HEADLIGHTS ARE ALMOST NON EXISTENT DURING NIGHT DRIVING, FIRST NOTICED DRIVING AT NIGHT ON STATE HIGHWAY 35 FROM BAY CITY TEXAS TO PALACIOS TEXAS NOVEMBER 13 2019 DURING INTERMITTENT RAIN SHOWERS...HAD TO USE BRIGHTS TO GET ANY DOWN ROAD ILLUMINATION.
2015 Cadillac Srx
Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations
More warning signs than most Srx years
Owner complaints for the 2015 Cadillac Srx are substantially higher than the model-year median of 192.
About this comparison →How this year compares
Owner complaints by model year
Compare all Srx years →Counts vary with age, sales and reporting. They are not failure rates.
What owners reported most
All reported categories
Tap a category to read its complaints. One report may name several components.
When problems were reported
Mileage at the reported incident
248 reports with mileage · 194 unknown
NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.
What to inspect
Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.
- Exterior Lighting. Review the 302 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Electrical System. Review the 44 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
- Suspension. Review the 29 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.
Exterior Lighting complaints
302 reportsWHILE DRIVING ON I-95 AT NIGHT, WITH ONCOMING TRAFFIC, LEGALLY FORBIDDING THE USE OF HI-BEAMS, A DEER, I BELIEVE, SUDDENLY CROSSED THE ROAD, 50-75 FEET IN FRONT OF MY VEHICLE. THE LOW BEAMS ON THE VEHICLE ARE SO POOR I WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE DEER UNTIL IT WAS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. I HAD TO SLAM ON THE BRAKES AND VIOLE…
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING ON I-95 AT NIGHT, WITH ONCOMING TRAFFIC, LEGALLY FORBIDDING THE USE OF HI-BEAMS, A DEER, I BELIEVE, SUDDENLY CROSSED THE ROAD, 50-75 FEET IN FRONT OF MY VEHICLE. THE LOW BEAMS ON THE VEHICLE ARE SO POOR I WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE DEER UNTIL IT WAS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. I HAD TO SLAM ON THE BRAKES AND VIOLENTLY SWERVE TO THE RIGHT, LEAVING THE ROAD SURFACE IN A SIDEWAYS SLIDE, CROSSING THE SHOULDER AND FINALLY STOPPING ON THE GRASS, HEADING DOWN HILL, ONLY INCHES FROM A POST. THIS LACK OF EFFICIENT HEAD LIGHTING, NOW KNOWN TO BE FROM HEADLIGHT UNIT SEAL FAILURE LEADING TO LOW LIGHT LEVELS FROM THE PROJECTORS, CAUSED THIS ACCIDENT. THE PASSENGER STRUCK HER HEAD ON THE PASSENGER WINDOW AND SUFFERED A BUMP AND BRUISE TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF HER HEAD. IT IS NOW MY UNDERSTANDING THAT MITIGATING THIS SEAL FAILURE WILL COST ME ABOUT $1600.00 AT THE CADILLAC DEALER. ADDITIONALLY, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE ONLY REPLACEMENT AVAILABLE FROM CADILLAC IS THE SAME UNIT THAT HAS FAILURES AND THAT NO UPGRADED UNIT HAS BEEN MADE. ADDITIONALLY, I UNDERSTAND THAT CADILLAC HAS BEEN FOUND LIABLE IN A CLASS ACTION SUIT REGARDING THESE FAULTY HEADLIGHTS IN FLORIDA AND CALIFORNIA, HOWEVER, NOT IN MY STATE OF RESIDENCE, ALTHOUGH, COINCIDENTALLY, MY ACCIDENT OCCURRED IN FLORIDA. THESE 300,000 VEHICLES NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED FROM MODEL YEARS 2010 TO 2016, AS THEY ALL USE THE SAME HALOGEN HEADLIGHTS. IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME, UNLESS ALREADY OCCURRED, UNTIL LOSS OF LIFE IS SUFFERED FROM THESE INADEQUATE HEADLIGHT UNITS. MY PARTNER, THE PRIMARY DRIVER OF THIS VEHICLE, IS NOW AFRAID TO DRIVE THIS CAR AND WILL NOT DRIVE IT IN ANY CONDITION OTHER THAN DAYLIGHT, CAUSING HARDSHIP ON US.
