← New search

2012 Ford Edge

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Ford Edge do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 724.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

874 reports with mileage · 260 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 462 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 247 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 168 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

26 crash reports5 fire reports12 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

247 reports
Clear category filter
80,000 miles · Jul 15, 2019
Service Brakes

I HAVE EXPERIENCE BRAKE FAILURE 3 TIMES SINCE NOVEMBER 2018. I HAVE HAD NUMEROUS REPAIRS SUCH AS BRAKE BOOSTER REPLACEMENT, MASTER CYLANDER, FLUSHES,HCU ASSY REPLACEMENT AND MY BRAKES STILL GO OUT. ALL THE WHILE WITH MY CHILDREN IN THE CAR. I AM SCARED TO DRIVE IT ANYMORE

NHTSA ODI #11232016

127,000 miles · Jul 9, 2019
Service Brakes

BRAKES QUIT WORKING WHILE EXECUTING A NORMAL STOP. PEDAL TO THE FLOOR. REPLACED ALL BRAKE COMPONENTS AND AFTER A MONTH OF REPAIRS MECHANIC SAID CAR IS NOT FIXABLE THAT I NEED TO JUNK THE CAR. UPON FURTHER RESEARCH I DISCOVERED THAT MANY OTHER VEHICLES WITH THE SAME MAKE AND MODEL HAVE THE EXACT SAME PROBLEMS

NHTSA ODI #11230456

147,013 miles · Jul 3, 2019
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH, THE BRAKES FAILED. WHEN THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO BRAKE, THE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE CONTACT ALMOST CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE DUE TO THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHO DIAGNOSED THAT A NEW MASTER CYLINDER AND ABS BLEED MOT…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING 40 MPH, THE BRAKES FAILED. WHEN THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO BRAKE, THE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOORBOARD. THE CONTACT ALMOST CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE DUE TO THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHO DIAGNOSED THAT A NEW MASTER CYLINDER AND ABS BLEED MOTOR UNIT NEEDED TO BE INSTALLED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER AND DEALER WERE NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 147,013. THE CONSUMER STATED NO WARNING LIGHTS ILLUMINATED WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED.*JS

NHTSA ODI #11229281

100,000 miles · Jul 1, 2019
Service Brakes

BRAKING ISSUES EXACTLY AS A PRIOR ISSUE THAT WAS REPAIRED WITH BOOSTER REPAIR AS PART OF A CUSTOMER CAMPAIGN. DEALERSHIP AND THE FORD CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE STATES THAT THESE PARTS ARE NO LONGER COVERED OR A SAFETY CONCERN FOR THEM! ISSUE APPEARS UNEXPECTEDLY WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR, FEELS SOFT INITI…

Read full complaint

BRAKING ISSUES EXACTLY AS A PRIOR ISSUE THAT WAS REPAIRED WITH BOOSTER REPAIR AS PART OF A CUSTOMER CAMPAIGN. DEALERSHIP AND THE FORD CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE STATES THAT THESE PARTS ARE NO LONGER COVERED OR A SAFETY CONCERN FOR THEM! ISSUE APPEARS UNEXPECTEDLY WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR, FEELS SOFT INITIALLY THEN HARDENS AT THE LAST POSSIBLE MINUTE. IT HAPPENS INTERMITTENTLY AT FIRST AND IS UNRELIABLE AND UNSAFE! THIS HAPPENED AT 70 AND 100 THOUSAND MILES. THIS HAPPENS WHILE DRIVING UNDER VARYING CIRCUMSTANCES AND IS UNPREDICTABLE INITIALLY, VERY SAD THAT FORD IS NOT CONCERNED FOR A PREVIOUSLY LOYAL CUSTOMER!

NHTSA ODI #11228728

82,351 miles · Jun 28, 2019
Service BrakesUnknown Or Other

FROM JUNE 2018 TO JUNE 2019 I HAVE INVESTED OVER $4000 IN PRIMARILY THE BRAKING SYTEM OF MY CAR. I CONTINUE TO HAVE ISSUES WHEN AFTER FILLING MY GAS TANK THE CAR HESITATES IN STARTING. I HAVE REPLACED EVERYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE BREAKING SYSTEM FROM BRAKE PADS TO HCU SYSTEM TO THE ABS SYSTEM. EVEN THE NEW PARTS HAVE HAD T…

Read full complaint

FROM JUNE 2018 TO JUNE 2019 I HAVE INVESTED OVER $4000 IN PRIMARILY THE BRAKING SYTEM OF MY CAR. I CONTINUE TO HAVE ISSUES WHEN AFTER FILLING MY GAS TANK THE CAR HESITATES IN STARTING. I HAVE REPLACED EVERYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE BREAKING SYSTEM FROM BRAKE PADS TO HCU SYSTEM TO THE ABS SYSTEM. EVEN THE NEW PARTS HAVE HAD TO BE REPLACED BECAUSE THEY WERE FAULTY.

