← New search

2012 Ford Edge

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Similar to other model years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Ford Edge do not stand out strongly from the model-year median of 724.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

874 reports with mileage · 260 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 462 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 247 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Structure. Review the 168 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

26 crash reports5 fire reports12 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

247 reports
Clear category filter
125,000 miles · Oct 21, 2019
Service Brakes

BRAKES HAVE FAILED TWICE ON THIS VEHICLE IN DRIVEWAY.

NHTSA ODI #11269991

120,000 miles · Sep 24, 2019
Service Brakes

DRIVING DOWN A STEEP HILL AFTER PICKING UP MY INFANT CHILD FROM DAYCARE MY BRAKES LOST ALL PRESSURE. MY BRAKES HAD DEPRESSED ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR BEFORE CATCHING ANY BRAKES AT ALL. I IMMEDIATELY THREW MY CAR INTO 1ST GEAR AND BEGAN MY VERY SLOW AND SCARY DESCENT INTO TOWN AND IMMEDIATELY INTO THE SERVICE STATION. I PARKED TH…

Read full complaint

DRIVING DOWN A STEEP HILL AFTER PICKING UP MY INFANT CHILD FROM DAYCARE MY BRAKES LOST ALL PRESSURE. MY BRAKES HAD DEPRESSED ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR BEFORE CATCHING ANY BRAKES AT ALL. I IMMEDIATELY THREW MY CAR INTO 1ST GEAR AND BEGAN MY VERY SLOW AND SCARY DESCENT INTO TOWN AND IMMEDIATELY INTO THE SERVICE STATION. I PARKED THE CAR, SHUT OFF THE ENGINE. WHEN THE TECHNICIAN CAME TO TEST DRIVE FOR ISSUES AS THERE WERE NO CODES BEING THROWN, THE CAR HAD REGAINED ITS NORMAL BRAKES. I HAD MISTAKENLY ASSUMED IT WAS A GLITCH OF SOME SORT AND TWO WEEKS LATER IT DID THE SAME THING IN THE MIDDLE OF DRIVING IN TOWN. I WAS ABLE TO PULL OVER, SHUT THE CAR DOWN AND RESTART THE ENGINE, BUT THIS TIME THE CAR DID NOT REGAIN THE BRAKES AS NORMAL AND IS STILL NOT DRIVEABLE WITH MY KIDS IN TOW. WE HAVE MANAGED TO PARK IT IN THE MEANTIME, BUT THIS IS EXTREMELY UNSAFE AND NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED.

NHTSA ODI #11257799

50,000 miles · Sep 23, 2019
Service Brakes

WHEN NORMALLY DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL, THE ABS INTERMITTENTLY ACTIVATES. ALSO, THE BRAKE PEDAL GETS SOFT. THERE ARE VERY NEW BRAKES ON MY 2012 FORD EDGE. THE LOCAL FORD DEALER, FORD CUSTOMER SERVICE HOTLINE ALL SAY THERE IS NO KNOWN ISSUE AS THIS. THERE ARE WEBSITE LISTING NUMEROUS ACCIDENTS INDICATING SAME ISSUES WHERE ABS A…

Read full complaint

WHEN NORMALLY DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL, THE ABS INTERMITTENTLY ACTIVATES. ALSO, THE BRAKE PEDAL GETS SOFT. THERE ARE VERY NEW BRAKES ON MY 2012 FORD EDGE. THE LOCAL FORD DEALER, FORD CUSTOMER SERVICE HOTLINE ALL SAY THERE IS NO KNOWN ISSUE AS THIS. THERE ARE WEBSITE LISTING NUMEROUS ACCIDENTS INDICATING SAME ISSUES WHERE ABS ACTIVATES, BRAKE PEDAL GOES TO THE FLOOR RESULTING IN AN ACCIDENT. THIS ISSUE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED BY FORD AND A RECALL PERFORMED. SO FAR, NO KNOWN DEATHS BUT THERE HAVE BEEN MANY ACCIDENTS WITH INJURIES. THE ISSUE IS IN THE ABS, NOT THE BOOSTER, NOT THE MASTER CYLINDER. DISABLING THE ABS REMOVES THE ISSUE. FORD NEEDS TO FIX THIS PROBLEM ASAP BEFORE SOMEONE DIES.

