2006 Buick Rendezvous

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS. WHILE DRIVING BETWEEN 25 TO 35 MPH THE VEHICLE WOULD STALL AND BECOME VERY DIFFICULT TO RESTART. THE DEALER OFFERED TO INSPECT THE VEHICLE BUT SHE DECLINED AND STATED THAT THEY WOULD IMPROPERLY INSPECT THE VEHICLE. SHE SUSPECTS THAT RAIN ENTERS INSIDE OF THE HEADLIGHTS, TAIL LIGHTS, AND THE CABIN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 90,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 103,000. UPDATED 11/12/09 *CN THE CONSUMER STATED SHE ALSO HAS A WATER PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE. WATER CONTINUES TO ENTER THE VEHICLE THROUGH THE FLOORBOARD. THE SEATS FAILED AND THE AC WAS NOT COOLING PROPERLY WHICH WAS PART OF THE PROBLEM WITH THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. THE CONSUMER STATED THE PROBLEM WERE DUE TO WATER BECOME TRAPPED INSIDE THE HEADLAMPS AND REAR ASSEMBLY RECEPTACLES. UPDATED 11/17/09

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS. THE CONTACT APPROACHED THE VEHICLE AND NOTICED THAT THE REAR GLASS HAD A HUGE HOLE. THE GLASS AROUND THE HOLE HAD SEVERAL FRACTURES. THE POLICE WAS CALLED TO INSPECT THE VEHICLE FOR VANDALIZATION. THE OFFICER STATED THAT THE GLASS APPEARED TO HAVE CRACKED DUE TO A DEFECT. HE FURTHER CONCLUDED THAT THE IMPACT OF THE HOLE IN THE GLASS ORIGINATED FROM INSIDE THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE CONTACT IS IN THE PROCESS OF NOTIFYING THE MANUFACTURER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 21,000.

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SIDE VIEW MIRRORS ON HIS VEHICLE WERE TOO LARGE AND TOO HIGH. IF THERE WAS ANY VEHICLE WITHIN A 12 INCH RADIUS, HE WOULD NOT SEE IT WHEN LOOKING OUT OF THE PASSENGER SIDE VIEW MIRROR. THE FAILURE ALMOST CAUSED TWO CRASHES. HE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER, BUT THEY HAD NO REPLACEMENT MIRRORS IN ANOTHER SIZE. THE MANUFACTURER OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE CONTACT ALSO ATTEMPTED TO FIND AFTERMARKET MIRROS OF A DIFFERENT SIZE, BUT WAS INFORMED THAT THERE WERE NONE. HE HAD TO CONFORM TO FMVSS REGARDING REPLACEMENT MIRRORS AND THE PROPER SIZE OF THE MIRRORS. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 41,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 2,000.

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS. THE CONTACT HEARD A GRINDING SOUND AND THE BRAKES BECAME HARD WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THEY REPLACED THE FRONT AND REAR BRAKES. SHORTLY AFTERWARD, THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, WIRING FOR THE ALL-WHEEL DRIVE, WIRING FOR THE SPEED SENSORS, AND THE REAR TIE RODS WERE ALL REPLACED BETWEEN 17,500 AND 22,000 MILES. THE REAR DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR ALSO FELL OFF THE VEHICLE AND WAS RE-ADJUSTED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH FOR FAILED COMPONENTS. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 17,542 AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 23,126.

2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS: OPERATOR STOPPED THE CAR IN PARKING LOT, TURNED OFF THE IGNITION AND REMOVED THE KEYS. CAR WAS IN DRIVE "D" AND KEYS WERE REMOVED. LATER, CAR ROLLED BACKWARD AND HIT ANOTHER CAR IN PARKING LOT (LUCKILY NO ONE WAS INJURED). DEALER INDICATES THAT THE KEYS CANNOT BE REMOVED WHEN CAR IS IN DRIVE. THE RENDEZVOUS SAFETY FEATURE IN THE STEERING WHEEL / IGNITION IS NOT WORKING. *TR

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE LEFT HIS WIFE IN THE VEHICLE WHILE HE ENTERED THE STORE. HE LEFT THE RADIO ON, BUT WHEN HIS WIFE TURNED IT OFF, THE VEHICLE ROLLED BACKWARDS AND CRASHED INTO AN UNOCCUPIED VEHICLE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE DEALER HAS NOT BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE AND THE CONTACT HAS NOT INQUIRED ABOUT THIS FAILURE OCCURRING WITH OTHER VEHICLES. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 28,100 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 28,000.

