← New search

2011 Chrysler Town And Country

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Town And Country years

Owner complaints for the 2011 Chrysler Town And Country are substantially higher than the model-year median of 216.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

554 reports with mileage · 219 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Electrical System. Review the 523 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine. Review the 107 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Fuel/propulsion System. Review the 106 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

10 crash reports12 fire reports12 injury reports

Service Brakes complaints

51 reports
Clear category filter
47,700 miles · May 2, 2014
Service Brakes

ON 8/3/13 (OR WITHIN A DAY OR TWO OF THAT DATE), I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP. THE CAR HAD LESS THAN 36,000 MILES ON IT. IT NEEDED THE REAR BRAKES REPLACED, AND THERE WAS UNEVEN WEAR BETWEEN THE R & L BRAKES. DEALERSHIP REPLACED BRAKES AND CALIPERS ON BOTH REAR WHEELS. HAVE FELT SOME PULSING WHEN BREAKING, HAVE BEEN GETT…

Read full complaint

ON 8/3/13 (OR WITHIN A DAY OR TWO OF THAT DATE), I TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP. THE CAR HAD LESS THAN 36,000 MILES ON IT. IT NEEDED THE REAR BRAKES REPLACED, AND THERE WAS UNEVEN WEAR BETWEEN THE R & L BRAKES. DEALERSHIP REPLACED BRAKES AND CALIPERS ON BOTH REAR WHEELS. HAVE FELT SOME PULSING WHEN BREAKING, HAVE BEEN GETTING A HORRID BURNING SMELL WHEN DRIVING, CAN FEEL EXTREME HEAT FROM LR WHEEL AFTER DRIVING. TOOK TO DEALER. 4/28/14 REAR BRAKES AGAIN HAVE UNEVEN WEAR (L 6MM; R 8MM) LR OUTBOARD BRAKE PAD BACKING CLIP DISLODGED AND CONTACTING ROTOR. LIP IS DAMAGED. REMOVED LR CALIPER AND FOUND PADS FROZEN IN CALIPER BRACKET. APPROXIMATELY 8 MONTHS SINCE BOTH WERE REPLACED BY DEALERSHIP; AND APX. 12,000 MILES PUT ON THE CAR. ROTORS WERE DAMAGED AS WELL AND HAD TO BE REPLACED. HAD TO PUT NEW ADAPTER BRACKETS ON THE VAN, BECAUSE THE OEM ONES WERE CAUSING BRAKES TO SEIZE UP - PER DEALERSHIP. DEALERSHIP ALL FOR FIXING PROBLEM, AND SO IS CHRYSLER, AS LONG AS YOU ARE WILLING TO PAY FOR THE REPAIRS FOR THEIR DEFECTIVE AND DESIGN FLAWED BRAKES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10586284

45,000 miles · Apr 29, 2014
Service Brakes

WHILE BRAKING, THERE IS A LOT OF SHUDDERING AND CLICKING FROM THE REAR BRAKES. CONCLUSION IS THAT THIS IS A WARPED ROTOR. CHRYSLER DEALER SAYS IT IS NORMAL, BUT THE VAN HAS LESS THAN 50,000 MILES. WHILE RESEARCHING ONLINE, FOUND THAT THIS IS A COMMON COMPLAINT. SOME HAVE REPLACED ROTORS SEVERAL TIMES WITH LESS THAN 50,000 MILES.…

Read full complaint

WHILE BRAKING, THERE IS A LOT OF SHUDDERING AND CLICKING FROM THE REAR BRAKES. CONCLUSION IS THAT THIS IS A WARPED ROTOR. CHRYSLER DEALER SAYS IT IS NORMAL, BUT THE VAN HAS LESS THAN 50,000 MILES. WHILE RESEARCHING ONLINE, FOUND THAT THIS IS A COMMON COMPLAINT. SOME HAVE REPLACED ROTORS SEVERAL TIMES WITH LESS THAN 50,000 MILES. THESE SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH BETTER PARTS AT THE DEALER, FOR FREE; HOWEVER, THEY REFUSE TO HONOR THEIR CUSTOMERS. *JS

