← New search

1999 Chevrolet Malibu

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Malibu years

Owner complaints for the 1999 Chevrolet Malibu are substantially higher than the model-year median of 310.5.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

265 reports with mileage · 524 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 292 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 144 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Engine And Engine Cooling. Review the 138 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

44 crash reports2 fire reports30 injury reports

Suspension complaints

82 reports
Clear category filter
73,318 miles · Apr 21, 2005
Suspension

I WAS DRIVING MY 1999 CHEVROLET MALIBU DOWN MY DRIVEWAY WHEN I HEARD A LOUD CLUNKING NOISE. THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE OF THE CAR WENT DOWN ALMOST TO THE GROUND. I TURNED CAR AROUND TO GO BACK TO MY HOME AND SMOKE STARTED POURING FROM UNDER THE CAR. HAD TO HAVE IT TOWED TO THE DEALER WHERE THE SPRING AND STRUT HAD TO BE REPLA…

Read full complaint

I WAS DRIVING MY 1999 CHEVROLET MALIBU DOWN MY DRIVEWAY WHEN I HEARD A LOUD CLUNKING NOISE. THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE OF THE CAR WENT DOWN ALMOST TO THE GROUND. I TURNED CAR AROUND TO GO BACK TO MY HOME AND SMOKE STARTED POURING FROM UNDER THE CAR. HAD TO HAVE IT TOWED TO THE DEALER WHERE THE SPRING AND STRUT HAD TO BE REPLACED. THEY HAD BROKEN AND CUT INTO THE TIRE. EXTENDED WARRANTY PAID FOR THE BROKEN SPRING AND STRUT BUT WOULD NOT REPLACE OTHER SIDE. JUST HAVE TO WAIT FOR IT TO BREAK. I HAD TO PAY TO REPLACE THE TIRES WHICH HAD ONLY 30,000 MILES ON THEM. THE MALIBU HAS 72,000 MILES ON IT. I BOUGHT IT AT 29,000 MILES. HAVE HAD TO REPLACE 4 FUEL INJECTORS, REPLACE BRAKES, HAVE HAD THE BLOWER CONTROL FIXED TWICE, STILL DOES NOT OPERATE ON 1 OR 2 SETTING, CHECK ENGINE LIGHT AND ANITLOCK BRAKE LIGHT COMES ON AND OFF FOR NO REASONS, REPLACED BELT TENSIONER TWICE, SERPENTINE BELT TWICE, HAD OIL LEAKS, HAS A LOUD TAPPING NOISE WHEN FIRST STARTING ENGINE (WAS TOLD THAT THIS IS COMMON IN THIS CAR) (SOUNDS LIKE A VALVE PROBLEM TO ME. I AM KEEPING THIS CAR ONLY UNTIL THE EXTENDED WARRANTY IS ABOUT TO EXPIRE. IT HAS BEEN A LEMON SINCE DAY 1. THIS MODEL OF MALIBU SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECALLED. IT IS A DANGER FOR ANYONE TO DRIVE. THANK GOD I WAS IN MY OWN DRIVEWAY AND NOT ON THE EXPRESSWAY WITH MY GRANDAUGHTER. NO MORE CHEVROLETS FOR ME! *NM

NHTSA ODI #10118210

88,189 miles · Apr 10, 2005
Suspension

(1) I WAS DRIVING MY 1999 CHEVROLET MALIBU ABOUT 35 MPH ON A TOWN STREET. (2)WITHOUT WARNING, I HEARD A LOUD BANG FROM THE LEFT FRONT WHEEL. THE CAR INSTANTLY MADE A SHARP LEFT HAND TURN INTO THE ONCOMING LANE. THERE WERE NO ONCOMING CARS. I WAS ABLE TO QUICKLY REGAIN CONTROL OF THE CAN AND GET BACK INTO MY LANE. I PULLED DOWN …

