VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHILE PURSUING TO DRIVE VEHICLE AND FRONT TIRES STARTED TO RUB AGAINST FRONT FRAME. DEALER WAS NOTIFIED, MECHANIC STATED TORSION BAR WAS CORRODED. *TT
1995 Chevrolet Astro
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Astro years
Owner complaints for the 1995 Chevrolet Astro are substantially higher than the model-year median of 69.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Astro years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
Limited mileage data: 32 of 446 reports include usable mileage. There isn’t enough coverage to show a useful chart.
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Service Brakes, Hydraulic. Review the 105 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Visibility. Review the 104 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Suspension. Review the 75 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Suspension complaints
75 reportsTHE FRONT LEFT TORSION BAR BROKE AFTER WE CAME HOME. A COUPLE OF HOURS LATER THE RIGHT FRONT TORSION BAR BROKE SO THAT WE COULDN'T TURN THE STEERING WHEEL WITHOUT THE BODY OF THE VAN HITTING THE TIRES. WE FEEL EXTREMELY LUCKY THAT THIS DID NOT HAPPEN WHILE DRIVING, AS IT WOULD MORE THAN LIKELY HAVE BLOWN THE FRONT TIRES AND WE C…
Read full complaint
THE FRONT LEFT TORSION BAR BROKE AFTER WE CAME HOME. A COUPLE OF HOURS LATER THE RIGHT FRONT TORSION BAR BROKE SO THAT WE COULDN'T TURN THE STEERING WHEEL WITHOUT THE BODY OF THE VAN HITTING THE TIRES. WE FEEL EXTREMELY LUCKY THAT THIS DID NOT HAPPEN WHILE DRIVING, AS IT WOULD MORE THAN LIKELY HAVE BLOWN THE FRONT TIRES AND WE COULD HAVE HAD A MAJOR ACCIDENT. AFTER HAVING OUR VAN HAULED ON A FLATBED WRECKER WE WERE ADVISED THAT THESE VANS HAVE A HISTORY WITH THE TORSION BARS BREAKING. BOTH THE AUTO REPAIR PLACE AND THE WRECKER SERVICE SAID THEY WERE REALLY SURPRISED THAT THERE WASN'T A RECALL AS THIS IS A SAFETY HAZARD. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM AS OTHER PEOPLE, LIKE OURSELVES, HAVE NO IDEA THAT THE WHOLE FRONT OF THESE VANS CAN JUST DROP DOWN ON THE TIRES WHILE DRIVING WHEN THESE TORSION BARS BREAK. AGAIN WE FEEL VERY FORTUNATE THAT OURS BROKE AFTER WE RETURNED HOME FROM CHURCH SUNDAY AND NOT WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH ON THE HIGHWAY!*AK
WHILE DRIVING, TORSION BARS BROKE, CAUSING VEHICLE TO PULL, MAKING IT HARD TO STEER VEHICLE.*AK CONSUMER WOULD LIKE FOR CHEVROLET TO MAKE PAYMENT FOR THE FAILURE THAT OCCURED WITH THE VEHICLE. *JG
WHILE MAKING A LEFT TURN AT 5 MPH DRIVER'S SIDE FRONT OF VEHICLE DROPPED. VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A REPAIR SHOP, TORSION BAR SNAPPED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED.*AK
VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHEN WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE PASSENGER'S SIDE FRONT OF VEHICLE DROPPED. VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO DEALER ONE DAY LATER, BY THAT TIME DRIVER'S SIDE OF VEHICLE HAD DROPPED, AS WELL. DEALER DETERMINED THAT TORSION BAR HAD BROKEN ON BOTH SIDES, IT WAS RUSTED THROUGH. A NEWLY DESIGNED TORSION BAR WAS INSTALLED.*AK
THIS PART WAS HAD A DESIGN CHANGE BY THE COMPANY OF CHEVROLET, ALTHOUGH THEY FAILED TO POST THIS ANYWHERE. I HAVE TALKED TO THE COMPANY AND WRITTEN THEM A LETTER AND THEY ARE NOT CONCERNED. THE FRONT OF MY CAR FELL DOWN IN A PARKING LOT THANKFULLY AND NOT ON THE HIGHWAY. I CAN SUPPLY YOU WITH A COPY OF THE LETTER IF YOU WISH.…
Read full complaint
