MY WIFE WAS DRIVING ON A CITY STREET & HAD TO APPLY HARD BRAKING. NOW THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR & THE CAR DOES NOT STOP PROPERLY.
2012 Ford Edge
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
Similar to other model years
Owner complaints for the 2012 Ford Edge do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 724.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Edge years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
874 reports with mileage · 260 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Electrical System. Review the 462 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes. Review the 247 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Structure. Review the 168 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Service Brakes complaints
247 reportsCOULD NOT STOP THE VEHICLE. SOFT PEDAL. THANK GOODNESS I ALWAYS LEAVE LOTS OF ROOM WHEN IN TRAFFIC. PRESSED ON BRAKES. NOTHING. QUICKLY PRESSED AGAIN. NOTHING. QUICKLY PRESSED AGAIN. STOOD ON BRAKES. :FINALLY STOPPED. SCARED THE DAYLIGHTS OUT OF ME. WAS SOLE PASSENGER, THANK GOODNESS, AS USUALLY HAVE PASSENGERS WITH…
Read full complaint
COULD NOT STOP THE VEHICLE. SOFT PEDAL. THANK GOODNESS I ALWAYS LEAVE LOTS OF ROOM WHEN IN TRAFFIC. PRESSED ON BRAKES. NOTHING. QUICKLY PRESSED AGAIN. NOTHING. QUICKLY PRESSED AGAIN. STOOD ON BRAKES. :FINALLY STOPPED. SCARED THE DAYLIGHTS OUT OF ME. WAS SOLE PASSENGER, THANK GOODNESS, AS USUALLY HAVE PASSENGERS WITH ME. HAS HAPPENED A FEW TIMES THIS WEEK AND A FEW OTHER TIMES OVER THE PAST MONTH. THOUGHT I JUST NEEDED TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT WITH MY MECHANIC TO BLEED THE BRAKES OR CHECK THE MASTER CYLINDER. STARTED AT AROUND 70,000 MILES ON VEHICLE. AM TAKING CAR TO MY MECHANIC BUT AM READING THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH 2012 FORD EDGES. WHY ISN'T THERE AR ECAL WHEN THIS SEEMS TO BE A COMMON OCCURRENCE! IT'S NOT A MATTER OF IF, BUT WHEN, THIS WILL BE A SERIOUS MULTI-CASUALTY ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN. DO PEOPLE NEED TO DIE/BECOME VEGETABLES BEFORE ANYTHING WILL BE DONE SO THAT FORD TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR MECHANICAL/DESIGN FLAWS THAT CAN DESTROY LIVES AND PROPERTY???????
2012 FORD EDGE LIMITED. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO BRAKE PERFORMANCE ISSUES. *LD THE CONSUMER REQUESTED TO BE REIMBURSED FOR THE LABOR COST REPLACEMENT OF THE APIM. *JS
BRAKE CONCERN - THE BRAKES ON MY 2012 FORD EDGE ARE VERY SPONGY, YOU MUST DEPRESS ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR IN ORDER TO STOP. I SEE THE BRAKE BOOSTER WAS REPLACED ONCE UNDER A OWNER NOTIFICATION PROGRAM WHICH TECHNICALLY ISN'T A RECALL BUT IT IS SOMETHING FORD PROVIDES AS A CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ACTION. I FEEL THE CONCERN IS …
Read full complaint
BRAKE CONCERN - THE BRAKES ON MY 2012 FORD EDGE ARE VERY SPONGY, YOU MUST DEPRESS ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR IN ORDER TO STOP. I SEE THE BRAKE BOOSTER WAS REPLACED ONCE UNDER A OWNER NOTIFICATION PROGRAM WHICH TECHNICALLY ISN'T A RECALL BUT IT IS SOMETHING FORD PROVIDES AS A CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ACTION. I FEEL THE CONCERN IS RELATED TO THE ORIGINAL PROGRAM BUT THE BRAKING CONCERN IS STILL PRESENT AND I AM CONCERNED THAT SOMETHING BIGGER MAY BE GOING ON. I AM PLEADING FOR ASSISTANCE IN GETTING THIS RESOLVED BECAUSE IT WOULD BE COSTLY OUT OF POCKET EXPENSE FOR ME CONSIDERING IT IS A KNOWN CONCERN WITHIN FORD.