Read full complaint

(1) I WAS DRIVING MY 1999 CHEVROLET MALIBU ABOUT 35 MPH ON A TOWN STREET. (2)WITHOUT WARNING, I HEARD A LOUD BANG FROM THE LEFT FRONT WHEEL. THE CAR INSTANTLY MADE A SHARP LEFT HAND TURN INTO THE ONCOMING LANE. THERE WERE NO ONCOMING CARS. I WAS ABLE TO QUICKLY REGAIN CONTROL OF THE CAN AND GET BACK INTO MY LANE. I PULLED DOWN A SIDE AND LOOKED AT THE LEFT FRONT TIRE AND IT LOOKED NORMAL. UNDER THE HOOD LOOKED NORMAL. I PROCEDED HOME. THE LEFT FRONT WHEEL HAD A NOTICABLE CLUNK OVER THE SLIGHTEST BUMP IN THE ROAD. I WENT HOME ABOUT ONE MILE AND TOOK THE LEFT FRONT WHEEL OFF. I NOTICED THE COIL SPRING AROUND THE STRUT HAD FRACTURED. THE BASE OF THE COIL SPRING, (THE PEARCH IT WAS SITTING ON WAS BENT) WAS CLOSE TO THE TIRE. I NOTICED A RUB IN THE TIRE WAS CAUSED BY THE FRACTURED SPRING. THE FRACTURE WAS CLEAN EXCEPT SOME CORROSION WAS EVIDENT AT THE START OF THE CRACK PROPAGATION. I HAVE PHOTOS IF YOU WANT. I WILL ALSO ASK FOR THE FRACTURED SPRING. (3) THE CAR HAD BOTH FRONT END STRUTS REPLACED AND COIL SPRINGS REPLACED. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10116684

33,153 miles · Mar 26, 2005
Suspension

CAR HAD BEEN DRIVEN FROM OHIO TO FLORIDA FOR VACATION. CAR WAS DRIVEN OUT OF LIVING COMPLEX WHEN BLACK SMOKE & BURNING RUBBER WAS NOTICED,DROVE BACK INTO COMPLEX & EXITED CAR WHEN THE TIRE ON FRONT PASSENGER SIDE BLEW.CALLED AAA TO HAVE VEHICLE TAKEN TO AN AUTO REPAIR SHOP. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10114773

31,000 miles · Feb 24, 2005
Suspension

THE VEHICLE ALARM WENT OFF. THE CONSUMER WENT TO CHECK THE VEHICLE, UPON TRYING TO BACK THE VEHICLE OUT OF THE GARAGE, THE VEHICLE LEANED OVER TO THE RIGHT. THE CONSUMER HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THE STRUT AND THE SPRING HAD BROKEN ON ITS OWN. *NM

NHTSA ODI #10113027

43,264 miles · Jan 28, 2005
Suspension

VEHICLE EXPERIENCED FRONT COIL SPRING PROBLEMS. CONSUMER WAS BACKING OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY AND THE SUSPENSION DROPPED. THEN, DRIVER SAW THE TIRE SMOKING. THE TIRE WAS DAMAGED BECAUSE THE SPRING WENT RIGHT INSIDE THE INNER SIDEWALL. *AK

NHTSA ODI #10109188

100,800 miles · Jan 20, 2005
Suspension

I HEARD A REALLY LOUD BANG AND THE FRONT OF THE CAR DROPPED DOWN WHILE TRAVELING AT 25 MPH NEAR MY HOME. AFTER PULLING INTO MY DRIVEWAY AND REMOVING THE FRONT TIRE, I FOUND THAT THE DRIVERS SIDE COIL SPRING HAD BROKEN AND THE COIL WAS NOW RUBBING ON THE TIRE. THE TIRE WAS SLIGHTLY DAMAGED AND THE CAR IS NOT DRIVABLE. I AM PLA…