I WAS DRIVING DOWN A CITY STREET AT NIGHT AT APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH AND MY FRIEND INFORMED ME THAT MY HEAD LIGHTS DID NOT LOOK LIKE THEY WERE ON AT ALL. SINCE THIS INCIDENT, I ASKED ANOTHER FRIEND TO DRIVE AHEAD OF ME ON A DARK CITY STREET AND TELL ME IF MY LIGHTS WERE ON. HIS RESPONSE WAS, "YES THEY ARE, BUT VERY DIM. I AM VERY…
Read full complaint
I WAS DRIVING DOWN A CITY STREET AT NIGHT AT APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH AND MY FRIEND INFORMED ME THAT MY HEAD LIGHTS DID NOT LOOK LIKE THEY WERE ON AT ALL. SINCE THIS INCIDENT, I ASKED ANOTHER FRIEND TO DRIVE AHEAD OF ME ON A DARK CITY STREET AND TELL ME IF MY LIGHTS WERE ON. HIS RESPONSE WAS, "YES THEY ARE, BUT VERY DIM. I AM VERY WORRIED ABOUT YOU DRIVING AT NIGHT"!!
HEADLAMPS HAVE BECOME VERY DIM WHICH CAUSES AN UNSAFE CONDITION WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT. IN ORDER TO SEE THE ROAD I MUST USE HIGH BEAMS. I AM CONSTANTLY SWITCHING OFF THE HIGH BEAMS WHEN AN ONCOMING CAR APPROACHES. DEALER HAS STATED THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE BULB BUT THE PROJECTED LENSE IN FRONT OF THE BULB. THE PROBLEM HAS GOTTEN ST…
Read full complaint
HEADLAMPS HAVE BECOME VERY DIM WHICH CAUSES AN UNSAFE CONDITION WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT. IN ORDER TO SEE THE ROAD I MUST USE HIGH BEAMS. I AM CONSTANTLY SWITCHING OFF THE HIGH BEAMS WHEN AN ONCOMING CAR APPROACHES. DEALER HAS STATED THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE BULB BUT THE PROJECTED LENSE IN FRONT OF THE BULB. THE PROBLEM HAS GOTTEN STEADILY WORSE.
LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS DO NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH LIGHT TO DRIVE SAFELY AT NIGHT. THIS PROBLEM IS KNOWN BY GM AND THEY REFUSE TO HONOR THE REPAIRS. MANY FORUMS DISCUSS THIS SINCE IT INVOLVES THE CADILLAC SRX FROM 2011-2015. ALL THEY GO IS REPLACE THE WEATHER STRIPPING AROUND THE LIGHT BUT THAT IS NOT EFFECTIVE. MY WIFE AND I ARE PRETTY …
Read full complaint
LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS DO NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH LIGHT TO DRIVE SAFELY AT NIGHT. THIS PROBLEM IS KNOWN BY GM AND THEY REFUSE TO HONOR THE REPAIRS. MANY FORUMS DISCUSS THIS SINCE IT INVOLVES THE CADILLAC SRX FROM 2011-2015. ALL THEY GO IS REPLACE THE WEATHER STRIPPING AROUND THE LIGHT BUT THAT IS NOT EFFECTIVE. MY WIFE AND I ARE PRETTY MUCH CONFINED TO DAYTIME DRIVING BECAUSE THE LOW BEAMS ARE SO USELESS AT NIGHT OR IN THE RAIN THAT YOU REALLY WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH CANDLES. I WAS FORCED TO DRIVE FOR AN EMERGENCY LAST NIGHT AND ALMOST HAD AN ACCIDENT ON A COUNTRY ROAD BECAUSE THE LIGHTS DID NOT LIGHT UP THE ROAD GOOD ENOUGH TO SEE WHERE I WAS DRIVING. SERVICE CENTER SAID THERE WAS NOTHING THEY COULD DO BUT THERE IS. THEY HAVE BETTER HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLIES BUT WILL NOT REPLACE THEM. GM JUST STALLS AND STONEWALLS THE CUSTOMER. I HAD THE BRIGHTEST LOW BEAM BULB REPLACED IN BOTH LIGHTS BUT THE HEADLIGHT DESIGN IS THE PROBLEM. MOST EXPENSIVE PEACE OF TRASH I HAVE EVER OWNED. BEEN DEALING WITH THIS SINCE PURCHASING IN 2017.
