← New search

2012 Cadillac Srx

Owner reports · Recalls · Investigations

More warning signs than most Srx years

Owner complaints for the 2012 Cadillac Srx are substantially higher than the model-year median of 192.

About this comparison →

When problems were reported

Mileage at the reported incident

270 reports with mileage · 146 unknown

NHTSA’s mileage field refers to the reported incident, not necessarily the filing date. This shows report counts, not the likelihood of a failure.

What to inspect

Issues worth paying extra attention to based on owner reports.

  • Exterior Lighting. Review the 233 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Service Brakes. Review the 42 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →
  • Suspension. Review the 41 owner reports in this category and discuss these concerns during a pre-purchase inspection. Read reports →

NHTSA owner reports · September 18, 2026 snapshot.

32 crash reports4 fire reports23 injury reports

Exterior Lighting complaints

233 reports
Clear category filter
Mileage unknown · Jul 26, 2020
Exterior Lighting

I HAVE A 2012 CADILLAC SRX LUXERY THE VEHICLE HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM WITH THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS , WHEN THEY ARE ON YOU CAN NOT SEE 30 FT I FRONT OF YOU. IWENT AS FAR TO CHANGE THE BULBS TO HALOGEN,S BUT THE ISSUE STILL REMAINS. I ABSOULUTELY REFUSE TO DRIVE IT AT NIGHT. AFTER LOOKING INTO THE PROBLEM I WAS ABLE TO DETERMIN THIS I…

Read full complaint

I HAVE A 2012 CADILLAC SRX LUXERY THE VEHICLE HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM WITH THE LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS , WHEN THEY ARE ON YOU CAN NOT SEE 30 FT I FRONT OF YOU. IWENT AS FAR TO CHANGE THE BULBS TO HALOGEN,S BUT THE ISSUE STILL REMAINS. I ABSOULUTELY REFUSE TO DRIVE IT AT NIGHT. AFTER LOOKING INTO THE PROBLEM I WAS ABLE TO DETERMIN THIS IS A PROBLEM WITH SRX,S FROM2012 TO 2015 . WITH NO SAFETY RECALLS ON THE VEHICLE,S IN QUESTION I DON,T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS HAS NOT BEEN A RECALL WHEN RECENTLY A CLASS ACTION SUIT WAS SETTLED IN CALIFORNIA AND FLORIDA.

NHTSA ODI #11341550

53,000 miles · Jun 2, 2020
Exterior LightingCrash

SINCE PURCHASING CAR AS CERTIFIED USED FROM DEALERSHIP IN JANUARY 2020, THE OVERLY DIM LOW BEAMS HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE. CAN HARDLY SEE AT NIGHT, ESPECIALLY IN INCLEMENT WEATHER. I IMMEDIATELY FLAGGED THE PROBLEM, AND DEALERSHIP CHANGED OUT BULBS WHILE UNDER WARRANTY. THE PROBLEM CONTINUED. WELL, THE LOW VISIBILITY ULTIMATELY PARTIC…

Read full complaint

SINCE PURCHASING CAR AS CERTIFIED USED FROM DEALERSHIP IN JANUARY 2020, THE OVERLY DIM LOW BEAMS HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE. CAN HARDLY SEE AT NIGHT, ESPECIALLY IN INCLEMENT WEATHER. I IMMEDIATELY FLAGGED THE PROBLEM, AND DEALERSHIP CHANGED OUT BULBS WHILE UNDER WARRANTY. THE PROBLEM CONTINUED. WELL, THE LOW VISIBILITY ULTIMATELY PARTICIPATED IN A RECENT RUN IN WITH A BEAR. CLEAR NIGHT, DRY ROADS, JUST DIMINISHED VISION. I JUST COULD NOT SEE THE MASSIVE, BLACK BODY OF THE ANIMAL CROSSING THE DARK ROAD. IT RESULTED IN $9000 PLUS IN DAMAGES. MIRACULOUSLY, I WAS NOT SERIOUSLY INJURED IN THE CRASH, AND INSURANCE COVERED THE CLAIM. NOW THAT IT HAS BEEN REPAIRED AND I AM BACK BEHIND THE WHEEL, I AM PETRIFIED TO HAVE A RE-OCCURRENCE. GM SHOULD RECALL PERTAINING VEHICLES AND SUCK UP THE COST TO INSTALL HID/LED HOUSING AND BULBS. IT IS UNCONSCIONABLE THAT, AFTER ALL THE COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS ABOUT THIS KNOWN ISSUE, GM IS NOT APPROACHING THIS AS A VERY SERIOUS RISK TO SAFETY AND THAT LIVES MAY HAVE TO BE LOST BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN. I WAS LUCKY, THE NEXT PERSON MAY NOT BE. *TR