PROBLEM WITH EMERGENCY BRAKE ON 2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS. I AM UNHAPPY WITH THE EMERGENCY BRAKE ON THE BUICK. AFTER SOME DISCUSSION WITH THE REPAIR DEPARTMENT OF THE DEALER, DESCRIBED IN THE COPY OF THE LETTER TO THE DEALER BELOW, I WAS TOLD THAT THE EMERGENCY BRAKE WAS NOT ADJUSTED PROPERLY AND THEY FIXED IT; OF COURSE UNDER WARRANTY. BUT, IN MY OPINION, THE BRAKE IS STILL NOT ADJUSTED PROPERLY. IT DOES NOT HOLD THE CAR. THE CAR FEELS SAFELY STOPPED ONLY WHEN IN 'PARK.' I HAVE AN OLDSMOBILE SILHOUETTE AND WHEN WE PUT ON THE EMERGENCY BRAKE, IT HOLDS THE CAR. IN REPLY TO THE ATTACHED LETTER I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ANDERSON DEALERSHIP, MR. TAYLOR. HE TOLD ME BY PHONE THAT THE EMERGENCY BRAKE ON THE BUICK RENDEZVOUS WAS DIFFERENT THAN THE OLDSMOBILE BY DESIGN AND THAT IT REALLY WASN'T INTENDED TO FULLY HOLD THE CAR WHEN IT IS STOPPED BUT IN 'DRIVE.' I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS. 1. HOW IS THE BUICK RENDEZVOUS SUPPOSED TO BE STOPPED IN THE EVENT OF REGULAR BRAKE FAILURE? 2. IS THIS SOMETHING WITH MY PARTICULAR BUICK OR IS THIS SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE TAKEN UP WITH GM TO FIX? ************BELOW IS MY ORIGINAL LETTER TO MR. MORTIMER*************** I AM UNHAPPY WITH THE EMERGENCY BRAKE ON THE BUICK. I RAISED THIS WITH THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT ON MY FIRST OR SECOND VISIT AFTER PURCHASE. ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS I WAS TOLD WAS THAT FOR SERVICE TO LOOK AT THIS WOULD COST ME SOME MONEY. THIS IS WHEN THE CAR HAD ONLY A FEW THOUSAND MILES ON IT AND IS UNDER A BUMPER TO BUMPER WARRANTY. WHEN I POINTED THIS OUT THE GENTLEMAN SAID IT MIGHT TAKE TIME TO FIX BECAUSE THE BRAKE MAN WAS NOT IN. I SAID I WOULD WAIT. AFTERWARDS, I WAS TOLD THAT THE BRAKE WAS NOT ADJUSTED PROPERLY AND THEY FIXED IT; OF COURSE UNDER WARRANTY. BUT, IN MY OPINION, THE BRAKE IS STILL NOT ADJUSTED PROPERLY. IT DOES NOT HOLD THE CAR. IN THE SILHOUETTE, WHEN WE PUT ON THE EMERGENCY BRAKE, IT HOLDS THE CAR. *TR

2006 BUICK RENDEZVOUS STEERING COLUMN REPLACEMENT. CONSUMER STATES THAT SHE HAS REPLACED THE STEERING COLUMN TWICE. *KB THE LEFT OUTER TIE ROD END WAS LOOSE WHICH THE DEALER REPLACED. THE CONSUMER ALSO STATED WHEN THE LEFT TURN SIGNAL WAS ACTIVATED THE RIGHT TURN SIGNAL WOULD ALSO BLINK. THE DEALER WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. *JB