SUDDEN COMPLETE LOSS OF OIL DUE TO HEAD GASKET FAILURE. *AK
1996 Dodge Neon
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Neon years
Owner complaints for the 1996 Dodge Neon are substantially higher than the model-year median of 173.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Neon years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 38 of 611 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 340 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 93 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 88 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Engine And Engine Cooling complaints
340 reportsNO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK
I HAVE HAD MULTIPLE PROBLEMS ON A 96 NEON. I THINK AROUND 35,000 MILES (10/29/98) THAT THE HEAD GASKET BLEW. I TOOK IT TO BE FIXED AT A COST OF $100 COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. AGAIN AT 50,000 + MILES (4/29/99) WE HAD TO TAKE IT IN AGAIN FOR A BLOWN HEAD GASKET. IN ADDITION, I THINK THIS WAS THE TIME THAT WE HAD TO REPLACE SOME KI…
Read full complaint
I HAVE HAD MULTIPLE PROBLEMS ON A 96 NEON. I THINK AROUND 35,000 MILES (10/29/98) THAT THE HEAD GASKET BLEW. I TOOK IT TO BE FIXED AT A COST OF $100 COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. AGAIN AT 50,000 + MILES (4/29/99) WE HAD TO TAKE IT IN AGAIN FOR A BLOWN HEAD GASKET. IN ADDITION, I THINK THIS WAS THE TIME THAT WE HAD TO REPLACE SOME KIND OF FRONT OIL SEAL. WE ALSO HAD THEM TRY TO FIX THE SPEED GAUGE THAT HAD STARTED ACTING STRANGE. WHEN THE SPEED GAUGE ACTED UP SO DID ALL THE OTHER LIGHTS ON THE DASH COME ON FOR NO REASON. THEY REPLACED THE CABLE BUT WE SOON FOUND OUT THAT IT DIDN'T HELP. THIS WAS AT A COST OF $114.58 COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. AT 75,000 (12/3/99) BACK AGAIN FOR SOME OIL SEAL AROUND THE SPARK PLUGS AND THE CHANGING SPARK PLUGS ETC. MOSTLY UNDER WARRANTY AT A TOTAL COST TO ME OF $134.41. THIS DID NOT FIX THE PROBLEM SO I TOOK IT BACK FOR MORE CHARGES OF $197.43. I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT I NEEDED TO REPLACE SOMETHING IN THE DASH TO KEEP THE WARRANTY GOOD SO THAT THE TACHOMETER WOULD STILL WORK. I TOLD THEM TO GET THE PARTS ORDERED BECAUSE THEY TOLD ME IT WOULD BE MORE THAN FIVE DAYS TO GET THIS DONE AND MY WARRANTY ONLY COVERS A RENTAL FOR 5 DAYS. I HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM THEM. TWO DAYS AGO, I CHANGED THE OIL AND IT WAS LEAKING FROM THE FRONT SEAL (OR IT SEEMS TO ME). YESTERDAY THE SERVICE ENG. LIGHT COMES ON. I WILL BE CONTACTING BOB ALLEN CHRYSLER IN DANVILLE MONDAY TO SEE WHAT THEY WILL DO. MY POINT IS THAT CHRYSLER NEEDS TO HELP ALL OF US THAT HAVE PROBLEMS WITH THE HEAD GASKET. ONE OF THE SERVICE WORKERS TOLD ME THAT THEY WORKED ON WAY TO MANY OF THE NEONS FOR HEAD GASKETS. I HAVE ALSO HAD THE ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS WITH THE DASH AND THE CAR SEAT DOES NOT LOCK INTO PLACE VERY WELL WHEN YOU ADJUST IT. *AK
PROBLEM WITH A BLOWN ENGINE HEAD GASKET CAUSING OIL LEAKAGES. DEALER NOTIFIED AND INFORMED REPAIRS WAS NOT UNDER A MFR. RECALL. *AK
ENGINE HEAD GASKET HAS FAILED, LEAKING LARGE AMOUNTS OF OIL INTO THE POSTERIOR PART OF THE ENGINE. THROUGH RESEARCH HAVE FOUND THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH THE NEON, AND AT TIMES HAS RESULTED IN ENGINE FIRES. THIS POSES A SIGNIFICANT SAFETY RISK AND I AM WONDERING WHY THERE HAS NOT BEEN A RECALL. I ALSO FEEL THAT CHRYSLER SHOU…
Read full complaint
ENGINE HEAD GASKET HAS FAILED, LEAKING LARGE AMOUNTS OF OIL INTO THE POSTERIOR PART OF THE ENGINE. THROUGH RESEARCH HAVE FOUND THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM WITH THE NEON, AND AT TIMES HAS RESULTED IN ENGINE FIRES. THIS POSES A SIGNIFICANT SAFETY RISK AND I AM WONDERING WHY THERE HAS NOT BEEN A RECALL. I ALSO FEEL THAT CHRYSLER SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS FAILURE AND NEEDS TO PAY FOR THE COST OF THE REPAIR. *AK
WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY RECALL PROBLEMS WITH THE 1996 DODGE NEON DUE TO HEAD GASKET PROBLEMS. *AK