NHTSA ODI #10585480

23,430 miles · Apr 24, 2014
Service Brakes

AT 23,430 MILES, BRAKE ROTORS (ALL 4) EXCESSIVELY OUT OF ROUND. VEHICLE SHUDDERED UPON BRAKING, ESPECIALLY AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. ALL 4 ROTORS WERE RESURFACED AT CHRYSLER DEALER. AGAIN, AT 28,630 MILES, SAME VEHICLE, BRAKE PADS DOWN TO 15% AND HAD TO REPLACE ALL 4 BRAKE PADS AND MACHINE ALL 4 ROTORS AGAIN AT SAME CHRYSLER DEALE…

Read full complaint

AT 23,430 MILES, BRAKE ROTORS (ALL 4) EXCESSIVELY OUT OF ROUND. VEHICLE SHUDDERED UPON BRAKING, ESPECIALLY AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. ALL 4 ROTORS WERE RESURFACED AT CHRYSLER DEALER. AGAIN, AT 28,630 MILES, SAME VEHICLE, BRAKE PADS DOWN TO 15% AND HAD TO REPLACE ALL 4 BRAKE PADS AND MACHINE ALL 4 ROTORS AGAIN AT SAME CHRYSLER DEALER. VEHICLE SHUDDERED SLIGHTLY UPON BRAKING ONCE AGAIN, ESPECIALLY AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS. THESE INCIDENCES ARE ONLY 4,200 MILES AND 4 MONTHS APART, AND $1,000 OUT OF MY POCKET AND NOT COVERED BY WARRANTY, AS ARE SAID TO BE "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR." REALLY? HMMM... *TR

NHTSA ODI #10584699

20,000 miles · Feb 21, 2014
Service Brakes

HAVE HEARD UNEXPLAINED NOISES IN BACK/REAR BRAKE AREA OF CAR SINCE NEW. BROUGHT TO DEALER TWICE AND THEY COULD FIND NOTHING WRONG. NEXT TIME I BROUGHT TO BE SERVICED IT NEEDED ALL NEW BRAKES! THIS IS ABSURD. AT 20,000 MILES BRAKES SHOT! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10565301

10,500 miles · Feb 4, 2014
Service Brakes

BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE A LOUD, FREQUENTLY OCCURRING SQUEAK AND SQUEALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REAR BRAKES WHILE CAR WAS MOVING. WOULD APPEAR RANDOMLY AT ANYTIME OR ANY SPEED AND WOULD LAST FOR HOURS OR DAYS. HAVE HAD PROBLEM OVER ONE YEAR. A SLIGHT TOUCH OF THE BRAKE PEDAL WOULD CAUSE NOISE TO IMMEDIATELY CEASE. HAD DEALER REMOVE REAR…

Read full complaint

BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE A LOUD, FREQUENTLY OCCURRING SQUEAK AND SQUEALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REAR BRAKES WHILE CAR WAS MOVING. WOULD APPEAR RANDOMLY AT ANYTIME OR ANY SPEED AND WOULD LAST FOR HOURS OR DAYS. HAVE HAD PROBLEM OVER ONE YEAR. A SLIGHT TOUCH OF THE BRAKE PEDAL WOULD CAUSE NOISE TO IMMEDIATELY CEASE. HAD DEALER REMOVE REAR WHEELS ON TWO DIFFERENT OCCASIONS OVER THE LAST YEAR AND THEY REPORTED NO PROBLEM OBSERVED. ISSUE NEVER WENT AWAY. IN FOR OIL CHANGE TODAY AND TOLD DEALER TO LOOK AT REAR WHEELS AND BRAKES AGAIN....... THEY TOLD ME REAR BRAKES WERE METAL TO METAL AND COMPLETELY WORN DOWN AND WANT $450.00 TO TURN ROTORS AND REPLACE BRAKE PADS. CAR HAS 23,500 MILES OF NORMAL DRIVING. TO ME, THIS IS QUITE OUT OF THE ORDINARY AND CLEARLY THERE IS A MANUFACTURING ERROR HERE. IT'S CRAZY TO EXPECT $450.00 EVERY 23 K MILES TO REPAIR REAR BRAKES ON A PRACTICALLY NEW CAR THAT I BOUGHT NEW AND HAVE OWNED FOR ONLY 2 YEARS ! HAVE SEEN A LITANY OF SIMILAR COMPLAINTS-----IS THERE ANY RECOURSE ? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10562881