NHTSA ODI #11326915

110,000 miles · May 19, 2020
Exterior Lighting

THE PROBLEM IS THAT 2010-2015 CADILLAC SRX HEADLIGHTS CAN EVENTUALLY DIM OR BURN OUT WHEN MOISTURE BECOMES TRAPPED IN THEM DUE TO FAULTY SEALS. THIS SEVERELY LIMITS VISIBLE DISTANCE AT NIGHT AND IS VERY DANGEROUS ON TYPICAL TEXAS WINDY ROADS ESPECIALLY IF THEY LACK STREET LIGHTS. SEVERAL STATES, INCLUDING CALIFORNIA AND FLORIDA,…

Read full complaint

THE PROBLEM IS THAT 2010-2015 CADILLAC SRX HEADLIGHTS CAN EVENTUALLY DIM OR BURN OUT WHEN MOISTURE BECOMES TRAPPED IN THEM DUE TO FAULTY SEALS. THIS SEVERELY LIMITS VISIBLE DISTANCE AT NIGHT AND IS VERY DANGEROUS ON TYPICAL TEXAS WINDY ROADS ESPECIALLY IF THEY LACK STREET LIGHTS. SEVERAL STATES, INCLUDING CALIFORNIA AND FLORIDA, HAVE CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS AGAINST CADILLAC FOR THIS PROBLEM. CADILLAC RECOGNIZES THE PROBLEM, BUT WILL NOT ISSUE A RECALL. INSTEAD, AS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX CUSTOMER, I RECEIVED A LETTER IN FEBRUARY NOTIFYING ME THAT THE EXPENSE OF REPLACING THE HEADLIGHTS WOULD BE REIMBURSED IF I GOT THE WORK DONE AND RETURNED THE CLAIM FORM WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION BY 5/28/2020. I HAD THE WORK DONE ON 5/15 AT A COST OF $1,261.15 AND MAILED MY PAPERWORK FOR REIMBURSEMENT. I HAVE SEVERAL CONCERNS. FIRST, DIM HEADLIGHTS ARE A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION IN MANY CIRCUMSTANCES.FREQUENTLY, I USED MY BRIGHTS TO SEE A SHORT DISTANCE. THIS COULD BLIND ONCOMING DRIVERS AND CAUSE INJURY TO THEM AS WELL AS CADILLAC CUSTOMERS. SHOCKED THE CAR PASSES STATE INSPECTION, IT IS THAT BAD. RECENTLY I STAYED OVERNIGHT IN A HOTEL IN MISSOURI RATHER THAN DRIVE AT NIGHT THROUGH OKLAHOMA ON DARK, WINDY HIGHWAY 69 BACK HOME TO COLLIN COUNTY. SECOND, CADILLAC NEVER ISSUED A RECALL. A RECALL WOULD NOT REQUIRE AN UPFRONT CUSTOMER CASH OUTLAY. FINALLY, I HAVE READ THAT THE HEADLIGHTS ARE BEING REPLACED WITH PARTS THAT HAVE THE SAME MOISTURE SUSCEPTIBILITY, SO THE DIM HEADLIGHTS PROBLEM CAN EVENTUALLY RETURN. I THINK THIS ISSUE SHOULD BE RESOLVED WITH AN IMMEDIATE RECALL, WITH DEFECT FREE PARTS AND WITH NO CUSTOMER CASH OUTLAY, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER CAR SAFETY RECALL. IN THE EVENT THE PARTS CANNOT BE SOURCED, CADILLAC SHOULD PROVIDE A COMPARABLE REPLACEMENT LOANER VEHICLE AT NO COST TO THE CUSTOMER. *TR

NHTSA ODI #11325188

59,000 miles · Apr 24, 2020
Electrical SystemExterior LightingVehicle Speed ControlCrash

I HAVE BEEN HAVING PROBLEMS WITH MY HEADLIGHTS FOR ABOUT 3 YEARS.MY HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM I HAVE REPLACED THE LOW BEAM BULBS 4TIMES. IT'S COST ME 100.00 EVERY TIME. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP MORE THAN ONCE AND THEY SAID IT NEEDS NEW HEADLIGHTS, THE WHOLE ASSEMBLY. I CAN'T AFFORD IT. IT'S BECAUSE OF MOISTURE INSIDE THE HEADLIGH…