NHTSA ODI #11257507

111,030 miles · Sep 20, 2019
Service Brakes

BREAKS ARE HARD AND THEN GO TO THE FLOOR. BREAK FLUED SEEMS TO BE LEAKING FROM THE BREAK BOOSTER. MY WIFE INHERITED THIS VEHICLE FROM HER MOTHER WHO HAS PARKINSON DISEASE AND CAN NO LONGER DRIVE. SHE TOOK OWNERSHIP ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 19, 2019. SHE HAS COMPLAINED ABOUT THE BREAKS, BUT THE PROBLEMS SEEMED TO COME AND GO. OVER…

Read full complaint

BREAKS ARE HARD AND THEN GO TO THE FLOOR. BREAK FLUED SEEMS TO BE LEAKING FROM THE BREAK BOOSTER. MY WIFE INHERITED THIS VEHICLE FROM HER MOTHER WHO HAS PARKINSON DISEASE AND CAN NO LONGER DRIVE. SHE TOOK OWNERSHIP ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 19, 2019. SHE HAS COMPLAINED ABOUT THE BREAKS, BUT THE PROBLEMS SEEMED TO COME AND GO. OVER THE PAST 2 DAYS THE BRAKES FAILED SEVERAL TIMES WITH HER NARROWLY AVOIDING MAJOR ACCIDENTS.AS SHE ATTEMPTED TO STOP AT LIGHTS IN A 45 MPH ZONE IN THE CITY OF FLOWER MOUND TX. THE CAR IS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE. MILLAGE IS CURRENTLY 11,1030.

NHTSA ODI #11256884

136,000 miles · Sep 18, 2019
Service Brakes

INTERMITTENT BRAKE FAILURE. FIRST OCCURRENCE ON 7/9/19. MOST RECENT, TODAY, 9/17/19. NO WARNING LIGHTS, SYSTEM SHOWS BRAKES ARE OK, FLUID LEVEL IS CONTINUALLY PERFECT. ABSOLUTELY NO WARNING. YOU GO TO APPLY BRAKES AND IT SUDDENLY GOES STRAIGHT TO THE FLOOR. FIRST 3 OCCURRENCES I WAS ABLE TO PUMP THE BRAKES HARD 3-6 TIMES AND IT …

Read full complaint

INTERMITTENT BRAKE FAILURE. FIRST OCCURRENCE ON 7/9/19. MOST RECENT, TODAY, 9/17/19. NO WARNING LIGHTS, SYSTEM SHOWS BRAKES ARE OK, FLUID LEVEL IS CONTINUALLY PERFECT. ABSOLUTELY NO WARNING. YOU GO TO APPLY BRAKES AND IT SUDDENLY GOES STRAIGHT TO THE FLOOR. FIRST 3 OCCURRENCES I WAS ABLE TO PUMP THE BRAKES HARD 3-6 TIMES AND IT GRADUALLY WENT BACK TO NORMAL. 4TH TIME RESULTED IN BRAKE FAILURE MULTIPLE TIMES OVER A 2-3 MILE PERIOD, CONTINUALLY PUMPING BRAKES. THEY WOULD START TO STIFFEN UP, BE SPONGY, FALL TO THE FLOOR AGAIN, STIFFEN UP, FAIL, SPONGY, ETC. THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY ISSUE AND THERE APPEARS TO BE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS. HOW MANY CRASHES OR DEATHS WILL IT TAKE TO HOLD THE MANUFACTURER ACCOUNTABLE? THIS NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED THOROUGHLY, THE ISSUE NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED AND CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE LOSS OF LIFE OR SERIOUS INJURY. PREVIOUS COMPLAINTS SHOW COSTLY REPAIRS WITH NO RESULT OF THE ISSUE BEING CORRECTED. ALL 4 INSTANCES OF BRAKE FAILURE I HAVE EXPERIENCED I WAS IN MOTION, ON A COUNTY ROAD, THREE INSTANCES OF TURNING AND ONE GOING STRAIGHT.

