THIS IS ONLY A REPRESENTATIVE REPORT ON ONE GM VEHICLE IN AN EFFORT TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THIS SERIOUS PROBLEM WE HAVE HAD WITH MANY GM VEHICLES IN THE LAST YEAR AND ONE-HALF. WE OPERATE ABOUT 12 GM VANS, PICKUPS, TAHOES, SUBURBANS AND MINI-VANS AND WE HAVE HAD ABOUT 8 FUEL PUMP FAILURES ON THEM, SOME WHILE STILL IN WARRANTY, AN…
Read full complaint
THIS IS ONLY A REPRESENTATIVE REPORT ON ONE GM VEHICLE IN AN EFFORT TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THIS SERIOUS PROBLEM WE HAVE HAD WITH MANY GM VEHICLES IN THE LAST YEAR AND ONE-HALF. WE OPERATE ABOUT 12 GM VANS, PICKUPS, TAHOES, SUBURBANS AND MINI-VANS AND WE HAVE HAD ABOUT 8 FUEL PUMP FAILURES ON THEM, SOME WHILE STILL IN WARRANTY, AND SOME JUST OUT OF WARRANTY. WE ARE NOW STARTING ON THE "SECOND ROUND" OF REPLACING FUEL PUMPS ON SOME OF THE SAME VEHICLES WE REPLACED THEM ON SEVERAL MONTHS AGO. IN THE 1995, 1996, 1997 & 1998 VEHICLES I MENTIONED, THE FUEL PUMPS FAIL WITH REGULARITY AND CREATE A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION IF ONE IS ON A CROWDED THOROFARE OR A RAILROAD CROSSING. WE DISCUSSED THIS PROBLEM WITH OUR GASOLINE SUPPLIER (LION OIL CO.) AND THEY ASSURED US IT WAS NOT A FUEL PROBLEM. THE LOCAL DEALERS TRIED TO BLAME THE PROBLEM ON OUR FUEL SUPPLY, BUT THE PROBLEM IS PREVALENT WITH GM DEALERS THROUGHOUT THE SOUTHEAST U.S. WE WERE TOLD BY LION OIL. THE FUEL PUMPS ARE MADE OF CHEAP PLASTIC MATERIALS AND PROBABLY COST THE DEALER ABOUT $50 BUT THEY CHARGE $427 FOR THEM TO A CUSTOMER. FOR GM OWNERS THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS DRIVING HAZARD AND UNFAIR FINANCIAL SITUATION TO HAVE TO CONTEND WITH AS THE FUEL PUMPS GO OUT WITH NO NOTICE AND THE VEHICLE COMES TO A HALT. THE TWO DEALERS I HAVE DEALT WITH WILL VERBALLY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS IN FACT A PROBLEM WITH THE PUMPS, BUT THEY SAY THEIR HANDS ARE TIED UNTIL GM ISSUES A RECALL. HOW MANY DOLLARS MUST BE WASTED AND HOW MANY DRIVERS MUST BE ENDANGERED BEFORE THIS HAPPENS? AND WILL OWNERS LIKE MYSELF BE REIMBURSED FOR THE ERRORS OF GM'S WAYS? THANK YOU. NO SAFETY DEFECT MENTIONED. *AK
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: CHEVROLET AND GMC G VANS EQUIPPED WITH SLIDING SIDE DOORS AND REMEDIED DURING SAFETY CAMPAIGN (95V197/95-C-58) BETWEEN JULY 18, 1997 AND FEBRUARY 6, 1999. THE SLIDING SIDE-DOOR REAR LATCH WAS REPLACED WITH A LATCH THAT WAS IMPROPERLY RIVETED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE DOOR MAY NOT PERFORM AS REQUIRED AND INCREASED INJURIES COULD RESULT.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE SLIDING DOOR REAR LATCH.
THESE VEHICLES WERE BUILT WITH A SLIDING SIDE-DOOR REAR LATCH THAT WAS IMPROPERLY RIVETED. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FMVSS NO. 206, "DOOR LOCKS AND DOOR RETENTION COMPONENTS."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: CONSEQUENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE DOOR WILL NOT PERFORM AS REQUIRED BY THE STANDARD.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE SLIDING DOOR REAR LATCH ON ALL SUSPECT VEHICLES.
BOTH THE SUPPLEMENTAL INFLATABLE RESTRAINT (SIR) CAUTION LABEL AND AN ENGINE START LABEL WERE INSTALLED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE DRIVER'S SUN VISOR. THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FMVSS NO. 208, "OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION."
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: CONSEQUENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: OPERATORS COULD FAIL TO NOTICE AND HEED THE WARNING LABELS.
Remedy: A NEW LABEL, WITH INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS, WILL BE SENT DIRECTLY TO OWNERS. OWNERS WILL INSTALL THE LABEL OR CAN HAVE THEIR DEALER INSTALL THE LABEL FOR THEM.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
0
No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.
1995 Chevrolet G20 Problems, Complaints & Recalls | Skip That Year