← New search

2012 Ford Edge

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Ford Edge do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 724.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

874 reports with mileage · 260 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 462 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 247 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 168 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

26 crash reports5 fire reports12 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

247 reports
Clear category filter
22,200 miles · Oct 13, 2015
Service Brakes

BACKING DOWN DRIVEWAY IN REVERSE THE BRAKES FAILED TO FUNCTION PROPERLY. I HAD TO STAND ON THEM (PUSH WITH ALL MY LEG STRENGTH) AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY WERE WORKING WITH THE POWER ASSIST. THANKFULLY NO ONE WAS COMING DOWN THE STREET AT THE TIME. I'M CERTAIN THIS IS A DESIGN OR MANUFACTURING FLAW. IT WAS SIMILAR TO THE TIM…

Read full complaint

BACKING DOWN DRIVEWAY IN REVERSE THE BRAKES FAILED TO FUNCTION PROPERLY. I HAD TO STAND ON THEM (PUSH WITH ALL MY LEG STRENGTH) AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY WERE WORKING WITH THE POWER ASSIST. THANKFULLY NO ONE WAS COMING DOWN THE STREET AT THE TIME. I'M CERTAIN THIS IS A DESIGN OR MANUFACTURING FLAW. IT WAS SIMILAR TO THE TIME I BROKE A BRAKE LINE AND ONLY HAD THE REAR DRUM BRAKES WORKING AND HAD TO USE THE EMERGENCY BRAKE TO STOP. TO ME THE BRAKES ARE MISSION CRITICAL FOR SAFETY AND IF FORD WON'T ADMIT IT AND HAVE A RECALL THEN THE NTSB MUST STEP IN. THIS THREAD IS LOADED WITH SIMILAR COMPLAINTS AND SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE RECTIFIED BEFORE SOME ONE IS KILLED.

NHTSA ODI #10781510

Mileage unknown · Oct 8, 2015
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS AN ABNORMAL NOISE COMING FROM THE VEHICLE AS THE BRAKE SYSTEM FAILED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO DEPRESS. THE CONTACT HAD TO APPLY FORCE TO THE BRAKE PEDAL IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TO B…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THERE WAS AN ABNORMAL NOISE COMING FROM THE VEHICLE AS THE BRAKE SYSTEM FAILED. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO DEPRESS. THE CONTACT HAD TO APPLY FORCE TO THE BRAKE PEDAL IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TO BE TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS AWAITING DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS NOT AVAILABLE.

NHTSA ODI #10780916

50,729 miles · Sep 21, 2015
Service Brakes

BRAKES DID NOT INITIALLY RESPOND WHEN BACKING UP. BRAKE PEDAL WAS HARD AND TOOK TREMENDOUS FORCE TO EVEN BEGIN TO SLOW VEHICLE. SAME OCCURRENCE WHEN MOVING FORWARD AT SLOW SPEED. AT FASTER SPEED, BRAKES WERE VERY GRABBY AND INCONSISTENT. IMMEDIATELY CONCERNED FOR SAFETY AND TOOK TO FORD DEALERSHIP. SERVICE TECH. KNEW IMMEDI…

Read full complaint

BRAKES DID NOT INITIALLY RESPOND WHEN BACKING UP. BRAKE PEDAL WAS HARD AND TOOK TREMENDOUS FORCE TO EVEN BEGIN TO SLOW VEHICLE. SAME OCCURRENCE WHEN MOVING FORWARD AT SLOW SPEED. AT FASTER SPEED, BRAKES WERE VERY GRABBY AND INCONSISTENT. IMMEDIATELY CONCERNED FOR SAFETY AND TOOK TO FORD DEALERSHIP. SERVICE TECH. KNEW IMMEDIATELY WHAT ISSUE WAS JUST BY DESCRIPTION OF SYMPTOMS. INFORMED ME CAR UNSAFE TO DRIVE AND THAT REPAIR WOULD BE COVERED BY FORD CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N02 TO REPLACE BRAKE BOOSTER. THIS SEEMS LIKE A RECALL SITUATION AS EVIDENCED BY MANY OTHER ACCOUNTS OF THIS BRAKE FAILURE BY ME AND MANY OTHERS. I WAS JUST FORTUNATE IT DIDN'T OCCUR ON HIGHWAY THE DAY BEFORE.

