2005 FORD FIVE HUNDRED CUSTOMER STATES THAT THE VEHICLE IS A LEMON AND THAT THE BRAKES NEEDS TO BE RECALLED**NAR**CC THE REAR ROTORS WERE MACHINED. *JB
2005 Ford Five Hundred
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Limited comparison data
There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Five Hundred years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
443 reports with mileage · 67 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Power Train. Review the 136 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Vehicle Speed Control. Review the 104 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 95 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
510 reportsFORD RECALL NO. 06S45 DID NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. OUR FORD FIVE HUNDRED DRIVERS DOOR FAILED TO LATCH THE DAY AFTER A TRIP THROUGH THE CAR WASH IN BELOW FREEZING WEATHER. MY WIFE TRIED TO LATCH THE DOOR MANY TIMES AND LOCKED AND UNLOCKED IT SEVERAL TIMES. IT FINALLY LATCHED. THE LOCAL DEALER LOOKED AT IT AND LUBED IT (AGAIN). THE TE…
Read full complaint
FORD RECALL NO. 06S45 DID NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. OUR FORD FIVE HUNDRED DRIVERS DOOR FAILED TO LATCH THE DAY AFTER A TRIP THROUGH THE CAR WASH IN BELOW FREEZING WEATHER. MY WIFE TRIED TO LATCH THE DOOR MANY TIMES AND LOCKED AND UNLOCKED IT SEVERAL TIMES. IT FINALLY LATCHED. THE LOCAL DEALER LOOKED AT IT AND LUBED IT (AGAIN). THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THIS WAS NOT THE FIRST ONE HE HAD SEEN. *JB
DRIVING MY 2005 FORD 500 WITH 36, 216 MILES TO WORK IN A.M. ON 1/22/07, SUDDENLY EXPERIENCED CAR GOING FROM SIDE TO SIDE WHILE DRIVING ON HIGHWAY. HARD TO CONTROL, HAD TO GREATLY REDUCE SPEED TO KEEP CONTROL OF VEHICLE. UPON ACCELERATING, FELT AS IF I WAS HAVING TO PULL THE VEHICLE DOWN THE ROAD. TOOK IMMEDIATELY TO FORD DEAL…
Read full complaint
DRIVING MY 2005 FORD 500 WITH 36, 216 MILES TO WORK IN A.M. ON 1/22/07, SUDDENLY EXPERIENCED CAR GOING FROM SIDE TO SIDE WHILE DRIVING ON HIGHWAY. HARD TO CONTROL, HAD TO GREATLY REDUCE SPEED TO KEEP CONTROL OF VEHICLE. UPON ACCELERATING, FELT AS IF I WAS HAVING TO PULL THE VEHICLE DOWN THE ROAD. TOOK IMMEDIATELY TO FORD DEALERSHIP AND WAS TOLD THAT THE SWAY BAR IN THE REAR WAS BAD. SERVICE TOLD ME THAT THIS WAS VERY UNUSUAL AND ADVISED ME TO CONTACT FORD DIRECTLY. PHONED FORD AND WAS TOLD THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO RESEARCH THE SWAY BAR PROBLEM MORE AND WOULD CONTACT ME WITHIN 2-3 BUSINESS DAYS. CURRENTLY WAITING ON PARTS FOR REPAIR, AS DEALERSHIP DOES NOT KEEP THEM IN STOCK DUE TO THIS BEING A VERY RARE OCCURRENCE. SERVICE FEELS THAT FACTORY SWAY BAR MUST HAVE BEEN DEFECTIVE. *JB
TOOK MY 2005 FORD FIVE HUNDRED IN FOR AN OIL CHANGE AND TIRE ROTATION (17K MILES), 12 MONTHS OLD. WAS CALLED BY THE FORD DEALER SERVICE MANGER AND TOLD I NEEDED REAR BRAKE PADS ASAP!. I QUESTION HOW A CAR THAT HAS ONLY BEEN OWNED FOR 12 MONTHS NEED BRAKES (AND ONLY REAR ONES!). TOLD FORD KNOWS OF THE PROBLEM AND RESIGNED THE PAD…
Read full complaint
TOOK MY 2005 FORD FIVE HUNDRED IN FOR AN OIL CHANGE AND TIRE ROTATION (17K MILES), 12 MONTHS OLD. WAS CALLED BY THE FORD DEALER SERVICE MANGER AND TOLD I NEEDED REAR BRAKE PADS ASAP!. I QUESTION HOW A CAR THAT HAS ONLY BEEN OWNED FOR 12 MONTHS NEED BRAKES (AND ONLY REAR ONES!). TOLD FORD KNOWS OF THE PROBLEM AND RESIGNED THE PADS, BUT I WOULD HAVE TO PAY $250 FOR THE BRAKE JOB (I DECLINED). MULTIPLE CONTACTS (VIA EMAIL) TO FORD HQTS. HAVE BEEN A WASTE OF TIME. NO RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEM, NO ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. *NM
TL* - THE CONTACT HAS A 2005 FORD 500 WITH AN ODOMETER READING OF 34900 MILES AND HIS REAR BREAK PADS HAVE WORN OUT. THE CONTACT HEARD A GRINDING NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE AND FOUND THAT HIS REAR BREAK PADS ARE GRINDING INTO THE ROTORS, BUT HIS FRONT BREAK PADS ARE LESS THAN HALF WAY WARN. THE CONTACT STATED THA…
Read full complaint
TL* - THE CONTACT HAS A 2005 FORD 500 WITH AN ODOMETER READING OF 34900 MILES AND HIS REAR BREAK PADS HAVE WORN OUT. THE CONTACT HEARD A GRINDING NOISE COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE AND FOUND THAT HIS REAR BREAK PADS ARE GRINDING INTO THE ROTORS, BUT HIS FRONT BREAK PADS ARE LESS THAN HALF WAY WARN. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE IS SERVICE BULLETIN (06-22-17) FROM FORD WHICH STATES THAT DEFECTIVE MATERIALS USED ON THE REAR BREAK PADS. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER (WEBSTER DUDLEY LINCOLN MERCURY) AND THEY STATED THAT HE WAS NOT COVERED BY FORD AND HE WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THE REPAIR. THE CONTACT ALSO CALLED FORD AND STATED THAT IT IS A WEAR ITEM AND IS NO LONGER COVERED. *NM
PURCHASED 2005 FORD 500 NEW ON OCT 11, 2005. AT FIRST OIL CHANGE 3000 MILES ON JAN 10, 2006 I REPORTED VIBRATION AND POPPING ON RIGHT FRONT OF CAR. THEY REPLACED UPPER STRUT MOUNTS/BEARINGS. VIBRATION CONTINUED. ON MARCH 7, 2006 A TIRE SPECIALIST STATED TIRES WERE SHOWING LIGHT CHOPPING ON THE OUTER EDGES AND THE RIGHT FRO…
Read full complaint
PURCHASED 2005 FORD 500 NEW ON OCT 11, 2005. AT FIRST OIL CHANGE 3000 MILES ON JAN 10, 2006 I REPORTED VIBRATION AND POPPING ON RIGHT FRONT OF CAR. THEY REPLACED UPPER STRUT MOUNTS/BEARINGS. VIBRATION CONTINUED. ON MARCH 7, 2006 A TIRE SPECIALIST STATED TIRES WERE SHOWING LIGHT CHOPPING ON THE OUTER EDGES AND THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE HAD IT. MARCH 8, 2006 RETURNED TO DEALERSHIP REPORTED THE VIBRATION AGAIN-NOTHING DONE. TIRES CHECKED. MAY 30, 2006 REPORTED VIBRATION. DID ROAD FORCE BALANCE . VIBRATION CONTINUED. AUG 8, 2006 TOLD THE MGR ABOUT THE VIBRATION AGAIN. WEEK OF OCT 9 THE MGR SAID NOTHING MORE COULD BE DONE. MGR SAID HIS SERVICE REP WOULD NOT BE BACK FOR 2-3 MONTHS. I ASKED THE MANAGER IF I COULD CONTACT HIS SERVICE REP AND HE SAID NO. OCT 19, 2006 CALLED BILL MCCORT, TOOK CAR TO THE GARAGE AGAIN. TEST DROVE WITH BILL MCCORT, JOE ESSEX, TECH, MY HUSBAND, AND MYSELF. TECH CONFIRMED THE VIBRATION. CAR LEFT AT DEALERSHIP.. SCOTT VASKO, ASST. SERVICE MGR. CALLED AND TOLD US ALL READINGS WERE WITHIN SPECS. SAID THEY DID FOUR HOOK-UPS FOR TESTING. STILL VIBRATING. OCT 19, 2006 