NHTSA ODI #11256297

Mileage unknown · Sep 12, 2019
Service BrakesUnknown Or OtherVehicle Speed ControlCrash

"TAKATA RECALL' - I CANNOT COUNT HOW MANY TIMES THIS HAS HAPPENED TO MY VEHICLE. THE BREAKS JUST REFUSES TO FUNCTION AND THE SPEED WOULD NOT DECREASE. I HAVE TAKEN IT TO THE DEALERSHIP SEVERAL TIMES AND THEY CANNOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE BREAKS AND THEY ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT. LAST SUNDAY (SEPTEMBER 8,), MY FAMILY…

Read full complaint

"TAKATA RECALL' - I CANNOT COUNT HOW MANY TIMES THIS HAS HAPPENED TO MY VEHICLE. THE BREAKS JUST REFUSES TO FUNCTION AND THE SPEED WOULD NOT DECREASE. I HAVE TAKEN IT TO THE DEALERSHIP SEVERAL TIMES AND THEY CANNOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE BREAKS AND THEY ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT. LAST SUNDAY (SEPTEMBER 8,), MY FAMILY AND I ALMOST DIED ON THE WAY TO CHURCH. THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP!!! IT FINALLY CAME TO A HALT AFTER BEEN STOPPED BY A PAVEMENT. I HAD TO CALL FORD FOR A TOW TRUCK (WHICH I HAD TO PAY FOR BUT THEY GAVE ME A DISCOUNT). MY CAR HAS BEEN WITH THEIR SERVICE DEPARTMENT FOR THREE DAYS NOW. THEY KEEP SAYING THAT THEY CANNOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH IT - THIS WAS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED THE FIRST TIME AND 1-2 MONTHS LATER, WE ARE BACK AT THE EXACT SAME SPOT!! THERE ARE SEVERAL PEOPLE ONLINE WITH THE SAME ISSUE. THIS CAR IS NOT SAFE. WHO ELSE IS SUPPOSED TO DIAGNOSE A CAR BUT THE MANUFACTURER?!! IF THE MANUFACTURER CANNOT FIND WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT, THEN THE WORLD IS IN BIG TROUBLE. I THANK GOD FOR ALWAYS PROTECTING MYSELF AND MY FAMILY. MY VEHICLE WAS IN MOTION FROM HIGHWAY TO TURNING TO RED LIGHT. THIS CAR IS NOT SAFE FOR THE ROAD. **ON THE NEXT PAGE: I ANSWERED YES TO "WAS THERE A CRASH" - I DIDN'T CRASH INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, I CRASHED INTO A PAVEMENT AT CHURCH THAT STOPPED THE CAR.

NHTSA ODI #11255110

60,000 miles · Sep 12, 2019
Service Brakes

INTERMITTENTLY, AT LOW SPEEDS THE BRAKE PEDAL IS HARD TO DEPRESS AND BRAKING IS DIFFICULT. IT OCCURS FREQUENTLY IN REVERSE AND LESS SO IN DRIVE.

NHTSA ODI #11255056

Mileage unknown · Aug 19, 2019
Electrical SystemService Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKES WERE MALFUNCTIONING. THE CONTACT NOTICED A CRACK ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE ROTOR THAT PULSATED WHEN DRIVING DOWN A HILL. THE CONTACT SUSPECTED THE DEALER SWITCHED THE VIN WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE WHEN SHE TOOK IT TO JEFF WYLER NISSAN OF CINCINNATI (8680 COLERAIN AV…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 FORD EDGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKES WERE MALFUNCTIONING. THE CONTACT NOTICED A CRACK ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE ROTOR THAT PULSATED WHEN DRIVING DOWN A HILL. THE CONTACT SUSPECTED THE DEALER SWITCHED THE VIN WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE WHEN SHE TOOK IT TO JEFF WYLER NISSAN OF CINCINNATI (8680 COLERAIN AVE, CINCINNATI, OH 45251, (513) 385-1400) EARLIER FOR AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS. THE REPAIRS HAD NOT YET BEEN COMPLETED. THE DEALER DENIED THE VIN ACCUSATION AND THE CONTACT WAS SEEKING LEGAL ASSISTANCE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT SINCE THE DEALER WAS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THEM, THEY COULD NOT ASSIST. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.