MOISTURE COLLECTS IN THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY WHICH CAUSES THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHT EFFECTIVENESS TO SERIOUSLY REDUCED. THE LUMENS PROJECTED ONTO THE ROAD ARE SO LOW THAT IT IS ALMOST LIKE DRIVING WITHOUT YOUR HEADLIGHTS ON. THIS PRESENTS A SERIOUS NIGHT DRIVING SAFETY SITUATION. THE DEALER AND GM ADMIT THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH TH…
Read full complaint
MOISTURE COLLECTS IN THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY WHICH CAUSES THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHT EFFECTIVENESS TO SERIOUSLY REDUCED. THE LUMENS PROJECTED ONTO THE ROAD ARE SO LOW THAT IT IS ALMOST LIKE DRIVING WITHOUT YOUR HEADLIGHTS ON. THIS PRESENTS A SERIOUS NIGHT DRIVING SAFETY SITUATION. THE DEALER AND GM ADMIT THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE HEADLIGHT DESIGN BUT WILL DO NOTHING TO CORRECT IT.
VERY BAD VISIBILITY DRIVING AFTER DARK. THE HEADLIGHTS ARE VERY DIM AND IT'S DIFFICULT TO SEE THE ROAD AND SURROUNDING AREA WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. I'VE CONTACTED A LOCAL AUTO REPAIR SHOP AND THEY STATED THIS WAS A ONGOING PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE I DRIVE. I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE USED AND NO MENTION OF THE PROBLEM WAS GIVEN. …
Read full complaint
VERY BAD VISIBILITY DRIVING AFTER DARK. THE HEADLIGHTS ARE VERY DIM AND IT'S DIFFICULT TO SEE THE ROAD AND SURROUNDING AREA WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. I'VE CONTACTED A LOCAL AUTO REPAIR SHOP AND THEY STATED THIS WAS A ONGOING PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE I DRIVE. I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE USED AND NO MENTION OF THE PROBLEM WAS GIVEN. I FEEL IT'S A SAFETY HAZARD THAT CAN RESULT IN SERIOUS ACCIDENTS. I CURRENTLY DRIVE USING HIGH BEAM WHICH ALSO CAUSES A HAZARD. I LIVE IN A RURAL AREA WITH FEW LIGHTED ROADS.
WHILE DRIVING MY 2015 CADILLAC SRX AT NIGHT WITH MY HEADLIGHTS ON LOW BEAM THE VISIBILITY IS SO BAD THAT YOU MIGHT AS WELL BE DRIVING WITH NO HEADLIGHTS ON AT ALL. MOST OF THE TIME WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT I HAVE TO DRIVE WITH MY HEADLIGHTS ON HIGH BEAMS ALL THE TIME BECAUSE IF NOT I CANNOT SEE ANYTHING. WE HAVE REPLACED THE BULB …
Read full complaint
WHILE DRIVING MY 2015 CADILLAC SRX AT NIGHT WITH MY HEADLIGHTS ON LOW BEAM THE VISIBILITY IS SO BAD THAT YOU MIGHT AS WELL BE DRIVING WITH NO HEADLIGHTS ON AT ALL. MOST OF THE TIME WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT I HAVE TO DRIVE WITH MY HEADLIGHTS ON HIGH BEAMS ALL THE TIME BECAUSE IF NOT I CANNOT SEE ANYTHING. WE HAVE REPLACED THE BULB IN OUR HEADLIGHTS SEVERAL TIME AND THIS DID NOT FIX THE ISSUE. WE RESEARCHED AND DID NOT FIND A RECALL ABOUT THIS, WHICH WAS SURPRISING BECAUSE THIS IS A HUGE SAFETY HAZARD. THIS HAPPENS ANYTIME THE HEADLIGHTS ARE ON, WHETHER YOU ARE DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD, SITTING IN THE VEHICLE IN THE DRIVEWAY OR PARKING LOT AT ANYTIME WHEN YOU TURN THE LOW BEAMS ON FOR THE HEADLIGHTS THE REMAIN DIM AND DOES NOT PROJECT LIGHT ENOUGH RANGE OF LIGHT TO BE ABLE TO DRIVE SAFELY WHILE THE LOW BEAMS ARE IN USE. VERY FRUSTRATING AND NERVE RATTLING.
MY HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM I NO LONGER FEEL SAFE DRIVING AT NIGHT AND WHEN I NEED TO I DRIVE WITH MY BRIGHTS ON, WHICH SEEMS TO UPSET A LOT OF OTHER DRIVERS. I HAVE BROUGHT MY VEHICLE TO THE DEALERSHIP IN REGARDS TO THIS ISSUE AND THEY SAID "YEAH, WE'VE HAD A LOT OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS BUT THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT IT".…
Read full complaint
MY HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM I NO LONGER FEEL SAFE DRIVING AT NIGHT AND WHEN I NEED TO I DRIVE WITH MY BRIGHTS ON, WHICH SEEMS TO UPSET A LOT OF OTHER DRIVERS. I HAVE BROUGHT MY VEHICLE TO THE DEALERSHIP IN REGARDS TO THIS ISSUE AND THEY SAID "YEAH, WE'VE HAD A LOT OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS BUT THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT IT". WHY NOT? THIS IS A HUGE SAFETY ISSUE! WILL IT TAKE A MAJOR CAR ACCIDENT OR TWO TO GET GM TO FIX THIS ISSUE THAT A LOT OF OTHER CONSUMERS ARE HAVING? THIS IS MY FIRST CADILLAC AND IF THIS IS NOT RESOLVED, IT WILL CERTAINLY BE MY LAST. I HAVE TWO TEENAGE DAUGHTERS THAT OCCASIONALLY DRIVE MY VEHICLE AND NOW THEY CANNOT AT NIGHT TIME. FOR THE PRICE I PAID FOR THIS VEHICLE I EXPECT TO BE DRIVING A CADILLAC THAT IS SAFE AND I DO NOT THINK THAT IS TOO MUCH TO ASK TO BE FIXED, AT THEIR COST.
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 CADILLAC SRX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE LIGHTS ON THE VEHICLE WERE VERY DIM, WHICH MADE IT DIFFICULT TO SEE WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT. CADILLAC OF BIRMINGHAM (1677 MONTGOMERY HWY, VESTAVIA HILLS, AL 35216, (205) 588-4478) STATED THAT THE FAILURE WAS WELL KNOWN AND THE ENTIRE LIGHTING FIXTURE NEEDED TO B…
Read full complaint
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 CADILLAC SRX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE LIGHTS ON THE VEHICLE WERE VERY DIM, WHICH MADE IT DIFFICULT TO SEE WHEN DRIVING AT NIGHT. CADILLAC OF BIRMINGHAM (1677 MONTGOMERY HWY, VESTAVIA HILLS, AL 35216, (205) 588-4478) STATED THAT THE FAILURE WAS WELL KNOWN AND THE ENTIRE LIGHTING FIXTURE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED AT THE COST OF APPROXIMATELY $1,800. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT CONTACTED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28,000.
Official recalls
426V329000 · Air Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
May 21, 2026
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2015 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, XTS, 2015-2016 Cadillac ATS, CTS, and SRX vehicles. The front-driver air bag inflator may rupture during deployment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: An inflator rupture may result in sharp metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants, resulting in serious injury or death.
Remedy: Dealers will replace the front-driver air bag module, free of charge. Interim letters notifying owners of the safety risk were mailed June 19, 2026. Additional letters will be mailed once the remedy is available. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. The manufacturer's number for this recall is N262555870. Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) involved in this recall became searchable on NHTSA.gov on May 21, 2026.
21V473000 · Suspension:rear
Jun 24, 2021
General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.
14V804000 · Seats
Dec 19, 2014
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured November 11, 2014, to December 3, 2014. The front driver's seat may have been built with an incorrect seat track bracket. Drivers' seats with this condition may not be properly attached to the seat track.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: The front outboard seat bracket may become disengaged during a vehicle crash, increasing the risk of personal injury.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace affected seat track hook brackets, free of charge. The recall began on February 5, 2015. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac). GM's number for this recall is 14863.
14V571000 · Suspension:rear
Sep 19, 2014
General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.
Consequence & remedy
Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.
Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗
NHTSA investigations
1PE20019 · Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation
Opened Nov 6, 2020 · Closed Dec 23, 2021
Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:rear
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Additional source detail variants (2)
Suspension
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Suspension:rear
On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.
Illustration