THIS PART WAS HAD A DESIGN CHANGE BY THE COMPANY OF CHEVROLET, ALTHOUGH THEY FAILED TO POST THIS ANYWHERE. I HAVE TALKED TO THE COMPANY AND WRITTEN THEM A LETTER AND THEY ARE NOT CONCERNED. THE FRONT OF MY CAR FELL DOWN IN A PARKING LOT THANKFULLY AND NOT ON THE HIGHWAY. I CAN SUPPLY YOU WITH A COPY OF THE LETTER IF YOU WISH. WE CHECKED AROUND AND FOUND NO WARNING OF FAILURE OF THIS PART. THERE IS A PROBLEM, MY HUSBAND CALLED TWO LOCAL CHEV GARAGES AND THEY SAID THEY THOUGHT THERE SHOULD BE SOMETHING DONE AND THERE IS A PROBLEM HERE. THE ORIGINAL PART IS NARROW AT ONE POINT, WHICH IS WHERE IT BROKE AND THE NEW PART IS WIDE ALL THE WAY ACROSS. THEY KNOW , OF COURSE THAT THIS ORIGINAL PART IS INADEQUATE, OR THEY WOULD NOT HAVE HAD A DESIGN CHANGE. MY HUSBAND IS A MECHANIC ON SEMI TRUCKS AND HE FEELS THAT THIS ORGINAL PART WAS NOT ADEQUATE. PEOPLE SHOULD BE MADE AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM. I AM PRETTY SURE THE COMPANY IS NOT INTERESTED IN MAKING THIS HAPPEN. WHEN THE FRONT OF YOUR CAR FALLS DOWN GOING DOWN THE HIGHWAY I AM AFRAID THAT SOME PEOPLE WOULD NOT BE AS LUCKY AS ME.*AK
WHILE DRIVING AT APPROX 10MPH IN MALL PARKING LOT HEARD A PING AND LEFT FRONT OF VECHICLE DROPED TO WERE THE TIRE HIT THE WHEEL WELL CAUSING LOSS OF STEERING, IF HAD HAPPENED ON HI-WAY AT HI-WAY SPEEDS COULD HAVE RESULTED IN SEVERE ACCID OR DEATH. DEALER SAID WAS A DESIGN FLAW THAT GM KNOWS ABOUT AND REDESIGNED. HAD TO REPLACE B…
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING AT APPROX 10MPH IN MALL PARKING LOT HEARD A PING AND LEFT FRONT OF VECHICLE DROPED TO WERE THE TIRE HIT THE WHEEL WELL CAUSING LOSS OF STEERING, IF HAD HAPPENED ON HI-WAY AT HI-WAY SPEEDS COULD HAVE RESULTED IN SEVERE ACCID OR DEATH. DEALER SAID WAS A DESIGN FLAW THAT GM KNOWS ABOUT AND REDESIGNED. HAD TO REPLACE BOTH TORSION BARS AND BUY AN ADAPTER KIT WITH TOWING AND REPAIRS COST WAS $910.00 OF WHICH I HAD TO PAY. BELEAVE THAT SINCE GM HAD TO REDESIGN THE BAR IT SHOWS A FLAW DOES EXIST, AND THAT GM SHOULD AT LEAST PAY PART OF THE REPAIRS. BUT HAVE HEARD NOTHING FROM THEM CONCERNING THAT. WHAT WILL IT TAKE, A WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUIT TO GET GM TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS? OR PURHAPS A CONSUMER CLASS ACTION SUIT.*AK
NO SUMMARY LISTED FOR ABOVE VEHICLE. *AK
WHILE AT REST FRONT TORSION BAR BROKE, CAUSING FRONT OF VEHICLE TO DROP. NON DEALER SERVICE STATION INSPECTED VEHICLE. *AK *YH
VEHICLE PULLED TO LEFT AT ALL TIMES WHEN APPLYING BRAKES. VEHICLE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO DEALERSHIP 11 TIMES. DEALER REPLACED FRONT SHOCKS/ IDLER ARM/ RESURFACED ROTORS/DID WHEEL ALIGNMENTS, AND REPLACED TIRES. CURRENTLY, DEALER SAID REMEDY WOULD BE A COMPLETE BRAKE JOB. NONE OF THE MENTIONED REPAIRS REMEDIED PROBLEM. *AK
Official recalls
303V159000 · Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer
Apr 28, 2003
ON CERTAIN MINIVANS, PICKUP TRUCKS, AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES WITH CERTAIN MODEL-ENGINE COMBINATIONS, THE WINDSHIELD WIPER MOTOR MAY FAIL DUE TO CRACKED SOLDER JOINTS ON THE CONTROLLER CIRCUIT BOARD. THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS COULD WORK INTERMITTENTLY OR NOT AT ALL.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: IF THIS WERE TO OCCUR DURING BAD WEATHER, DRIVER VISIBILITY WOULD BE REDUCED, WHICH COULD RESULT IN A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE WIPER MOTOR CIRCUIT BOARD AND COVER. OWNER NOTIFICATION BEGAN ON JUNE 19, 2003. OWNERS WHO TAKE THEIR VEHICLES TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER ON AN AGREED UPON SERVICE DATE AND DO NOT RECEIVE THE FREE REMEDY WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME SHOULD CONTACT CHEVROLET AT 1-800-222-1020, GMC AT 1-800-462-8782, OR OLDSMOBILE AT 1-800-442-6537.
