NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
What owners actually said
442 reports25,000 miles · Nov 15, 2019
Exterior Lighting
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT WITH THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ACTIVATED, THE ILLUMINATION WAS EXTREMELY DIM AND CAUSED A VISIBILITY HAZARD. THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS NOT DETERMINED. STERLING MCCALL CADILLAC (10422 SW FREEWAY, HOUSTON, TX) AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT N…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 CADILLAC SRX. WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT WITH THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ACTIVATED, THE ILLUMINATION WAS EXTREMELY DIM AND CAUSED A VISIBILITY HAZARD. THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS NOT DETERMINED. STERLING MCCALL CADILLAC (10422 SW FREEWAY, HOUSTON, TX) AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT NO ASSISTANCE WAS OFFERED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 25,000.*JB
NHTSA ODI #11280274
28,468 miles · Nov 15, 2019
Exterior Lighting
THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM ITS LIKE YOU DON'T HAVE ANY HEADLIGHTS ON AT ALL. THE HIGH BEAMS WORK PERFECT. ITS VERY DANGEROUS TO BE DRIVING THIS VEHICLE AT NIGHT SINCE THE LIGHTS DON'T WORK PROPERLY.
NHTSA ODI #11280271
23,000 miles · Nov 14, 2019
Exterior Lighting
HEADLIGHTS ARE ALMOST NON EXISTENT DURING NIGHT DRIVING, FIRST NOTICED DRIVING AT NIGHT ON STATE HIGHWAY 35 FROM BAY CITY TEXAS TO PALACIOS TEXAS NOVEMBER 13 2019 DURING INTERMITTENT RAIN SHOWERS...HAD TO USE BRIGHTS TO GET ANY DOWN ROAD ILLUMINATION.
NHTSA ODI #11280032
99,000 miles · Nov 10, 2019
Exterior LightingInjury
WHILE DRIVING ON I-95 AT NIGHT, WITH ONCOMING TRAFFIC, LEGALLY FORBIDDING THE USE OF HI-BEAMS, A DEER, I BELIEVE, SUDDENLY CROSSED THE ROAD, 50-75 FEET IN FRONT OF MY VEHICLE. THE LOW BEAMS ON THE VEHICLE ARE SO POOR I WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE DEER UNTIL IT WAS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. I HAD TO SLAM ON THE BRAKES AND VIOLE…
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING ON I-95 AT NIGHT, WITH ONCOMING TRAFFIC, LEGALLY FORBIDDING THE USE OF HI-BEAMS, A DEER, I BELIEVE, SUDDENLY CROSSED THE ROAD, 50-75 FEET IN FRONT OF MY VEHICLE. THE LOW BEAMS ON THE VEHICLE ARE SO POOR I WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE DEER UNTIL IT WAS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. I HAD TO SLAM ON THE BRAKES AND VIOLENTLY SWERVE TO THE RIGHT, LEAVING THE ROAD SURFACE IN A SIDEWAYS SLIDE, CROSSING THE SHOULDER AND FINALLY STOPPING ON THE GRASS, HEADING DOWN HILL, ONLY INCHES FROM A POST. THIS LACK OF EFFICIENT HEAD LIGHTING, NOW KNOWN TO BE FROM HEADLIGHT UNIT SEAL FAILURE LEADING TO LOW LIGHT LEVELS FROM THE PROJECTORS, CAUSED THIS ACCIDENT. THE PASSENGER STRUCK HER HEAD ON THE PASSENGER WINDOW AND SUFFERED A BUMP AND BRUISE TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF HER HEAD. IT IS NOW MY UNDERSTANDING THAT MITIGATING THIS SEAL FAILURE WILL COST ME ABOUT $1600.00 AT THE CADILLAC DEALER. ADDITIONALLY, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE ONLY REPLACEMENT AVAILABLE FROM CADILLAC IS THE SAME UNIT THAT HAS FAILURES AND THAT NO UPGRADED UNIT HAS BEEN MADE. ADDITIONALLY, I UNDERSTAND THAT CADILLAC HAS BEEN FOUND LIABLE IN A CLASS ACTION SUIT REGARDING THESE FAULTY HEADLIGHTS IN FLORIDA AND CALIFORNIA, HOWEVER, NOT IN MY STATE OF RESIDENCE, ALTHOUGH, COINCIDENTALLY, MY ACCIDENT OCCURRED IN FLORIDA. THESE 300,000 VEHICLES NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED FROM MODEL YEARS 2010 TO 2016, AS THEY ALL USE THE SAME HALOGEN HEADLIGHTS. IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME, UNLESS ALREADY OCCURRED, UNTIL LOSS OF LIFE IS SUFFERED FROM THESE INADEQUATE HEADLIGHT UNITS. MY PARTNER, THE PRIMARY DRIVER OF THIS VEHICLE, IS NOW AFRAID TO DRIVE THIS CAR AND WILL NOT DRIVE IT IN ANY CONDITION OTHER THAN DAYLIGHT, CAUSING HARDSHIP ON US.
