasing an updated powertrain control calibration for vehicles with CVT transmissions.On October 19, 2011, Ford issued a second bulletin (TSB 11-10-21) superseding TSB 11-8-5 and including updated powertrain control calibration for vehicles with 6-speed transmissions.Prior to Ford issuing the TSB?s, owner?s experiencing the alleged defect either received no repairs, if dealers could not duplicate the condition, or had the throttle body cleaned or replaced, which only provided temporary correction until the throttle deposit build-up returned.Ford?s revised powertrain calibrations appear to be effective remedies for the idle instability caused by build-up of throttle body deposits.However, even after the TSB?s were released, many owners experiencing the condition continued to have difficulty with proper diagnosis and repair as dealers were often either unable to duplicate the condition or were unfamiliar with the new repair procedures.Ford's new program addresses those concerns.NHTSA's testing and complaint analysis indicate that the idle speed control issue in the subject vehicles can only occur at very low speeds, are very brief events, are easily controlled by moderate brake pedal forces and result in minor increases in vehicle speed even with no braking.This investigation is closed.The closing of this in
PE08060 · Tire Valve Cracking
Opened Oct 14, 2008 · Closed Apr 9, 2009
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Tires:valve
ON OCTOBER 14, 2008, ODI OPENED PE08-060 TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF CRACKED AND LEAKING SNAP-IN TIRE VALVES IN MODEL YEAR (MY) 2007 VEHICLES MANUFACTURED BY FORD MOTOR COMPANY.THE VALVES WERE SUPPLIED TO FORD BY TOPSEAL AUTO-PARTS, A SUBSIDIARY OF THE SHANGHAI BAOLONG AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION IN CHINA.VALVES MADE BY TOPSEAL FOR AFTERMARKET SALE WERE THE SUBJECT OF TWO RECENT SAFETY RECALLS BY TECH INTERNATIONAL (08T-018) AND DILL AIR CONTROLS (08T-028), THE LATTER OF WHICH WAS INVESTIGATED BY ODI IN PE08-036 AND EA08-022.THE DEFECT CONDITIONS ADDRESSED BY THE AFTERMARKET TIRE VALVE RECALLS BOTH INVOLVED INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING DUE TO ISSUES WITH THE SUPPLY OF ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS TO TOPSEAL FOR A PERIOD FROM JULY TO MID-NOVEMBER 2006.THE AFTERMARKET VALVES WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A BLEND OF EPDM AND NATURAL RUBBER, USING A RELATIVELY LOW PERCENTAGE OF EPDM (EPDM PROVIDES INHERENT RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING).HENCE, THE NEED FOR ANTI-OZONANT CHEMICALS AND THE PROBLEMS WITH CRACKING WHEN THOSE CHEMICALS WERE MISSING OR OUT OF SPECIFICATION IN SOME LOTS OF VALVES.BOTH RECALL CAMPAIGNS INVOLVED INSPECTION PROGRAMS TO IDENTIFY AND REPLACE VALVES WITH VISIBLE SURFACE CRACKING.ALTHOUGH THE TOPSEAL VALVES SUPPLIED TO FORD ALSO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BY THE ANTI-OZONANT SUPPLY ISSUES IN MID TO LATE-2006, FORD INDICATED THAT ITS VALVES WERE MADE AT A DIFFERENT TOPSEAL PRODUCTION LINE AND WERE COMPOUNDED WITH A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF EPDM RUBBER TO MEET MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATIONS FROM FORD.ODI'S ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY DATA PROVIDED BY FORD SHOWED THAT PROBLEMS WITH CRACKED TIRE VALVES WERE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER FOR MY 2007 VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007.FORD RESPONDED BY IMPLEMENTING CHANGES IN ITS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SNAP-IN RUBBER TIRE VALVES AND ALSO INCREASING THE QUALITY AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR VALVES IMPORTED FOR USE IN ITS VEHICLES.WHILE THE COMPLAINT AND WARRANTY CLAIM RATES ARE ELEVATED FOR SUBJECT VEHICLES PRODUCED FROM DECEMBER 2006 THROUGH MARCH 2007, THE RATES OF LEAKING VALVES ARE WELL BELOW ONE PERCENT OF PRODUCTION FOR EACH OF THE PEAK MONTHS FOR ALL OF THE AFFECTED MODELS.A SUBSTANTIAL MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS (TPMS) WHICH WARN THE DRIVER WHEN ANY TIRE PRESSURES DROPS BELOW 25 PERCENT OF RECOMMENDED INFLATION PRESSURE. AS OUTLINED IN A LETTER TO ODI DATED APRIL 6, 2009, FORD HAS AGREED TO SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS OF CERTAIN MY 2007 AND 2008 FORD, LINCOLN AND MERCURY VEHICLES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CRACKING CONCERN. LETTERS WILL BE SENT TO OWNERS OF VEHICLES BUILT FROM NOVEMBER 2006 THROUGH MAY 2007.OWNERS CAN OPT FOR A FREE DEALER INSPECTION.VALVES EXHIBITING SURFACE CRACKS OR AIR LEAKAGE RELATED TO OZONE ATTACK WILL BE REPLACED BY FORD UNDER ITS NORMAL WARRANTY TERMS.FORD EXPECTS TO SEND THE LETTER BY APPROXIMATELY MID-MAY 2009. BASED ON THE USE OF TPMS IN THE MAJORITY OF SUBJECT VEHICLES AND THE RELATIVELY LOW RATES OF REPAIRS ASSOCIATED WITH LEAKING VALVES AND RESULTANT TIRE DAMAGE, ODI BELIEVES THAT THE ACTIONS FORD HAS AGREED TO TAKE WILL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AND EXPEDITIOUS RESOLUTION FOR VEHICLES THAT WERE BUILT DURING THE PERIOD WHEN VALVES WITH INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OZONE CRACKING WERE MOST LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN USED IN VEHICLE PRODUCTION.FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF THIS MATTER WOULD NOT BE AN EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF AGENCY RESOURCES.ACCORDINGLY, THIS INVESTIGATION IS CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO