TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2003 CHEVROLET S10. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKE LIGHT ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE BRAKE LIGHT MODULE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 54,000.
2003 Chevrolet S10
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most S10 years
Owner complaints for the 2003 Chevrolet S10 are substantially higher than the model-year median of 42.5.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all S10 years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
132 reports with mileage · 46 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Structure. Review the 30 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 22 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Power Train. Review the 17 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Exterior Lighting complaints
4 reportsMY VEHICLE, A 2003 CHEVY S10 TRUCK, LIKE MANY VEHICLES, HAS DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS THAT AUTOMATICALLY GO ON WHEN THE TRUCK IS RUNNING; THE REGULAR HEADLIGHTS AND TAILLIGHTS COME ON AUTOMATICALLY WHEN OUTDOOR LIGHT FADES. AS A RESULT I NEVER TOUCH THE HEADLIGHT SWITCH. RECENTLY MY FRIEND WAS FOLLOWING ME IN HER CAR ON A HIGHWA…
Read full complaint
MY VEHICLE, A 2003 CHEVY S10 TRUCK, LIKE MANY VEHICLES, HAS DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS THAT AUTOMATICALLY GO ON WHEN THE TRUCK IS RUNNING; THE REGULAR HEADLIGHTS AND TAILLIGHTS COME ON AUTOMATICALLY WHEN OUTDOOR LIGHT FADES. AS A RESULT I NEVER TOUCH THE HEADLIGHT SWITCH. RECENTLY MY FRIEND WAS FOLLOWING ME IN HER CAR ON A HIGHWAY TRIP WHEN WE ENCOUNTERED SURPRISINGLY DENSE DAYLIGHT FOG; SENSIBLE SPEED ON THE HIGHWAY DROPPED TO 25 OR 30 MPH. HAPPILY EVERY CAR I SAW HAD ITS LIGHTS ON (NOT TO SEE BUT TO BE SEEN). AT ONE POINT MY FRIEND FLASHED HER LIGHTS AT ME REPEATEDLY AND I PULLED OVER TO FIND OUT WHAT WAS WRONG. "YOUR TAILLIGHTS AREN'T ON," SHE SAID. "I KNOW YOU'RE THERE, BUT IF I'M AS FAR BACK AS FEELS SAFE, I REALLY CAN'T SEE YOU!" IT HAD NEVER OCCURRED TO ME THAT THERE WAS EVER A TIME WHEN SAFETY REQUIRED ME TO ACTUALLY TURN ON THE HEADLIGHTS. IT SEEMS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE TO ME THAT THE NON-AUTOMATIC LIGHTING OF TAILLIGHTS ON VEHICLES WITH THIS LIGHTING ARRANGEMENT MIGHT CONTRIBUTE TO PILEUPS IN DAYTIME FOG OR BLOWING SNOW. I'M GOING TO RIG MY LIGHTS SO THE TAILLIGHTS COME ON IN DAYTIME RUNNING TOO. THIS SITUATION MIGHT NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL OF A RECALL, BUT I WONDER WHETHER STANDARDS FOR FUTURE VEHICLES SHOULD REQUIRE THAT DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS INCLUDE TAILLIGHTS. *TR
THE CONSUMERS VEHICLE IS EQUIPPED WITH A 2 HEADLAMP SYSTEM. AFTER ALIGNING THE DRIVERS SIDE LOWER BEAM HEADLAMP, THE UPPER BEAM HEADLAMP (WHICH DOES NOT CONTAIN A SEPARATE AIMING MECHANISM) APPEARS TO BE AIMED LOWER THAN THE LOWER BEAM. THE CONSUMER STATES THAT THIS CONDITION SIGNIFICANTLY LIMITS THE DRIVERS VISIBILITY WHEN US…
Read full complaint
THE CONSUMERS VEHICLE IS EQUIPPED WITH A 2 HEADLAMP SYSTEM. AFTER ALIGNING THE DRIVERS SIDE LOWER BEAM HEADLAMP, THE UPPER BEAM HEADLAMP (WHICH DOES NOT CONTAIN A SEPARATE AIMING MECHANISM) APPEARS TO BE AIMED LOWER THAN THE LOWER BEAM. THE CONSUMER STATES THAT THIS CONDITION SIGNIFICANTLY LIMITS THE DRIVERS VISIBILITY WHEN USING UPPER BEAM. THE CONSUMER HAS TAKEN THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND THEY STATED THAT THE HEADLAMP WAS NOT REPAIRABLE. THE DEALER ALSO DEMONSTRATED A SIMILAR ANAMOLY IN THE DRIVERS SIDE HEADLAMP ON ANOTHER 2003 S10 THAT IT HAD ON THE DEALER LOT. *AK
HEADLIGHTS DIM WITHOUT WARNING. ON 2 OCCASIONS THE HEADLIGHTS DIMMED AND FAILED. THIS REDUCES DRIVER'S VISIBILITY. AS A RESULT, THE CONSUMER DROVE OFF THE ROAD AND WENT INTO A DITCH. ALSO, UPON DEPRESSING ACCELERATOR PEDAL AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION DROPPED INTO FIRST GEAR ABRUPTLY.*AK
Official recalls
104V132000 · Equipment:other:labels
Mar 18, 2004
CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: SOME OF THESE VEHICLES INCLUDE INCORRECT STATEMENTS ON ONE OF THE AIR BAG WARNING LABELS.
Remedy: OWNERS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH CORRECT LABELS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN ON JUNE 4, 2004. OWNERS SHOULD CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-630-2438 OR GMC AT 1-866-996-9463.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
0No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.
Illustration