Read full complaint

I HEARD A REALLY LOUD BANG AND THE FRONT OF THE CAR DROPPED DOWN WHILE TRAVELING AT 25 MPH NEAR MY HOME. AFTER PULLING INTO MY DRIVEWAY AND REMOVING THE FRONT TIRE, I FOUND THAT THE DRIVERS SIDE COIL SPRING HAD BROKEN AND THE COIL WAS NOW RUBBING ON THE TIRE. THE TIRE WAS SLIGHTLY DAMAGED AND THE CAR IS NOT DRIVABLE. I AM PLANNING TO HAVE THE CAR TOWED TO MY REPAIR SHOP. *JB

NHTSA ODI #10107634

97,235 miles · Jan 8, 2005
Suspension

I WAS PULLING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE AND HEARD A LOUD CLUNK FOLLOWING WITH THE VEHICLE DROPPING A FEW INCHES. AFTER I GOT THE VEHICLE TOWED I PULLED OFF THE LEFT FRONT WHEEL AND NOTICED THE SPRING BROKE OFF, AND THERE WAS A FRACTURE THAT OCCURRED IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR. THE COIL SPRING DID NOT DAMAGE …

Read full complaint

I WAS PULLING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE AND HEARD A LOUD CLUNK FOLLOWING WITH THE VEHICLE DROPPING A FEW INCHES. AFTER I GOT THE VEHICLE TOWED I PULLED OFF THE LEFT FRONT WHEEL AND NOTICED THE SPRING BROKE OFF, AND THERE WAS A FRACTURE THAT OCCURRED IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR. THE COIL SPRING DID NOT DAMAGE THE TIRE, BUT WAS LYING ON TOP OF THE TIRE PRIOR TO REMOVAL. NOTHING HAS BEEN REPAIRED YET, AND YES THE OLD PARTS ARE STILL AND WILL BE AVAILABLE.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10106002

Mileage unknown · Nov 5, 2004
Service Brakes, HydraulicSuspension

PROBLEMS WITH BRAKE EQUIPMENT ON CHEVROLET MALIBU. *MR THE CONSUMER HAS HAD TO REPLACE THE VEHICLE'S BRAKES, CALIPERS AND ROTORS MANY TIMES. THE VEHICLE'S STRUTS WERE ALSO REPLACED. *NM THE CONSUMER WAS MADE AWARE OF OTHER CONSUMERS WITH THE SAME MAKE/MODEL THAT HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME PROBLEM. *SC

NHTSA ODI #10087567

41,695 miles · Aug 12, 2004
Fuel System, GasolineService Brakes, HydraulicSuspension

THE CONSUMER SMELLED FUEL WHILE DRIVING. SHE THEN OBSERVED FUEL DRIPPING ONTO THE GROUND WHILE PARKED, THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE FUEL LINE WAS LEAKING AT THE FUEL FILTER CONNECTOR DUE TO CORROSION. THE CONSUMER FEELS THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD BE 100% RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACI…

Read full complaint

THE CONSUMER SMELLED FUEL WHILE DRIVING. SHE THEN OBSERVED FUEL DRIPPING ONTO THE GROUND WHILE PARKED, THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR INSPECTION. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE FUEL LINE WAS LEAKING AT THE FUEL FILTER CONNECTOR DUE TO CORROSION. THE CONSUMER FEELS THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD BE 100% RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING THE FUEL LINE. THE CONSUMER HAS HAD OTHER COMPONENTS FAIL ON THE VEHICLE. ALL FOUR TIRES WERE REPLACED DUE TO CENTER TREAD WEAR. THE FRONT BRAKE PADS WERE REPLACED AT 20000 MILES AND AGAIN AT 41313. THE DRIVER'S SIDE SUNVISOR BROKE. BOTH FRONT WHEEL HUB ASSEMBLIES WERE REPLACED DUE TO BEARING FAILURE AT 41313 MILES. BOTH FRONT BRAKE ROTORS WERE REPLACED AT 41313 MILES. *JB *NM