Read full complaint

I HAVE BEEN HAVING PROBLEMS WITH MY HEADLIGHTS FOR ABOUT 3 YEARS.MY HEADLIGHTS ARE SO DIM I HAVE REPLACED THE LOW BEAM BULBS 4TIMES. IT'S COST ME 100.00 EVERY TIME. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP MORE THAN ONCE AND THEY SAID IT NEEDS NEW HEADLIGHTS, THE WHOLE ASSEMBLY. I CAN'T AFFORD IT. IT'S BECAUSE OF MOISTURE INSIDE THE HEADLIGHT GLASS. WELL AFTER COMPLAINING FOR 3 YEARS I FINALLY GOT A LETTER IN THE MAIL SAYING IT'S NOT A RECALL BUT DUE TO MOISTURE INSIDE THE HEADLIGHTS THEY NEED TO BE REPLACED AND THEY WILL REIMBURSE ME UP TO 800.00 FOR GETTING THEM FIXED. AND IT'S FOR 2010-2015 CADILLAC SRX. I'M ON DISABILITY AND I CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY FOR THEM AND WORRY ABOUT GETTING MY MONEY BACK. I CAN'T GO ANYWHERE AT NIGHT BECAUSE I ONLY HAVE BRIGHT LIGHTS AND I'VE HAD A FENDER BENDER 1TIME AND ALMOST HAD SEVERAL WRECKS BECAUSE THE OTHER CAR COULDN'T SEE ME. I'M IN DANGER EVERY TIME I HAVE TO GO SOMEWHERE AT NIGHT. WHY IS IT NOT A RECALL?AND HOW CAN I GET THEM FIXED.? I CAN'T GET ANYBODY TO HELP ME. THEY WOULDN'T FIX THEM EVEN WHEN IT WAS UNDER WARRANTY . I NEED HELP VERY BAD.

NHTSA ODI #11322180

78,000 miles · Mar 9, 2020
Exterior Lighting

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HEADLAMPS LOW BEAM FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LIGHTING FOR SAFE DRIVING. THE CONTACT STATED THAT IT WAS DIFFICULT TO SEE IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO BE DIAGNOSED NOR REPAIRED. NEITHER THE DEALER NOR THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED. THE…

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE HEADLAMPS LOW BEAM FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LIGHTING FOR SAFE DRIVING. THE CONTACT STATED THAT IT WAS DIFFICULT TO SEE IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT TAKEN TO BE DIAGNOSED NOR REPAIRED. NEITHER THE DEALER NOR THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 78,000.

NHTSA ODI #11317064

72,000 miles · Mar 7, 2020
Exterior Lighting

HEAD LIGHTS STOP WORKING VERY DIM WHILE DRIVING AND PARKEDU

NHTSA ODI #11316796

Mileage unknown · Mar 7, 2020
Exterior Lighting

NOTHING HAS HAPPENED YET TO ME. I AM REQUESTING AN INVESTIGATION FOR A RECALL ON THE CADILLAC SRX 2010-2015 FOR FAULTY HEADLIGHTS. MY HALOGEN HEADLIGHTS HAVE MOISTURE ACCUMULATIONS WHICH DIM MY LIGHTS IN THE DARK. ANOTHER CONCERN IS WHAT IF THE LIGHTS SHORT OUT DUE TO THE MOISTER WITHIN THE HEADLIGHTS WHILE SOMEONE IS DRIVING. T…