NHTSA ODI #11244882

85,600 miles · Aug 3, 2019
Service Brakes

WHILE MY WIFE WAS DRIVING THE CAR, SHE WAS NOT ABLE TO STOP THE CAR IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR. WE TOOK IT TO THE FORD DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS MOST LIKELY THE MASTER CYLINDER, THEY REPLACED IT BUT THE PROBLEM WAS STILL THERE. THEY THEN REPLACED A HYDRAULIC BRAKE MODULE AND SAID IT WAS …

Read full complaint

WHILE MY WIFE WAS DRIVING THE CAR, SHE WAS NOT ABLE TO STOP THE CAR IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR. WE TOOK IT TO THE FORD DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS MOST LIKELY THE MASTER CYLINDER, THEY REPLACED IT BUT THE PROBLEM WAS STILL THERE. THEY THEN REPLACED A HYDRAULIC BRAKE MODULE AND SAID IT WAS OK. WE PICKED IT UP, PAID $781.40 FOR THE REPAIR. WE DROVE IT HOME APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE, AND THE PROBLEM HAD NOT CHANGED, WE ALMOST WENT THROUGH THE GARAGE BEFORE IT WOULD STOP.

NHTSA ODI #11241468

70,550 miles · Jul 19, 2019
Service Brakes

ABS, MASTER CYLINDER AND BOOSTER FAILED. PROBLEM IS INFREQUENT SOFT PEDAL. 1. BOOSTER REPLACED UNDER FORD NOTICE 13N02C. BUT SOFT PEDAL PERSISTED OFF AND ON FOR MONTHS 2. NOW DEALER SAYS ABS AND MASTER CYLINDER ARE NOT WORKING RIGHT. 3. DEALER REQUESTED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM FORD AND NO REPLY. $1800 EST FOR REPAIRS 4. CAR I…

Read full complaint

ABS, MASTER CYLINDER AND BOOSTER FAILED. PROBLEM IS INFREQUENT SOFT PEDAL. 1. BOOSTER REPLACED UNDER FORD NOTICE 13N02C. BUT SOFT PEDAL PERSISTED OFF AND ON FOR MONTHS 2. NOW DEALER SAYS ABS AND MASTER CYLINDER ARE NOT WORKING RIGHT. 3. DEALER REQUESTED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM FORD AND NO REPLY. $1800 EST FOR REPAIRS 4. CAR IS SITTING AT THE DEALER FOR 2 WEEKS WITH NO RESOLUTION, TODAY IS 7/19/2019. WHY HAVE ALL THREE MAJOR BRAKING COMPONENTS FAILED ON THIS CAR? ONE PROBLEM, BOOSTER, FORD FIXED N/C BUT NOW THEY ARE NO HELP WITH THE OTHER TWO. IS THERE A DESIGN OR MFG PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM? THE SOFT PEDAL IS VERY INFREQUENT BUT SCARY WHEN IT DOES HAPPEN. DEALER HAD DIFFICULTY FIGURING OUT THE ISSUES AS WE KEPT COMING BACK BUT BY THE TIME WE ARRIVED THE SOFT PEDAL WENT AWAY AND THE DEALER COULD NOT TEST IT. FINALLY WE CAME BACK AND THE PEDAL WAS SOFT AND THEY TESTED IT AND DETERMINED IT WAS THE ABS AND MASTER CYLINDER. DEALER SAYS CAR IS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE

NHTSA ODI #11233440

Official recalls

3

14V393000 · Power Train:axle Assembly:axle Shaft

Jul 2, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX vehicles manufactured September 2, 2010, to November 30, 2013; 2013-2014 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS vehicles manufactured August 25, 2011, to November 30, 2013; and 2013-2014 Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles manufactured September 12, 2011, to November 30, 2013. In the affected vehicles, the halfshaft retention circlip may not have been properly installed, and as a result, the halfshaft may move outward and disengage from the linkshaft while driving and without prior warning.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the halfshaft and linkshaft become disengaged while driving, power will no longer be transmitted to the wheels, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. Additionally, if the parking brake is not applied before exiting the vehicle, the vehicle may roll away despite the transmission being placed in 'Park', increasing the risk of injury to exiting occupants and bystanders.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the vehicles to make sure that the halfshaft is properly retained. If it is not, dealers will replace the linkshaft and also replace the halfshaft if it shows evidence of spline damage, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2014. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1-800-392-3673. Ford's number for this recall is 14S10.

14V002000 · Fuel System, Gasoline

Jan 6, 2014

Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2012-2013 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through April 25, 2013, and equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the fuel line with one that does not have a damper, free of charge. The safety recall began on February 25, 2014. Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this recall is 13S13. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes recall 12V-438. All vehicles that have been remedied under the previous recall need to have the current remedy applied.

12V438000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings

Sep 7, 2012

Ford is recalling certain 2012 Edge vehicles manufactured from September 2, 2010, through October 31, 2011, equipped with 2.0L engines. The fuel line pulse damper metal housing may crack as a result of an improper manufacturing process. A cracked fuel line pulse damper housing may result in a combination of fuel odor, weepage, or a continuous leak while the fuel system is pressurized.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.

Remedy: Ford will notify owners, and dealers will repair the vehicles free of charge. The safety recall began on September 27, 2012. Owners may contact Ford Motor Company Customer Relationship Center at 1-866-436-7332.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE16012 · Door Ajar Warning Light Always On

Opened Sep 28, 2016 · Closed Mar 20, 2017

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Interior Lighting; Latches/locks/linkages; Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Interior Lighting

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages:doors:latch

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.

Latches/locks/linkages

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on September 28, 2016 based on allegations that the door ajar light located on the instrument cluster stays on all of the time even when all doors are closed and fully latched on 2011-2013 model year Ford Edge vehicles.When the light is illuminated continuously, vehicle occupants cannot be certain if any of the doors are properly latched.Reported safety consequences as a result of this issue include doors opening while driving (because doors were initially not latched properly), doors cannot be locked while driving, and the interior dome lights staying on continuously. Ford data received from the Information Request letter corresponding to this investigation indicates the failures were caused by contamination of the electrical contacts on the switch located within each door latch that tells the vehicle if the door is open or closed.All four doors contain the same latch design and switch.According to Ford, the Body Control Module (BCM) monitors the position of the switch and continuously samples it to detect a state of change.After a closed door state is detected, a continuous wetting current designed to keep the electrical contacts clean is sent from the BCM to the switches as long as the BCM is active.Beginning with the 2011 model year Edge vehicles, a change in BCM strategy resulted in a reduction of the wetting current sent out to clean the switch contacts by more than 75%.Over time, this low level of current is not sufficient to keep the switch contacts clean and contamination build up causes them to fail as described above.During the course of this investigation, ODI has identified a total of 1,983 complaints related to the door ajar light.Of these complaints, 14 indicated that a door opened while driving.Twelve of the 14 door opening events were situations where an occupant of the vehicle (often a child) opened a passenger door because the doors were not locked.The remaining two complaints involved a door opening on its own because the driver was unaware that the door was unlatched.There were no accidents but one complainant reported that a shoulder injury was caused by the driver having to repeatedly slam the door in an effort to get the door ajar light to turn off.After reviewing all available data, an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety has not been identified.The door latches themselves continue to function properly, remaining securely latched until acted upon by a driver or passenger.Child safety locks on the rear doors continue to function properly and can be used to prevent the rear doors from opening via the inside door handles.Vehicle crashworthiness is not affected by the lock condition of the doors and all active safety systems continue to function normally even if the vehicle BCM believes one or more doors is open.In addition, no accidents or accident related injuries have been reported.A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.Accordingly, the investigation is closed.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.The agency will monitor the issue and reserves the right to take future action if warranted by the circumstances.ODI numbers for the reports cited above are shown in the attached document.