NHTSA ODI #10074219

62,100 miles · Jul 17, 2004
Suspension

FRONT SPRING FAILURE AND FRONT TIRE BLOWOUT.*AK

NHTSA ODI #10081259

Official recalls

1

14V400000 · Electrical System:ignition

Jul 3, 2014

This defect can affect the safe operation of the airbag system. Until this recall is performed, customers should remove all items from their key rings, leaving only the ignition key. The key fob (if applicable), should also be removed from the key ring. General Motors LLC (GM) notified the agency on July 3, 2014, that they are recalling 5,877,718 model year 2000-2005 Chevrolet Impala and Monte Carlo, 1997-2003 Chevrolet Malibu, 2004-2005 Malibu Classic, 1999-2004 Oldsmobile Alero, 1998-2002 Oldsmobile Intrigue, 1999-2005 Pontiac Grand Am and 2004-2008 Pontiac Grand Prix vehicles. In these models, the weight on the key ring and/or road conditions or some other jarring event may cause the ignition switch to move out of the run position, turning off the engine.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the key is not in the run position, the air bags may not deploy if the vehicle is involved in a crash, increasing the risk of injury.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will install two key rings and an insert in the key slot or a cover over the key head on all ignition keys, free of charge. The recall began on September 9, 2014. GM's number for this recall is 14350.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

5

RQ04005 · Turn Signal Failures

Opened Jun 18, 2004 · Closed Nov 30, 2004

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting:hazard Flashing Warning Lights:switch; Exterior Lighting:turn Signal:switch

GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Exterior Lighting:hazard Flashing Warning Lights:switch

GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

Exterior Lighting:turn Signal:switch

GM CONDUCTED A RECALL (NHTSA RECALL NUMBER 03V327) ON MODEL YEAR (MY) 2000-2001 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE HAZARD SWITCHES THAT CAUSE THE TURN SIGNALS AND HAZARD LIGHTS TO FAIL.THE RECALL COVERED VEHICLES BUILT FROM FEBRUARY 2000 THROUGH MAY 2001 (DEPENDING ON MODEL).ODI OPENED THIS INVESTIGATION BASED ON 64 REPORTS ALLEGING TURN SIGNAL FAILURE ON MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER THE RECALL AND BUILT PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 2000.IN DECEMBER 2004, GM WILL ISSUE A SPECIAL POLICY FOR MY 1999-2000 ALERO, GRAND AM AND MALIBU VEHICLES NOT COVERED UNDER RECALL 03V327.THE POLICY COVERS TURN SIGNAL/HAZARD FLASHER FAILURE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS OR 150,000 MILES (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST) TO PROVIDE A NO COST REPLACEMENT OF THE HAZARD SWITCH.GM WILL SEND LETTERS TO OWNERS STARTING DECEMBER 30, 2004.THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE MANUFACTURER IS SUFFICIENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES RAISED BY THIS INVESTIGATION.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE FUTURE ACTION IF WARRANTED BY THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

EA03021 · Front Suspension Coil Spring Fracture

Opened Nov 4, 2003 · Closed Oct 19, 2004

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:front; Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

Additional source detail variants (3)

Suspension:front

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

Suspension

THE FAILURE RATE OF THE SUBJECT VEHICLES IS LOW RELATIVE TO PAST ODI INVESTIGATIONS.THE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS IS THEREFORE CLOSED.THE CLOSING OF THIS INVESTIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINDING BY NHTSA THAT NO SAFETY-RELATED DEFECT EXISTS.THE AGENCY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR COMPLAINTS AND OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ALLEGED DEFECT IN THE SUBJECT VEHICLES AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN THE FUTURE IF WARRANTED.PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.