NHTSA ODI #10766342

85,680 miles · Aug 18, 2015
Service Brakes

BRAKE PEDAL HARD WHEN PUSHED. MAKES WHOOSHING SOUND WHEN HELD TO FLOOR. BRAKES WILL GRAB WHEN PUSHED HARD. HAVE NOTICED BRAKE PEDAL IS VERY HARD TO PUSH WHEN IN REVERSE. IT IS HARD TO STOP VEHICLE WHEN BACKING UP. AT TIMES AFTER HAVING CRUISE CONTROL SET, BRAKES DO NOT WANT TO WORK AT ALL.

NHTSA ODI #10749613

33,000 miles · Aug 4, 2015
Service Brakes

WHEN DRIVING MY EDGE THROUGH THE MOUNTAINS OF UPSTATE NEW YORK, I WENT TO SLOW DOWN GOING DOWN A MOUNTAINOUS ROAD. THE BRAKE PEDAL GOT VERY HARD TO PUSH, AND THE VEHICLE DID NOT WANT TO SLOW DOWN PROPERLY. ALSO NOTICED A HISSING NOISE WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED. CHECKED THE BRAKE FLUID AT THE FIRST AVAILABLE EXIT AND NOTIC…

Read full complaint

WHEN DRIVING MY EDGE THROUGH THE MOUNTAINS OF UPSTATE NEW YORK, I WENT TO SLOW DOWN GOING DOWN A MOUNTAINOUS ROAD. THE BRAKE PEDAL GOT VERY HARD TO PUSH, AND THE VEHICLE DID NOT WANT TO SLOW DOWN PROPERLY. ALSO NOTICED A HISSING NOISE WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED. CHECKED THE BRAKE FLUID AT THE FIRST AVAILABLE EXIT AND NOTICED THE MASTER CYLINDER WAS 1/2 EMPTY. PURCHASED NEW FLUID AND INSTALLED THE NEEDED AMOUNT IN THE MASTER CYLINDER. THE REMAINDER OF THE 1400 MILE TRIP THE MASTER CYLINDER DID NOT SHOW ANY LOSS OF FLUID, BUT THE BRAKES ARE STILL NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. GOT HOME AND BROUGHT THE VEHICLE TO THE LOCAL LINCOLN/ FORD DEALERSHIP, AS I PURCHASED THIS VEHICLE NEW. THEY REPLACED THE BRAKE POWER BOOSTER UNDER THE EXTENDED BRAKE WARRANTY, AND SAID THE VEHICLE WAS READY TO GO. I TEST DROVE THE VEHICLE AND FOUND THE BRAKES STILL NOT PROPERLY FUNCTIONING. STILL VERY LOW BRAKE PEDAL, AND SOFT ALSO WHILE STOPPED AT LIGHT THE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR AREA. AND THEY TEST DROVE THE CAR THEY SAID. IMMEDIATELY WENT BACK TO DEALER AND LEFT THE VEHICLE. THEY SAID THEY WILL ASK FORD IF THEY WILL APPROVE THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER FOR REPLACEMENT. VEHICLE IS AT THE DEALER AS OF TODAY AUGUST 4, 2015. VEHICLE NOT SAFE TO DRIVE, COLLISION IS A VERY HIGH RISK WITH THE VEHICLE AS IT NOW IS. LEFT THE VEHICLE AT THE DEALER AS STATED BEFORE AND WILL NOT PICKUP THE VEHICLE UNTIL PROPERLY REPAIRED A SECOND TIME. LOOSING FAITH IN FORD AT THIS TIME, WHAT OTHER ISSUES WILL OCCUR IN THE FUTURE?