28,593 miles · Oct 30, 2013
Service Brakes

LIKE MANY OTHERS, MY CAR BEGAN TO SHUDDER WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED. THIS WENT ON FOR A FEW MONTHS & GOT WORSE. I SAW THE MANY OTHER COMPLAINTS ON THIS WEBSITE OF PREMATURE BRAKE WEAR, AND BROUGHT IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DEALER WHEN I BROUGHT MY VEHICLE IN. I KNEW THE FINDING WAS GOING TO BE WARPED ROTORS & THAT WAS IND…

Read full complaint

LIKE MANY OTHERS, MY CAR BEGAN TO SHUDDER WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED. THIS WENT ON FOR A FEW MONTHS & GOT WORSE. I SAW THE MANY OTHER COMPLAINTS ON THIS WEBSITE OF PREMATURE BRAKE WEAR, AND BROUGHT IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DEALER WHEN I BROUGHT MY VEHICLE IN. I KNEW THE FINDING WAS GOING TO BE WARPED ROTORS & THAT WAS INDEED THE CASE. YES, THEY GAVE ME THE EXTENDED WARRANTY TO REPLACE THE FRONT BRAKE ROTORS & PADS AND ONLY CHARGED THE $100 COPAY. THEY OFFERED TO REPLACE THE REAR ROTORS FOR $300 OR RESURFACE FOR $130. I WENT WITH THE RESURFACING. AS WITH THE OTHERS, I DON'T SEE WHY WARPING OF THE ROTORS PREMATURELY ISN'T A DEFECT AND A SAFETY HAZARD! *TR

NHTSA ODI #10550181

10,500 miles · Oct 4, 2013
Power TrainService Brakes

AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT WAS DRIVING ON A FREEWAY WERE SOME VIBRATIONS WHEN I PRESSED THE BRAKES FROM 60-65 MPH. WHILE I EXIT AND TO CHECK OUT I FELT SOME PULSATION ON THE BRAKE PEDALS IN ABOUT 10-15 MPH. I BROUGHT THE MINIVAN AT THE DEALER AND THEY SAID FRONT ROTORS ARE WARPED AND BRAKE PADS ARE NOT USABLE. THEY REPLACED THE FRO…

Read full complaint

AT THE TIME OF INCIDENT WAS DRIVING ON A FREEWAY WERE SOME VIBRATIONS WHEN I PRESSED THE BRAKES FROM 60-65 MPH. WHILE I EXIT AND TO CHECK OUT I FELT SOME PULSATION ON THE BRAKE PEDALS IN ABOUT 10-15 MPH. I BROUGHT THE MINIVAN AT THE DEALER AND THEY SAID FRONT ROTORS ARE WARPED AND BRAKE PADS ARE NOT USABLE. THEY REPLACED THE FRONT ROTORS AND THE PADS AS PART OF THEY EXTENDED WARRANTY. I THINK CHRYSLER KNEW THAT'S THERE'S ISSUE THAT'S WHY THEY EXTEND THE WARRANTY. THEY TESTED AND AFTER THAT THEY SAID THERE'S PULSATION AND FOUND OUT THAT MY REAR ROTORS WERE BAD AS WELL AND NEEDED MACHINING TO MY EXPENSE @$300 BECAUSE THE EXTENDED WARRANTY IS ONLY FOR FRONT BRAKES. AFTER ABOUT 4,000 MILES DURING THE REGULAR OIL THEY RECOMMENDED ME THAT ON NEXT VISIT I HAVE TO CHANGE MY REAR BRAKES AS WELL TO MY EXPENSE. I THINK THIS ISSUE HAS NOT BEEN FIXED. WE DRIVE AS NORMAL, WE DON'T DRAG BRAKES BUT WITHIN 15,000 MILES I THINK PREMATURE BRAKE WEAR ON BOTH SIDES IS NOT NORMAL. THIS IS A SAFETY CONCERN. I DO NOT TRUST THIS ISSUE THIS SHOULD BE A SAFETY CONCERN. CHRYSLER DO NOT GIVE ME A DEFINITE ANSWER, THEY JUST SAID IT'S NORMAL AND HOW WE DRIVE. ALSO TRANSMISSION HAVE HESITATIONS ON SOME UPHILL FREEWAYS AND SHUDDERS WHEN BACKING UP. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10546757