95V175000 · Suspension:front:control Arm:lower Arm
Sep 13, 1995
THESE VEHICLES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH THE LEFT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM-TO-FRAME REAR NUT NOT TIGHTENED TO THE SPECIFIED TORQUE.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: LOW TORQUE CAN ALLOW THE ATTACHMENT BOLT TO LOOSEN AND SUBSEQUENTLY FATIGUE AND BREAK. THIS CAN RESULT IN SEPARATION OF THE LEFT-HAND CONTROL ARM FROM THE FRAME INCREASING THE POTENTIAL FOR A VEHICLE ACCIDENT.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL TIGHTEN THE LEFT-HAND LOWER CONTROL ARM-TO- FRAME REAR NUT TO THE PROPER TORQUE SPECIFICATION.
94V188000 · Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:mounting
Oct 4, 1994
THE FUEL LINES ATTACHED TO THE FUEL TANK WERE NOT PROPERLY TIGHTENED.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: THESE FUEL LINES CAN LOOSEN TO THE POINT OF ALLOWING FUEL TO LEAK FROM THE LINES RESULTING IN A VEHICLE FIRE.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL LOWER THE FUEL TANK AND TIGHTEN THE FUEL TANK LINES TO THE PROPER TORQUE VALUE.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
3EA02006 · Windshield Wiper Failure
Opened May 31, 2002 · Closed Jul 23, 2003
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer:motor
AS A RESULT OF THIS, AND THE PRECEDINGINVESTIGATION, RQ99-003, GM HAS EXPANDED THE POPULATION OF SAFETY RECALL 98V-150 (REPLACEMENT OF THE WINDSHIELD WIPER CONTROL MODULE) TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1.77 MILLION VEHICLES.INCLUDED ARE VARIOUS 1994-1997 MY M/L VANS, S/T TRUCKS AND SUVS, & C/K TRUCKS AND SUVS.SEE ATTACHED TECHNICAL REPORT FOR DETAILS.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer:motor
AS A RESULT OF THIS, AND THE PRECEDINGINVESTIGATION, RQ99-003, GM HAS EXPANDED THE POPULATION OF SAFETY RECALL 98V-150 (REPLACEMENT OF THE WINDSHIELD WIPER CONTROL MODULE) TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1.77 MILLION VEHICLES.INCLUDED ARE VARIOUS 1994-1997 MY M/L VANS, S/T TRUCKS AND SUVS, & C/K TRUCKS AND SUVS.SEE ATTACHED TECHNICAL REPORT FOR DETAILS.
Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer:motor
AS A RESULT OF THIS, AND THE PRECEDINGINVESTIGATION, RQ99-003, GM HAS EXPANDED THE POPULATION OF SAFETY RECALL 98V-150 (REPLACEMENT OF THE WINDSHIELD WIPER CONTROL MODULE) TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1.77 MILLION VEHICLES.INCLUDED ARE VARIOUS 1994-1997 MY M/L VANS, S/T TRUCKS AND SUVS, & C/K TRUCKS AND SUVS.SEE ATTACHED TECHNICAL REPORT FOR DETAILS.
EA00008 · Loss Of Power Assist
Opened Mar 16, 2000 · Closed Aug 31, 2001
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Service Brakes, Hydraulic
There is no summary currently available
RQ99003 · Windshield Wiper
Opened Mar 8, 1999 · Closed May 31, 2002
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Visibility:windshield Wiper/washer
No summary supplied.
Illustration