THE 2010-2013 FORD EDGE HAS A KNOWN ISSUE WITH THE BRAKE BOOSTER, HOWEVER, AFTER TWO REPLACEMENTS OF THE BRAKE BOOSTER ALONE, I AM CONTINUING TO EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS WITH MY BRAKES. THE TIME FOR MY VEHICLE TO COME TO A COMPLETE STOP HAS TRIPLED, IF NOT MORE. I HAD THE INITIAL REPLACEMENT DONE AT APPROXIMATELY 60,000 MILES AND AM …
Read full complaint
THE 2010-2013 FORD EDGE HAS A KNOWN ISSUE WITH THE BRAKE BOOSTER, HOWEVER, AFTER TWO REPLACEMENTS OF THE BRAKE BOOSTER ALONE, I AM CONTINUING TO EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS WITH MY BRAKES. THE TIME FOR MY VEHICLE TO COME TO A COMPLETE STOP HAS TRIPLED, IF NOT MORE. I HAD THE INITIAL REPLACEMENT DONE AT APPROXIMATELY 60,000 MILES AND AM HAVING THE SAME PROBLEM AT 82,000. THE BRAKES FEEL SPONGY AND WHILE THEY DO NOT COMPLETELY FAIL, THE PEDAL GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR AND STOPPING TIME IS SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASED. THIS HAPPENS AT ALL SPEEDS IN ALL CONDITIONS.
BRAKE PEDAL IS GETTING VERY HARD WHEN DRIVING
I HAVE THIS CAR IN THE SHOP FOR PTU X2, THE SENSORS IN THE CAR WENT OUT CAUSING THE SHIFTER AND LIGHTS AND DOORS NOT TO WORK THE BREAKS WENT OUT AND NOW THE CYCLIC CONVERTER IS GOING OUT AND THERE IS A GAS LICK SOMEWHERE IN THE CAR OR A VIPER LICK SOMEWHERE AND ALL OF THIS STARTED 3000 MILES OVER THE WARRANTY AND IT HAS BEEN IN …
Read full complaint
I HAVE THIS CAR IN THE SHOP FOR PTU X2, THE SENSORS IN THE CAR WENT OUT CAUSING THE SHIFTER AND LIGHTS AND DOORS NOT TO WORK THE BREAKS WENT OUT AND NOW THE CYCLIC CONVERTER IS GOING OUT AND THERE IS A GAS LICK SOMEWHERE IN THE CAR OR A VIPER LICK SOMEWHERE AND ALL OF THIS STARTED 3000 MILES OVER THE WARRANTY AND IT HAS BEEN IN SHOP A TOTAL OF 5 TIMES IN THE PAST 2 YEARS
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS LOOSE AND TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. AFTERWARDS, THE VEHICLE MADE AN ABNORMAL HISSING …
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS LOOSE AND TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE MASTER CYLINDER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. AFTERWARDS, THE VEHICLE MADE AN ABNORMAL HISSING NOISE. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE BRAKE BOOSTER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE CONTACT CALLED A LOCAL DEALER (SLOAN-FORD LINCOLN MERCURY INC, 115 S JAMES CAMPBELL BLVD, COLUMBIA, TN 38401). THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE ISSUE AND REFERRED THE CONTACT TO NHTSA. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 78,000.