NHTSA ODI #11279310
24,800 miles · Nov 7, 2019
Exterior Lighting
I WAS DRIVING DOWN A CITY STREET AT NIGHT AT APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH AND MY FRIEND INFORMED ME THAT MY HEAD LIGHTS DID NOT LOOK LIKE THEY WERE ON AT ALL. SINCE THIS INCIDENT, I ASKED ANOTHER FRIEND TO DRIVE AHEAD OF ME ON A DARK CITY STREET AND TELL ME IF MY LIGHTS WERE ON. HIS RESPONSE WAS, "YES THEY ARE, BUT VERY DIM. I AM VERY…
Read full complaint
I WAS DRIVING DOWN A CITY STREET AT NIGHT AT APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH AND MY FRIEND INFORMED ME THAT MY HEAD LIGHTS DID NOT LOOK LIKE THEY WERE ON AT ALL. SINCE THIS INCIDENT, I ASKED ANOTHER FRIEND TO DRIVE AHEAD OF ME ON A DARK CITY STREET AND TELL ME IF MY LIGHTS WERE ON. HIS RESPONSE WAS, "YES THEY ARE, BUT VERY DIM. I AM VERY WORRIED ABOUT YOU DRIVING AT NIGHT"!!
NHTSA ODI #11278586
Mileage unknown · Nov 2, 2019
Exterior Lighting
HEADLAMPS HAVE BECOME VERY DIM WHICH CAUSES AN UNSAFE CONDITION WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT. IN ORDER TO SEE THE ROAD I MUST USE HIGH BEAMS. I AM CONSTANTLY SWITCHING OFF THE HIGH BEAMS WHEN AN ONCOMING CAR APPROACHES. DEALER HAS STATED THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE BULB BUT THE PROJECTED LENSE IN FRONT OF THE BULB. THE PROBLEM HAS GOTTEN ST…
Read full complaint
HEADLAMPS HAVE BECOME VERY DIM WHICH CAUSES AN UNSAFE CONDITION WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT. IN ORDER TO SEE THE ROAD I MUST USE HIGH BEAMS. I AM CONSTANTLY SWITCHING OFF THE HIGH BEAMS WHEN AN ONCOMING CAR APPROACHES. DEALER HAS STATED THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE BULB BUT THE PROJECTED LENSE IN FRONT OF THE BULB. THE PROBLEM HAS GOTTEN STEADILY WORSE.
NHTSA ODI #11277698
Mileage unknown · Oct 30, 2019
Exterior LightingVisibility/wiper
LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS DO NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH LIGHT TO DRIVE SAFELY AT NIGHT. THIS PROBLEM IS KNOWN BY GM AND THEY REFUSE TO HONOR THE REPAIRS. MANY FORUMS DISCUSS THIS SINCE IT INVOLVES THE CADILLAC SRX FROM 2011-2015. ALL THEY GO IS REPLACE THE WEATHER STRIPPING AROUND THE LIGHT BUT THAT IS NOT EFFECTIVE. MY WIFE AND I ARE PRETTY …
Read full complaint
LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS DO NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH LIGHT TO DRIVE SAFELY AT NIGHT. THIS PROBLEM IS KNOWN BY GM AND THEY REFUSE TO HONOR THE REPAIRS. MANY FORUMS DISCUSS THIS SINCE IT INVOLVES THE CADILLAC SRX FROM 2011-2015. ALL THEY GO IS REPLACE THE WEATHER STRIPPING AROUND THE LIGHT BUT THAT IS NOT EFFECTIVE. MY WIFE AND I ARE PRETTY MUCH CONFINED TO DAYTIME DRIVING BECAUSE THE LOW BEAMS ARE SO USELESS AT NIGHT OR IN THE RAIN THAT YOU REALLY WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH CANDLES. I WAS FORCED TO DRIVE FOR AN EMERGENCY LAST NIGHT AND ALMOST HAD AN ACCIDENT ON A COUNTRY ROAD BECAUSE THE LIGHTS DID NOT LIGHT UP THE ROAD GOOD ENOUGH TO SEE WHERE I WAS DRIVING. SERVICE CENTER SAID THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO BUT THERE IS. THEY HAVE BETTER HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLIES BUT WILL NOT REPLACE THEM. GM JUST STALLS AND STONEWALLS THE CUSTOMER. I HAD THE BRIGHTEST LOW BEAM BULB REPLACED IN BOTH LIGHTS BUT THE HEADLIGHT DESIGN IS THE PROBLEM. MOST EXPENSIVE PEACE OF TRASH I HAVE EVER OWNED. BEEN DEALING WITH THIS SINCE PURCHASING IN 2017.
NHTSA ODI #11277095
41,089 miles · Oct 28, 2019
Exterior Lighting
MOISTURE COLLECTS IN THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY WHICH CAUSES THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHT EFFECTIVENESS TO SERIOUSLY REDUCED. THE LUMENS PROJECTED ONTO THE ROAD ARE SO LOW THAT IT IS ALMOST LIKE DRIVING WITHOUT YOUR HEADLIGHTS ON. THIS PRESENTS A SERIOUS NIGHT DRIVING SAFETY SITUATION. THE DEALER AND GM ADMIT THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH TH…
Read full complaint
MOISTURE COLLECTS IN THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY WHICH CAUSES THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHT EFFECTIVENESS TO SERIOUSLY REDUCED. THE LUMENS PROJECTED ONTO THE ROAD ARE SO LOW THAT IT IS ALMOST LIKE DRIVING WITHOUT YOUR HEADLIGHTS ON. THIS PRESENTS A SERIOUS NIGHT DRIVING SAFETY SITUATION. THE DEALER AND GM ADMIT THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE HEADLIGHT DESIGN BUT WILL DO NOTHING TO CORRECT IT.