25,465 miles · Aug 30, 2013
Service Brakes

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOOR BOARD AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE FAILURE WAS RECURRING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, WHO STATED THAT THE HEAT CAPACITY WAS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE VEH…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL TRAVELED TO THE FLOOR BOARD AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO STOP. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE FAILURE WAS RECURRING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, WHO STATED THAT THE HEAT CAPACITY WAS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE VEHICLE AND CAUSED THE BRAKE PADS TO OVERHEAT WHEN THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING DOWNHILL. AS A RESULT, THE TECHNICIAN RECOMMENDED REPLACING PART OF THE BRAKING SYSTEM WITH CERAMIC BRAKING PARTS. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 25,465 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 35,000.

NHTSA ODI #10538131

31,000 miles · Aug 21, 2013
Service Brakes

IN NOVEMBER OF 2012, WITH APPROXIMATELY 31000 MILES ON MY VAN, I HAD TO REPLACE FRONT AND BACK BRAKES AND ROTORS, JANUARY 2013, REPLACED BRAKES AND ROTORS AGAIN WITH APPROXIMATELY 33000 MILES, MAY OF 2013 REPLACED BRAKES AND ROTORS A THIRD TIME WITH APPROXIMATELY 35000 MILES ON VEHICLE, NOW WITH ALMOST 41000 MILES MY BRAKES AND…

Read full complaint

IN NOVEMBER OF 2012, WITH APPROXIMATELY 31000 MILES ON MY VAN, I HAD TO REPLACE FRONT AND BACK BRAKES AND ROTORS, JANUARY 2013, REPLACED BRAKES AND ROTORS AGAIN WITH APPROXIMATELY 33000 MILES, MAY OF 2013 REPLACED BRAKES AND ROTORS A THIRD TIME WITH APPROXIMATELY 35000 MILES ON VEHICLE, NOW WITH ALMOST 41000 MILES MY BRAKES AND ROTORS NEED REPLACING A FOURTH TIME. FOUR TIMES IN ABOUT 10000 MILES IS ABSURD, I HAVE REPLACED THE BRAKES AND ROTORS WITH THE CORRECT PADS AND ROTORS FROM AUTOZONE, SINCE I AM TRYING TO MAINTAIN MY VEHICLE ON A BUDGET, CALLED CHRYSLER TO FILE A COMPLAINT AND WAS TOLD UNLESS I GO TO A DEALER TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM, THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN OR WILL DO, I PAID 94000 DOLLARS FOR 3 2011 TOWN AND COUNTRY VANS, THE OTHER TWO VANS HAVE NOT GONE THROUGH BRAKES OR ROTORS LIKE THE ONE I DRIVE DAILY, THERE HAS BEEN NO RECALL, OR SERVICE BULLETIN ISSUED, I HAVE READ HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE BRAKING SYSTEMS IN THE REDESIGNED CHRYSLER AND DODGE VANS, TO ME AND ALL THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE HAVING THIS ISSUE, IT I A SERIOUS ONE FOR US, WE HAVE ALL PAID GOOD MONEY FOR OUR VEHICLES, JUST TO HAVE THE VEHICLE NICKEL AND DIME US LIKE AN OLD USED CAR, CHRYSLER AND DODGE NEED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES, LIKE MYSELF, PEOPLE ARE ON BUDGETS, AND MOST CANT AFFORD TO KEEP REPLACING THE SAME PART OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN, PLEASE DO SOMETHING, IT IS A SAFETY ISSUE, WHO KNOWS WHY THE BRAKES ARE GETTING USED UP SO QUICKLY, OR WHEN OR IF THEY WILL COMPLETELY FAIL AND CAUSE SERIOUS INJURIES OR FATALITIES. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10536588