NHTSA ODI #11228282

Mileage unknown · Jun 28, 2019
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED, THE CONTACT FELT AN ABNORMAL CONDITION AND HEARD A NOISE COMING FROM THE BRAKE SYSTEM. THE BRAKE PEDAL HAD TO BE APPLIED WITH FORCE TO THE FLOORBOARD TO ENSURE THE VEHICLE CAME TO A COMPLETE STOP. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INC…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED, THE CONTACT FELT AN ABNORMAL CONDITION AND HEARD A NOISE COMING FROM THE BRAKE SYSTEM. THE BRAKE PEDAL HAD TO BE APPLIED WITH FORCE TO THE FLOORBOARD TO ENSURE THE VEHICLE CAME TO A COMPLETE STOP. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN ANY RECALL CAMPAIGNS FOR THE BRAKES. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE DEALER WAS NOT CONTACTED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS NOT AVAILABLE.

NHTSA ODI #11223122

122,500 miles · Jun 4, 2019
Electrical SystemService Brakes

I WAS DRIVING TO WORK THROUGH A BUSY TOWN I WAS PREPARING TO STOP AT A STOPLIGHT AND MY BRAKES WENT TO THE FLOOR THERE WEREN'T ANY SIGNS OF BRAKE ISSUES PRIOR SO I ASSUMED THE BRAKES NEEDED REPLACING SO WHEN I GOT OFF WORK I WENT AND BOUGHT BRAKES MY HUSBAND WAS GONNA PUT THEM ON WHEN HE CHECKED HE SAID THE BRAKES WERE FINE THAT…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING TO WORK THROUGH A BUSY TOWN I WAS PREPARING TO STOP AT A STOPLIGHT AND MY BRAKES WENT TO THE FLOOR THERE WEREN'T ANY SIGNS OF BRAKE ISSUES PRIOR SO I ASSUMED THE BRAKES NEEDED REPLACING SO WHEN I GOT OFF WORK I WENT AND BOUGHT BRAKES MY HUSBAND WAS GONNA PUT THEM ON WHEN HE CHECKED HE SAID THE BRAKES WERE FINE THAT THE FLUID COULD BE LEAKING THE FLUID LEVEL WAS FINE AND NO LEAKS WERE FOUND HE STILL LOOKED FOR ONE JUST IN CASE SO NEXT HE SAID IT COULD BE MASTER CYLINDER AND RESERVOIR I WAS LOOKING ONLINE AT THIS POINT AND SEEN ALL THE SAME ISSUES OTHERS WERE HAVING AS WELL WITH THIS SUV I TOLD HIM THERE WASN'T ANY NEED TO SPEND MORE MONEY BECAUSE THE WAY IT SOUNDED WAS THAT ITS NOT GONNA FIX THE ISSUE ANY HOW BECAUSE FORD ITSELF CAN'T FIGURE OUT WHY BRAKES ARE GOING TO THE FLOOR THEMSELVES SO I'M LEFT WITH A UNSAFE VEHICLE TO DRIVE WITH A PAYOFF OF 10000 DOLLARS WHAT DO I DO? I'M SO TIRED OF GETTING SCREWED THAT I'M ABT TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY AND FIND OUT WHY AM I LEFT WITH THIS PROBLEM TO FACE AND WHY OTHERS ARE HAVING TO SUFFER AS WELL IF THERE'S AN ONGOING LAWSUIT NEAR WASHINGTON NC LET ME KNOW IF NOT THERE'S SOON TO BE ONE IF OTHERS NEED TO JOIN AS WELL

NHTSA ODI #11217883

65,495 miles · May 19, 2019
Service Brakes

VEHICLE PURCHASED 12 FEB 2012. AT 8,344 MILES, VEHICLE WAS CHECKED INTO THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT AT SHAMALEY FORD, EL PASO, TX BECAUSE POWER BRAKES WERE NOT WORKING ON AN INTERMITTENT BASIS. COMPLAINT READS: "BRAKE PEDAL HARD AND WHEN PUMPING GOES VERY LOW." SERVICE DEPARTMENT COMMENT: "CAUSE: BOOSTER NOT WORKING AT TIMES. 2005A B…