NHTSA ODI #11271592
34,000 miles · Oct 19, 2019
Exterior Lighting
VERY BAD VISIBILITY DRIVING AFTER DARK. THE HEADLIGHTS ARE VERY DIM AND IT'S DIFFICULT TO SEE THE ROAD AND SURROUNDING AREA WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. I'VE CONTACTED A LOCAL AUTO REPAIR SHOP AND THEY STATED THIS WAS A ONGOING PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE I DRIVE. I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE USED AND NO MENTION OF THE PROBLEM WAS GIVEN. …
Read full complaint
VERY BAD VISIBILITY DRIVING AFTER DARK. THE HEADLIGHTS ARE VERY DIM AND IT'S DIFFICULT TO SEE THE ROAD AND SURROUNDING AREA WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. I'VE CONTACTED A LOCAL AUTO REPAIR SHOP AND THEY STATED THIS WAS A ONGOING PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE I DRIVE. I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE USED AND NO MENTION OF THE PROBLEM WAS GIVEN. I FEEL IT'S A SAFETY HAZARD THAT CAN RESULT IN SERIOUS ACCIDENTS. I CURRENTLY DRIVE USING HIGH BEAM WHICH ALSO CAUSES A HAZARD. I LIVE IN A RURAL AREA WITH FEW LIGHTED ROADS.
NHTSA ODI #11269540
60,000 miles · Oct 17, 2019
Electrical System
WE DRIVE A 2015 CADILLAC SRX. I WORK IN REAL ESTATE AND WENT OUT TO ONE OF MY HOMES TO REMOVE THE SIGNAGE AFTER THE HOME HAD SOLD AND WHEN I WENT TO LET UP THE HATCH TO PLACE THE SIGN IN THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE THE HATCH WOULD NOT OPEN. AFTER SEVERAL FAILED ATTEMPTS OF TRYING TO OPEN THE HATCH FROM THE PUSH BUTTON AT THE REAR OF…
Read full complaint
WE DRIVE A 2015 CADILLAC SRX. I WORK IN REAL ESTATE AND WENT OUT TO ONE OF MY HOMES TO REMOVE THE SIGNAGE AFTER THE HOME HAD SOLD AND WHEN I WENT TO LET UP THE HATCH TO PLACE THE SIGN IN THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE THE HATCH WOULD NOT OPEN. AFTER SEVERAL FAILED ATTEMPTS OF TRYING TO OPEN THE HATCH FROM THE PUSH BUTTON AT THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE I THOUGHT I WOULD TRY THE BUTTON ON THE INSIDE OF THE DRIVERS DOOR, STILL NOTHING IT WILL NOT OPEN. DID SOME RESEARCH, SPOKE WITH SOME OTHER GMC/CADILLAC OWNERS AND MECHANICS WE WAS TOLD THAT THIS IS A COMMON ISSUE WITH THEIR VEHICLES AND THAT THERE WAS NO RECALL FOR THIS ISSUE EITHER. AND DURING OUR RESEARCH WE WAS TOLD THAT WATER LEAKS INTO THE AREA WHERE OF WHICH THE LIFT GATE MODULE KIT IS STORED ON THE LEFT REAR OF THE VEHICLE THIS OF COURSE IF WHAT MADE THE COMPUTER BOARD TO BURN OUT. LOOKED UP TO SEE IF THERE IS A RECALL ON THIS AND LIKE SEVERAL OTHER ISSUES WE HAVE EXPERIENCED THERE HAS NOT BEEN A RECALL TO FIX THIS PROBLEM EITHER.
NHTSA ODI #11269148
Official recalls
4May 21, 2026
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2015 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, XTS, 2015-2016 Cadillac ATS, CTS, and SRX vehicles. The front-driver air bag inflator may rupture during deployment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants, resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Dealers will replace the front-driver air bag module, free of charge. Interim letters notifying owners of the safety risk were mailed June 19, 2026. Additional letters will be mailed once the remedy is available. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. The manufacturer's number for this recall is N262555870. Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) involved in this recall became searchable on NHTSA.gov on May 21, 2026.
Jun 24, 2021
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.
Dec 19, 2014
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured November 11, 2014, to December 3, 2014. The front driver's seat may have been built with an incorrect seat track bracket. Drivers' seats with this condition may not be properly attached to the seat track.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: The front outboard seat bracket may become disengaged during a vehicle crash, increasing the risk of personal injury.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace affected seat track hook brackets, free of charge. The recall began on February 5, 2015. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac). GM's number for this recall is 14863.
Sep 19, 2014
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