15,000 miles · Aug 5, 2013
Service Brakes

I HAD TO REPLACE THE FRONT ROTORS AND PADS ON A VEHICLE WITH ONLY 15000 MILES ON IT. I HAVE BEEN DRIVING FOR 45 YEARS AND HAVE NEVER HAD A VEHICLE THAT HAD TO HAVE THIS KIND OF WORK DONE. AFTER BRINGING THE T&C IN BECAUSE OF FRONT END SHIMMY WHEN BREAKING, I WAS TOLD THE ROTORS WERE BAD/WARPED. 15000 MILES! I WAS ALSO TOLD T…

Read full complaint

I HAD TO REPLACE THE FRONT ROTORS AND PADS ON A VEHICLE WITH ONLY 15000 MILES ON IT. I HAVE BEEN DRIVING FOR 45 YEARS AND HAVE NEVER HAD A VEHICLE THAT HAD TO HAVE THIS KIND OF WORK DONE. AFTER BRINGING THE T&C IN BECAUSE OF FRONT END SHIMMY WHEN BREAKING, I WAS TOLD THE ROTORS WERE BAD/WARPED. 15000 MILES! I WAS ALSO TOLD THAT CHRYSLER HAS HAD PROBLEMS WITH BREAKS PREVIOUSLY AND A RECALL WAS PERFORMED BUT IT ENDED ON THE 2010 AND DID NOT COVER MY T&C; BUT THEY WOULD BE NICE AND JUST CHARGE ME $100.00, BECAUSE I HAD THE EXTENDED WARRANTY AND THAT WAS MY DEDUCTIBLE. THIS T&C IS STILL UNDER THE 3 YEAR 36 MILE WARRANTY BUT IT DOES NOT COVER ROTORS OR PADS. (HOW CONVENIENT) MY BIG CONCERN IS THAT THIS VEHICLE HAS MANY REPORTED BRAKING ISSUES, EVEN CHRYSLER ACKNOWLEDGES THIS. THEY DID HAVE A RECALL NOTICE BUT DOES NOT COVER 2011 T&C'S. WHEN WILL CHRYSLER STEP UP AND FIX THEIR BRAKES? *TR

NHTSA ODI #10533691

Official recalls

3

25V876000 · Equipment Adaptive/mobility:wheelchair Restraints/securement:latch/anchor:

Dec 17, 2025

Rollx Vans (Rollx) is recalling certain GMC Yukon, Sierra, Chevrolet Express 2500, Ford Transit, E-250, Toyota Sienna, Sienna Hybrid, Honda Odyssey, Chrysler Town and Country, Voyager, Pacifica, Dodge Grand Caravan, and Ram Promaster vehicles equipped with QRT-Deluxe and QRT-Max wheelchair restraints. Please refer to Rollx's recall report for specific model year information. The retractors may not lock, preventing the wheelchair from being properly secured.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An unsecured wheelchair can move during transit, increasing the risk of injury.

Remedy: Rollx will work with Q'Straint to inspect and replace the retractors as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed February 5, 2026. Owners may contact Rollx's customer service at 1-800-956-6668.

14V234000 · Electrical System

May 7, 2014

Chrysler Group, LLC (Chrysler) is recalling certain model year 2010-2014 Chrysler Town and Country and Dodge Grand Caravan vehicles manufactured August 25, 2010, through October 31, 2013. The affected vehicles may experience overheating of the vent window switch in the driver's door armrest.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: An overheated switch may result in a vehicle fire.

Remedy: Chrysler will notify owners, and dealers will replace the vent window switch with a newer version, free of charge. The owner notification letter was issued and the remedy campaign launched on on December 31, 2014. Owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 1-800-853-1403. Chrysler's number for this recall is P25.

11V315000 · Steering:column

Jun 8, 2011

CHRYSLER IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011DODGE JOURNEY, JEEP WRANGLER, CHRYSLER 200, CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE, DODGE AVENGER, DODGE NITRO, JEEP LIBERTY, DODGE CALIBER, JEEP COMPASS, JEEP PATRIOT, DODGE GRAND CARAVAN AND CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY VEHICLES. SOME OF THESE VEHICLES MAY HAVE BEEN BUILT WITH A MISSING OR INCORRECTLY INSTALLED STEERING COLUMN PIVOT RIVET.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A MISSING OR INCORRECTLY INSTALLED RIVET COULD COMPROMISE THE ABILITY OF THE STEERING COLUMN TO SUPPORT THE OCCUPANT LOADS IN THE EVENT OF A FRONTAL CRASH, DECREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FRONTAL IMPACT SAFETY SYSTEM. AS A RESULT, THE CONDITION MAY INCREASE THE POTENTIAL FOR INJURY IN A FRONTAL CRASH.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT FOR RIVET PRESENCE AND ALIGNMENT AND REPAIR THE STEERING COLUMN PIVOT AS REQUIRED, FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 4, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT CHRYSLER AT 1-800-853-1403.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