BILL MCCORT AUTHORIZED THE CONTINENTAL TIRES BE REPLACED BY NEW MICHELIN TIRES. STILL VIBRATING AFTER NEW TIRES WERE PUT ON. OCT 20, 2006 MET PHYLLIS STOVES AND, OWNER OF DEALERSHIP. SHE DROVE MY CAR AND FELT VIBRATION. OCT 21, 2006 STOVES AND, MY HUSBAND , AND MYSELF DROVE TWO 2007 FORD FIVE HUNDREDS. THEY HAD THE SAME VIBRATION. STOVES SAID SHE WOULD E-MAIL AN ENGINEER AND WILL CONTACT US WEEK AFTER NEXT STOVES CALLED ME AND ASKED ME TO BRING THE CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP BECAUSE AN ENGINEER WAS COMING TO LOOK AT MY CAR. I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO SEE OR TALK TO THE ENGINEER. STOVES SAID CUSTOMERS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MEET WITH OR TALK TO THE ENGINEER. LATER STOVES CALLED AND TOLD ME SHE AND THE ENGINEER DROVE MY CAR AND IT DROVE WONDERFULLY. VIBRATION CONTINUES. I ONCE AGAIN REPORTED JAN 4, 2007. *JB
VIBRATION ON RIGHT FRONT OF CAR DURING SPEEDS OF 55 MPH TO 62 MP. REPLACED CONTINENTAL TIRES WITH MICHELIN AND VIBRATION STILL OCCURS. *JB
RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FROM FORD MOCO. TOOK THE WIFES VEHICLE INTO THE DEALERSHIP FOR REPAIRS, THE TECHNICIAN CALLED AND SAID THE CAR WAS REPAIRED AND WE TOOK THE VEHICLE HOME. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO WORK THAT EVENING AND WHEN I GOT OFF WORK MY FREIND AND I THAT RIDES TO WORK WITH ME NOTICED THAST THE DOOR STILL WASN'T SHUTT…
Read full complaint
RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FROM FORD MOCO. TOOK THE WIFES VEHICLE INTO THE DEALERSHIP FOR REPAIRS, THE TECHNICIAN CALLED AND SAID THE CAR WAS REPAIRED AND WE TOOK THE VEHICLE HOME. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO WORK THAT EVENING AND WHEN I GOT OFF WORK MY FREIND AND I THAT RIDES TO WORK WITH ME NOTICED THAST THE DOOR STILL WASN'T SHUTTING PROPERLY. I SLAMMED THE DOOR 3 OR4 TIMES AND THOUGHT IT HAD LATCHED AS THE DOME LIGHT WENT OUT. I DROPPED MY FREIND OFF AT HIS HOME AND WAS HEADING TO A NEARBY CONVENIENCE STORE WHEN THE DOOR POPPED OPEN. I WAS STARTLED AND WAS TRYING TO CLOSE THE DOOR, WHILE I WAS DISTRACTED WITH THE DOOR I WENT OFF THE ROAD AND STRUCK A POWER POLE AND CHAIN LINK FENCE. I REFUSED AN AMBULANCE RIDE TO THE HOSPITAL BUT HAD TO GO LATER WITH NECH PAIN.
UPON STARTING CAR AND A FEW MINUTES AFTER DRIVING THE CAR, THE CAR STARTS TO SPIT AND SPUTTER AND TOTALLY SHUTS DOWN. THIS HAS HAPPENED AT LEAST 8 TIMES IN THE PAST 4 MONTHS AND HAS LEFT ME TO SWERVE ON THE HIGHWAY BEFORE IT SHUTS COMPLETELY DOWN SO I AM NOT IN A DANGEROUS SITUATION (COMPLETELY STOPPED IN THE MIDDLE OF FLOWING …
Read full complaint
UPON STARTING CAR AND A FEW MINUTES AFTER DRIVING THE CAR, THE CAR STARTS TO SPIT AND SPUTTER AND TOTALLY SHUTS DOWN. THIS HAS HAPPENED AT LEAST 8 TIMES IN THE PAST 4 MONTHS AND HAS LEFT ME TO SWERVE ON THE HIGHWAY BEFORE IT SHUTS COMPLETELY DOWN SO I AM NOT IN A DANGEROUS SITUATION (COMPLETELY STOPPED IN THE MIDDLE OF FLOWING TRAFFIC). THE MESSAGE "ENGINE FAIL SAFE MODE" COMES ON. WE HAVE HAD CAR TO THE DEALER NUMEROUS TIMES AND THEY CANNOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG. PROBLEM HAS NOT BEEN FIXED AND CAR CONTINUES TO STOP. *JB
