2005 Chrysler Crossfire Convertible

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE CONVERTIBLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE REAR WINDOW WELDING FAILED AND CAUSED THE WINDOW TO DETACH FROM THE VEHICLE. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO A DEALER, WHO STATED THAT THEY COULD NOT REPAIR THE REAR WINDOW DUE TO NOT HAVING THE PROPER EQUIPMENT. THE DEALER STATED THE CONTACT HAD TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO ANOTHER DEALER. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 38,000.

THE REAR WINDOW SEPARATED FROM THE CONVERTIBLE TOP. THIS HAPPENED 2 MONTHS AFTER I CAME OUT OF A 7YR WARRANTY THAT I PAID A LOT FOR. I CALLED CHRYSLER. THEY SAID THEY ARE ONLY FIXING TOPS THAT WERE ORIGINALLY SENT TO SOUTHERN STATES. SO NO LUCK FOR ME--IT DOES GET HOT IN PHILA. THE DEALER WON'T DO ANYTHING. THE CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE FORUM IS FULL OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS DEFECT. THIS IS VERY DISCOURAGING THAT AN AMERICAN CAR MAKER WON'T STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE CONVERTIBLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE REAR WINDOW BECAME DETACHED. AS A RESULT, THE TRUNK WOULD BECOME FILLED WITH WATER WHENEVER IT WOULD RAIN. THE CONTACT SPOKE WITH THE MANUFACTURER AND WAS TOLD THAT THE COMPONENT WAS NOT UNDER WARRANTY, BUT WANTED THE VEHICLE INSPECTED TO SEE WHAT CAUSED THE FAILURE. THE CONTACT REFERENCED NHTSA ITEM NUMBER: 10042531 (VISIBILITY) THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO COVER AND CORRECT THE PROBLEM FOR 10 YEARS AND 100,000 MILES, BUT THE MANUFACTURER ADVISED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT COVERED BECAUSE IT WAS NOT REGISTERED IN A SOUTHERN STATE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 48,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 51,000.

REAR WINDOW SEPARATED FROM TOP. LEAKS WATER IN RAIN AND IS A SAFETY ISSUE AT ANY SPEED. DEALER HAD ME CALL CHRYSLER FOR DETAILS ON WARRANTY CODE X31. TSB SB-23035-11REV A CHRYSLER INDICATED EVEN THOUGH THIS VEHICLE'S PROBLEM IS CONSISTANT WITH ALL OTHER COMPLAINTS BEING ADDRESSED BY WARRANTY X31 AND THE VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY BEING UTILIZED IN THE STATE OF TENNESEE WHERE THE "RECALL" IS ACTIVE THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT ORIGINALLY PURCHASED IN ONE OF THE COVERED STATES AND THEREFOE IS NOT COVERED. THIS POLICY IS NOT FAIR AND CONSISITANT. ALL 2005 CROSSFIRES WERE BUILT IN GERMANY, THEREFORE ORIGINATION POINT OR US STATE OF INITIAL SALE SHOULD NOT BE THE INDICATING FACTOR. IF THE FAILURE OCCURS DURING THE X31 WARRANTY EXTENSION PERIOD THEN THE REPAIR SHOULD BE COVERED. THIS IS A $3000.00 PROBLEM. *TR

WAS DRIVING DOWN A CITY STREET AND STARTED HEARING BANGING FROM THE BACK OF THE CAR. PULLED OVER AND SAW THAT REAR WINDOW HAD DISENGAGED FROM THE CONVERTIBLE RAG TOP. HAVE READ HUNDREDS OF THE SAME COMPLAINTS PERTAINING TO THE 2005 ONLY. SUPPOSEDLY CHRYSLER HAS ADMITTED IT WAS A DEFECT. UNFORTUNATELY MY VIN # DOES NOT QUALITY AND I HAVE 137,000 MILES ON THE CAR. I HAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT THE WINDOW CANNOT BE REGLUED AND THE ONLY ANSWER IS A BRAND NEW TOP COSTING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS. CHRYSLER KNEW OF THIS DEFECT YEARS AGO AND DID NOT NOTIFY ANYONE. IT SEEMS TO HAPPEN WHERE THE WEATHER IS WARM. IT WAS CLOSE TO 100 DEGREES WHEN THIS HAPPENED. I WAS GETTING READY TO GET ON THE HIGHWAY AND WHO KNOWS THE DAMAGE IT WOULD HAVE CAUSED MY CAR AND ANOTHER CAR DRIVING BEHIND ME IF THE WINDOW HAD COME OFF. IF I HAD BEEN MADE AWARE, I WOULD HAVE HAD IT CHECKED. WHY HAS THERE NOT BEEN A RECALL? *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 CHRYSLER CROSS FIRE CONVERTIBLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE REAR WINDOW WAS DANGLING FROM THE ROOF. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER TO GET THE WINDOW REPAIRED BUT THEY INFORMED THE CONTACT THAT THE VEHICLE WOULD HAVE TO BE TAKEN TO A GLASS SHOP FOR THE REPAIR. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A GLASS SHOP BUT WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 54,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.