2

PE19014 · Active Head Rest Inadvertent Deployment

Opened Sep 9, 2019 · Closed Feb 25, 2026

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Seats; Seats:front Assembly:head Restraint

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Seats

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Seats:front Assembly:head Restraint

The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened PE19014 on September 9, 2019, to investigate 128 consumer complaints alleging that the Active Head Rest (AHR) inadvertently deployed without the occurrence of a crash or other rear impact event in model year (MY) 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles.When ODI opened the investigation, ODI was aware of thirteen alleged injuries.A small number of Early Warning Reports identified driver and/or passenger front seat AHR inadvertent deployments without a rear impact event.Reported safety consequences resulting from the AHR deployments include concussions, headaches, soft tissue injuries, disorientation, nausea, vomiting and/or loss of vehicle control as a result of being surprised and distracted by being struck in the head by the inadvertent AHR deployment. On September 24, 2019, ODI sent an Information Request (IR) letter to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA).ODI requested certain detailed information from FCA related to the following subject vehicles: MY 2010-2014 Dodge Avenger 200, MY 2010-2014 Dodge Calber, MY 2010-2014 Chrysler Sebring, MY 2013-2015 Ram Tradesman, MY 2012 Ram Van, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Grand Caravan, MY 2010-2016 Chrysler Town and Country, MY 2010-2017 Jeep Compass, MY 2011-2020 Dodge Durango, MY 2011-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee, MY 2010-2019 Dodge Journey, MY 2010-2012 Jeep Liberty, MY 2010-2011 Jeep Nitro, and MY 2010-2011 Jeep Patriot vehicles.On December 2, 2019, ODI received a response from FCA that included vehicle production data, consumer complaints, field reports, warranty claims, manufacturer actions, production changes, and other data related to the alleged defect from the start of production (2010) through September 24, 2019.On January 27, 2020, ODI received an update to the December 2, 2019, IR response from FCA.On September 22, 2020, ODI requested additional subject vehicle AHR information from FCA.ODI received FCA's response on October 21, 2020.ODI subsequently received an update to FCA's October 21, 2020, response on February 16, 2021.During the investigation, ODI requested updates to certain IR questions on two occasions.FCA provided updates to question #2 on March 5, 2021, and questions #2 and #5 on May 26, 2023. FCA’s IR response data identified approximately 7.5 million subject vehicles (with approximately 15 million AHR assemblies).Due to the large number of vehicles and failure reports, ODI focused its analysis on the FCA vehicle model with the highest failure rate to represent the worst-case scenario.For this purpose, ODI focused on MY 2012-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles for its analysis.This population includes 710,890 vehicles that FCA manufactured between August 19, 2011, and August 8, 2015.ODI identified 2,839 alleged AHR failures within this limited population.ODI identified 263 alleged injuries that were caused by AHR failures in MY 2012-2015 Grand Cherokees vehicles.Of these alleged injuries, ODI categorized them as eighty-two (82) soft tissue (neck/whiplash, bruise) injuries, four (4) concussions, fifty-nine (59) headaches, and one hundred eighteen (118) without a specific injury description.Although complainants have alleged injuries, ODI has been unable to obtain evidence to substantiate or validate any injuries where medical treatment was required.Consumer outreach was conducted by ODI, where sixty-three (63) FCA complainants with alleged injuries were contacted.Twelve of the sixty-three FCA consumers responded and were interviewed by ODI.ODI requested medical records, however, only one response was provided. Attorneys representing the responding complainant provided a synopsis that indicated they had experienced prior neck-related injuries dating to the mid-1990s.ODI also contacted one hundred (100) consumers who submitted Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQ) in an attempt to validate alleged injuries. Despite the efforts of ODI, the office has been unsuccessful at obtaining substantive documentation/evidence supporting complaints that allege serious injuries (where pre-existing medical conditions did not already exist). In addition to the low severity of alleged injuries caused by AHR deployments, there have been eleven alleged crashes and two alleged lane departures within the entire subject vehicle population that has been in the field up to sixteen years (with over 8,500 AHR inadvertent deployments).ODI was not able to validate that the alleged crashes were the result of inadvertent head rest deployments, and the crashes were minor in nature. ODI has conducted a thorough investigation of the alleged safety defect and with up to sixteen years of exposure for some vehicles and over 8,500 inadvertent AHR deployments, no serious crashes or injuries could be validated in the sub-population of focus.The lack of serious injuries validated by ODI with such large period of field exposure is consistent with thework done by NHTSA’s Human Injury Research Division and the Biodynamic Research Corporation, which support that an inadvertent AHR deployment is not likely to cause serious injury.In addition to the low risk of injury, FCA released an extended warranty program that covers inadvertent AHR deployment for ten years / unlimited mileage from the vehicle's in-service date. PE19014 is closed with the FCA extended warranty program.The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist, and the Agency reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by new circumstances. To review a complete closing summary, please the attached closing report. To review the ODI reports cited in the Closing Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