I HAVE HAD TROUBLE WITH BRAKE SYSTEM SINCE I'VE PURCHASED THE VEHICLE. REPLACED BRAKE PADS SEVERAL TIMES. LAST WEEK, NOTICED PUSHING BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR TO STOP, TOOK IN TO THE MECHANIC THAT I USE-THE ENTIRE MASTER CYLINDER WAS BLOWN OUT THE BACK WITH BRAKE FLUID JUST POURING OUT. HE REPLACED THE MASTER CYLINDER (FROM FOR…
Read full complaint
I HAVE HAD TROUBLE WITH BRAKE SYSTEM SINCE I'VE PURCHASED THE VEHICLE. REPLACED BRAKE PADS SEVERAL TIMES. LAST WEEK, NOTICED PUSHING BRAKE PEDAL TO THE FLOOR TO STOP, TOOK IN TO THE MECHANIC THAT I USE-THE ENTIRE MASTER CYLINDER WAS BLOWN OUT THE BACK WITH BRAKE FLUID JUST POURING OUT. HE REPLACED THE MASTER CYLINDER (FROM FORD PARTS STORE) AND ALSO FRONT AND BACK BRAKES. WHEN I PICKED UP MY VEHICLE, ITS STILL NOT CORRECTED. BRAKE PEDAL IS STILL "LOOSE" ALMOST GOING TO THE FLOOR AS IT WAS AND NOW IT HAS HISSING NOISE AND SPONGE PEDAL. I CALLED THE FORD DEALERSHIP, STATES THAT IS A BRAKE BOOSTER ISSUE.TO CALL AND CHECK RECALL ON THIS PARTICULAR VIN #. I CALLED FORD MOTOR CO AT 1-800-392-3673 AND VERIFIED NO RECALL ON MY SPECIF VIN #, BUT MANY FORD EDGE 2012 HAVE BEEN RECALLED FOR THE BRAKE BOOSTER. THEY REFERRED ME TO CONTACT THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION TO GIVE THIS SAFETY COMPLAINT. I';M VERY UPSET THAT THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE WITH MY FORD EDGE AND NOTHING IS BEING OFFERED TO ME THROUGH FORD TO GET THIS ISSUE FIXED. THIS WOULD BE WHEN VEHICLE IS IN MOTION OBVIOUSLY....
BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED NEARLY KILLING US IN DEC 2015 AS WE ROLLED INTO AN INTERSECTION. LUCKILY NOBODY HIT US. REPAIRED JAN 2016 UNDER CUST SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N02 BY FORD, LIKELY TO AVOID A REAL RECALL. REPLACEMENT BOOSTER HAS NOW FAILED ALMOST CAUSING ANOTHER ACCIDENT AFTER A YEAR AND 1/2 AND 15K MILES AS WIFE HAD TO RUN O…
Read full complaint
BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED NEARLY KILLING US IN DEC 2015 AS WE ROLLED INTO AN INTERSECTION. LUCKILY NOBODY HIT US. REPAIRED JAN 2016 UNDER CUST SATISFACTION PROGRAM 13N02 BY FORD, LIKELY TO AVOID A REAL RECALL. REPLACEMENT BOOSTER HAS NOW FAILED ALMOST CAUSING ANOTHER ACCIDENT AFTER A YEAR AND 1/2 AND 15K MILES AS WIFE HAD TO RUN OFF ROAD TO AVOID STOPPED TRAFFIC BECAUSE SHE HAD NO BRAKES. WHY HAS NHTSA NOT FORCED A RECALL? IT IS LITERALLY IS A SITUATION WHERE THOUSANDS OF THESE CARS ARE ROLLING AROUND WITH ADULTS AND YOUNG DRIVERS NOT KNOWING THAT AT SOME POINT THEY'LL NEED TO STOP AND THEY WILL HAVE ZERO BRAKES. IS ANYBODY READING THESE? YES IF YOU PUSH TO THE FLOOR HARD AND HOLD IT TIGHT IT WILL EVENTUALLY STOP AS A CRUDE MANUAL BRAKE. KIDS HAVE NEVER DRIVEN A CAR WITHOUT POWER BRAKES! THE REST OF US AREN'T EXPECTING IT SINCE NO WARNING SIGNS. FORD IS SIMPLY INSTALLING THE SAME DEFECTIVE PART ENDANGERING LIVES. WHAT DO WE DO, SELL THE CAR AND PUT SOMEONE ELSE AT RISK SINCE THE REPLACEMENT PARTS ARE THE SAME FAULTY CRAP?
Official recalls
314V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft
Jul 2, 2014
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.
14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline
Jan 6, 2014
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.
12V438000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings
Sep 7, 2012
Ford is recalling certain 2012 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through October 31, 2011, equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.
Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will repair the vehicles free of charge. The safety recall began on September 27, 2012. Owners may contact Ford Motor Company Customer Relationship Center at 1-866-436-7332.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On
Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Additional source detail variants (3)
Interior Lighting
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Latches/locks/linkages
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.
Illustration