TL* - THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 FORD FIVE HUNDRED. THE CONTACT STATED WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD THE BRAKE PADS FAIL WHEN RESTARTING THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN PARKED FOR ELEVEN DAYS WHEN THE INCIDENT OCCURRED. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 65 MPH AND COULD HEAR THE SOUND OF METAL GRINDING ON METAL WHEN …
Read full complaint
TL* - THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 FORD FIVE HUNDRED. THE CONTACT STATED WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD THE BRAKE PADS FAIL WHEN RESTARTING THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN PARKED FOR ELEVEN DAYS WHEN THE INCIDENT OCCURRED. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 65 MPH AND COULD HEAR THE SOUND OF METAL GRINDING ON METAL WHEN ATTEMPTING TO APPLY THE BRAKES, IT WAS ALSO VERY DIFFICULT TO STOP THE VEHICLE. FORD AGREES THAT THE INCIDENT OCCURRED DUE TO PREMATURE WEAR ON THE VEHICLE. THE DEALER STATED THE CONTACT WAS LIABLE FOR THE REPAIR COST. THE CONTACT MAINTAINED THISWAS NOT A WEAR ISSUE INSTEAD ITWAS A SAFETY/FAILURE ISSUE. FORD REFUSED TO REIMBURSE THE CONTACT, BUT ADVISED THE CONTACT IT WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE. FORD REDESIGNED THE BRAKE PADS DUE TO THIS INCIDENT. FORD STATED RUST APPEARS ON THE BRAKE PADS AFTER BEING PARKED FOR AN EXTENDED TIME. THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT AND THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF BRAKE PROBLEMS AT THE TIME. THE CONTACT REFERENCED FORD BULLETIN # 06-22-17. *AK
Official recalls
206V383000 · Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch
Oct 5, 2006
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN THE FOLLOWING STATES: ALASKA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, IDAHO, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH DAKOTA, UTAH, VERMONT, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN, AND WYOMING. THE SIDE DOOR LATCH MECHANISMS MAY EXPERIENCE WATER INTRUSION ALLOWING THE LATCH MECHANISM TO FREEZE IN COLD WEATHER.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: AS A RESULT, THE DOOR LATCH PAWL MAY NOT RETURN TO THE LATCH POSITION WHEN THE DOOR IS CLOSED, AND THE DOOR COULD OPEN WHILE THE VEHICLE IS MOVING.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSTALL A SHIELD OVER THE FRONT LATCHES; SEAL A DRAIN HOLE IN THE REAR WINDOW TRIM MOLDING ON THE FREESTYLE REAR SIDE DOORS; AND APPLY GREASE TO ALL FRONT AND REAR SIDE-DOOR LATCH MECHANISMS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 8, 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
05V515000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:mounting
Nov 9, 2005
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, THE STRAPS THAT SECURE THE FUEL TANK TO THE VEHICLE BODY MAY BREAK, CAUSING THE FUEL TANK AND FUEL TANK HEAT SHIELD TO DROP ON THE DRIVESHAFT (ALL WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLES) OR EXHAUST SYSTEM (FRONT WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLES).