DP14004 · Totally Integrated Power Module Failure

Opened Sep 25, 2014 · Closed Jul 24, 2015

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Electrical System

In a letter dated August 21, 2014, the Center for Auto Safety (CAS) petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a defect investigation of alleged failures associated with the Totally Integrated Power Module (TIPM) installed in Chrysler SUV?s, trucks, and vans beginning in the 2007 model year. The petitioner alleges that TIPM defects may result in engine stall, airbag non-deployment, failure of fuel pump shutoff resulting in unintended acceleration, fire, and other symptoms. On September 25, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP14-004 to evaluate the petition for a grant or deny decision. ODI analyzed complaint data provided by CAS as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers. In total, there were 296 complaints submitted by the petitioner in the original petition and five supplements, including 271 complaints related to the subject vehicles equipped with TIPM-7. Approximately 3 percent of CAS complaints are related to vehicles equipped with TIPM-6 and ODI?s review of these complaints did not identify any safety defect trends. ODI conducted a detailed review of complaints narratives submitted by CAS and consumers including careful analysis of vehicle repair histories, warranty claims obtained from the manufacturer and any available Customer Assistance Inquiry reports (CAIR). Analysis of the field data indicated that MY2011-2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles exhibited significantly higher complaint rates related to fuel pump relay (FPR) failures than other subject vehicles. In a September 3, 2014 letter to NHTSA, Chrysler submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) identifying a defect in the FPR within the TIPM-7 which can result in a no start or stall condition in approximately 188,723 model year (MY) 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WK) and Dodge Durango (WD) vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2010 through July 20, 2011 (14V-530).In a February 24, 2015 letter, Chrysler submitted a second DIR expanding the scope of the FPR defect condition to include an additional 338,216 MY 2012 through 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles manufactured from September 17, 2010 through August 19, 2013 and MY 2012 through 2013 Dodge Durango vehicles manufactured from January 18, 2011 through August 19, 2013 (15V-115).ODI analysis of the CAS allegations of TIPM defects resulting in stall while driving, airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration, fire and other faults identified a single defect condition related to 1 of over 60 different circuits in the TIPM assembly. The most common effect of this defect condition, related to the fuel pump relay, was a no-start concern, but it could also result in stall while driving (76 complaints). No valid evidence was presented in support of claims related to airbag non-deployment, unintended acceleration or fire resulting from TIPM faults and these claims were found to be wholly without merit based on review of the field data and design of the relevant systems and components.Except insofar as the petitioner's contentions relate to the defect condition addressed by the Chrysler recalls, the factual bases of the petitioner's contentions that any further investigation is necessary are unsupported. In our view, additional investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists or a NHTSA order for the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect as alleged by the petitioner at the conclusion of the requested investigation. Therefore, in view of the need to allocate and prioritize NHTSA's limited resources to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the petition is den