DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE RETRIEVING ITEMS FROM THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE THE TAILGATE CABLES SNAPPED OFF TWICE CAUSING MINOR INJURIES TO THE CONTACT. THE DEALERS OFFERED TO REPLACE THE CABLES AT COST AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THE FULL SIZE TRUCKS BUT NOT THE S10. NO SERVICE OR REPAIRS HAVE BEEN MADE …
Read full complaint
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE RETRIEVING ITEMS FROM THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE THE TAILGATE CABLES SNAPPED OFF TWICE CAUSING MINOR INJURIES TO THE CONTACT. THE DEALERS OFFERED TO REPLACE THE CABLES AT COST AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THE FULL SIZE TRUCKS BUT NOT THE S10. NO SERVICE OR REPAIRS HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE VEHICLE.
NHTSA ODI #10162146
127,680 miles · Jun 19, 2005
Structure
I HAD JUST NOTICED THROUGH MY FRONT WHEEL WELL THAT THERE WAS A CRACK IN MY FRAME. I TOOK IT TO A MECHANIC AND THEY HAD NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THAT BEFORE. HE HAD NOTICED THAT IT IS CRACKED ON BOTH SIDES AND MY REAREND IS ALSO AFFECTED BY THE CRACKS IN THE FRAME. THE FRAME IS NOT RUSTED AND I HAVE NEVER BEEN IN AN ACCIDENT OR…
Read full complaint
I HAD JUST NOTICED THROUGH MY FRONT WHEEL WELL THAT THERE WAS A CRACK IN MY FRAME. I TOOK IT TO A MECHANIC AND THEY HAD NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THAT BEFORE. HE HAD NOTICED THAT IT IS CRACKED ON BOTH SIDES AND MY REAREND IS ALSO AFFECTED BY THE CRACKS IN THE FRAME. THE FRAME IS NOT RUSTED AND I HAVE NEVER BEEN IN AN ACCIDENT OR HAVE TAKEN IT OFF ROAD. IT HAS 127,000 MILES ON THE TRUCK AND IT IS A 1999 SO IT IS ONLY 6 YEARS OLD. THERE IS NO PLAUSABLE EXPLANATION FOR THIS I WOULD LIKE AN INVESTIGATION DONE SO THIS DOESNT HAPPEN TO ANYONE ELSE. I WILL BE TAKING IT TO THE DEALER I BOUGHT IT FROM ALSO TO SEE WHAT CAN BE DONE.
NHTSA ODI #10125744
100,000 miles · Feb 15, 2005
Structure
I OWN A 1999 CHEVY S-10 PICKUP. I VERY RARELY HAVE PUT LOADS IN MY TRUCK. I HAVE MOVED A COUPLE OF TIMES SINCE I BOUGHT THE TRUCK NEW, AND THAT'S BEEN ABOUT IT. I HAVE NOT PUT ANYTHING REALLY HEAVY IN THE BACK SUCH AS AN ATV. THIS PAST SUMMER, ONE OF MY TAILGATE CABLES BROKE. UPON INSPECTION, IT CLEARLY RUSTED OUT UNTIL IT …
Read full complaint
I OWN A 1999 CHEVY S-10 PICKUP. I VERY RARELY HAVE PUT LOADS IN MY TRUCK. I HAVE MOVED A COUPLE OF TIMES SINCE I BOUGHT THE TRUCK NEW, AND THAT'S BEEN ABOUT IT. I HAVE NOT PUT ANYTHING REALLY HEAVY IN THE BACK SUCH AS AN ATV. THIS PAST SUMMER, ONE OF MY TAILGATE CABLES BROKE. UPON INSPECTION, IT CLEARLY RUSTED OUT UNTIL IT BECAME WEAKENED AND BROKE. I INSPECTED MY OTHER CABLE AND IT APPEARS AS THOUGH IT IS ABOUT TO BREAK AS WELL. THE CABLE HAS RUSTED ON THE INSIDE OF THE PLASTIC COATING THAT COVERS THE CABLE. WHEN MY CABLE BROKE IT BENT THE TAILGATE OF MY TRUCK (I GUESS WHEN IT HIT THE BUMPER). UPON A VISIT TO MY DEALER, I WAS TOLD IT WOULD COST ME $40 JUST FOR THE REPLACEMENT PART, MUCH LESS INSTALLATION. THESE CABLES NEED TO BE REDESIGNED/REPLACED. SOMEONE COULD GET HURT IF THEY ARE NOT. I HAVE A 1980 LUV PICKUP AND ITS TAILGATE WORKS FINE. NOW I CAN'T PUT ANY WEIGHT ON MY 1999 S-10'S TAILGATE FOR FEAR OF THE OTHER SIDE BREAKING.
NHTSA ODI #10110587
50,000 miles · Jan 2, 2005
Structure
LOADING A CLOTHES DRYER WHEN TAILGATE CABLES BROKE, NO INJURIES WERE NOTED. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10104926
59,889 miles · Dec 19, 2004
Structure
I OWN A 1999 CHEVROLET S-10 4X4. ON WED DEC THE 15TH BOTH MY TAILGATE CABLES BROKE IN HALF. I WAS PUTTING SOME EXTRA SETS OF WHEELS IN THE BACK. WHEN I SET THE WHEEL ON THE TAILGATE THE TAILGATE CABLES SNAPPED. NO ONE WAS HURT AND THERE IS SOME MINOR DAMAGE TO MY TAILGATE. I AM GLAD NO ONE WAS RIDING ON THE TAILGATE OR IT DIDN'T…
Read full complaint
I OWN A 1999 CHEVROLET S-10 4X4. ON WED DEC THE 15TH BOTH MY TAILGATE CABLES BROKE IN HALF. I WAS PUTTING SOME EXTRA SETS OF WHEELS IN THE BACK. WHEN I SET THE WHEEL ON THE TAILGATE THE TAILGATE CABLES SNAPPED. NO ONE WAS HURT AND THERE IS SOME MINOR DAMAGE TO MY TAILGATE. I AM GLAD NO ONE WAS RIDING ON THE TAILGATE OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN WHILE DRIVING. IT LOOKS LIKE THEY HAD RUSTED OUT AND JUST LET LOOSE. I NEVER EVEN KNEW THEY WERE RUSTING OUT. *JB
NHTSA ODI #10104074
39,000 miles · Aug 27, 2004
Structure
BOTH WIRE CABLES TO THE REAR TAILGATE OF MY 1999 S-10 PICKUP FAILED AT THE SAME TIME AND THE TAILGATE DROPPED TOTHE REAR BUMPER AND I FELL OFF THE TRUCK.*AK CABLES WERE RUSTED OUT AT THE SAME PLACES WERE THE PLASTIC COATING HAD CRACKED.
NHTSA ODI #10088688
81,408 miles · Jul 6, 2004
Structure
1999 CHEVROLET S-10 4X4 EXTENDED CAB PICKUP. TAILGATE CABLE BROKE DUE TO CORROSION. OTHER CABLE IN FAIL MODE. CONTACTED DEALER AS I WAS MADE AWARE OF GM RECALL FOR PROBLEM. WAS INFORMED MY TRUCK YEAR & MODEL WAS NOT IN RECALL. VEHICLES COVERED ARE FOR CORRODED CABLES BREAKING. I CAN UNDERSTAND GM RELUCTANCE AS A FIX FOR M…
Read full complaint
1999 CHEVROLET S-10 4X4 EXTENDED CAB PICKUP. TAILGATE CABLE BROKE DUE TO CORROSION. OTHER CABLE IN FAIL MODE. CONTACTED DEALER AS I WAS MADE AWARE OF GM RECALL FOR PROBLEM. WAS INFORMED MY TRUCK YEAR & MODEL WAS NOT IN RECALL. VEHICLES COVERED ARE FOR CORRODED CABLES BREAKING. I CAN UNDERSTAND GM RELUCTANCE AS A FIX FOR MY TRUCK IS MORE EXPENSIVE. REPLACEMENT WOULD ALSO INCLUDE TAILGATE LATCH BRACKET AS CABLES END IS PERMANENTLY RIVETED TO IT. BUT THIS STILL REMAINS TO BE A SAFETY ISSUE NO MATTER WHAT YEAR OR MODEL. *NM
NHTSA ODI #10080420
Mileage unknown · Jun 29, 2004
Structure
THE PASSENGER'S SIDE TAILGATE BROKE IN HALF DUE TO CORROSION. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION AND THE MECHANIC INFORMED THE CONSUMER THAT THIS PART WAS NOT UNDER RECALL. *AK THE CONSUMER FELT THAT THE RECALL FOR THE 200 MODEL SHOULD APPLY TO THIS VEHICLE AS WELL. *SC *JB
NHTSA ODI #10074069
60,000 miles · Mar 17, 2004
Structure
UPON OPENING TAILGATE AND WITHOUT ANY INDICATION TAIL CABLES BROKE, CAUSING TAILGATE TO DROP. *AK *MR
NHTSA ODI #10059676
Mileage unknown · Jan 16, 2004
Air BagsStructureVisibilityCrash
1999 CHEVROLET S10 EXTENDED CAB.*MR (NAR) THE CONSUMER WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT AND THE AIR BAGS NEVER DEPLOYED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOTALED SMASHING THE FRONT END AND BREAKING THE WINDSHIELD. *CB
NHTSA ODI #10055323
Official recalls
0
No recalls in this snapshot.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
3
EA05008 · Tailgate Support Cables
Opened Apr 14, 2005 · Closed May 19, 2006
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Latches/locks/linkages:tailgate:latch
GENERAL MOTORS IS CONDUCTING A SPECIAL POLICY PROGRAM FOR 903,464 OWNERS OF 2000 - 2003 MODEL S/T VEHICLES THROUGH WHICH OWNERS MAY, AT THEIR OPTION, EITHER (1) PERIODICALLY INSPECT THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES INSTALLED IN THEIR VEHICLE AND HAVE THE CABLES REPLACED IF THE CABLE COATING EXHIBITS ANY INDICATIONS OF DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION OR (2) REQUEST THAT THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES BE REPLACED FREE OF CHARGE. GM WILL HONOR ALL REQUESTS BY OWNERS WHO OPT FOR REPLACEMENT WITHOUT QUESTION REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITION OR APPEARANCE OF THE CABLES. GM HAS AGREED TO MAIL REMINDER NOTIFICATIONS TO OWNERS EVERY TWO YEARS UNTIL THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES HAVE BEEN REPLACED OR UNTIL THE VEHICLE IS 12 YEARS OLD.ODI'S INVESTIGATION INDICATES THAT A SIGNIFICANT MAJORITY OF THE REPORTED COMPLAINTS (87%) AND INJURIES (94%) HAVE OCCURRED IN MY 2000 - 2003 S/T VEHICLES.
RQ04012 · Tailgate Support Cable(s) Break
Opened Nov 22, 2004 · Closed Apr 14, 2005
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Structure:body:hatchback/liftgate:support Device/strut
ODI IS UPGRADING RQ04-012 AND OPENING AN EA TO INVESTIGATE THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES INSTALLED IN 1998 - 2004 MODEL YEAR SONOMA AND S10 MODEL VEHICLES.GENERAL MOTORS IS CONDUCTING RECALL CAMPAIGN 04V-129 TO REPLACE THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES ORIGINALLY INSTALLED IN CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2000-2004 SIERRAS AND SILVERADOS AND CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2002-2004 AVALANCHES AND ESCALADE EXTS (C/K MODELS).GENERAL MOTORS HAS ADVISED ODITHAT THE TAILGATE SUPPORT CABLES INSTALLED IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES WERE FABRICATED USING IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR SHEATHING MATERIAL AS THE RECALLED VEHICLES.HOWEVER,GENERAL MOTORS HAS ADVISED ODI THAT SONOMA AND S-10 VEHICLES DIFFER FROM C/K MODELS IN SEVERAL WAYS: THE VEHICLE HEIGHT IS LOWER; THE TAILGATE DISPLACEMENT (DROP) WHEN NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CABLES IS SMALLER AND THE TAILGATE COMES TO REST AT A LESS SEVERE TIP ANGLE WHEN NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CABLES; THE TAILGATE MASS IS SMALLER; AND THE SIZE, PAYLOAD, AND USAGE CHARACTERISTCIS ARE LESS DEMANDING THAN C/K MODEL VEHICLES.GM ALSO STATED THAT SONOMA AND S-10 WARRANTY CLAIM INFORMATION INDICATES A LOWER CLAIM COUNT AND A LOWER CLAIM RATE THAN RECALLED C/K MODELS.NOTWITHSTANDING THE ABOVE INFORMATION, ODI HAS RECEIVED AN ADDITIONAL 73 NON-INJURY COMPLAINTS AND 10 INJURY COMPLAINTS ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES DURING RQ04-012 (SINCE NOVEMBER 2004 TO DATE), WHICH JUSTIFIES OPENING AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE.
PE99009 · POST-COLLISION Fuel System Integrity
Opened Feb 1, 1999 · Closed Jun 11, 1999
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Vehicle Speed Control:linkages
ALLEGED THAT THE FUEL TANK MAY BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO PUNCTURE IN CERTAIN CRASH MODES
1999 Chevrolet S10 Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year