I HAVE HEARD RECENTLY THAT ENGINE HEAD GASKET FAILURE IS VERY COMMON WITH THE DODGE NEONS AS WELL AS OTHER CHRYSLER CARS. I NOTICED MY CAR WAS LEAKING LAST WEEK SOMETIME, AND DIDN'T REALIZE IT WAS COMING FROM TEH HEAD GASKET. IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME THAT SO MANY OF TEH DODGE NEONS ARE HAVING THIS PROBLEM IF DODGE MADE A GO…
Read full complaint
I HAVE HEARD RECENTLY THAT ENGINE HEAD GASKET FAILURE IS VERY COMMON WITH THE DODGE NEONS AS WELL AS OTHER CHRYSLER CARS. I NOTICED MY CAR WAS LEAKING LAST WEEK SOMETIME, AND DIDN'T REALIZE IT WAS COMING FROM TEH HEAD GASKET. IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME THAT SO MANY OF TEH DODGE NEONS ARE HAVING THIS PROBLEM IF DODGE MADE A GOOD PRODUCT. IF THEY KNOW THAT ALL OF THESE CARS ARE HAVING THIS PROBLEM AND THERE IS RUMOR OF A SECRET WARRANTY OUT THERE IF YOU RAISE ENOUGH FUSS, DOESN'T IT SEEM FAIR, AND LAWFUL THAT CHRYSLER SHOULD ISSUE A RECALL ON THE CARS AND FIX TEH HEAD GASKETS ON THEIR PRODUCTS BEFORE FURTHER TROUBLE IS CAUSED. IF I WAS OBLIVIOUS TO TEH LEAK COULDN'T I HAVE CAUSED FURTHER DAMAGE THAT COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED HAD CHRYSLER NOT CUT CORNERS AND MADE A CHEAP GASKET TO BEGIN WITH? IS IT MY FAULT THAT WHEN I PURCHASED THE CAR I WAS NOT INFORMED THAT EVENTUALLY I WOULD HAVE TO SPEND CLOSE TO A THOUSAND DOLLARS TO FIX MY CAR BECAUSE CHRYSLER DIDN'T FEEL LIKE MAKING A STRONG HEAD GASKET, AND WANTED TO SAVE A LITTLE MONEY. I FEEL AS IF I AM BEING SCREWED HERE, AND I FEEL THAT I SHOULD BE REIMBURSED. HOW MANY PEOPLE MUST COMPLAIN BEFORE CHRYSLER ISSUSES A RECALL. A RECALL THAT IS OBVIOUSLY NECESSARY. *AK
REAR BRAKE FAILED. YH
ENGIN EHEAD GASKET BLEW OUT EVERY 6-8 MONTHS/ BRAKE CALIPER COLLAPSED , AND INSTRUMENT PANEL DEAD; NO ASSISTANCE FROM DODGE. *AK
DEFECTIVE DESIGN OF THE ENGINE HEAD GASKET CAUSED COOLANT TO LEAK THROUGH THE VALVE COVER WHICH COULD SPRAY INTO THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT, AND START A FIRE. DEALER SAID HEAD GASKET AND VALVE COVER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION. *AK
Official recalls
296V075000 · Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components:master Cylinder
May 3, 1996
THE BRAKE MASTER CYLINDER CAN LEAK BRAKE FLUID DUE TO A DAMAGED DOUBLE LIP REAR PISTON SEAL.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: BRAKE FLUID LEAKAGE CAN RESULT IN DIMINISHED EFFECTIVENESS OF ONE HALF OF THE SPLIT BRAKE SYSTEM. THE INSTRUMENT PANEL WARNING LIGHT(S) WILL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPAIRMENT PRIOR TO PARTIAL BRAKE SYSTEM LOSS.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE REAR BRAKE MASTER CYLINDR PISTON ASSEMBLY.
96V026000 · Electrical System:wiring:front Underhood
Feb 5, 1996
AN ENGINE WIRING HARNESS CAN SHORT CIRCUIT DUE TO CONTACT WITH THE EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION TUBE..
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: SHORTING OF THE WIRING HARNESS CAN CAUSE VARIOUS ELECTRICAL MALFUNCTIONS, INCLUDING ENGINE STALLING.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REROUTE THE ENGINE WIRING HARNESS PROPERLY AND ANY WIRE THAT HAS BEEN DAMAGED WILL BE REPLACED.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
2PE02082 · Safety Belt Cinching Latch Plate
Opened Nov 6, 2002 · Closed Apr 23, 2003
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seat Belts
THERE ARE NO INJURIES OR FATALITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ALLEGED DEFECT.WHILE CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, ODI FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT CINCHES MEET THE LOAD BEARING REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD 208, AND THAT MANY OF THE REPORTED FAILURES WERE DUE TO INCORRECT CHILD SAFETY SEAT INSTALLATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE REPORT RATE IS LOW (1.60/100K).THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE FAILS TO ESTABLISH THE EXISTENCE OF A DEFECT TREND AT THIS TIME.FURTHER ALLOCATION OF AGENCY RESOURCES TO THIS ISSUE IS UNWARRANTED AND THE PRELIMINARY EVALUATION IS BEING CLOSED.
PE98012 · Underhood Fires
Opened Feb 26, 1998 · Closed Jun 23, 1998
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System
There is no summary currently available
Illustration