Read full complaint

NOTHING HAS HAPPENED YET TO ME. I AM REQUESTING AN INVESTIGATION FOR A RECALL ON THE CADILLAC SRX 2010-2015 FOR FAULTY HEADLIGHTS. MY HALOGEN HEADLIGHTS HAVE MOISTURE ACCUMULATIONS WHICH DIM MY LIGHTS IN THE DARK. ANOTHER CONCERN IS WHAT IF THE LIGHTS SHORT OUT DUE TO THE MOISTER WITHIN THE HEADLIGHTS WHILE SOMEONE IS DRIVING. THIS IS A CLEAR DANGER THAT GM HAS ALREADY ADMITTED TO WITH THE CADILLAC SRX YEARS 2010-2015. I JUST RECEIVED A LETTER FROM GM STATING THEY WOULD COVER $800.00 PER HEADLIGHT; I MUST PAY THE MONEY UP FRONT AND GET REIMBURSED FROM GM. THE CADILLAC DEALERSHIP QUOTED A REPLACEMENT COST OF $3,393.50 THIS MORNING 3/7/2020. THE DEADLINE DATE FOR REPAIRS IS 5/28/2020. I AM ASSUMING THIS IS FROM A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT, WHICH FAVORS GM AND LEAVES THE CONSUMERS AND DRIVERS WITH ALL THE RISK. THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE FOR ANYONE DRIVING IN POOR CONDITIONS OR IN THE DARK. I DO NOT HAVE CAR CRASH STATISTIC; HOWEVER, THIS IS A FAULTY DESIGN THAT SHOULD BE COVERED 100% BY A GM RECALL. NOT EVERYONE CAN PAY FOR THIS UP FRONT AND/OR COVER THE ADDITIONAL UNCOVERED COST. HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL BE PLACED IN DANGER AND/OR LOSS OF LIFE IN A CRASH CAUSED BY THE FAULTY HEADLIGHTS. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT CAN BE DONE FOR GM TO COVER THE COST 100% AND HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

NHTSA ODI #11316740

Mileage unknown · Mar 6, 2020
Exterior Lighting

HEADLIGHTS ARE DIM DUE TO KNOWN DEFECT. THE LIGHTS ALLOW MOISTURE TO ENTER AND CORRODE THE COMPONENTS AND FOG AND/OR DISCOLOR THE LENS WHICH CAUSE THE HEADLIGHTS TO BE DIM AND DANGEROUS. IN MY CAR SPECIFICALLY, THE FRONT ASSEMBLY PROJECTOR LENS IS DISCOLORED CAUSING THE HEADLIGHTS TO BE DIM WHICH MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO SEE AT NI…

Read full complaint

HEADLIGHTS ARE DIM DUE TO KNOWN DEFECT. THE LIGHTS ALLOW MOISTURE TO ENTER AND CORRODE THE COMPONENTS AND FOG AND/OR DISCOLOR THE LENS WHICH CAUSE THE HEADLIGHTS TO BE DIM AND DANGEROUS. IN MY CAR SPECIFICALLY, THE FRONT ASSEMBLY PROJECTOR LENS IS DISCOLORED CAUSING THE HEADLIGHTS TO BE DIM WHICH MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO SEE AT NIGHT. THIS IS A CONSTANT ISSUE WHEN USING THE LIGHTS.

NHTSA ODI #11316584

27,000 miles · Mar 5, 2020
Exterior Lighting

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT HEADLIGHTS WERE DIM DUE TO MOISTURE BUILD UP IN THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO JOSEPH CADILLAC 7600 INDUSTRIAL RD, FLORENCE, KY 41042, WHERE THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO PAY OUT OF …

Read full complaint

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2012 CADILLAC SRX. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FRONT HEADLIGHTS WERE DIM DUE TO MOISTURE BUILD UP IN THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO JOSEPH CADILLAC 7600 INDUSTRIAL RD, FLORENCE, KY 41042, WHERE THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO PAY OUT OF POCKET FOR THE REPAIR. THE CONTACT STATED THAT A LETTER WAS RECEIVED IN REGARD TO THE ISSUE AND THE VEHICLE WAS INSPECTED BY AN UNKNOWN DEALER. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER HAD BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE AND OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 27,000.

NHTSA ODI #11316390

118,000 miles · Mar 2, 2020
Exterior LightingService Brakes

WHILE DRIVING AND WITHOUT WARNING, I HAVE MINIMUM BRAKING POWER. I MUST SMASH THE PETAL TO FLOOR IN ORDER TO STOP AT A LIGHT OR STOP SIGN. USUALLY, I'M NOT GOING MORE THAN 35 MPH. THIS HAPPENS AT LEAST 2-3 TIMES PER MONTH. I FEAR I WILL HAVE AN ACCIDENT. TWO DIFFERENT REPAIR SHOPS COULD NOT ID THE PROBLEM. THE OTHER ISSUE IS WHE…

Read full complaint

WHILE DRIVING AND WITHOUT WARNING, I HAVE MINIMUM BRAKING POWER. I MUST SMASH THE PETAL TO FLOOR IN ORDER TO STOP AT A LIGHT OR STOP SIGN. USUALLY, I'M NOT GOING MORE THAN 35 MPH. THIS HAPPENS AT LEAST 2-3 TIMES PER MONTH. I FEAR I WILL HAVE AN ACCIDENT. TWO DIFFERENT REPAIR SHOPS COULD NOT ID THE PROBLEM. THE OTHER ISSUE IS WHEN DRIVING, THE DASH LIGHTS AND THE HEAD LIGHTS WILL SUDDENLY DIM, WHERE I AM BARELY ABLE TO READ ANYTHING OR SEE. THESE PROBLEMS ARE TRULY A HAZARD AND SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE.

