← New search

2004 Chevrolet Astro

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

Limited comparison data

There is not enough comparable history to draw a useful model-year comparison.

About this comparison →

How this year compares

Owner complaints by model year

Other model years Selected year
Compare all Astro years →

Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.

What owners reported most

All reported categories

Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

Limited mileage data: 13 of 14 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 4 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Electrical System. Review the 2 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 2 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

1 crash reports1 fire reports1 injury reports

Electrical System complaints

2 reports
Clear category filter
133,000 miles · Jun 20, 2014
Electrical SystemEngineFuel System, Gasoline

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHEVROLET ASTRO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO START UNTIL AFTER THREE ATTEMPTS. THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO DRIVE AND THEN THE VEHICLE LOST ALL POWER. THE CONTACT PUMPED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL, WAITED TEN MINUTES AND THE VEHICLE RESUMED ITS NORMAL OPERATION. THE FAILURE OCCURRED ON A RE…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 CHEVROLET ASTRO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO START UNTIL AFTER THREE ATTEMPTS. THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO DRIVE AND THEN THE VEHICLE LOST ALL POWER. THE CONTACT PUMPED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL, WAITED TEN MINUTES AND THE VEHICLE RESUMED ITS NORMAL OPERATION. THE FAILURE OCCURRED ON A REGULAR BASIS. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE DEALER DIAGNOSED THE FAILURE AND STATED THAT THE FUEL PUMP NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE DEALER ASSURED THE CONTACT THAT AFTER PAYING FOR THE REPAIR, THE FAILURE WOULD BE RESOLVED. THE FUEL PUMP, STARTER, MOTOR MOUNTS, AND GENERATOR WERE ALL REPLACED; HOWEVER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 133,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 134,249.

NHTSA ODI #10604713

126,000 miles · Feb 4, 2010
Electrical SystemService Brakes, HydraulicFire

WHEN MY WIFE RETURNED TO OUR 2004 CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN, THE VEHICLE SEEMED TO HAVE A DEAD BATTERY. THE CAR WOULD NOT TURN OVER OR FIRE THE IGNITION. AFTER HAVING THE BATTERY AND STARTER CHECKED, WE WERE TOLD THE BATTERY WAS DRAINED AND THEY WERE ABLE TO CHARGE THE BATTERY. THE STARTER CHECKED GOOD. THE CAR SEEMED TO HAVE A "DEAD …

Read full complaint

WHEN MY WIFE RETURNED TO OUR 2004 CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN, THE VEHICLE SEEMED TO HAVE A DEAD BATTERY. THE CAR WOULD NOT TURN OVER OR FIRE THE IGNITION. AFTER HAVING THE BATTERY AND STARTER CHECKED, WE WERE TOLD THE BATTERY WAS DRAINED AND THEY WERE ABLE TO CHARGE THE BATTERY. THE STARTER CHECKED GOOD. THE CAR SEEMED TO HAVE A "DEAD SHORT" WHEN TRYING TO START AND/OR BOOST. AFTER REPLACING ALL COMPONENTS, THE VAN STARTED, HOWEVER, WHEN I PUT MY FOOT ON THE BRAKES, THERE WAS NO BRAKE PRESSURE ON THE PEDAL. IT APPEARED THAT WE WERE LOSING BRAKE FLUID UNDER THE VEHICLE FROM A RUPTURED LINE. WE TOWED THE CAR HOME TO INSPECT AND REPLACE THE BRAKE LINE. UPON INSPECTION, WE FOUND ELECTRICAL ARCING WHERE THE BRAKE LINE HAD GROUNDED ON THE VEHICLE FRAME CAUSING A HOLE TO RUPTURE IN THE BRAKE LINE JUST REAR OF THE ELECTRICAL UNIT. WHAT WE DETERMINED CAUSED THE PROBLEM WAS A HOT WIRE THAT RAN BETWEEN THE BATTERY AND STARTER WAS RUBBING ON THE SUSPENSION LINKS ON THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE VEHICLE. IT RUBBED THROUGH THE ELECTRICAL SHEATH AND CAUSED CONTACT BETWEEN THE FRAME AND THE ELECTRICAL CHARGING SYSTEM IF THE VEHICLE. AFTER CONTACTING GM/CHEVROLET SUPPORT, THEY WERE "SORRY" ABOUT THE ISSUE AND FELT THE ISSUE WAS DUE TO A WIRE CLAMP THAT "MUST BE MISSING." WE HAVE TEMPORARILY REPAIRED THE ISSUE, HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO FACTORY WIRE CLAMPS THAT WERE MISSING. THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW FROM CHEVROLET ON THIS VEHICLE THAT HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED ON THE INTERNET IN VARIOUS PLACES. HAD MY WIFE BEEN DRIVING 55MPH, SHE WOULD HAVE HAD NO BRAKES DUE TO THE ISSUE. CHEVROLET SIMPLY SAID THE VEHICLE WAS A 2004 AND THEY WOULD NOT TAKE ACTION ON A VEHICLE "THAT OLD". SEVERAL OF THE VEHICLES ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN DISRUPTED THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE BRAKING SYSTEM SUCH AS DOOR LOCKS, DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS, ETC... WE WANT THE PUBLIC WARNED ABOUT THIS ISSUE SO NO LIVES ARE LOST. WE HAVE TEMPORARILY REPAIRED THE ISSUE, HOWEVER, THE ORIGINAL CABLE AND TIES ARE STILL IN PLACE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #10305971

Official recalls

0

No recalls in this snapshot.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

0

No exact-year investigations in this snapshot.