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS HAPPENS, DRIVERS MAY NOTICE A NOISE OR A FUEL LEAK. A FUEL LEAK IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE BOTH FUEL TANK STRAPS. THE RECALL BEGAN ON DECEMBER 1, 2005. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD AT 1-800-392-3673.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2PE11018 · Idle Instability
Opened May 11, 2011 · Closed Feb 7, 2013
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control
On November 29, 2012, Ford Motor Company (Ford) initiated Customer Satisfaction Program 12N03 to extend warranty coverage terms for repair of engine idle RPM surge caused by throttle body deposits in all model year (MY) 2005 through 2007 Ford Freestyle, Five Hundred and Mercury Montego vehicles.The program extends the coverage for up to 10 years of service or 150,000 miles from the warranty start date of the vehicle (all vehicles are eligible for the program through May 31, 2013, regardless of mileage).Dealers will repair vehicles exhibiting the condition by removing and cleaning the throttle body and reprogramming the PCM with software containing an updated idle speed control strategy.According to Ford, some of the affected vehicles may experience momentary, intermittent engine idle RPM surge (idle flare) when stopped or during low speed driving maneuvers such as in a parking lot or driveway.Unstable idle speed control (dips and flares) around the target engine speed (700 rpm) can occur in vehicles with deposit build-up in the throttle body when the system adjusts engine speed in response to changes in engine load, typically from power steering application or air-conditioner compressor cycling.Idle speed control logic is only active at vehicle speeds below 3.5 mph and when the accelerator pedal is not applied.Ford testing of a vehicle with a worst case throttle body measured a maximum idle flare of 1360 RPM lasting approximately 1 second, which Ford indicated was consistent with system design to limit vehicle speed and acceleration in idle control mode.Ford indicated that the test vehicle was held in place with normal brake effort and that vehicle speed remained under 4 mph without the brake pedal applied.In addition to throttle body deposit accumulation, symptoms associated with the condition may include Check Engine lamp illumination and diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) P0505, P0506 or P061B.Ford attributed the surge condition to changes in idle air flow resulting from the progressive buildup of deposits in the throttle body from normal Positive Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) system operation.This condition was not adequately compensated for in the original Powertrain Control Module (PCM) calibration.Ford issued a technical service bulletin on August 15, 2011 (TSB 11-8-5), releasing an updated powertrain control calibration for vehicles with CVT transmissions.On October 19, 2011, Ford issued a second bulletin (TSB 11-10-21) superseding TSB 11-8-5 and including updated powertrain control calibration for vehicles with 6-speed transmissions.Prior to Ford issuing the TSB?s, owner?s experiencing the alleged defect either received no repairs, if dealers could not duplicate the condition, or had the throttle body cleaned or replaced, which only provided temporary correction until the throttle deposit build-up returned.Ford?s revised powertrain calibrations appear to be effective remedies for the idle instability caused by build-up of throttle body deposits.However, even after the TSB?s were released, many owners experiencing the condition continued to have difficulty with proper diagnosis and repair as dealers were often either unable to duplicate the condition or were unfamiliar with the new repair procedures.Ford's new program addresses those concerns.NHTSA's testing and complaint analysis indicate that the idle speed control issue in the subject vehicles can only occur at very low speeds, are very brief events, are easily controlled by moderate brake pedal forces and result in minor increases in vehicle speed even with no braking.This investigation is closed.The closing of this in
PE07058 · Instrument Cluster Failure
Opened Nov 16, 2007 · Closed Mar 11, 2008
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System: Instrument Cluster/panel
THE SUBJECT VEHICLES EXPERIENCE A LOSS OF PROPER INSTRUMENT CLUSTER OPERATION.TYPICALLY, THE PROBLEM APPEARS AS THE NEEDLE ON THE GAUGE (SPEEDOMETER, TACHOMETER, FUEL, AND/OR TEMPERATURE) SWEEPS AND RESETS INTERMITTENTLY.FORD REPORTS THE PROBLEM AS MOMENTARY POWER INTERRUPTION CAUSES THE GAUGES TO SWEEP AND THEN RECOVER TO NORMAL FUNCTION.IN AUGUST 2006, FORD ISSUED A TECHNICAL SERVICE BULLETIN (TSB 06-17-9) TO PROVIDE GUIDELINES TO SERVICE TECHNICIANS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND REPAIR OF THIS CONDITION.ODI'S REVIEW OF FORD'S RESPONSE TO THE AGENCY'S INFORMATIONREQUEST LETTER REVEALS THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE REPORTS TO FORD (63%) INDICATE THAT THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER WOULD EXPERIENCE INTERMITTENT LOSS OF POWER.FORD REPORTS THAT THISLASTS FOR ONLY A FEW SECONDS.ALSO FORD STATES, THE VEHICLE'S EXTERIOR LIGHTING WOULD NOT FAIL TO ILLUMINATE EVEN IN THE EVENT OF POWER INTERRUPTION TO THE CLUSTER BECAUSE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS ARE POWERED SEPARATELY AND DO NOT RELY ON ANY SIGNAL FROM THE CLUSTER.ADDITIONALLY, ODI CONTACTED COMPLAINANTS WHO AFFIRMED THE INTERMITTENT CONDITION AND THAT NONE OF THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES WOULD BE AFFECTED BY POWER INTERRUPTIONS TO THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER.ODI LAST RECEIVED A REPORT REGARDING THIS ISSUE IN AUGUST OF 2007.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT A SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT DOES NOT EXIST.FURTHER USE OF AGENCY RESOURCES DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WARRANTED AT THIS TIME.ODI WILL HOWEVER CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE ISSUE AND WILL TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
Illustration