NHTSA ODI #10746123

Mileage unknown · Jul 16, 2015
Service Brakes

DURING NORMAL DRIVING HITTING THE BREAK, THE PEDAL FEELS HARD AND THE VEHICLE DOESN'T WANT TO STOP. IT JUST KEEPS MOVING FOREWORD. I HAVE TO PUSH HARDER ON THE BREAK PEDAL TO GET THE BREAKS TO CATCH AND STOP THE VEHICLE . I'M THINKING CHECK VALVE OR BOOSTER.

NHTSA ODI #10734658

31,000 miles · Jul 9, 2015
Service BrakesCrashInjury

6-2-2015: I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AND WAS COMING TO A STOP SIGN. I STEPPED ON BRAKES AND WITHOUT WARNING THE BRAKES DID NOT ENGAGE. I WENT THRU THE STOP SIGN ON MAJOR ROADWAY AT 30 MPH. I WAS HIT BY ONCOMING TRAFFIC TRAVELING AT 45 MPH. THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED AND 3 PEOPLE, MYSELF INCLUDED, WERE INJURED. I OWNED THE VEHICLE …

Read full complaint

6-2-2015: I WAS DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AND WAS COMING TO A STOP SIGN. I STEPPED ON BRAKES AND WITHOUT WARNING THE BRAKES DID NOT ENGAGE. I WENT THRU THE STOP SIGN ON MAJOR ROADWAY AT 30 MPH. I WAS HIT BY ONCOMING TRAFFIC TRAVELING AT 45 MPH. THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED AND 3 PEOPLE, MYSELF INCLUDED, WERE INJURED. I OWNED THE VEHICLE LESS THAN 2 MONTHS. MY FIRST FORD IN YEARS. FORD HAS KNOWN ABOUT A BRAKE BOOSTER PROBLEM FOR YEARS AND HAS NOT RECALLED THE VEHICLE. FORD'S FIX IS TO EXTEND THE WARRANTY 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES FOR THE BRAKE BOOSTER. I FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS ON GOING PROBLEM WITH THE EDGE AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS SALVAGED. I TALKED WITH MY INSURANCE COMPANY AND THEIR RESPONSE WAS TOO BAD FOR YOU. I WANTED THE BRAKE BOOSTER CHECKED OUT. FORD SHOULD BE RECALLING ALL THE EFFECTED VEHICLES NOW, BEFORE SOMEBODY IS KILLED. THERE HAVE BEEN OVER 50 COMPLAINTS FILED WITH NHTSA SINCE 2012.

NHTSA ODI #10732917

76,285 miles · Jul 2, 2015
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING AT 55 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL MULTIPLE TIMES TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE RECURRED ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF T…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING AT 55 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THE CONTACT HAD TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL MULTIPLE TIMES TO STOP THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE RECURRED ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 76,285.

NHTSA ODI #10731719

23,281 miles · Jun 27, 2015
Service Brakes

SEPT 2013 - BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO FLOOR IN REVERSE WITH VERY LITTLE RESPONSE. MOVING FORWARD ALMOST NO RESPONSE FROM BRAKES AND ALMOST HIT A CAR CROSSING IN FRONT. AT THE FORD DEALER, THE COMPONENT TEST MASTER CYLINDER FAILED AND ALSO NOTED WITH BRAKE PEDAL WHISTLE NOISE WHEN PEDAL COMPLETELY ON THE FLOOR. REPLACED THE BOOSTER …