NHTSA ODI #11315539

Official recalls

3

21V473000 · Suspension:rear

Jun 24, 2021

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: A loose toe link can separate and cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: Owners are advised to not drive their vehicle if they experience certain Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) warnings or other issues, such as unusual steering behavior, while driving. Please see the Part 573 report for the full list of warnings. Dealers will replace the adjustable toe link with a non-adjustable one, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed August 6, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on October 25, 2021. Cadillac and Saab customers may direct questions to Cadillac customer service at 1-800-333-4223. GM's number for this recall is N212340980.

14V571000 · Suspension:rear

Sep 19, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: Failure of the toe adjuster link could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the torque of the left and right rear toe link adjuster lock nuts, and replace the parts if there is evidence of damage or a loose link, free of charge. The The recall began November 11, 2014. Owners may contact Cadillac customer service at 1-800-458-8006 or Saab customer service at 1-800-955-9007. GM's number for this recall is 14457.

14V447000 · Seats:front Assembly:power Adjust

Jul 23, 2014

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Buick LaCrosse, Regal and Chevrolet Camaro, as well as certain 2010-2012 Cadillac SRX, Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain vehicles, equipped with power height adjustable driver and passenger seats. In the affected vehicles, the bolt that secures the driver's and passenger's power front seat height adjuster may fall out causing the seat to drop suddenly to the lowest vertical position.

Consequence & remedy

Consequence: If the driver's seat unexpectedly drops, the distraction and altered seat position may affect the drivers' control of the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

Remedy: GM will notify owners, and dealers will replace the height adjuster shoulder bolts, free of charge. The manufacturer distributed interim letters to owners on September 11, 2014. The recall began on December 26, 2014. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-521-7300 (Buick), 1-800-458-8006 (Cadillac), 1-800-222-1020 (Chevrolet), or 1-800-462-8782 (GMC). GM's number for this recall is 14271.

Model-level recall history does not show whether a particular VIN is affected or has received a repair. Check a VIN with NHTSA ↗

NHTSA investigations

1

PE20019 · Rear Toe Link Adjuster Separation

Opened Nov 6, 2020 · Closed Dec 23, 2021

Status: closed (inferred from source dates) · Suspension; Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Additional source detail variants (2)

Suspension

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.

Suspension:rear

On November 06, 2020, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation (PE20-019) to assess the remedy and scope of General Motors (GM) recall 14V-571. ODI had received a total of 9 complaints with allegations of rear toe links separating while the vehicle was in motion. There were 4 complainants indicating that the remedy for recall 14V-571 had been performed on their vehicle. The other 5 complaints were outside the original recall scope but exhibited the same failure mode as addressed by recall 14V-571 and reported uncontrolled swaying while driving.ODI's review focused on all 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles that experienced a rear toe link failure while the vehicle was in motion under various driving conditions. The failures were the same or similar to those addressed by the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. The remedy for recall 14V-571 was to inspect the rear toe link adjusters and replace them if necessary as well as tighten both jam nuts to a manufacturer specified torque. The remedy can be reversed when the vehicle gets a rear alignment adjustment and the jam nuts are not properly re-torqued to the manufacturer's specification. ODI's data review confirmed a high toe link failure rate in vehicles that either had and had not received the remedy associated with recall 14V-571. On June 24, 2021, GM filed a defect information report recalling all 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles to remedy the potential failure of the rear toe link adjuster while driving. The remedy replaces adjustable toe links with non-adjustable toe links. The recall (21V-473) includes vehicles that were remedied under 14V-571. In view of the recall action being taken by GM, ODI is closing this Preliminary Evaluation. NHTSA reserves the right to take additional action if warranted by future circumstances.The ODI complaints cited above can be viewed at www.nhtsa.gov.The ODI identification numbers for the complaints cited above can be found in a separate document attached to this closing resume.