PE03031 · Front Suspension Coil Spring Fracture

Opened Jul 14, 2003 · Closed Nov 4, 2003

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension:front; Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH A COIL SPRING-OVER-STRUT FRONT SUSPENSION WITH THE SPRING ITSELF RESTING IN COMPRESSION BETWEEN TWO POLYMER ISOLATORS.PE03-031 WAS OPENED TO INVESTIGATE REPORTS OF FRACTURE OF THIS SPRING.THE FRACTURES OCCUR IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR AND APPARENTLY ORIGINATE IN CORROSION PITS FOUND BENEATH REGIONS OF DAMAGED EPOXY COATING.CONSUMER COMPLAINTS AND WARRANTY DATA SHOW THAT THE FAILURES OCCUR PREDOMINANTLY IN THE ?CORROSION STATES? AND TEND TO APPEAR OUTSIDE OF THE STANDARD 36,000 MILE WARRANTY TERM.THESE DATA ALSO SUGGEST THAT THESE FAILURES WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN.SLIGHTLY MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINTS HAVE INVOLVED THE BROKEN SPRING COIL CONTACTING THE ADJACENT TIRE.ODI IS UPGRADING PE03-031 TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO GATHER FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCES OF THESE FAILURES.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Suspension:front

THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH A COIL SPRING-OVER-STRUT FRONT SUSPENSION WITH THE SPRING ITSELF RESTING IN COMPRESSION BETWEEN TWO POLYMER ISOLATORS.PE03-031 WAS OPENED TO INVESTIGATE REPORTS OF FRACTURE OF THIS SPRING.THE FRACTURES OCCUR IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR AND APPARENTLY ORIGINATE IN CORROSION PITS FOUND BENEATH REGIONS OF DAMAGED EPOXY COATING.CONSUMER COMPLAINTS AND WARRANTY DATA SHOW THAT THE FAILURES OCCUR PREDOMINANTLY IN THE ?CORROSION STATES? AND TEND TO APPEAR OUTSIDE OF THE STANDARD 36,000 MILE WARRANTY TERM.THESE DATA ALSO SUGGEST THAT THESE FAILURES WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN.SLIGHTLY MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINTS HAVE INVOLVED THE BROKEN SPRING COIL CONTACTING THE ADJACENT TIRE.ODI IS UPGRADING PE03-031 TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO GATHER FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCES OF THESE FAILURES.

Suspension:front:springs:coil Springs

THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH A COIL SPRING-OVER-STRUT FRONT SUSPENSION WITH THE SPRING ITSELF RESTING IN COMPRESSION BETWEEN TWO POLYMER ISOLATORS.PE03-031 WAS OPENED TO INVESTIGATE REPORTS OF FRACTURE OF THIS SPRING.THE FRACTURES OCCUR IN THE FIRST ACTIVE COIL ABOVE THE LOWER ISOLATOR AND APPARENTLY ORIGINATE IN CORROSION PITS FOUND BENEATH REGIONS OF DAMAGED EPOXY COATING.CONSUMER COMPLAINTS AND WARRANTY DATA SHOW THAT THE FAILURES OCCUR PREDOMINANTLY IN THE ?CORROSION STATES? AND TEND TO APPEAR OUTSIDE OF THE STANDARD 36,000 MILE WARRANTY TERM.THESE DATA ALSO SUGGEST THAT THESE FAILURES WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN.SLIGHTLY MORE THAN ONE THIRD OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINTS HAVE INVOLVED THE BROKEN SPRING COIL CONTACTING THE ADJACENT TIRE.ODI IS UPGRADING PE03-031 TO AN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO GATHER FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SCOPE AND CONSEQUENCES OF THESE FAILURES.

DP02008 · Engine Coolant Boils Over

Opened Sep 3, 2002 · Closed Sep 24, 2002

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Engine And Engine Cooling

There is no summary currently available

EA00010 · Stop Lamp Assembly Overheat

Opened Mar 27, 2000 · Closed Aug 9, 2001

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Exterior Lighting

There is no summary currently available