Read full complaint

SEPT 2013 - BRAKE PEDAL WENT TO FLOOR IN REVERSE WITH VERY LITTLE RESPONSE. MOVING FORWARD ALMOST NO RESPONSE FROM BRAKES AND ALMOST HIT A CAR CROSSING IN FRONT. AT THE FORD DEALER, THE COMPONENT TEST MASTER CYLINDER FAILED AND ALSO NOTED WITH BRAKE PEDAL WHISTLE NOISE WHEN PEDAL COMPLETELY ON THE FLOOR. REPLACED THE BOOSTER AND MASTER CYLINDER UNDER WARRANTY. JULY 2014 - BRAKE PROBLEM INTERMITTENTLY RECURS. BRAKE PEDAL SOMETIMES GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR WHEN THE CAR IS STARTED. FORD DEALER COULD NOT REPLICATE PROBLEM. JULY 2015 - AT CAR START, BRAKE IS VERY FIRM THEN SLOWLY GOES ALL THE WAY TO FLOOR. THIS OCCURS ABOUT EVERY OTHER TIME THE CAR IS STARTED. THIS APPEARS TO BE THE SAME ISSUE DESCRIBED IN THE RECENT FORD F-150 INVESTIGATION OF THE ELECTRIC VACUUM ASSIST PUMP.

NHTSA ODI #10730755

39,000 miles · Jun 13, 2015
Service BrakesCrash

STOP AND GO TRAFFIC. STOPPED AT TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4 CARS BACK. TRAFFIC STARTED MOVING ON GREEN LIGHT, I TAPPED MY BRAKES 3X, 4TH TIME NO BRAKES. I ROLLED INTO THE BACK OF A JEEP SLOWLY, 2MPH, WHILE STANDING ON MY BRAKE PEDAL WITH NO HYDRAULIC PRESSURE AT ALL. WE MOVED TO THE SHOPPING MALL PARKING LOT, BRAKE PRESSURE WAS RESTORED.…

Read full complaint

STOP AND GO TRAFFIC. STOPPED AT TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4 CARS BACK. TRAFFIC STARTED MOVING ON GREEN LIGHT, I TAPPED MY BRAKES 3X, 4TH TIME NO BRAKES. I ROLLED INTO THE BACK OF A JEEP SLOWLY, 2MPH, WHILE STANDING ON MY BRAKE PEDAL WITH NO HYDRAULIC PRESSURE AT ALL. WE MOVED TO THE SHOPPING MALL PARKING LOT, BRAKE PRESSURE WAS RESTORED. HAPPENED ONLY WHEN PUMPING BRAKES REPEATEDLY AT SLOW RATE OF SPEED. BROUGHT VEHICLE TO DEALER. TOLD BRAKE BOOSTER WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROGRAM # 13N02.COMPLETED 7/29/14. PREVIOUSLY RAN VEHICLE HEALTH REPORT THROUGH MYSYNC = BRAKES OK. FEB'14 - OIL CHANGE AT DEALERSHIP. ASKED ABOUT LETTER I RECEIVED ABOUT BRAKE BOOSTER BUT WAS TOLD "I WASN'T READY FOR THAT JUST YET. I WOULD FEEL SPONGY BRAKES BEFORE IT NEEDED REPLACING". THEY DROVE MY VEHICLE INTO BAY AND TECH SAID BRAKES WERE FINE. OBVIOUSLY NOT. BRAKES FAILED WITHOUT WARNING. 77% INCREASE IN PREMIUMS DUE TO MERIT RATING BOARD, INSURANCE AGENT SAID THEY COULD DO NOTHING ABOUT SURCHARGE (10 YR OLD JEEP BUMPER THAT WAS ALREADY RUSTED OUT) .

NHTSA ODI #10725078

Official recalls

3

14V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft

Jul 2, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.

14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline

Jan 6, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.

12V438000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings

Sep 7, 2012

Ford is recalling certain 2012 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through October 31, 2011, equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will repair the vehicles free of charge. The safety recall began on September 27, 2012. Owners may contact Ford Motor Company Customer Relationship Center at 1-866-436-7332.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Interior Lighting

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.