Read full complaint

VEHICLE PURCHASED 12 FEB 2012. AT 8,344 MILES, VEHICLE WAS CHECKED INTO THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT AT SHAMALEY FORD, EL PASO, TX BECAUSE POWER BRAKES WERE NOT WORKING ON AN INTERMITTENT BASIS. COMPLAINT READS: "BRAKE PEDAL HARD AND WHEN PUMPING GOES VERY LOW." SERVICE DEPARTMENT COMMENT: "CAUSE: BOOSTER NOT WORKING AT TIMES. 2005A BRAKE BOOSTER ASSEMBLY . . . REPLACE BT4Z*2005*A BOOSTER ASY - BRAKE" NOW AT 65,495 (16 MAY 2019), THE SAME CONDITION EXISTS. NOT INVOLVED IN A COLLISION, BUT A FEW TIMES THE VEHICLE CAME TOO CLOSE TO OTHER CARS BEFORE STOPPING. OCCURS CONSISTENTLY AFTER BEING PARKED, AND THEN INTERMITTENTLY AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS WHILE USING CRUISE CONTROL. STEPPING ON BRAKE FAILED TO DISENGAGE CRUISE CONTROL THE FIRST TIME, HAD TO TAKE THE FOOT OFF THE BRAKE PEDAL AND STEP ON THE BRAKE HARD AGAIN. HAPPENS A CITY SPEED LIMITS, ALSO INTERMITTENTLY. DEFECTIVE PART? NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED, AND IF DEFECTIVE, ISSUE A RECALL AND HOLD FORD RESPONSIBLE FOR FREE REPLACEMENT.

NHTSA ODI #11208508

92,250 miles · Apr 18, 2019
Service BrakesCrash

MY BRAKES HAVE BEEN ROUTINELY SERVICED AND BRAKE BOOSTER REPLACED . THE PADDLE GOES ALL THE WAY TO FLOOR. I JUST HAD THE WORKS DONE LAST WEEK ON APRIL 10TH 2019 . WELL TODAY WE WEREN'T SO LUCKY. WE LEFT FOR VACATION AND IN VIRGINIA WE GOT INTO AN ACCIDENT BECAUSE THE BRAKES FAILED ON US .

NHTSA ODI #11197109

119,000 miles · Apr 18, 2019
Service Brakes

PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WHILE DRIVING ON A HIGHWAY WHICH ALMOST RESULTED IN A SERIOUS CAR ACCIDENT BECAUSE THE BRAKING SYSTEM DID NOT ENGAGE. UNAWARE OF THE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ABOUT SPONGY BRAKES, NTB ATTEMPTED TO REPLACE HOSES AND MASTER CYLINDER TO NO AVAIL AFTER REPLACING THE MASTER CYLINDER THREE TIMES. THERE IS OBVIOUSLY…

Read full complaint

PEDAL WENT TO THE FLOOR WHILE DRIVING ON A HIGHWAY WHICH ALMOST RESULTED IN A SERIOUS CAR ACCIDENT BECAUSE THE BRAKING SYSTEM DID NOT ENGAGE. UNAWARE OF THE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ABOUT SPONGY BRAKES, NTB ATTEMPTED TO REPLACE HOSES AND MASTER CYLINDER TO NO AVAIL AFTER REPLACING THE MASTER CYLINDER THREE TIMES. THERE IS OBVIOUSLY A DEFECT IN THE PARTS /SYSTEM SINCE QUALIFIED MECHANICS CAN'T FIX THE VEHICLE. CAR WILL BE TOWED TO A FORD DEALERSHIP BUT THEY HAVE ALREADY STARTED WITH DISCLAIMERS AND THAT THERE IS NO RECALL OR ISSUES WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM DESPITE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS VERY PROBLEM . NHTSA NEEDS TO INTERVENE AND FORCE FORD TO RECALL THIS DEFECTIVE PART . LIVES CAN BE LOST UNNECESSARILY BECAUSE NO ONE HAS TAKEN ACTION ON BEHALF OF THE CONSUMER.

NHTSA ODI #11197086

Official recalls

3

14V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft

Jul 2, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.

14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline

Jan 6, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.

12V438000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings

Sep 7, 2012

Ford is recalling certain 2012 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through October 31, 2011, equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will repair the vehicles free of charge. The safety recall began on September 27, 2012. Owners may contact Ford Motor Company Customer Relationship Center at 1-866-436-7332.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Interior Lighting

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.